Hillary Above the Law, Part 2; Misuse of Air Force One Violates US Campaign Laws

[AmericanFirst1]

I raised an eyebrow when Hillary got on AF1 to go campaigning, I would have thought this is against campaigning rules, but apparently not ?

It's not.

It is dumbass.

Any proof it is?

......thought not.

Proof it's not? Thought so scumbag.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Is this the newest scandal? Howdy Gowdy should launch a full congressional investigation!

Lasting 5 years.

With a REAL President in the WH it wont take a year, dude.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

This is use of Federal money for aiding Hilarys campaign and is a violation of federal law.

But nothing will happen because Hillary is above the law and the GOP is a bunch of cowardly lap dogs to do a damned thing about it.

More laws for the little people only, not the rulers.

The Latest: Hillary Clinton Joins Obama on Air Force One

Trump protests Clinton riding Air Force One with Obama

Citizens' Guide

how many troll threads do you wingers need on this subject?

As many as they can come up with.
Until the next faux scandal comes along.

they're such pathetic and desperate loons.

But we are right, retard.

 

[Political Junky]

This is use of Federal money for aiding Hilarys campaign and is a violation of federal law.

But nothing will happen because Hillary is above the law and the GOP is a bunch of cowardly lap dogs to do a damned thing about it.

More laws for the little people only, not the rulers.

The Latest: Hillary Clinton Joins Obama on Air Force One

Trump protests Clinton riding Air Force One with Obama

Citizens' Guide

According to the OP, he relies solely on Trump's opinion.

 

[BlueGin]

Some people seem very upset today. I heard the guy live....he laid into her good....called her careless. What is everyone so upset about?

Why would you vote such a careless woman into office?

Ahhhh......well.

I expect she has been reformed when it comes to her email communications.

She's highly qualified for the job.....and this mistake can be forgiven.

And...the alternative is far more careless. Believe me.

Who would believe a Clinton ass licker?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Some people seem very upset today. I heard the guy live....he laid into her good....called her careless. What is everyone so upset about?

Because extreme carelessness = gross negligence, and gross negligence is in the wording of the law she broke. So he basically laid out the legal case against her stating she broke the law, and then said she won't be prosecuted for it.

Most people get a little peeved at stuff like that.

Does extreme carelessness EQUAL gross negligence?

I wonder why he didn't use the term gross negligence?

Are you with Drumph in claiming that the FBI is crooked?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Some people seem very upset today. I heard the guy live....he laid into her good....called her careless. What is everyone so upset about?

Why would you vote such a careless woman into office?

Ahhhh......well.

I expect she has been reformed when it comes to her email communications.

She's highly qualified for the job.....and this mistake can be forgiven.

And...the alternative is far more careless. Believe me.

Who would believe a Clinton ass licker?

High quality. You should post a lot more often.

 

[WillowTree]

Extreme carelessness means unfit for office. Fuck that skank.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Extreme carelessness means unfit for office. Fuck that skank.

Extreme Carelessness also equals 'gross negligence', a phrase that Comey did his best to avoid.

How did the Dimbocrats get to Comey? They threaten his kids, his pension, his membership in the Ark Club?

Or is he and the whole FBI now corrupt to the core as was hinted in their mishandling of the Fast and Furious investigation?

 

[OldLady]

He explained why he didn't recommend prosecution. No Republican who has been hoping and dreaming for years that Clinton would be thrown in prison heard that part.
But be of good cheer, all ye Clinton haters. This morning, CBS and CNN were compiling all their footage of Clinton saying she had never had Classified information on her server, etc. Now, does the fact that Clinton blithely and repeatedly lied to us about it surprise me? No. It might be the straw that broke the camel's back for a lot of undecided voters, however. She is not liked to begin with, and now it is being once again very clearly and without equivocation shown that she is an inveterate liar. I can't wait to see how she tries wiggling her way out of this one.
Which is why, again, I suggest the Right stop whining about this, that, and the other, and start selling a positive position on how they are going to save this country.

 

[WillowTree]

He explained why he didn't recommend prosecution. No Republican who has been hoping and dreaming for years that Clinton would be thrown in prison heard that part.
But be of good cheer, all ye Clinton haters. This morning, CBS and CNN were compiling all their footage of Clinton saying she had never had Classified information on her server, etc. Now, does the fact that Clinton blithely and repeatedly lied to us about it surprise me? No. It might be the straw that broke the camel's back for a lot of undecided voters, however. She is not liked to begin with, and now it is being once again very clearly and without equivocation shown that she is an inveterate liar. I can't wait to see how she tries wiggling her way out of this one.
Which is why, again, I suggest the Right stop whining about this, that, and the other, and start selling a positive position on how they are going to save this country.

Hey, Asshole! Explain why he said that anybody else doing the same thing could expect prosecution. Explain that shit away. Do it.

 

[daws101]

He explained why he didn't recommend prosecution. No Republican who has been hoping and dreaming for years that Clinton would be thrown in prison heard that part.
But be of good cheer, all ye Clinton haters. This morning, CBS and CNN were compiling all their footage of Clinton saying she had never had Classified information on her server, etc. Now, does the fact that Clinton blithely and repeatedly lied to us about it surprise me? No. It might be the straw that broke the camel's back for a lot of undecided voters, however. She is not liked to begin with, and now it is being once again very clearly and without equivocation shown that she is an inveterate liar. I can't wait to see how she tries wiggling her way out of this one.
Which is why, again, I suggest the Right stop whining about this, that, and the other, and start selling a positive position on how they are going to save this country.

Hey, Asshole! Explain why he said that anybody else doing the same thing could expect prosecution. Explain that shit away. Do it.

Did he where?
Got a link?

 

[rightwinger]

How many Air Force One trips will Hillary and her staff get from a corrupt Obama regime before this election is over?

And will the gutless Republican Congresspukes ever raise their lap dog voice in protest?

I hope she takes enough trips on Air Force One to thoroughly piss off Trump and the Republicans


She might as well get used to it

 

[OldLady]

He explained why he didn't recommend prosecution. No Republican who has been hoping and dreaming for years that Clinton would be thrown in prison heard that part.
But be of good cheer, all ye Clinton haters. This morning, CBS and CNN were compiling all their footage of Clinton saying she had never had Classified information on her server, etc. Now, does the fact that Clinton blithely and repeatedly lied to us about it surprise me? No. It might be the straw that broke the camel's back for a lot of undecided voters, however. She is not liked to begin with, and now it is being once again very clearly and without equivocation shown that she is an inveterate liar. I can't wait to see how she tries wiggling her way out of this one.
Which is why, again, I suggest the Right stop whining about this, that, and the other, and start selling a positive position on how they are going to save this country.

Hey, Asshole! Explain why he said that anybody else doing the same thing could expect prosecution. Explain that shit away. Do it.

Did he actually say that? Don't be paraphrasing to suit your agenda. Tsk, tsk, tsk, calling old ladies names for no reason.

 

[WillowTree]

He explained why he didn't recommend prosecution. No Republican who has been hoping and dreaming for years that Clinton would be thrown in prison heard that part.
But be of good cheer, all ye Clinton haters. This morning, CBS and CNN were compiling all their footage of Clinton saying she had never had Classified information on her server, etc. Now, does the fact that Clinton blithely and repeatedly lied to us about it surprise me? No. It might be the straw that broke the camel's back for a lot of undecided voters, however. She is not liked to begin with, and now it is being once again very clearly and without equivocation shown that she is an inveterate liar. I can't wait to see how she tries wiggling her way out of this one.
Which is why, again, I suggest the Right stop whining about this, that, and the other, and start selling a positive position on how they are going to save this country.

Hey, Asshole! Explain why he said that anybody else doing the same thing could expect prosecution. Explain that shit away. Do it.

Did he actually say that? Don't be paraphrasing to suit your agenda. Tsk, tsk, tsk, calling old ladies names for no reason.

"We do not see those things here. To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions, but that's not what we're deciding now," Comey added. “As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case."

Read more: FBI recommends no charges against Clinton in email probe
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook



He sure as fuck did. Moron.

 

[rightwinger]

Hillary and Bill back on Air Force One

Just like the "Good ole days"

 

[daws101]

He explained why he didn't recommend prosecution. No Republican who has been hoping and dreaming for years that Clinton would be thrown in prison heard that part.
But be of good cheer, all ye Clinton haters. This morning, CBS and CNN were compiling all their footage of Clinton saying she had never had Classified information on her server, etc. Now, does the fact that Clinton blithely and repeatedly lied to us about it surprise me? No. It might be the straw that broke the camel's back for a lot of undecided voters, however. She is not liked to begin with, and now it is being once again very clearly and without equivocation shown that she is an inveterate liar. I can't wait to see how she tries wiggling her way out of this one.
Which is why, again, I suggest the Right stop whining about this, that, and the other, and start selling a positive position on how they are going to save this country.

Hey, Asshole! Explain why he said that anybody else doing the same thing could expect prosecution. Explain that shit away. Do it.

Did he actually say that? Don't be paraphrasing to suit your agenda. Tsk, tsk, tsk, calling old ladies names for no reason.

"We do not see those things here. To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions, but that's not what we're deciding now," Comey added. “As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case."

Read more: FBI recommends no charges against Clinton in email probe
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook



He sure as fuck did. Moron.

actually he didn't "To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions"
if you could read you'd see he makes no mention of criminal charges being brought against any one in that same situation.
consequences and security or administrative sanctions are disciplinary actions ,rarely are they criminal.

 

[WillowTree]

He explained why he didn't recommend prosecution. No Republican who has been hoping and dreaming for years that Clinton would be thrown in prison heard that part.
But be of good cheer, all ye Clinton haters. This morning, CBS and CNN were compiling all their footage of Clinton saying she had never had Classified information on her server, etc. Now, does the fact that Clinton blithely and repeatedly lied to us about it surprise me? No. It might be the straw that broke the camel's back for a lot of undecided voters, however. She is not liked to begin with, and now it is being once again very clearly and without equivocation shown that she is an inveterate liar. I can't wait to see how she tries wiggling her way out of this one.
Which is why, again, I suggest the Right stop whining about this, that, and the other, and start selling a positive position on how they are going to save this country.

Hey, Asshole! Explain why he said that anybody else doing the same thing could expect prosecution. Explain that shit away. Do it.

Did he actually say that? Don't be paraphrasing to suit your agenda. Tsk, tsk, tsk, calling old ladies names for no reason.

"We do not see those things here. To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions, but that's not what we're deciding now," Comey added. “As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case."

Read more: FBI recommends no charges against Clinton in email probe
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook



He sure as fuck did. Moron.

actually he didn't "To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions"
if you could read you'd see he makes no mention of criminal charges being brought against any one in that same situation.
consequences and security or administrative sanctions are disciplinary actions ,rarely are they criminal.

I am so glad you cleared that up asshole So now the question is will Hillary receive security or administrative sanctions or is her doughy ass above the law? Corruption is at play here don't you agree?

 

[daws101]

He explained why he didn't recommend prosecution. No Republican who has been hoping and dreaming for years that Clinton would be thrown in prison heard that part.
But be of good cheer, all ye Clinton haters. This morning, CBS and CNN were compiling all their footage of Clinton saying she had never had Classified information on her server, etc. Now, does the fact that Clinton blithely and repeatedly lied to us about it surprise me? No. It might be the straw that broke the camel's back for a lot of undecided voters, however. She is not liked to begin with, and now it is being once again very clearly and without equivocation shown that she is an inveterate liar. I can't wait to see how she tries wiggling her way out of this one.
Which is why, again, I suggest the Right stop whining about this, that, and the other, and start selling a positive position on how they are going to save this country.

Hey, Asshole! Explain why he said that anybody else doing the same thing could expect prosecution. Explain that shit away. Do it.

Did he actually say that? Don't be paraphrasing to suit your agenda. Tsk, tsk, tsk, calling old ladies names for no reason.

"We do not see those things here. To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions, but that's not what we're deciding now," Comey added. “As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case."

Read more: FBI recommends no charges against Clinton in email probe
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook



He sure as fuck did. Moron.

actually he didn't "To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions"
if you could read you'd see he makes no mention of criminal charges being brought against any one in that same situation.
consequences and security or administrative sanctions are disciplinary actions ,rarely are they criminal.

I am so glad you cleared that up asshole So now the question is will Hillary receive security or administrative sanctions or is her doughy ass above the law? Corruption is at play here don't you agree?

Are you really this stupid ?
I just explained that no laws were broken.
You have no proof of corruption as much as you wish you did.

 

[WillowTree]

Hey, Asshole! Explain why he said that anybody else doing the same thing could expect prosecution. Explain that shit away. Do it.

Did he actually say that? Don't be paraphrasing to suit your agenda. Tsk, tsk, tsk, calling old ladies names for no reason.

"We do not see those things here. To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions, but that's not what we're deciding now," Comey added. “As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case."

Read more: FBI recommends no charges against Clinton in email probe
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook



He sure as fuck did. Moron.

actually he didn't "To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions"
if you could read you'd see he makes no mention of criminal charges being brought against any one in that same situation.
consequences and security or administrative sanctions are disciplinary actions ,rarely are they criminal.

I am so glad you cleared that up asshole So now the question is will Hillary receive security or administrative sanctions or is her doughy ass above the law? Corruption is at play here don't you agree?

Are you really this stupid ?
I just explained that no laws were broken.
You have no proof of corruption as much as you wish you did.

You believe no laws were broken? That makes you the stupid one. She broke the law,