Help the Black community

Racism is believing your "race" is superior. Since I know that we are all one race I am not racist. The problem I have with the Eurocentric point of view is that it was cultivated and crafted specifically to absolve whites in the US and other countries of paradox of enslaving Blacks. It has proven to be so full of lies that you dont know what the truth is now. I know of no "goal" to dominate the earth by Black people. The true history of the world should be taught instead of pretending "white people" were the only ones that created and did anything of significance.

No, "superior" isn't correct. The idea that people should be treated differently because of their race is racist.
I don't think you have a clue what a "Eurocentric point of view" is and I certainly don't think you know any thing about it's "cultivation. Are you trying to claim that all Europeans are white and plan to dominate the Earth? Are Blacks who enslave Blacks nicer than Whites who do so?

Before trying to correct me at least check your dictionary. It plainly states that it is a belief that a race is superior. I have more than a clue what a Eurocentric point of view is because I was indoctrinated with it formally from the moment I hit the school system. I was told Christopher Columbus discovered America when its a blatant lie. Cultivated in the context I used it means refined or polished. Are you really that ignorant or just pretending to be? Thats twice now you could have avoided embarrassing yourself simply by looking at a dictionary. If you knew anything about slavery at all you would know the type of slavery that was practiced in the US and some other places was entirely different than that practiced before that time.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:
Racism, also sometimes called racialism, is generally defined as actions, practices, or beliefs that consider the human species to be divided into races with shared traits, abilities, or qualities, such as personality, intellect, morality, or other cultural behavioral characteristics, and especially the belief that races can be ranked as inherently superior or inferior to others, or that members of different races should be treated differently.[1][2]The exact definition of racism is controversial both because there is little scholarly agreement about the meaning of the concept "race", and because there is also little agreement about what does and doesn't constitute discrimination. Critics argue that the term is applied differentially, with a focus on such prejudices by whites, and defining mere observations of racial differences as racism.[3] Some definitions would have it that any assumption that a person's behavior would be influenced by their racial categorization is racist, regardless of whether the action is intentionally harmful or pejorative.


If you intended to discuss the Eurocentric viewpoint of history you should written it as such not just Eurocentric viewpoint.


"The problem I have with the Eurocentric point of view is that it was cultivated and crafted specifically to absolve whites in the US and other countries of paradox of enslaving Blacks"Please feel free to try to prove that there is anything factual in your statement above. I suspect that it is nothing but opinion and a racist one at that. Why else pose a difference between Blacks and Whites who enslave Blacks? I have been of the opinion that history shows that most Black slaves in America were either born into slavery or enslaved mostly by other Blacks and Browns. Is this untrue? Why does it matter?
If you knew anything about slavery at all you would know the type of slavery that was practiced in the US and some other places was entirely different than that practiced before that time.

I know no such thing nor do I believe that to be true.
 
No, "superior" isn't correct. The idea that people should be treated differently because of their race is racist.
I don't think you have a clue what a "Eurocentric point of view" is and I certainly don't think you know any thing about it's "cultivation. Are you trying to claim that all Europeans are white and plan to dominate the Earth? Are Blacks who enslave Blacks nicer than Whites who do so?

Before trying to correct me at least check your dictionary. It plainly states that it is a belief that a race is superior. I have more than a clue what a Eurocentric point of view is because I was indoctrinated with it formally from the moment I hit the school system. I was told Christopher Columbus discovered America when its a blatant lie. Cultivated in the context I used it means refined or polished. Are you really that ignorant or just pretending to be? Thats twice now you could have avoided embarrassing yourself simply by looking at a dictionary. If you knew anything about slavery at all you would know the type of slavery that was practiced in the US and some other places was entirely different than that practiced before that time.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:
Racism, also sometimes called racialism, is generally defined as actions, practices, or beliefs that consider the human species to be divided into races with shared traits, abilities, or qualities, such as personality, intellect, morality, or other cultural behavioral characteristics, and especially the belief that races can be ranked as inherently superior or inferior to others, or that members of different races should be treated differently.[1][2]The exact definition of racism is controversial both because there is little scholarly agreement about the meaning of the concept "race", and because there is also little agreement about what does and doesn't constitute discrimination. Critics argue that the term is applied differentially, with a focus on such prejudices by whites, and defining mere observations of racial differences as racism.[3] Some definitions would have it that any assumption that a person's behavior would be influenced by their racial categorization is racist, regardless of whether the action is intentionally harmful or pejorative.


If you intended to discuss the Eurocentric viewpoint of history you should written it as such not just Eurocentric viewpoint.


"The problem I have with the Eurocentric point of view is that it was cultivated and crafted specifically to absolve whites in the US and other countries of paradox of enslaving Blacks"Please feel free to try to prove that there is anything factual in your statement above. I suspect that it is nothing but opinion and a racist one at that. Why else pose a difference between Blacks and Whites who enslave Blacks? I have been of the opinion that history shows that most Black slaves in America were either born into slavery or enslaved mostly by other Blacks and Browns. Is this untrue? Why does it matter?
If you knew anything about slavery at all you would know the type of slavery that was practiced in the US and some other places was entirely different than that practiced before that time.

I know no such thing nor do I believe that to be true.

You bolded the wrong part of the explanation so at best you are only slightly wrong but i fixed it for you. Please point out where I made a difference between black and white slavery. The only difference I made was the slavery specifically practised in the US specifically the south. Whites enslaved other whites and blacks but it was always more of an indentured servitude. I specifically meant a Eurocentric view. Whites along with Blacks have been indoctrinated in lies about history, the present and probably the future as it relates to Black inferiority and White superiority.
 
Before trying to correct me at least check your dictionary. It plainly states that it is a belief that a race is superior. I have more than a clue what a Eurocentric point of view is because I was indoctrinated with it formally from the moment I hit the school system. I was told Christopher Columbus discovered America when its a blatant lie. Cultivated in the context I used it means refined or polished. Are you really that ignorant or just pretending to be? Thats twice now you could have avoided embarrassing yourself simply by looking at a dictionary. If you knew anything about slavery at all you would know the type of slavery that was practiced in the US and some other places was entirely different than that practiced before that time.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:
Racism, also sometimes called racialism, is generally defined as actions, practices, or beliefs that consider the human species to be divided into races with shared traits, abilities, or qualities, such as personality, intellect, morality, or other cultural behavioral characteristics, and especially the belief that races can be ranked as inherently superior or inferior to others, or that members of different races should be treated differently.[1][2]The exact definition of racism is controversial both because there is little scholarly agreement about the meaning of the concept "race", and because there is also little agreement about what does and doesn't constitute discrimination. Critics argue that the term is applied differentially, with a focus on such prejudices by whites, and defining mere observations of racial differences as racism.[3] Some definitions would have it that any assumption that a person's behavior would be influenced by their racial categorization is racist, regardless of whether the action is intentionally harmful or pejorative.


If you intended to discuss the Eurocentric viewpoint of history you should written it as such not just Eurocentric viewpoint.


"The problem I have with the Eurocentric point of view is that it was cultivated and crafted specifically to absolve whites in the US and other countries of paradox of enslaving Blacks"Please feel free to try to prove that there is anything factual in your statement above. I suspect that it is nothing but opinion and a racist one at that. Why else pose a difference between Blacks and Whites who enslave Blacks? I have been of the opinion that history shows that most Black slaves in America were either born into slavery or enslaved mostly by other Blacks and Browns. Is this untrue? Why does it matter?
If you knew anything about slavery at all you would know the type of slavery that was practiced in the US and some other places was entirely different than that practiced before that time.

I know no such thing nor do I believe that to be true.

You bolded the wrong part of the explanation so at best you are only slightly wrong but i fixed it for you. Please point out where I made a difference between black and white slavery. The only difference I made was the slavery specifically practised in the US specifically the south. Whites enslaved other whites and blacks but it was always more of an indentured servitude. I specifically meant a Eurocentric view. Whites along with Blacks have been indoctrinated in lies about history, the present and probably the future as it relates to Black inferiority and White superiority.
OK, so who has schooled you in life towards your views on history and racism etc. ???? Do tell, because we all would love to know where it is that you are coming in from, otherwise say we are all in a room where there are many doors, and you have walked in from one of those doors, now is it that your views could be skewed, biased or slanted in life all depending on what door you have come in from, and you don't realize this maybe ? How is that you are so sure about what you have been taught or what you have learned to be truth in your life, while on the other hand you accuse others of lies and untruths as according to you and your understanding of things, so how can we trust you then ?
 
Racism is believing your "race" is superior. Since I know that we are all one race I am not racist. The problem I have with the Eurocentric point of view is that it was cultivated and crafted specifically to absolve whites in the US and other countries of paradox of enslaving Blacks. It has proven to be so full of lies that you dont know what the truth is now. I know of no "goal" to dominate the earth by Black people. The true history of the world should be taught instead of pretending "white people" were the only ones that created and did anything of significance.

No, "superior" isn't correct. The idea that people should be treated differently because of their race is racist.
I don't think you have a clue what a "Eurocentric point of view" is and I certainly don't think you know any thing about it's "cultivation. Are you trying to claim that all Europeans are white and plan to dominate the Earth? Are Blacks who enslave Blacks nicer than Whites who do so?

Before trying to correct me at least check your dictionary. It plainly states that it is a belief that a race is superior. I have more than a clue what a Eurocentric point of view is because I was indoctrinated with it formally from the moment I hit the school system. I was told Christopher Columbus discovered America when its a blatant lie. Cultivated in the context I used it means refined or polished. Are you really that ignorant or just pretending to be? Thats twice now you could have avoided embarrassing yourself simply by looking at a dictionary. If you knew anything about slavery at all you would know the type of slavery that was practiced in the US and some other places was entirely different than that practiced before that time.

if one were to use you as an example the reason blacks complain about slavery is to keep whites perpetually indebted. race based extortion.

it's worked in the past but will soon die a slow death.and........

one could easily make the case that the superior race enslaved the inferior race.

wanna go there?
 
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:
Racism, also sometimes called racialism, is generally defined as actions, practices, or beliefs that consider the human species to be divided into races with shared traits, abilities, or qualities, such as personality, intellect, morality, or other cultural behavioral characteristics, and especially the belief that races can be ranked as inherently superior or inferior to others, or that members of different races should be treated differently.[1][2]The exact definition of racism is controversial both because there is little scholarly agreement about the meaning of the concept "race", and because there is also little agreement about what does and doesn't constitute discrimination. Critics argue that the term is applied differentially, with a focus on such prejudices by whites, and defining mere observations of racial differences as racism.[3] Some definitions would have it that any assumption that a person's behavior would be influenced by their racial categorization is racist, regardless of whether the action is intentionally harmful or pejorative.


If you intended to discuss the Eurocentric viewpoint of history you should written it as such not just Eurocentric viewpoint.


"The problem I have with the Eurocentric point of view is that it was cultivated and crafted specifically to absolve whites in the US and other countries of paradox of enslaving Blacks"Please feel free to try to prove that there is anything factual in your statement above. I suspect that it is nothing but opinion and a racist one at that. Why else pose a difference between Blacks and Whites who enslave Blacks? I have been of the opinion that history shows that most Black slaves in America were either born into slavery or enslaved mostly by other Blacks and Browns. Is this untrue? Why does it matter?
If you knew anything about slavery at all you would know the type of slavery that was practiced in the US and some other places was entirely different than that practiced before that time.

I know no such thing nor do I believe that to be true.

You bolded the wrong part of the explanation so at best you are only slightly wrong but i fixed it for you. Please point out where I made a difference between black and white slavery. The only difference I made was the slavery specifically practised in the US specifically the south. Whites enslaved other whites and blacks but it was always more of an indentured servitude. I specifically meant a Eurocentric view. Whites along with Blacks have been indoctrinated in lies about history, the present and probably the future as it relates to Black inferiority and White superiority.
OK, so who has schooled you in life towards your views on history and racism etc. ???? Do tell, because we all would love to know where it is that you are coming in from, otherwise say we are all in a room where there are many doors, and you have walked in from one of those doors, now is it that your views could be skewed, biased or slanted in life all depending on what door you have come in from, and you don't realize this maybe ? How is that you are so sure about what you have been taught or what you have learned to be truth in your life, while on the other hand you accuse others of lies and untruths as according to you and your understanding of things, so how can we trust you then ?

Its not just me or it would not be that much of an issue. Its a lot of people. They dont dont know true history. I say this because it not a debate on what I was taught and what I find out that schools are still teaching. Its a blatant lie CC discovered America. He thought til his dying day he had hit India and actually never set foot on the American continent. I could understand your argument if that was not a fact and I had no proof. If this story is untrue and recognized as so why are people still teaching it? I'm not asking you to trust me. You are either going to believe or you wont. I'm more concerned with Black people understanding the truth because it seems to me only open minded white people actually research this stuff anyway.
 
No, "superior" isn't correct. The idea that people should be treated differently because of their race is racist.
I don't think you have a clue what a "Eurocentric point of view" is and I certainly don't think you know any thing about it's "cultivation. Are you trying to claim that all Europeans are white and plan to dominate the Earth? Are Blacks who enslave Blacks nicer than Whites who do so?

Before trying to correct me at least check your dictionary. It plainly states that it is a belief that a race is superior. I have more than a clue what a Eurocentric point of view is because I was indoctrinated with it formally from the moment I hit the school system. I was told Christopher Columbus discovered America when its a blatant lie. Cultivated in the context I used it means refined or polished. Are you really that ignorant or just pretending to be? Thats twice now you could have avoided embarrassing yourself simply by looking at a dictionary. If you knew anything about slavery at all you would know the type of slavery that was practiced in the US and some other places was entirely different than that practiced before that time.

if one were to use you as an example the reason blacks complain about slavery is to keep whites perpetually indebted. race based extortion.

it's worked in the past but will soon die a slow death.and........

one could easily make the case that the superior race enslaved the inferior race.

wanna go there?


Maybe I'm not making myself clear. You can go where you choose. I dont follow people so go ahead and take a hike. Like I said there is no superior race but if you do want to debate on what group is responsible for the knowledge base our current civilization is based on go ahead and give it a try if you dont mind being embarrassed.
 
Before trying to correct me at least check your dictionary. It plainly states that it is a belief that a race is superior. I have more than a clue what a Eurocentric point of view is because I was indoctrinated with it formally from the moment I hit the school system. I was told Christopher Columbus discovered America when its a blatant lie. Cultivated in the context I used it means refined or polished. Are you really that ignorant or just pretending to be? Thats twice now you could have avoided embarrassing yourself simply by looking at a dictionary. If you knew anything about slavery at all you would know the type of slavery that was practiced in the US and some other places was entirely different than that practiced before that time.

if one were to use you as an example the reason blacks complain about slavery is to keep whites perpetually indebted. race based extortion.

it's worked in the past but will soon die a slow death.and........

one could easily make the case that the superior race enslaved the inferior race.

wanna go there?


Maybe I'm not making myself clear. You can go where you choose. I dont follow people so go ahead and take a hike. Like I said there is no superior race but if you do want to debate on what group is responsible for the knowledge base our current civilization is based on go ahead and give it a try if you dont mind being embarrassed.

So to you, the creepy ass cracker is not a race.
Just a fun thing to kill, correct?
Sociopath nazi genocidal maniac.
 
if one were to use you as an example the reason blacks complain about slavery is to keep whites perpetually indebted. race based extortion.

it's worked in the past but will soon die a slow death.and........

one could easily make the case that the superior race enslaved the inferior race.

wanna go there?


Maybe I'm not making myself clear. You can go where you choose. I dont follow people so go ahead and take a hike. Like I said there is no superior race but if you do want to debate on what group is responsible for the knowledge base our current civilization is based on go ahead and give it a try if you dont mind being embarrassed.

So to you, the creepy ass cracker is not a race.
Just a fun thing to kill, correct?
Sociopath nazi genocidal maniac.

Yes. If you are a creepy ass cracka I would not cry if you were exterminated. Please dont twist my words to mean white people. I mean crackas.
 
Maybe I'm not making myself clear. You can go where you choose. I dont follow people so go ahead and take a hike. Like I said there is no superior race but if you do want to debate on what group is responsible for the knowledge base our current civilization is based on go ahead and give it a try if you dont mind being embarrassed.

So to you, the creepy ass cracker is not a race.
Just a fun thing to kill, correct?
Sociopath nazi genocidal maniac.

Yes. If you are a creepy ass cracka I would not cry if you were exterminated. Please dont twist my words to mean white people. I mean crackas.

Define cracker , bet you can't.

I am absolutely not a cracker lets see if you can accurately show why you would say I am.

You hate all whites.
Just like your messiah does.
You are more racist than the hate filled supremacist Al Sharpton.
 
So to you, the creepy ass cracker is not a race.
Just a fun thing to kill, correct?
Sociopath nazi genocidal maniac.

Yes. If you are a creepy ass cracka I would not cry if you were exterminated. Please dont twist my words to mean white people. I mean crackas.

Define cracker , bet you can't.

I am absolutely not a cracker lets see if you can accurately show why you would say I am.

You hate all whites.
Just like your messiah does.
You are more racist than the hate filled supremacist Al Sharpton.

I would call a cracka a white person that has hate for people of color and supports any crimes done against those people. I dont know if you are in fact a cracka. You sound more like a white person in denial that crackas exist.
 
Yes. If you are a creepy ass cracka I would not cry if you were exterminated. Please dont twist my words to mean white people. I mean crackas.

Define cracker , bet you can't.

I am absolutely not a cracker lets see if you can accurately show why you would say I am.

You hate all whites.
Just like your messiah does.
You are more racist than the hate filled supremacist Al Sharpton.

I would call a cracka a white person that has hate for people of color and supports any crimes done against those people. I dont know if you are in fact a cracka. You sound more like a white person in denial that crackas exist.
Cracker.
A settler in Florida who would crack a whip whilst rounding up cattle.
A nickname given by the local Seminole Indians.
Recently a racist epithet used by black supremacists to dehumanize the subhuman white race.

What do you call a black person who denies that black on white race crimes run at 17 to one over white on black race crimes?

The last racially motivated killing of a black in the USA happened 50 years ago.
The last racially motivated killing of a subhuman by a supremacist black happened this year.
13 month old racist , creepy assed cracker one percenter, stalking a couple of innocent human beings from his stroller.
The hero of liberalism, deMarquis Elkins, taught that subhuman NRA **** a lesson!!
Shot the racist fuck in the fucking face, killed that subhuman piece of trash!!!

You still sipping champagne over that one?

What do you call a person of color who hates subhumans?
 
Last edited:
Define cracker , bet you can't.

I am absolutely not a cracker lets see if you can accurately show why you would say I am.

You hate all whites.
Just like your messiah does.
You are more racist than the hate filled supremacist Al Sharpton.

I would call a cracka a white person that has hate for people of color and supports any crimes done against those people. I dont know if you are in fact a cracka. You sound more like a white person in denial that crackas exist.
Cracker.
A settler in Florida who would crack a whip whilst rounding up cattle.
A nickname given by the local Seminole Indians.
Recently a racist epithet used by black supremacists to dehumanize the subhuman white race.

What do you call a black person who denies that black on white race crimes run at 17 to one over white on black race crimes?

The last racially motivated killing of a black in the USA happened 50 years ago.
The last racially motivated killing of a subhuman by a supremacist black happened this year.
13 month old racist , creepy assed cracker one percenter, stalking a couple of innocent human beings from his stroller.
The hero of liberalism, deMarquis Elkins, taught that subhuman NRA **** a lesson!!
Shot the racist fuck in the fucking face, killed that subhuman piece of trash!!!

You still sipping champagne over that one?

What do you call a person of color who hates subhumans?

I said cracka with an a not cracker with er. How do you know when the last racially motivated killing was? Are you now a mind reader? Why are you calling white people subhuman? I never heard of the case honestly but keep on assuming. I wouldnt know what to call a person of color that hates subhumans unless by that you mean whites. In that case I would call them misguided but justified.
 
I would call a cracka a white person that has hate for people of color and supports any crimes done against those people. I dont know if you are in fact a cracka. You sound more like a white person in denial that crackas exist.
Cracker.
A settler in Florida who would crack a whip whilst rounding up cattle.
A nickname given by the local Seminole Indians.
Recently a racist epithet used by black supremacists to dehumanize the subhuman white race.

What do you call a black person who denies that black on white race crimes run at 17 to one over white on black race crimes?

The last racially motivated killing of a black in the USA happened 50 years ago.
The last racially motivated killing of a subhuman by a supremacist black happened this year.
13 month old racist , creepy assed cracker one percenter, stalking a couple of innocent human beings from his stroller.
The hero of liberalism, deMarquis Elkins, taught that subhuman NRA **** a lesson!!
Shot the racist fuck in the fucking face, killed that subhuman piece of trash!!!

You still sipping champagne over that one?

What do you call a person of color who hates subhumans?

I said cracka with an a not cracker with er. How do you know when the last racially motivated killing was? Are you now a mind reader? Why are you calling white people subhuman? I never heard of the case honestly but keep on assuming. I wouldnt know what to call a person of color that hates subhumans unless by that you mean whites. In that case I would call them misguided but justified.

You never heard of the case!!!!!
You just proved a point for me.
Ever hear of a case involving a guy by the name of Rodney King?

I note that you recognize the term subhuman refers to whites, crackers , crackas or however else you refer to the people ( subhumans in your language ) you hate the most.
I'm glad I can communicate with you, using your own hate speech!
 
Last edited:
Cracker.
A settler in Florida who would crack a whip whilst rounding up cattle.
A nickname given by the local Seminole Indians.
Recently a racist epithet used by black supremacists to dehumanize the subhuman white race.

What do you call a black person who denies that black on white race crimes run at 17 to one over white on black race crimes?

The last racially motivated killing of a black in the USA happened 50 years ago.
The last racially motivated killing of a subhuman by a supremacist black happened this year.
13 month old racist , creepy assed cracker one percenter, stalking a couple of innocent human beings from his stroller.
The hero of liberalism, deMarquis Elkins, taught that subhuman NRA **** a lesson!!
Shot the racist fuck in the fucking face, killed that subhuman piece of trash!!!

You still sipping champagne over that one?

What do you call a person of color who hates subhumans?

I said cracka with an a not cracker with er. How do you know when the last racially motivated killing was? Are you now a mind reader? Why are you calling white people subhuman? I never heard of the case honestly but keep on assuming. I wouldnt know what to call a person of color that hates subhumans unless by that you mean whites. In that case I would call them misguided but justified.

You never heard of the case!!!!!
You just proved a point for me.
Ever hear of a case involving a guy by the name of Rodney King?

I note that you recognize the term subhuman refers to whites, crackers , crackas or however else you refer to the people ( subhumans in your language ) you hate the most.
I'm glad I can communicate with you, using your own hate speech!

No I never heard of the case. I didnt prove a point I helped your assumption. I have heard of Rodney King. You sound like you are losing it Paul. Stay with me now. Why is calling a person a cracka wrong if that is what they are?
 
Is calling a person a nigga wrong?

You heard of Rodney King because it was reported on a massive scale.
Even today you know his name, most people on earth do.
They know trayvon martins name too.

But DeMarquis Elkins, very little press, ever think why?
He murdered a 13 month old in cold blood.
Nothing, don't matter, who cares.
Why do you know about one but not the other 20?
Anti white racism and cover ups.
Whites don't count, they are subhuman in your mind.
 
Is calling a person a nigga wrong?

You heard of Rodney King because it was reported on a massive scale.
Even today you know his name, most people on earth do.
They know trayvon martins name too.

But DeMarquis Elkins, very little press, ever think why?
He murdered a 13 month old in cold blood.
Nothing, don't matter, who cares.
Why do you know about one but not the other 20?
Anti white racism and cover ups.
Whites don't count, they are subhuman in your mind.

If they are not being stingy then it is wrong to use the term. I agree I heard of Rodney King and Trayvon Martin due to the media. However, I also heard of Demarquis Elkins now that I looked up the name due to the media. I remember thinking they should torture him for shooting the child. The point you are missing is that he was promptly arrested. Your point is silly. I bet you haven't heard of one of my friends I saw shot and killed by a white cop because he was trying to show his ID. There was no media attention.
 
I would call a cracka a white person that has hate for people of color and supports any crimes done against those people. I dont know if you are in fact a cracka. You sound more like a white person in denial that crackas exist.
Cracker.
A settler in Florida who would crack a whip whilst rounding up cattle.
A nickname given by the local Seminole Indians.
Recently a racist epithet used by black supremacists to dehumanize the subhuman white race.

What do you call a black person who denies that black on white race crimes run at 17 to one over white on black race crimes?

The last racially motivated killing of a black in the USA happened 50 years ago.
The last racially motivated killing of a subhuman by a supremacist black happened this year.
13 month old racist , creepy assed cracker one percenter, stalking a couple of innocent human beings from his stroller.
The hero of liberalism, deMarquis Elkins, taught that subhuman NRA **** a lesson!!
Shot the racist fuck in the fucking face, killed that subhuman piece of trash!!!

You still sipping champagne over that one?

What do you call a person of color who hates subhumans?

I said cracka with an a not cracker with er. How do you know when the last racially motivated killing was? Are you now a mind reader? Why are you calling white people subhuman? I never heard of the case honestly but keep on assuming. I wouldnt know what to call a person of color that hates subhumans unless by that you mean whites. In that case I would call them misguided but justified.

using your logic a white person that hates niggas would be justified in doing so
 
You bolded the wrong part of the explanation so at best you are only slightly wrong but i fixed it for you. Please point out where I made a difference between black and white slavery. The only difference I made was the slavery specifically practised in the US specifically the south. Whites enslaved other whites and blacks but it was always more of an indentured servitude. I specifically meant a Eurocentric view. Whites along with Blacks have been indoctrinated in lies about history, the present and probably the future as it relates to Black inferiority and White superiority.
OK, so who has schooled you in life towards your views on history and racism etc. ???? Do tell, because we all would love to know where it is that you are coming in from, otherwise say we are all in a room where there are many doors, and you have walked in from one of those doors, now is it that your views could be skewed, biased or slanted in life all depending on what door you have come in from, and you don't realize this maybe ? How is that you are so sure about what you have been taught or what you have learned to be truth in your life, while on the other hand you accuse others of lies and untruths as according to you and your understanding of things, so how can we trust you then ?

Its not just me or it would not be that much of an issue. Its a lot of people. They dont dont know true history. I say this because it not a debate on what I was taught and what I find out that schools are still teaching. Its a blatant lie CC discovered America. He thought til his dying day he had hit India and actually never set foot on the American continent. I could understand your argument if that was not a fact and I had no proof. If this story is untrue and recognized as so why are people still teaching it? I'm not asking you to trust me. You are either going to believe or you wont. I'm more concerned with Black people understanding the truth because it seems to me only open minded white people actually research this stuff anyway.
Forget CC, what I am talking about is your racist attitude and/or view on whites in general.

How did you come about this closed minded slanted view in your life ? As smart as you are trying to be or that you are wishing for us to believe you are, one would think that you would be a person that is out to open peoples minds about how stupid racism really is, but here you are buried up to your own neck in it because you are a schooled or taught to be racist yourself ?
 

Forum List

Back
Top