Harvard President Gay Resigns

[Dogmaphobe]

You don’t even know the meaning of Zionist. You are condemning 95% of all American Jews.

He's just one of those cookie cutter Stalinists who doesn't actually know anything but just repeats jargon.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Maybe it's time some of these Ivy League colleges reflect on how far down the rabbit hole they have gone.

Only when the donations start drying up.

 

[Kondor3]

Harvard bent to pro-Zionist and pro-MAGA activist pressure.

Excellent. Activism cuts both ways, doesn't it? Sux when you're on the losing side, doesn't it?

Billionaire Zionist plutocrats started pulling money out of Harvard (or threatening to) and that was that.

People voting with their dollars? Fun, ain't it? ...Nicely played, "billionaire Zionist plutocrats"... nicely played...

 

[multivita-man]

The trap was asking if they’re OK with their antisemitic students marching around screaming “Death to Jews”? How DARE they trap them like that, and get them to admit they’re fine with the calls to genocide Jews.

Which quote are you referring to? Not the one that's made up in your imagination but an actual quote or video clip.

No disagreement from me that she could have given a better prepared and less ambiguous answer, but the idea that she and the other school presidents are anti-Jewish is a stretch. This is a right wing political witch hunt. The right hates higher education for teaching anything that conflicts with God, capitalism, or white supremacy, and the Zionists hate them for not being a pro-Likud Zionist boot-licker.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

The right hates higher education for teaching anything that conflicts with God, capitalism, or white supremacy, and the Zionists hate them for not being a pro-Likud Zionist boot-licker.

You talk in the same sorts of easy leftist cliches as I did back in 1968.

I entered high school that year, though, so decided it was time to grow up and actually learn something, instead.

 

[multivita-man]

Excellent. Activism cuts both ways, doesn't it? Sux when you're on the losing side, doesn't it?

People voting with their dollars? Fun, ain't it?

There shouldn't be a winning side or a losing side. They were probably on the same side when it comes to objecting to true antisemitism; they're on different sides when it comes to the freedom to express unpopular ideas.

You can call it voting with their dollars - that doesn't change the underlying motivation behind it, which is to use their financial influence to make the Israel-Palestine debate one-sided. You know when people refer to Jewish tropes about controlling the banks and the media, actions like this kind of feed that narrative.

 

[multivita-man]

You talk in the same sorts of easy leftist cliches as I did back in 1968.

I entered high school that year, though, so decided it was time to grow up and actually learn something, instead.

I call it like I see it.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

This is racism at work.

Yes! Gay is a virulent anti semitic racist!

 

[Zincwarrior]

They were compelled to testify. No choice.

You're funny.

 

[marvin martian]

Or agreeing to testify.

^^^The pro-Hamas crowd will defend Gay to the bitter end.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I call it like I see it.

You call it like you are trained to call it.

You would not be speaking in such trite cliche's otherwise.

 

[Kondor3]

There shouldn't be a winning side or a losing side.

This is not Utopia.

They were probably on the same side when it comes to objecting to true antisemitism

With LibProgs in charge of defining "true" in this context? No Sale.

...they're on different sides when it comes to the freedom to express unpopular ideas.

Gay's "politically correct" and noncommittal responses constituted both real and intellectual cowardice and she has paid the price.

You can call it voting with their dollars - that doesn't change the underlying motivation behind it, which is to use their financial influence to make the Israel-Palestine debate one-sided.

That's what politics is... perception, strategy and tactics, to achieve a desired goal.

Those ivy-league ivory-tower types were outgunned and demonstrated insensitivity and cowardice and they got nailed for it.

You know when people refer to Jewish tropes about controlling the banks and the media, actions like this kind of feed that narrative.

Irrelevant... but it is probably "revealing" that you chose to float that point.

 

[Markle]

Now the racists are happy. Meanwhile the white MAGA anti semitic racist Presidents of other universities will not be pressured.

More proof that you are a white guy.

No self-respecting black American would support such an obvious excuse for affirmative action.

 

[Markle]

Any bets that she will NOT SUE and receive a huge settlement along with a cush "job" somewhere?

 

[multivita-man]

This is not Utopia.

With LibProgs in charge of defining "true" in this context? No Sale.

Gay's "politically correct" and noncommittal responses constituted both real and intellectual cowardice and she has paid the price.

That's what politics is... perception, strategy and tactics, to achieve a desired goal.

Those ivy-league ivory-tower types were outgunned and demonstrated insensitivity and cowardice and they got nailed for it.

Irrelevant... but it is probably "revealing" that you chose to float that point.

Yeah, yeah...some woke lib-prog get chased off. Congrats.

I really don't give a fuck either way other than pointing out what really happened and what this is really all about. Gay will find another job and Harvard will find another President. Billionaire AIPAC members will start throwing money back into the endowment and all will be well.

 

[AMart]

Now the racists are happy. Meanwhile the white MAGA anti semitic racist Presidents of other universities will not be pressured.

That's why she went down retard for being antisemitic, which means you can't be OK with pro Palestinian stuff. Every institution is anti white and nobody gets fired for that.

 

[AMart]

Any bets that she will NOT SUE and receive a huge settlement along with a cush "job" somewhere?

Golden parachute, book deal, guest appearances on CNN etc., just for being black. Zero accomplishments. She has cheated her entire life.

 

[Lisa558]

Which quote are you referring to? Not the one that's made up in your imagination but an actual quote or video clip.

No disagreement from me that she could have given a better prepared and less ambiguous answer, but the idea that she and the other school presidents are anti-Jewish is a stretch. This is a right wing political witch hunt. The right hates higher education for teaching anything that conflicts with God, capitalism, or white supremacy, and the Zionists hate them for not being a pro-Likud Zionist boot-licker.

Why why she so unwilling to say that the students calling for the genocide of Jews was unacceptable? She didn’t deny that they were doing that. She just refused to condemn it.

And there you go with the “Zionist” smear again. You are smearing 95% of American Jews.

And finally, why should wealthy Jewish donors continue to fund Harvard when the president says that calling for the genocide of Jews can be acceptable, depending on context? In what context IS calling for another Holocaust of Jews acceptable?

 

[AMart]

Yeah, yeah...some woke lib-prog get chased off. Congrats.

I really don't give a fuck either way other than pointing out what really happened and what this is really all about. Gay will find another job and Harvard will find another President. Billionaire AIPAC members will start throwing money back into the endowment and all will be well.

Without even looking the temp prez at Harvard is 99% likely a jew. Let me know if I am right.

 

[AMart]

Why why she so unwilling to say that the students calling for the genocide of Jews was unacceptable? She didn’t deny that they were doing that. She just refused to condemn it.

And there you go with the “Zionist” smear again. You are smearing 95% of American Jews.

And finally, why should wealthy Jewish donors continue to fund Harvard when the president says that calling for the genocide of Jews can be acceptable, depending on context? In what context IS calling for another Holocaust of Jews acceptable?

You have it wrong. Calling for genocide if the pro Palestinians students did that is 1) acceptable under the the First Amendment, and 2) really ugly and disgusting. I can make a gazillion posts showing Jews calling for the genocide of whites. It actually seems part and parcel of their ideology and upbringing.