daws101
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #101
In your case believing and the facts are mutually exclusiveYou believe no laws were broken? That makes you the stupid one. She broke the law,Are you really this stupid ?I am so glad you cleared that up asshole So now the question is will Hillary receive security or administrative sanctions or is her doughy ass above the law? Corruption is at play here don't you agree?actually he didn't "To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions"Did he actually say that? Don't be paraphrasing to suit your agenda. Tsk, tsk, tsk, calling old ladies names for no reason.
"We do not see those things here. To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions, but that's not what we're deciding now," Comey added. “As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case."
Read more: FBI recommends no charges against Clinton in email probe
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
He sure as fuck did. Moron.
if you could read you'd see he makes no mention of criminal charges being brought against any one in that same situation.
consequences and security or administrative sanctions are disciplinary actions ,rarely are they criminal.
I just explained that no laws were broken.
You have no proof of corruption as much as you wish you did.
There is no evidence she broke any laws.
It's true I can be stupid , then again stupidity is chronic with you.