Hillary Indictment Already Handed Down By FBI And Obama Justice Department Is Sitting On It

[JoeB131]

They extort wages.

It wasn't his decisions, it was the piece of shit like you he hired. By the time he found out you were, you had destroyed things so badly.

Now you are getting into outright fantasy.

Yup, I personally caused our biggest customer to engage in an ill-advised merger and get taken over by their creditors!!! I then caused a housing collapse that eliminated another 20% of our business.

I also sank the Lusitania and kidnapped the Lindbergh Baby.

I had no idea I was so fucking devious.

On the food stamp vs. social security thing, people who get social security have paid into it. People getting food stamps don't pay the taxes that fund it. I didn't expect someone like you to know that.

Uh, guy, you get everything you paid into SS back in seven years of being on it. Given that the average life span has gone to 78 years in this country, most people will get twice what they paid into Social Security back in benefits.

There isn't a little account with your name on it that gets exhausted when you've spent the last dollar. Social Security IS a welfare program as every bit as much as Food Stamps are. The fact that old people come over here from Poland, work a couple of years, qualify for benefits and go back to Poland where they can live like Kings is testament to that.

And as much as you guys whine about Socialism and Welfare, the fact is, if you guys ever got your way on abolishing this White People Welfare, we would end you as a political movement.

 

[EverCurious]

Oh buddy, we don't have to pretend. You've defended the hildabeast at every turn continuously since this entire email scandal started and defended her on Benghazi. We know you don't hate her. Apparently she's got your jizz dripping down her chin.

Duly noted you couldn't answer the question of how you make this matter to people who don't already hate Hillary...

I don't hate Mrs. Clinton, but I do think what she did for her own personal convenience, and worse her shrugging attitude about our nations security, is a pretty serious issue, even more so given the current terrorist threat and power struggles going on all over the other continent. Now is not the time to have a president who is so flippantly careless with national security. Frankly I didn't mind when Mr. Clinton was president, and I'm pretty sure Mrs. Clinton was influencing Mr. Clinton and running the show from behind (as most first ladies have,) so it's not so much that I abhor the policies or anything, but rather that this is absolutely the worst time to have someone who isn't concerned about our keeping our nations secrets. In other times, in the past, it would have been far less an issue to me; more of an mmk we can't do that anymore, and move on situation. However, the fact that Mrs. Clinton completely denies that it is a problem at all, is actually the problem for me, not the private server itself per say - it is the thought that counts here.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Yup, I personally caused our biggest customer to engage in an ill-advised merger and get taken over by their creditors!!! I then caused a housing collapse that eliminated another 20% of our business.

I also sank the Lusitania and kidnapped the Lindbergh Baby.

Yep, it was these same morons in a thread I made who said it was my fault I quit a job where I deemed the warehouse I worked in to be too unsafe to continue employment. Three weeks later the same moron I was forced to work with burned the warehouse to the ground costing my company about a million dollars in lost equipment and the facility.

That's one reason I left the republican party, they can't fucking think for themselves. They don't understand someone can be unemployed for a reason other than "they're fucking lazy and want to suck off the gov't tit." They enjoy this dollar-a-gallon gas and don't realize it's absolutely killing the oil industry which is what my state survives on.

 

[theHawk]

Hillary’s Email Defense Is Laughable

She is guilty, no question about it. Everyone who handles classified material knows the rules. If it was anyone else they'd already be in jail.

 

[JoeB131]

She is guilty, no question about it. Everyone who handles classified material knows the rules. If it was anyone else they'd already be in jail.

Please cite a case where someone went to jail for using the wrong kind of server.

Thanks.

I keep asking for you guys to find me a case where someone did what Hillary did and went to jail for it and you never do.

 

[Conservative65]

They extort wages.

It wasn't his decisions, it was the piece of shit like you he hired. By the time he found out you were, you had destroyed things so badly.

Now you are getting into outright fantasy.

Yup, I personally caused our biggest customer to engage in an ill-advised merger and get taken over by their creditors!!! I then caused a housing collapse that eliminated another 20% of our business.

I also sank the Lusitania and kidnapped the Lindbergh Baby.

I had no idea I was so fucking devious.

On the food stamp vs. social security thing, people who get social security have paid into it. People getting food stamps don't pay the taxes that fund it. I didn't expect someone like you to know that.

Uh, guy, you get everything you paid into SS back in seven years of being on it. Given that the average life span has gone to 78 years in this country, most people will get twice what they paid into Social Security back in benefits.

There isn't a little account with your name on it that gets exhausted when you've spent the last dollar. Social Security IS a welfare program as every bit as much as Food Stamps are. The fact that old people come over here from Poland, work a couple of years, qualify for benefits and go back to Poland where they can live like Kings is testament to that.

And as much as you guys whine about Socialism and Welfare, the fact is, if you guys ever got your way on abolishing this White People Welfare, we would end you as a political movement.

Sure you did. Talk about fantasies. You just expressed one.

White People Welfare? Another fantasy yet another n*gger dreams up to make his miserable existence seem better.

 

[JoeB131]

Sure you did. Talk about fantasies. You just expressed one.

White People Welfare? Another fantasy yet another n*gger dreams up to make his miserable existence seem better.

I probably made more than you did last year. I will definitely make more than you this year.

But you know what, I'm good with a welfare state. You guys made this when you let the 1% dismantle them middle class, and now you are stuck with it.

 

[TooTall]

Same with the Trump scam university..

I didn't realize that the Trump University had a private server with Classified e-mails on it.

 

[TooTall]

Not using email incorrectly, having incorrect information in her email. Why must the left spin everything, oh right because the truth seldom works. Bill wasn't impeached because of a BJ, he lied under oath. Mrs. Tuluza is not being investigated for using a personal server, she is being investigated for having classified information on a personal server. Which would be, and probably was, easy to hack.

So essentially, you want to prosecute her for what other people did (sent her e-mails over the wrong system) because of what other people MIGHT have done (Hacked her server if they were aware it existed).

So what did SHE actually do that was criminal? Not what other people did that might have caused inadvertant criminality on her part.

Sending and receiving TS SAP information. They have emails that show her directing her staff to remove classification markers.

BTW, do you know what General Petraeus was busted for?

Sharing his schedule with a person who was not holding a clearance.

That's about it. For that he was fined, fired, and his clearance revoked.

How bad does discussing the attack on Benghazi with foreign leaders and her daughter compare to that? How about satellite pictures in the Middle East? How about discussing removing classified markers? Some were so sensitive that they couldn't be revealed to the public, but there they were on a unsecured server for any hacker to look at.

I seem to recall that the General shared classified material with his girl friend that was a Major in the reserves and most certainly did have a clearance at one time.

 

[mudwhistle]

Not using email incorrectly, having incorrect information in her email. Why must the left spin everything, oh right because the truth seldom works. Bill wasn't impeached because of a BJ, he lied under oath. Mrs. Tuluza is not being investigated for using a personal server, she is being investigated for having classified information on a personal server. Which would be, and probably was, easy to hack.

So essentially, you want to prosecute her for what other people did (sent her e-mails over the wrong system) because of what other people MIGHT have done (Hacked her server if they were aware it existed).

So what did SHE actually do that was criminal? Not what other people did that might have caused inadvertant criminality on her part.

Sending and receiving TS SAP information. They have emails that show her directing her staff to remove classification markers.

BTW, do you know what General Petraeus was busted for?

Sharing his schedule with a person who was not holding a clearance.

That's about it. For that he was fined, fired, and his clearance revoked.

How bad does discussing the attack on Benghazi with foreign leaders and her daughter compare to that? How about satellite pictures in the Middle East? How about discussing removing classified markers? Some were so sensitive that they couldn't be revealed to the public, but there they were on a unsecured server for any hacker to look at.

I seem to recall that the General shared classified material with his girl friend that was a Major in the reserves and most certainly did have a clearance at one time.

The charges were pretty trumped up.

But Hillary can conduct espionage and not even get a fine.
the definition of espionage
Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1917-1918

 

[Conservative65]

Sure you did. Talk about fantasies. You just expressed one.

White People Welfare? Another fantasy yet another n*gger dreams up to make his miserable existence seem better.

I probably made more than you did last year. I will definitely make more than you this year.

But you know what, I'm good with a welfare state. You guys made this when you let the 1% dismantle them middle class, and now you are stuck with it.

When you can prove it, continue to make that claim.

The reason people are on welfare is because they offer nothing of value in the way of skills. That's their own fault.

 

[Moonglow]

Same with the Trump scam university..

I didn't realize that the Trump University had a private server with Classified e-mails on it.

What is the difference, if both operators are ingenious?

 

[paperview]

Not using email incorrectly, having incorrect information in her email. Why must the left spin everything, oh right because the truth seldom works. Bill wasn't impeached because of a BJ, he lied under oath. Mrs. Tuluza is not being investigated for using a personal server, she is being investigated for having classified information on a personal server. Which would be, and probably was, easy to hack.

So essentially, you want to prosecute her for what other people did (sent her e-mails over the wrong system) because of what other people MIGHT have done (Hacked her server if they were aware it existed).

So what did SHE actually do that was criminal? Not what other people did that might have caused inadvertant criminality on her part.

Sending and receiving TS SAP information. They have emails that show her directing her staff to remove classification markers.

BTW, do you know what General Petraeus was busted for?

Sharing his schedule with a person who was not holding a clearance.

That's about it. For that he was fined, fired, and his clearance revoked.

How bad does discussing the attack on Benghazi with foreign leaders and her daughter compare to that? How about satellite pictures in the Middle East? How about discussing removing classified markers? Some were so sensitive that they couldn't be revealed to the public, but there they were on a unsecured server for any hacker to look at.

I seem to recall that the General shared classified material with his girl friend that was a Major in the reserves and most certainly did have a clearance at one time.

You have poor recollection.



Petraeus prosecutor: Clinton committed no crime

Unlike Petraeus, Clinton did not "knowingly" store or share classified information in violation of the law.

"As the former U.S. attorney for the Western District of North Carolina, I oversaw the prosecution of Gen. Petraeus, and I can say, based on the known facts, this comparison has no merit. The key element that distinguishes Secretary Clinton’s email retention practices from Petraeus’ sharing of classified information is that Petraeus knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct, and that was the basis of his criminal liability."

<snip>

Importantly, Petraeus was well aware of the classified contents in his journals, saying to his biographer, Paula Broadwell on tape, “I mean, they are highly classified, some of them. They don’t have it on it, but I mean there’s code word stuff in there.”

When questioned by the FBI, Petraeus lied to agents in responding that he had neither improperly stored nor improperly provided classified information to his biographer.

As Mukasey also highlighted, the key element is that Petraeus’ conduct was done “knowingly.” That is, when he stored his journals containing “highly classified” information at his home, he did so knowingly. Petraeus knew at that time that there was classified information in the journals, and he knew they were stored improperly.

In sharp contrast, Clinton is not being investigated for knowingly sending or receiving classified materials improperly."

 

[TooTall]

Same with the Trump scam university..

I didn't realize that the Trump University had a private server with Classified e-mails on it.

What is the difference, if both operators are ingenious?

One is a serious danger to national security and the other endangers no one.

 

[Moonglow]

Same with the Trump scam university..

I didn't realize that the Trump University had a private server with Classified e-mails on it.

What is the difference, if both operators are ingenious?

One is a serious danger to national security and the other endangers no one.

Yet both are running for president...One is no worse than the other...

 

[paperview]

Not using email incorrectly, having incorrect information in her email. Why must the left spin everything, oh right because the truth seldom works. Bill wasn't impeached because of a BJ, he lied under oath. Mrs. Tuluza is not being investigated for using a personal server, she is being investigated for having classified information on a personal server. Which would be, and probably was, easy to hack.

So essentially, you want to prosecute her for what other people did (sent her e-mails over the wrong system) because of what other people MIGHT have done (Hacked her server if they were aware it existed).

So what did SHE actually do that was criminal? Not what other people did that might have caused inadvertant criminality on her part.

Sending and receiving TS SAP information. They have emails that show her directing her staff to remove classification markers.

BTW, do you know what General Petraeus was busted for?

Sharing his schedule with a person who was not holding a clearance.

That's about it. For that he was fined, fired, and his clearance revoked.

How bad does discussing the attack on Benghazi with foreign leaders and her daughter compare to that? How about satellite pictures in the Middle East? How about discussing removing classified markers? Some were so sensitive that they couldn't be revealed to the public, but there they were on a unsecured server for any hacker to look at.

I seem to recall that the General shared classified material with his girl friend that was a Major in the reserves and most certainly did have a clearance at one time.

The charges were pretty trumped up.

But Hillary can conduct espionage and not even get a fine.
the definition of espionage
Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1917-1918

The mudflap actually thinks our secretary of State was a spy now.

 

[Meathead]

In sharp contrast, Clinton is not being investigated for knowingly sending or receiving classified materials improperly."

That is as patently stupid as it is untrue. It is exactly what the FBI is investigating.

 

[TooTall]

Not using email incorrectly, having incorrect information in her email. Why must the left spin everything, oh right because the truth seldom works. Bill wasn't impeached because of a BJ, he lied under oath. Mrs. Tuluza is not being investigated for using a personal server, she is being investigated for having classified information on a personal server. Which would be, and probably was, easy to hack.

So essentially, you want to prosecute her for what other people did (sent her e-mails over the wrong system) because of what other people MIGHT have done (Hacked her server if they were aware it existed).

So what did SHE actually do that was criminal? Not what other people did that might have caused inadvertant criminality on her part.

Sending and receiving TS SAP information. They have emails that show her directing her staff to remove classification markers.

BTW, do you know what General Petraeus was busted for?

Sharing his schedule with a person who was not holding a clearance.

That's about it. For that he was fined, fired, and his clearance revoked.

How bad does discussing the attack on Benghazi with foreign leaders and her daughter compare to that? How about satellite pictures in the Middle East? How about discussing removing classified markers? Some were so sensitive that they couldn't be revealed to the public, but there they were on a unsecured server for any hacker to look at.

I seem to recall that the General shared classified material with his girl friend that was a Major in the reserves and most certainly did have a clearance at one time.

You have poor recollection.



Petraeus prosecutor: Clinton committed no crime

Unlike Petraeus, Clinton did not "knowingly" store or share classified information in violation of the law.

"As the former U.S. attorney for the Western District of North Carolina, I oversaw the prosecution of Gen. Petraeus, and I can say, based on the known facts, this comparison has no merit. The key element that distinguishes Secretary Clinton’s email retention practices from Petraeus’ sharing of classified information is that Petraeus knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct, and that was the basis of his criminal liability."

<snip>

Importantly, Petraeus was well aware of the classified contents in his journals, saying to his biographer, Paula Broadwell on tape, “I mean, they are highly classified, some of them. They don’t have it on it, but I mean there’s code word stuff in there.”

When questioned by the FBI, Petraeus lied to agents in responding that he had neither improperly stored nor improperly provided classified information to his biographer.

As Mukasey also highlighted, the key element is that Petraeus’ conduct was done “knowingly.” That is, when he stored his journals containing “highly classified” information at his home, he did so knowingly. Petraeus knew at that time that there was classified information in the journals, and he knew they were stored improperly.

In sharp contrast, Clinton is not being investigated for knowingly sending or receiving classified materials improperly."

My memory was flawless. Paula Broadwell graduated with honors from West Point and attained the rank of Major, eventually becoming an expert on military intelligence. Broadwell lived, worked or traveled in more than 60 countries during more than 15 years of military service and worked in geopolitical analysis and counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations.

 

[TooTall]

Same with the Trump scam university..

I didn't realize that the Trump University had a private server with Classified e-mails on it.

What is the difference, if both operators are ingenious?

One is a serious danger to national security and the other endangers no one.

Yet both are running for president...One is no worse than the other...

Trump has not been a threat to our national security. That is not only worse, it is a crime.

 

[Blackrook]

Democrats, please explain why you think Hillary Clinton should never be held responsible for the numerous crimes she has committed.

And while you're at it, have you figured out the real killer of Nicole Simpson?