Has Sleepy Joe Condemned the Election Fraud?

[Snouter]

If not, why not?

 

[lennypartiv]

Of course he hasn't. Hopefully Rudy nails him to the wall.

 

[Skylar]

If not, why not?

What fraud?

 

[Skylar]

Of course he hasn't. Hopefully Rudy nails him to the wall.

Rudy got outsmarted by Borat and a 24 yar old Bulgarian.

Biden has little to be concerned with.

 

[lennypartiv]

If not, why not?

What fraud?

The fraud being done by the blacks in Georgia and the hispanics in Arizona.

 

[Skylar]

If not, why not?

What fraud?

The fraud being done by the blacks in Georgia and the hispanics in Arizona.

What fraud are you referring to?

Remembering of course that your imagination doesn't amount to much. You'll need more.

There's a reason why Trump is whining on national television rather than presenting evidence of fraud in court; there is no such evidence.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

 

[Skylar]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

 

[Blackrook]

If Biden doesn't know what's going on, that's even worse than if he does.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

 

[Ben Thomson]

Of course he hasn't. Hopefully Rudy nails him to the wall.

Rudy's to busy tucking his shirt in.

 

[Ben Thomson]

If Trump pulls this out at the last minute can the democrats use all your..THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN!! posts?..(chuckle)

 

[Skylar]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

What does that have to do with your conspiracy batshit?

 

[The2ndAmendment]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

What does that have to do with your conspiracy batshit?

Antrim County admits errors, ballot results subject to change

ANTRIM COUNTY, Mich. (WLNS) – Antrim County announced issues with the counting software, causing results reported this morning to not match up with tabulators. Ballots will be manually recoun…

www.wlns.com

 

[Ben Thomson]

If not, why not?

What fraud?

The fraud being done by the blacks in Georgia and the hispanics in Arizona.

LOL!! now your not even trying to hide your stupidity..

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

That's not what it says. It ways that the instructions in August were incorrect. It also says that they were corrected in October BEFORE the ballots were mailed out and the ballots were legal. No ballots were discounted.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Of course he hasn't. Hopefully Rudy nails him to the wall.

Rudy got outsmarted by Borat and a 24 yar old Bulgarian.

Biden has little to be concerned with.

Must be why he called the FBI on them.....

 

[The2ndAmendment]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

That's not what it says. It ways that the instructions in August were incorrect. It also says that they were corrected in October BEFORE the ballots were mailed out and the ballots were legal. No ballots were discounted.

Fake news.

 

[Skylar]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

Great News:

Arizona Supreme Court eliminates tens of thousands of Fraudulent 2020 Mail-in Ballots:

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

ARIZONA PUBLIC INTEGRITY ALLIANCE, v. ADRIAN FONTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER;

Today we address the proper overvote instruction that must be included with mail-in ballots. An overvote occurs when a person votes for more candidates than permitted for a specific election. Before the 2020 election cycle, the Maricopa County Recorder, in compliance with the Secretary of State’s Elections Procedures Manual, included an instruction (the “Overvote Instruction”) advising mail-in voters that overvotes would not be counted, and in the event of an overvote, to contact the Recorder’s Office and request a new ballot.

We hold that the Recorder acted unlawfully by including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. The Recorder does not have the constitutional or statutory authority to promulgate mail-in ballot instructions, nor does he have the authority to create voter guidelines for correcting overvotes to ensure that they will be counted. Rather, with respect to overvotes, the Recorder has a non-discretionary duty to provide the Overvote Instruction authorized by the Arizona Secretary of State, 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“2019 EPM”).

(“[T]he right to vote is the right to participate in an electoral process that is necessarily structured to maintain the integrity of the democratic system.”). Thus, public officials should, by their words and actions, seek to preserve and protect those laws

But when public officials, in the middle of an election, change the law based on their own perceptions of what they think it should be, they undermine public confidence in our democratic system and destroy the integrity of the electoral process.

The Recorder, however, is not empowered to promulgate rules regarding instructions for early voting, nor does he have the authority to change or supplant the EPM’s prescribed instructions.

Despite his lack of authority to prescribe voting instructions, the Recorder asserts that the law requires him to include the New Instruction with mail-in ballots. We disagree.

The gravy on top:

Under Arizona law, an overvote is invalid and is not counted.

We reverse the trial court and grant relief. The County is enjoined from including the New Instruction with mail-in ballots for the November 3, 2020 General Election.

Enjoin

www.law.cornell.edu

.

https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2020/CV200253APEL.pdf

That's not what it says. It ways that the instructions in August were incorrect. It also says that they were corrected in October BEFORE the ballots were mailed out and the ballots were legal. No ballots were discounted.

Yup.

This argument fails, however, because the County was able to remove the New Instruction and mail the early ballots by the October 7 deadline. SeeNovember General Election Early Voting Begins October 7, Maricopa County(Oct. 7,2020),Maricopa County, AZ.

And it doesn't say a thing about this imaginary 'election fraud'.

 

[Uncensored2008]

This is the rare instance that I will give Biden the benefit of the doubt. His handlers most likely haven't even told him about the fraud, or allowed him any free time to access the news/internet to discover it for himself.


This would be the most logical move since it would keep him sincere and and full of vigor each time he makes a public announcement.

So in my opinion, Biden doesn't even know what's going on.

Or....you've imagined the fraud.

That explanation works far better than your conspiracy.

{

Project Veritas conducted an interview with a Michigan USPS worker who said he was told to backdate ballots that came in on Nov 4 to Nov 3. Michigan law states that ballots that come in after midnight on November 3 cannot be counted.

“We were told to collect any ballots that we find in mailboxes, collection boxes, et cetera, for outgoing mail, at the end of the day, we are supposed to separate them from the standard letter mail, so they can hand-stamp them with yesterday’s date—and put them through the Express Mail system—to get wherever they need to go…For clarification, today is the fourth of November.” USPS insider

}

Election 2020 has a High Voter Fraud Margin ⋆ Conservative Firing Line

Facebook Twitter Flipboard How high is the voter fraud margin in Election 2020? The liberals say voter fraud is “rare.” Conservatives know the truth: voter fraud is very real, and has been showing up since Democrats demanded people stay home on election day instead of vote in person. They found...

conservativefiringline.com