Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,203
- 2,320
Okay. Drudge/MSN "chased her down" and the OP-er latched onto it. I sit corrected.For the record, no one had to "chase down" anything, it was linked on Drudge earlier today and I think I saw it on MSN as well.
I get much of my news from The Economist, Barron's, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy, Financial Times, PBS Newshour, The WSJ, Cook Political Report, the BBC, The Independent and whatever I pick up on CNN while it's on as "background noise" when I'm in my office. None of them any more consider Hillary Clinton currently newsworthy for the obvious reason: someone trying to make money by promoting their book that came out quite some time ago isn't worth mentioning. The only people talking about Hillary Clinton are (1) rational people on whose property she'll appear in person and (2) people who are obsessed with her. She's "old news."
There's plenty that's current and newsworthy in the world to criticize. Druge, MSN, and anyone else who's of a mind to remark on Clinton should catch-up with the rest of the world and discuss some of it, most especially conservatives for whom Hillary-ragging is, in a word, hackneyed.
I don't disagree. I consider her irrelevant. But as long as she's out there making noise, there will be people looking to take their shots.
As they should. She represents a reprehensible organization.