Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The sole Japanese diplomatic effort sanctioned by the key Japanese leadership was to secure the Soviet Union as a mediator to negotiate an end to the war. That effort ran through Sato. Decoded Japanese cables made American leaders fully aware that none of the Japanese diplomatic or military representatives in Europe who presented themselves as seeking peace on behalf of Japan carried actual sanction.
Japan’s one authorized diplomatic initiative required two things: 1) concessions that would enlist the Soviets as mediators; and 2) Japanese terms to end the war. Sato relentlessly exposed the fact that Japan never completed either of these two fundamental steps.
When Togo presented a pledge not to retain Japan’s conquests as “concessions” to secure Soviet mediation, Sato’s scathing reply was “How much effect do you expect our statements regarding the non-annexation and non-possession of territories which we have already lost or are about to lose will have on the Soviet authorities?” He added that mere “abstract statements” on concessions, which he slammed as “pretty little phrases devoid of all connection with reality,” would have no impact on “extremely realistic” Soviet authorities.
And he then inserted the knife thrust: “If the Japanese empire is really faced with the necessity of terminating the war, we must first of all make up our minds to terminate the war.” Sato thus charged that Japan’s leaders still lacked a real intent to end the war.
Togo’s reply acknowledged that Tokyo knew securing Soviet services for a proposal to send Prince Fumimaro Konoe, a former prime minister, to Moscow for talks would be difficult. Togo affirmed that Japan would not accept anything like unconditional surrender. Konoe represented the will of the emperor and he would have “positive intentions” to “negotiate details” to set up “a cooperative relationship between Japan and Russia.” Again, Togo only offered more of the “pretty little phrases” Sato had condemned.
Yet you still can not present anything as evidence, other than a single decades old clipping of anything that any of the Allied Powers would have accepted.You're nothing but a clown show now, liar. Go laugh to yourself in the corner.
.... What offer? ...
... A single offer extended to anybody that was remotely acceptable.
...
![]()
Article clipped from Chicago Tribune
Clipping found in Chicago Tribune published in Chicago, Illinois on 8/14/1965.www.newspapers.com
Even their own Ambassador said it was a joke.
Maybe you are too young to know what a “newspaper” is, but they don’t work unless you read them. I hope that was helpful.You are aware that proves nothing, right?
That is all you ever respond with. It means nothing, it gives no information, but you have some kind of fetish for it.
Is that what Poopy puts over his head when "playing"? IS that why you love that one single reference so much, even though it means nothing?
Maybe you are too young to know what a “newspaper” is, but they don’t work unless you read them. I hope that was helpful.
That was one of USA's worst Crimes Against Humanity.
There are multiple attempts to surrender. You’re uninformed as most Americans are.That is what their demand was after the finally submitted after 2 bombs were dropped.
They refused to even discuss Potsdam, and the only attempt they ever made prior to August was a return to 191 lines. But of course with them setting the terms and keeping half the Philippines.
But please, give us a single reference prior to the bomb dropping that showed that they told anybody outside of Japan they were willing to surrender, so long as the Emperor remained.
Duuuuude, like, really duuude? So like, duuude, do you know how a newspaper works, duuuuuude?...
Dude, I was probably living in Japan myself before you were born. ....
To say nothing of the absolutely absurd unconditional surrender requirement asshole FDR imposed and Dirty Harry continued. This alone caused the unnecessary deaths of hundreds of thousands of Japanese and Americans. Somehow this is ignored by ignorant Americans, but they somehow think the a-bombings were justified.It is surprising to see some conservatives cheering Truman's needless, barbaric nuking of anti-communist Japan. Japan did not "mess with America." FDR refused Japan's reasonable peace offers and provoked Japan to attack Pearl Harbor so he could enter WW II and save his beloved Soviet Union. FDR's and Truman's administrations were heavily penetrated with Soviet spies and sympathizers. A top Soviet policy goal was war between America and Japan, and FDR's disastrous pro-Soviet foreign policy toward Japan played a key role in making that goal become tragic reality.
There was absolutely no need to nuke Japan. Japan was prostrate, starving, and was virtually defenseless against air and naval attack.. Truman knew that most of Japan's leaders, including the emperor, wanted to end the war and were willing to surrender on very reasonable terms.
Electing Biden was.That was one of USA's worst Crimes Against Humanity.
Yeah, let Japan build up a military again, what could possibly go wrong!To say nothing of the absolutely absurd unconditional surrender requirement asshole FDR imposed and Dirty Harry continued. This alone caused the unnecessary deaths of hundreds of thousands of Japanese and Americans. Somehow this is ignored by ignorant Americans, but they somehow think the a-bombings were justified.
Again with the lies.There are multiple attempts to surrender. You’re uninformed as most Americans are.
I’ve yet to hear one alternative from any revisionist that didn’t include absurd lies like Japan was about to surrender anyway.What do you consider "revised" here?
It's how all wars are won, which is why we havent won any wars since. Do you even know the atrocities of the Japanese people? They were not innocent.A day that shall live in infamy.
Shame.
Mass murder of defenseless women and children, is nothing short of the most heinous thing a nation can do.
You keep saying "revisionist." Exactly what do you see being revised?I’ve yet to hear one alternative from any revisionist that didn’t include absurd lies like Japan was about to surrender anyway.
And you constantly shift to cover for your ignorance/lies.
So, all the civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki committed atrocities?It's how all wars are won, which is why we havent won any wars since. Do you even know the atrocities of the Japanese people? They were not innocent.