progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 62,127
- 37,990
that would be in violation of the 2nd A,,The guy in Idaho should still have to pass a background check.
Because the guy in Idaho is selling guns to New Yorkers through the internet?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
that would be in violation of the 2nd A,,The guy in Idaho should still have to pass a background check.
Because the guy in Idaho is selling guns to New Yorkers through the internet?
We want Trump working his followers in NY up so they go out on rampages killing Asian Americans? We want this?This type of thing isn't rare in places run by people like you. Because you WANT it that way.
right now its black democrats attacking asians,,We want Trump working his followers in NY up so they go out on rampages killing Asian Americans? We want this?
No it's not.that would be in violation of the 2nd A,,
No more background checks.The guy in Idaho should still have to pass a background check.
Because the guy in Idaho is selling guns to New Yorkers through the internet?
No it's not. You guys said a lot of blacks voted and supported Trump. Why couldn't it be one of Trump's black followers?right now its black democrats attacking asians,,
It needs to be amended to say that anyone who tries to ban any firearm or any other weapon will be immediately shot.No it's not.
And I'm sorry but the guys who wrote the Constitution didn't think women or blacks should vote. In fact, only 8% of the population were allowed to vote back then.
Are you saying the second amendment needs to be amended?
the 2nd is fine as it is and if you took time to read it you would see theres no room for background checksmmNo it's not.
And I'm sorry but the guys who wrote the Constitution didn't think women or blacks should vote. In fact, only 8% of the population were allowed to vote back then.
Are you saying the second amendment needs to be amended?
Yours should be the first guns confiscated.No more background checks.
We're gonna end that practice all together. Felons will have all guns because you fuckers can't leave it alone.
So be it. I hope you fucking get shot.
I hope you have to watch as someone you know and care about very much gets shot. LOL. Suck on that you bitch.No more background checks.
We're gonna end that practice all together. Felons will have all guns because you fuckers can't leave it alone.
So be it. I hope you fucking get shot.
got any proof it is??No it's not. You guys said a lot of blacks voted and supported Trump. Why couldn't it be one of Trump's black followers?
I'm just telling you those men weren't saints. Sounds like the 2nd amend is flawed.the 2nd is fine as it is and if you took time to read it you would see theres no room for background checksmm
not sure why people keep bringing up voting when oit has nothing to do with the 2nd A
Nope because someone I care about would have a gun and not be a fucking pussy.I hope you have to watch as someone you know and care about very much gets shot. LOL. Suck on that you bitch.
Easygot any proof it is??
We want Trump working his followers in NY up so they go out on rampages killing Asian Americans? We want this?
Shit like this - indeed, shit like every mass shooting in the US, save one - can equally happen with a pump-action shotgun.Huh?
What do you propose? I have a 45 handgun semi auto. I have 3 magazines maybe I can hold around 20 bullets in all three. Are you suggesting we make these types of handguns illegal? If not, then shit like this just can happen.
The Original Tree started this threadgot any proof it is??
Not flawed at all. It is a 100% ban all federal authority.I'm just telling you those men weren't saints. Sounds like the 2nd amend is flawed.
Vigilantee started this threadgot any proof it is??
Last onegot any proof it is??