Hillary finally does the right thing, turns over server

[Freewill]

I am sure that the right will try and make something out of her having it professionally wiped clean. Well what the hell do you want? Do you want her turning over her server with classified information on it? It will be interesting how the left tries and make this about the right.

The Countless Crimes of Hillary Clinton: Special Prosecutor Needed Now

Hillary finally hands over her server—after it's been professionally wiped clean


Read more at The Countless Crimes of Hillary Clinton Special Prosecutor Needed Now Observer Follow us: Observer on Twitter | Observer on Facebook Read more at: The Countless Crimes of Hillary Clinton Special Prosecutor Needed Now Observer

She never should have had classified information on her personal server. She is about as corrupt as they come, though the left will say she's innocent since evidence was destroyed and cannot be used against her.

The FBI investigation is not investigating Clinton. They are trying to track down who sent classified information to Clinton's server.

Law enforcement officials have said that Clinton, is not a target of the investigation, and she has said there is no evidence that her account was hacked. There has also been no evidence that she broke the law, and many specialists believe the occasional appearance of classified information in her account was probably of marginal consequence.

The most probably outcome is the FBI will not find who actually sent classified information to Clinton. However, if they do the employee(s) who violated security protocols will probably just be reprimanded because such violations are common and usually not intentional.

I suspect Republicans will continue to put out unsubstantiated accusations until the public is tire of hearing it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/15/u...hillary-clinton-at-state-department.html?_r=0

Water Gate was just a two bit break in where no one got hurt and nothing was actually stolen.

Yep,is was just a two bit break in but it was the tip of iceberg. The cover- up that followed certainly hurt a lot people. Covering-up and lying about misdeeds are far more damaging to an elected official than the actual deeds.

Who got hurt?

Hurt by allowing access to classified information, intentional or not?

 

[Mac1958]

Hillary finally hands over her server—after it's been professionally wiped clean

Pretty insulting. I'd rather she just didn't.

 

[Freewill]

Hillary never had possession of that clintonemail.com server. It was cloud space rented at a server farm that routinely backs up it's systems. She did not have access to wiped or scrubbed it squeaky clean. You people are gullible idiots!

So, she conducted US Government business and she processed Top Secret communiques on a phukking CLOUD-based system that was outside the control of both the US Government and her own person and on-the-premises staff?

Really?

Hell, that's 100 times as bad as a server that she would have had in her own possession.

No it's not worse! It's much easier to hack a personal server than a professionally managed & guarded server farm.

Professionally managed and guarded...

Professional only means someone is getting paid to do it.

 

[hortysir]

I wasn't talking about the level of tech-support and so-called safeguards.

I was talking about the Chain-of-Custody, which is FAR more important, in this instance.

Putting Government Business and Top Secret Communiques into the hands of people and/or companies without the proper controls and security clearances is a Big No-No.

Missed that, didja?

I missed nothing. There were no Top Secret emails there. You idiots have been wetting yourselves for months over incriminating Benghazi emails on her private server stashed away in her basement. Hillary just body-slammed you loooooossssers!!!

Some top secret emails have already been discovered.

And how on earth did she "hand over" a fucking cloud based system

I wasn't talking about the level of tech-support and so-called safeguards.

I was talking about the Chain-of-Custody, which is FAR more important, in this instance.

Putting Government Business and Top Secret Communiques into the hands of people and/or companies without the proper controls and security clearances is a Big No-No.

Missed that, didja?

I missed nothing. There were no Top Secret emails there. You idiots have been wetting yourselves for months over incriminating Benghazi emails on her private server stashed away in her basement. Hillary just body-slammed you loooooossssers!!!

Some top secret emails have already been discovered.

And how on earth did she "hand over" a fucking cloud based system

However, None Of The Emails Were Marked As "Classified" When They Were Sent." If the emails are not marked as such, then they should be handled as unclassified material.
You hand over a cloud server by giving full access to the party receiving it.

Myths And Facts On Hillary Clinton s Email And Reports Of Top Secret Materials Research Media Matters for America

Because Hillary says so?
Or because a state department spokesman says so?

We've already learned of three top secret emails.

No, because the Inspector General in the Dept. of Justice says so.

 

[hortysir]

Here's a link

hmmmmm


Hillary Clinton Emails Justice Department Mulls Investigation

 

[Ame®icano]

Water Gate was just a two bit break in where no one got hurt and nothing was actually stolen.

Speaking of Watergate...

 

[Obiwan]

Clinton s team went from nonchalant to nervous over e-mail controversy - The Washington Post
The investigation is being overseen by two veteran prosecutors in the Justice Department’s National Security Division. One of them helped manage the prosecution of David H. Petraeus, the retired general and former CIA director who was sentenced to probation earlier this year after pleading guilty to a misdemeanor charge of mishandling classified materials. He was also fined $100,000.

 

[hortysir]

Clinton s team went from nonchalant to nervous over e-mail controversy - The Washington Post
The investigation is being overseen by two veteran prosecutors in the Justice Department’s National Security Division. One of them helped manage the prosecution of David H. Petraeus, the retired general and former CIA director who was sentenced to probation earlier this year after pleading guilty to a misdemeanor charge of mishandling classified materials. He was also fined $100,000.

In the Justice department??

That can't be right.
FlipFlopper said that the IG said there's nothing

 

[Flopper]

I missed nothing. There were no Top Secret emails there. You idiots have been wetting yourselves for months over incriminating Benghazi emails on her private server stashed away in her basement. Hillary just body-slammed you loooooossssers!!!

Some top secret emails have already been discovered.

And how on earth did she "hand over" a fucking cloud based system

I missed nothing. There were no Top Secret emails there. You idiots have been wetting yourselves for months over incriminating Benghazi emails on her private server stashed away in her basement. Hillary just body-slammed you loooooossssers!!!

Some top secret emails have already been discovered.

And how on earth did she "hand over" a fucking cloud based system

However, None Of The Emails Were Marked As "Classified" When They Were Sent." If the emails are not marked as such, then they should be handled as unclassified material.
You hand over a cloud server by giving full access to the party receiving it.

Myths And Facts On Hillary Clinton s Email And Reports Of Top Secret Materials Research Media Matters for America

Because Hillary says so?
Or because a state department spokesman says so?

We've already learned of three top secret emails.

No, because the Inspector General in the Dept. of Justice says so.

Myths And Facts On Hillary Clinton s Email And Reports Of Top Secret Materials Research Media Matters for America

 

[Obiwan]

Some top secret emails have already been discovered.

And how on earth did she "hand over" a fucking cloud based system

Some top secret emails have already been discovered.

And how on earth did she "hand over" a fucking cloud based system

However, None Of The Emails Were Marked As "Classified" When They Were Sent." If the emails are not marked as such, then they should be handled as unclassified material.
You hand over a cloud server by giving full access to the party receiving it.

Myths And Facts On Hillary Clinton s Email And Reports Of Top Secret Materials Research Media Matters for America

Because Hillary says so?
Or because a state department spokesman says so?

We've already learned of three top secret emails.

No, because the Inspector General in the Dept. of Justice says so.

Myths And Facts On Hillary Clinton s Email And Reports Of Top Secret Materials Research Media Matters for America

MediaDon'tMatter isn't a credible source.

 

[hortysir]

Some top secret emails have already been discovered.

And how on earth did she "hand over" a fucking cloud based system

Some top secret emails have already been discovered.

And how on earth did she "hand over" a fucking cloud based system

However, None Of The Emails Were Marked As "Classified" When They Were Sent." If the emails are not marked as such, then they should be handled as unclassified material.
You hand over a cloud server by giving full access to the party receiving it.

Myths And Facts On Hillary Clinton s Email And Reports Of Top Secret Materials Research Media Matters for America

Because Hillary says so?
Or because a state department spokesman says so?

We've already learned of three top secret emails.

No, because the Inspector General in the Dept. of Justice says so.

Myths And Facts On Hillary Clinton s Email And Reports Of Top Secret Materials Research Media Matters for America

May as well copy campaign talking points like Valerie

 

[Obiwan]

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/Articles/mediamattersagendasandactivities.html

 

[Flopper]

Water Gate was just a two bit break in where no one got hurt and nothing was actually stolen.

Speaking of Watergate...

False
snopes.com FALSE Jerry Zeifman Fired Hillary Clinton from the Watergate Investigation

 

[Obiwan]

Water Gate was just a two bit break in where no one got hurt and nothing was actually stolen.

Speaking of Watergate...

False
snopes.com FALSE Jerry Zeifman Fired Hillary Clinton from the Watergate Investigation

Hillary Clinton s former boss says he fired her from an investigative position because she was a liar and unethical -Truth Fiction

The Truth:

It’s true that Hillary Clinton’s ex-boss has accused her of being a “liar” and “unethical” during the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry into Watergate, but claims that she was fired for those reasons are false.

But while Jerry Zeifman has been consistent in his criticism of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s work on the Watergate investigation, circumstances surrounding her termination are less clear. In a 1999 interview with the Scripps Howard News Service, Zeifman said he didn’t have the power to fire Clinton, or else he would have:

“Zeifman does not have flattering memories of Rodham’s work on the committee. ‘If I had the power to fire her, I would have fired her,’ he said.

Zeifman said Rodham sparked a bitter battle among Democrats by recommending the Judiciary Committee deny Nixon’s lawyers the right to attend the closed-door meetings.

‘Can you imagine that? This was a committee of lawyers and members of the bar, and she was saying the committee should deny the president representation,’ he said.

After a lengthy behind-the-scenes debate, Zeifman said the committee decided Nixon’s lawyers could attend.”

 

[KissMy]

For over 3 years now corrupt media & 501(c)(3) Political Action Groups have been BLASTING the airwaves & internet with baseless accusations of "Hillary is a criminal, liar, murderer, extortionist, thief, illegally destroying documents, emails, etc. Yet they have never had a shred of evidence, just made up bullshit to convict her in the press before she gets nominated or wins election.

 

[hortysir]

For over 3 years now corrupt media & 501(c)(3) Political Action Groups have been BLASTING the airwaves & internet with baseless accusations of "Hillary is a criminal, liar, murderer, extortionist, thief, illegally destroying documents, emails, etc. Yet they have never had a shred of evidence, just made up bullshit to convict her in the press before she gets nominated or wins election.

But it's okay to quote MM which, by the way, holds the same 501(c)

got it

 

[Obiwan]

For over 3 years now corrupt media & 501(c)(3) Political Action Groups have been BLASTING the airwaves & internet with baseless accusations of "Hillary is a criminal, liar, murderer, extortionist, thief, illegally destroying documents, emails, etc. Yet they have never had a shred of evidence, just made up bullshit to convict her in the press before she gets nominated or wins election.

Actually, classified information is still turning up in her emails, so she will probably get indicted. Hopefully, that will happen after she gets the nomination.

 

[Flopper]

For over 3 years now corrupt media & 501(c)(3) Political Action Groups have been BLASTING the airwaves & internet with baseless accusations of "Hillary is a criminal, liar, murderer, extortionist, thief, illegally destroying documents, emails, etc. Yet they have never had a shred of evidence, just made up bullshit to convict her in the press before she gets nominated or wins election.

Actually, classified information is still turning up in her emails, so she will probably get indicted. Hopefully, that will happen after she gets the nomination.

I don't see how Clinton can be held accountable for some one sending her classified information. It is the person that sent the information that is at fault.

 

[Obiwan]

Breaking news...
Are Hillary s emails gone Probably not US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[hortysir]

For over 3 years now corrupt media & 501(c)(3) Political Action Groups have been BLASTING the airwaves & internet with baseless accusations of "Hillary is a criminal, liar, murderer, extortionist, thief, illegally destroying documents, emails, etc. Yet they have never had a shred of evidence, just made up bullshit to convict her in the press before she gets nominated or wins election.

Actually, classified information is still turning up in her emails, so she will probably get indicted. Hopefully, that will happen after she gets the nomination.

I don't see how Clinton can be held accountable for some one sending her classified information. It is the person that sent the information that is at fault.

She's SoS. (or was, rather)
People send her classified information all the time.
What she does with it, afterwards, is on her.....not the sender