Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No... Godwin would need a Hitler. This part is about children, not Hitler.
The WBC is now in the ranks of Hitler on internet forums, any reference to them as a comparision is more often than not hyperbole.
^^ Martybegan's Law?
Or did you just fuck up?
No... Godwin would need a Hitler. This part is about children, not Hitler.
The WBC is now in the ranks of Hitler on internet forums, any reference to them as a comparision is more often than not hyperbole.
^^ Martybegan's Law?
Or did you just fuck up?
Again, the whole point of bearing arms is that they are effective when it comes to protecting one's children.
And anywhere that progressives are congregating, it's a good bet that children are in danger. Just saying.
Godwin's law at is base is the devolving of an argument to a nazi comparison, once a person has run out of original arguments. The WBC is so reviled that they are the 21st centuries new addition to the Nazis as the most evil people on the planet. Hence the godwin's law comparison.
Progressives pose a danger to children. It's true.
Can't wait to see what these assholes would do at a Mothers against drunk driving meeting
Can't wait to see what these assholes would do at a Mothers against drunk driving meeting
Again, the disconnect.
Drunk driving is not a constitutional right, and nobody ever saved a child by driving drunk.
Again with the minutiae. I've no interest in getting into a discussion over whether, at some point in the history of mankind, a child has been rescued from some situation by a drunk driver.
Because that would be pointless and stupid..like most of your posts. And I certainly don't want to imitate you.
There were not taken within seconds of each other and I've already told you why. You refuse to even address my comment about different hats and angle of the sun so I guess it's pretty obvious who has conceded the point.
So the people who are posed EXACTLY the same don't count? The spacing of the people, the order they are standing in, the relative positions of the people determined by shirt color, dont matter?
You are basing it on shadowing and hat angles?
The hat angles can be explained by a PERSON MOVING THIER HEAD in the few seconds between photographs. As for the shadowing, you are sounding a bit like a 9/11 troofer.
Not based on hat angles, based on entirely different hats. Texas must have some extremely fashion conscious gun enthusiasts for them to bother changing hats within the few seconds it took to take the two pictures (allegedly).
If you have to resort to comparing me to a truther even though the evidence is here in the thread for all to see then by all means please continue, I'm getting a kick out of watching you melt down. Details, who needs 'em, am I right?
I'll take your comment about the changing of the hats as proof that you have reviewed the pictures and now know that I was correct.
The angle of the sun is a minor detail? You are hilarious! KUTGW.
I'll take your comment about the changing of the hats as proof that you have reviewed the pictures and now know that I was correct.
The angle of the sun is a minor detail? You are hilarious! KUTGW.
I looked at every hat in both pictures, no one changed their hats.
I'll take your comment about the changing of the hats as proof that you have reviewed the pictures and now know that I was correct.
The angle of the sun is a minor detail? You are hilarious! KUTGW.
I looked at every hat in both pictures, no one changed their hats.
But they're all tinfoil.
Again with the minutiae. I've no interest in getting into a discussion over whether, at some point in the history of mankind, a child has been rescued from some situation by a drunk driver.
Because that would be pointless and stupid..like most of your posts. And I certainly don't want to imitate you.
Then maybe you shouldn't traffic in absolutes.
Again with the minutiae. I've no interest in getting into a discussion over whether, at some point in the history of mankind, a child has been rescued from some situation by a drunk driver.
Because that would be pointless and stupid..like most of your posts. And I certainly don't want to imitate you.
Then maybe you shouldn't traffic in absolutes.
I imagine you think you've made a point there.
But you haven't. The only point you've made is that you cannot argue the real issue intelligently, without seizing on minutiae and diverting attention from the substance of the discussion.
If you are so easily distracted then you aren't up to snuff anyway.
at pat:::Had a Texas trooper pull me over near Amarillo one evening. He saw my gunbelt lying on the floor of the cab and asked, Is it loaded?"
I replied, Of course it is loaded, it doesn't even make a decent club without bullets.
We got to talking about guns and he climbed up in the cab to shoot the shit. I showed him the Smith and Wesson model 629 and he got this green with envy look on his face.
I told him, "Go ahead. I know you want to shoot it. He rolled down the window and was about to fire out into a field when I shouted for him to get out of the truck. He would have blasted out all the windows and deafened us both if he fired from the truck.
He was suitably impressed.
Is the 629 the new titanium-frame Model 29?
No it's the stainless or nickel plaited. Mine is the nickel with 6" barrel. It's a friggin cannon. I can't imagine firing a titanium framed .44. The kick must be incredible. Mine weighs 4 pounds loaded and since I had a plate and screws put in my right arm, I have to fire it with a weird grip that sends recoil to my left hand.
