Heat Wave: Earth Just Had Its Hottest June On Record

omg we're all going to DIE

We need to give up our homes, cars, and lives so we can save the month of june from burning us up
 
Last edited:
I think this fitting to show how PHONY the global warmer freaks on the left are..AND how typical they dump on the woman

SNIP:

Michael Moore Owns Nine Homes



BY: Washington Free Beacon Staff
July 22, 2014 4:52 pm

The divorce between filmmaker Michael Moore and his wife is bringing many details to surface, including that the two own nine homes in New York and Michigan, according to the Detroit News.


By reaching a settlement, Moore avoids a trial that could have aired dirty laundry common in high-proile breakups and impugned his long-hewn image as a common man by disclosing details of his comfortable life.

His hit movies and best-selling books have begat a lifestyle far from most ballcap-wearing, duck-waddling denizens of Flint.

Moore and Glynn own nine properties in Michigan and New York, including a Manhattan condo that once was three apartments. CelebrityNetWorth.com pegs their wealth at $50 million.

In legal pleadings, Moore blames his wife for the expansion of the 10,000-square-foot home on Torch Lake, which has a value of $2 million.

all of it here:
Michael Moore Owns Nine Homes | Washington Free Beacon
 
Yeah we kept such accurate record 120 years ago.

In any event, who the fuck cares? What can you do about it?

Coastal residents care.

What can you do about it? Prepare for the sea levels to rise and the storms/disasters to increase in average strength.

But...but Obama still has 2 years to roll back the oceans and heal the planet. Wasn't that what you Obamabots promised?

So, you wish to prove that you are an idiot? You are doing very well.
 
We've had a very cool June so far...the tomatoes are stunted due to the foggy, overcast weather.

I'd love some global warming...but given the low solar activity, it's likely we will continue on an overall cooling trend.

Given the present TSI, and the aerosols put up by China and India, we should be having some very cold weather worldwide. Instead, we see record heat. Look people, reality is what it is, no matter how inconvenient.
 
.
The World Just Had Its Hottest June On Record



ap_wire.png
| By By SETH BORENSTEIN
Posted: 07/21/2014



WASHINGTON (AP) — The globe is on a hot streak, setting a heat record in June. That's after the world broke a record in May.


<snip>


And that's only part of it. The world's oceans not only broke a monthly heat record at 62.7 degrees, but it was the hottest the oceans have been on record no matter what the month, Arndt said.

<snip>


Heat records in June broke on every continent but Antarctica, especially in New Zealand, northern South America, Greenland, central Africa and southern Asia.

The United States had only its 33rd hottest June.


All 12 of the world's monthly heat records have been set after 1997, more than half in the last decade. All the global cold monthly records were set before 1917.


<snip>

Global temperature records go back to 1880 and this is the 352nd hotter than average month in a row.


"This is what global warming looks like," Overpeck said in an email. "Not record hot everywhere all the time, but certainly a reflection that the odds of record hot are going up everywhere around the planet."
.

Bullshit. Within five years the 'adjusted' temps will be adjusted down so that those new temps will be the hottest. Nearly thirty years of one consecutively hotter month after another? TOTAL BULLSHIT.

All this demonstrates is how far the Warmistas will go to fudge their data.


This is what statistical fraud looks like.
 
We've had a very cool June so far...the tomatoes are stunted due to the foggy, overcast weather.

I'd love some global warming...but given the low solar activity, it's likely we will continue on an overall cooling trend.

Given the present TSI, and the aerosols put up by China and India, we should be having some very cold weather worldwide. Instead, we see record heat. Look people, reality is what it is, no matter how inconvenient.

The only record heat is between your ears, dude.
 
Who predicted this cold 2013-14 winter in the US and Europe?

Weather Eye: 'Old Farmer's Almanac' correctly predicted this harsh winter | The Columbian

Report: Farmers? Almanac more accurate than government climate scientists | The Daily Caller

Who did NOT predict this cold winter:

The Official Forecast of the U.S. Government Never Saw This Winter Coming - Businessweek

Screen-Shot-2014-02-14-at-4.50.03-PM.png


The big red blotch in the top map represents parts of the country in which the Climate Prediction Center forecast above-average temperatures. The frigid-looking blue blotch in the bottom &#8220;verification&#8221; map shows areas where temperatures turned out to be below average.

&#8220;Not one of our better forecasts,&#8221; admits Mike Halpert, the Climate Prediction Center&#8217;s acting director. The center grades itself on what it calls the Heidke skill score, which ranges from 100 (perfection) to -50 (monkeys throwing darts would have done better). October&#8217;s forecast for the three-month period of November through January came in at -22. Truth be told, the September prediction for October-December was slightly worse, at -23. The main cause in both cases was the same: Underestimating the mammoth December cold wave, which brought snow to Dallas and chilled partiers in Times Square on New Year&#8217;s Eve.

Report: Farmers? Almanac more accurate than government climate scientists | The Daily Caller

This exceptionally cold and snowy winter has shown that government climate scientists were dead wrong when it came to predicting just how cold this winter would be, while the 197-year old Farmers&#8217; Almanac predicted this winter would be &#8220;bitterly cold&#8221;.

Bloomberg Businessweek reports that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration&#8217;s Climate Prediction Center (CPC) predicted temperatures would be &#8220;above normal from November through January across much of the lower 48 states.&#8221;

This, however, was dead wrong. As Bloomberg notes, the CPC underestimated the &#8220;mammoth December cold wave, which brought snow to Dallas and chilled partiers in Times Square on New Year&#8217;s Eve.&#8221;

...

CPC grades its prediction accuracy on a Heidke skill score, which ranges from 100 (perfect accuracy) to -50 (no better than playing pin the tail on the donkey while blindfolded).

CPC&#8217;s score for October&#8217;s weather predictions for November through January was -22 and the September weather prediction for October through December was at -23.

&#8220;Not one of our better forecasts,&#8221; Mike Halpert, the Climate Prediction Center&#8217;s acting director, told Bloomberg Businessweek.

What actually happened this winter? A &#8220;polar vortex&#8221; swept down and caused every state except Florida to experience snowfall and brought about 4,406 record low temperatures across the U.S. in January along with 1,073 record snowfalls.

The most recent winter storm that slammed into the eastern U.S. last week knocked out power for more than 1 million people in the Southeast and caused 21 deaths along the East Coast. More than 2,500 flights were delayed last Friday and 1,500 were canceled from East Coast airports.

....

Who could have predicted such a harsh winter? The Farmers Almanac did, according to a CBS News report from August 2013. The nearly 200-year old publication hit newsstands last summer and predicted that &#8220;a winter storm will hit the Northeast around the time the Super Bowl is played at MetLife Stadium in the Meadowlands in New Jersey,&#8221; and also predicted &#8220;a colder-than-normal winter for two-thirds of the country and heavy snowfall in the Midwest, Great Lakes and New England.&#8221;

&#8220;We&#8217;re using a very strong four-letter word to describe this winter, which is C-O-L-D. It&#8217;s going to be very cold,&#8221; Sandi Duncan, the almanac&#8217;s managing editor, told CBS News in August....

The Farmers&#8217; Almanac makes predictions based on planetary positions, sunspots and lunar cycles &#8212; a prediction system that has remained largely unchanged since its first publication in 1818. While modern scientists don&#8217;t put much stock in the almanac&#8217;s way of doing things, the book says it&#8217;s accurate about 80 percent of the time.



Climate has ALWAYS changed!
Temperature record with CO2 levels for the last 600 million years
6a010536b58035970c017c37fa9895970b-pi



Last 10,000 years
gisp-last-10000-new.png



Why Hansen Had To Corrupt The Temperature Record | Real Science

1998changesannotated-1.gif



iceland-1.gif


NASA GISS ? Adjusting the Adjustments « Climate Audit

As a simple exercise, I quickly revisited the everchanging Hansen adjustments, a topic commented on acidly by E.M. Smith (Chiefio) in many posts &#8211; also see his interesting comments in the thread at a guest post at Anthony&#8216;s, a post which revisited the race between 1934 and 1998 &#8211; an issue first raised at Climate Audit in 2007 in connection with Hansen&#8217;s Y2K error.

As CA readers recall, Hansen&#8217;s Y2K error resulted in a reduction of US temperatures after 2000 relative to earlier values. The change from previous values is shown in red in the graphic below; the figure also shows (black) remarkable re-writing of past history since August 2007 &#8211; a rewriting of history that has increased the 2000-6 relative to the 1930s by about 0.3 deg C.

nasa_us_adjustments.png



Climategate: The Smoking Code | Watts Up With That?

Now, here is some actual proof that the CRU was deliberately tampering with their data. Unfortunately, for readability&#8217;s sake, this code was written in Interactive Data Language (IDL) and is a pain to go through.

NOTE: This is an actual snippet of code from the CRU contained in the source file: briffa_Sep98_d.pro

1;
2; Apply a VERY ARTIFICAL correction for decline!!
3;
4 yrloc=[1400,findgen(19)*5.+1904]
5 valadj=[0.,0.,0.,0.,0.,-0.1,-0.25,-0.3,0.,-0.1,0.3,0.8,1.2,1.7,2.5,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.6]*0.75 ; fudge factor
6 if n_elements(yrloc) ne n_elements(valadj) then message,'Oooops!'
7
8 yearlyadj=interpol(valadj,yrloc,timey)

So the fudge factor is adjusting each year by their calendar year starting with 1904, in five year increments. Note that starting in 1930 the function arbitrarily subtracts 0.1 degrees, then in 1936 it removes 0.25, etc. Then in 1955 it begins to ADD temperature adjustments beginning with 0.3, etc.

Is it any wonder we have 'global warming' according to these liars?

Just the name 'fudge factor' at line 5 should be a dead give away.

Hansen?s NASA GISS ? cooling the past, warming the present | Watts Up With That?

I ran a post yesterday, showing how the latest version of GISSTEMP had changed from using Hadley/Reynolds to ERSST for ocean temperatures, with the result that about 0.03C had been added to recent warming.

However, this is not the only change they have made to the historical temperature record in recent years. Climate4You, fortunately, archived the GISS data in May 2008. Comparing this dataset with today&#8217;s version, we can see that about 0.10C of warming, or more, has been added to temperatures in the last decade, compared to data up to about 1950.

image32.png



Very revealing programmer comments found in the hacked emails in the Climategate scandal, and they explain how we have 'Global Warming' no matter what the temperatures may actually be.

And note how they call the temperatures they want to see the 'real' temperatures, when ordinary people might think the MEASURED proxy temperatures would be the 'real' temperatures or else the proxy temps are worthless anyway!

Climategate: hide the decline ? codified | Watts Up With That?

WUWT blogging ally Ecotretas writes in to say that he has made a compendium of programming code segments that show comments by the programmer that suggest places where data may be corrected, modified, adjusted, or busted. Some the HARRY_READ_ME comments are quite revealing. For those that don&#8217;t understand computer programming, don&#8217;t fret, the comments by the programmer tell the story quite well even if the code itself makes no sense to you....

?FOIA\documents\osborn-tree6\mann\oldprog\maps12.proFOIA\documents\osborn-tree6\mann\oldprog\maps15.proFOIA\documents\osborn-tree6\mann\oldprog\maps24.pro; Plots 24 yearly maps of calibrated (PCR-infilled or not) MXD reconstructions
; of growing season temperatures. Uses "corrected" MXD - but shouldn't usually
; plot past 1960 because these will be artificially adjusted to look closer to
; the real temperatures.

....

; anomalies against full NH temperatures and other series.
; CALIBRATES IT AGAINST THE LAND-ONLY TEMPERATURES NORTH OF 20 N
;
; Specify period over which to compute the regressions (stop in 1960 to avoid
; the decline

......

; Specify period over which to compute the regressions (stop in 1960 to avoid
; the decline that affects tree-ring density records)


...


;getting seriously fed up with the state of the Australian data. so many new stations have been
; introduced, so many false references.. so many changes that aren't documented.

....


;I am very sorry to report that the rest of the databases seem to be in nearly as poor a state as
; Australia was. There are hundreds if not thousands of pairs of dummy stations

...


Here, the expected 1990-2003 period is MISSING - so the correlations aren't so hot! Yet
the WMO codes and station names /locations are identical (or close). What the hell is
supposed to happen here? Oh yeah - there is no 'supposed', I can make it up. So I have :)


...

It's Sunday evening, I've worked all weekend, and just when I thought it was done I'm
hitting yet another problem that's based on the hopeless state of our databases. There is no uniform
data integrity
, it's just a catalogue of issues that continues to grow as they're found.

...

printf,1,&#8217;(April-September) temperature anomalies (from the 1961-1990 mean).&#8217;
printf,1,&#8217;Reconstruction is based on tree-ring density records.&#8217;
printf,1
printf,1,&#8217;NOTE: recent decline in tree-ring density has been ARTIFICIALLY&#8217;
printf,1,&#8217;REMOVED to facilitate calibration. THEREFORE, post-1960 values&#8217;
printf,1,&#8217;will be much closer to observed temperatures then they should be
,&#8217;
printf,1,&#8217;which will incorrectly imply the reconstruction is more skilful&#8217;
printf,1,&#8217;than it actually is.

...

printf,1,'temperature in many high-latitude locations. In this data set'
printf,1,'this "decline" has been artificially removed in an ad-hoc way, and'
printf,1,'this means that data after 1960 no longer represent tree-ring
printf,1,'density variations, but have been modified to look more like the
printf,1,'observed temperatures
.'


.....


; Apply a VERY ARTIFICAL correction for decline!!
;
yrloc=[1400,findgen(19)*5.+1904]
valadj=[0.,0.,0.,0.,0.,-0.1,-0.25,-0.3,0.,-0.1,0.3,0.8,1.2,1.7,2.5,2.6,2.6,$
2.6,2.6,2.6]*0.75 ; fudge factor
(...)
;
; APPLY ARTIFICIAL CORRECTION
;
yearlyadj=interpol(valadj,yrloc,x)
densall=densall+yearlyadj

...

;*** MUST ALTER FUNCT_DECLINE.PRO TO MATCH THE COORDINATES OF THE
; START OF THE DECLINE *** ALTER THIS EVERY TIME YOU CHANGE ANYTHING ***


...

applied the calibration to unfiltered MXD data (which
; gives a zero mean over 1881-1960) after extending the calibration to boxes
; without temperature data (pl_calibmxd1.pro). We have identified and
; artificially removed (i.e. corrected) the decline in this calibrated
; data set. We now recalibrate this corrected calibrated dataset against
; the unfiltered 1911-1990 temperature data
, and apply the same calibration
; to the corrected and uncorrected calibrated MXD data.
 
Anthropic Global Warming is the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on humanity, far worse then the liberal lies supporting Stalin in the 1930s and the lies they told to cover up his massive starvation of the Ukrainians that Durante covered up for the New York Times. The NY Times *Still* has a showcased memorial for Durante, despite his being one of the biggest liars to have ever worked in journalism in the United States.

Don't trust these lying bastards when it comes to anything that centralizes government power over your private lives.
 
Last edited:
Coastal residents care.

What can you do about it? Prepare for the sea levels to rise and the storms/disasters to increase in average strength.

But...but Obama still has 2 years to roll back the oceans and heal the planet. Wasn't that what you Obamabots promised?

So, you wish to prove that you are an idiot? You are doing very well.

No, but you are proving to be a gullible fool and a government stooge quite well.
 
So if we reduce CO2 by 5PPM, how much of a decrease will there be in sea levels, .5cm, 10 feet?

Anyone?

Bueller?

Anyone
 
My hypothesis is that our weather predictions are so bad, because it is based on bad information.
 
Coastal residents care.

What can you do about it? Prepare for the sea levels to rise and the storms/disasters to increase in average strength.

But...but Obama still has 2 years to roll back the oceans and heal the planet. Wasn't that what you Obamabots promised?

Never vote on the basis of which candidate looks or sounds better on a screen...................

For female candidates I vote based on cleavage.
 
if it is getting so damn warm.., why is the ice in the Arctic and Antarctic increasing more than past years ?

hummmmmmm ??

Latest Data Shows Arctic Sea Ice Volume Has Increased


Click to enlarge. Arctic sea ice extent for January 2014 was 13.73 million square kilometers (5.30 million square miles). The magenta line shows the 1981 to 2010 median extent for that month. The black cross indicates the geographic North Pole. Courtesy: NSIDC

Click to enlarge. The graph above shows Arctic sea ice extent as of February 3, 2014, along with daily ice extent data for the previous four years. 2013-2014 is shown in blue, 2012-2013 in brown, and 2011-2012 in green, 2010-2011 in orange, and 2009-2010 in light purple. The gray area around the average line shows the two standard deviation range of the data. Courtesy: NSIDC

Click to enlarge. Monthly January ice extent for 1979 to 2014 shows a decline of 3.2% per decade. Courtesy: NSIDC

Click to enlarge. This series of images from the European Space Agency CryoSat satellite compares Arctic sea ice thickness for the last four Octobers. Thinner ice is indicated in blues and greens; thicker ice is show in yellows and reds. Courtesy: National Snow and Ice Data Center/CryoSat, courtesy Rachel Tilling/University College London.

Click to enlarge. This image of Antarctic sea ice concentration anomaly trends for January 2014 suggests increases in sea ice in the western Ross and Weddell Seas (oranges and reds), and declines in the Amundsen and Bellingshausen Seas (blues). Courtesy: NSIDC

Click to enlarge. The graph above shows Antarctic sea ice extent as of February 3, 2014, along with daily ice extent data for the previous four years. 2013-2014 is shown in light blue, 2012-2013 in brown, and 2011-2012 in green, 2010-2011 in orange, and 2009-2010 in light purple. The gray area around the average line shows the two standard deviation range of the data. Courtesy: NSIDC

Click to enlarge. Antarctic sea ice extent growth continues at 3.7 per cent a decade. Courtesy: NSISC.

Satellite data shows that Arctic sea ice was 50 per cent thicker in Autumn 2013 than it was in Autumn 2012, according to the US National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC).
 
.
The World Just Had Its Hottest June On Record



ap_wire.png
| By By SETH BORENSTEIN
Posted: 07/21/2014



WASHINGTON (AP) — The globe is on a hot streak, setting a heat record in June. That's after the world broke a record in May.


<snip>


And that's only part of it. The world's oceans not only broke a monthly heat record at 62.7 degrees, but it was the hottest the oceans have been on record no matter what the month, Arndt said.

<snip>


Heat records in June broke on every continent but Antarctica, especially in New Zealand, northern South America, Greenland, central Africa and southern Asia.

The United States had only its 33rd hottest June.


All 12 of the world's monthly heat records have been set after 1997, more than half in the last decade. All the global cold monthly records were set before 1917.


<snip>

Global temperature records go back to 1880 and this is the 352nd hotter than average month in a row.


"This is what global warming looks like," Overpeck said in an email. "Not record hot everywhere all the time, but certainly a reflection that the odds of record hot are going up everywhere around the planet."
.

Was miserably hot n humid here yesterday. First time in my 14 years here I went swimming just to cool down. Don't blame global warming though. Believe it's happening n all, just don't blame abberant days on it.

Of the things possibly responsible for current weather, sunspots are more likely to blame than global warming. Sun's been strangely bereft of sunspots for about a week now. Still in solar maximum, but sunspots activity is unusually low.
 
LMAO.....read the fine print on this.........beat old record by >>>


:fu::fu::fu:by 1 / 20th of one degree:fu::fu::fu:



June joins May as hottest on record as experts warn 'this is what global warming looks like' | Mail Online



Im laughing so hard, my sides hurt!!



I know you are reading challenged but-----but go back------go back and read the article - no fine print, the 1/20 of a degree is clearly stated but-----but just to be clear, that would be 0.05°F hotter than the previous hottest year in recorded history but-----but 1.3°F above the 20th century average for June.


"The global temperature was 1.3°F above the 20th century average in June according to data released on Monday by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). That bests the previous hottest June record, set in 1998, by 0.05°F". ~ Brian Kahn
.
 

Forum List

Back
Top