Hillary Indictment Already Handed Down By FBI And Obama Justice Department Is Sitting On It

[JoeB131]

The charges were pretty trumped up.

But Hillary can conduct espionage and not even get a fine.

i thought the charges were pretty silly against Peteraus. But he actually DID something that was clearly against the rules- he shared classified information with someone who wasn't authorized to see them.

There's no evidence Hillary had anything that was marked classified at the time it was sent, and in any regards, she wasn't the person who sent them.

So Hillary would be no more legally liable than Petreaus' mistress. - who was not charged with a crime.

 

[JoeB131]

When you can prove it, continue to make that claim.

The reason people are on welfare is because they offer nothing of value in the way of skills. That's their own fault.

I kind of don't have to prove it. Your own words indicated your lack of education or mental stability... which indicates marginal employ-ability at best.

All that said, the fact is,half the country, mostly white people, are receiving some kind of entitlement. It's just that you pretend White people Welfare of Social Security, Medicare and Unemployment insurance is "earned",while food stamps are not.

But the guy on Unemployment who plays out his full 26 weeks and asks is producing less of value than the lady working on Walmart who qualifies for SNAP benefits.

So, here's the thing. Since you've now said socialism is okay, maybe you can stop whining about it.

 

[JoeB131]

My memory was flawless. Paula Broadwell graduated with honors from West Point and attained the rank of Major, eventually becoming an expert on military intelligence. Broadwell lived, worked or traveled in more than 60 countries during more than 15 years of military service and worked in geopolitical analysis and counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations.

And she still wasn't authorized to see the material Petreaus showed her. Hence, why Petreaus actually committed a crime.

Hillary was authorized to see the material that was e-mailed to her. Hence, no crime was committed by her seeing it.

 

[paperview]

In sharp contrast, Clinton is not being investigated for knowingly sending or receiving classified materials improperly."

That is as patently stupid as it is untrue. It is exactly what the FBI is investigating.

Sorry, I'll believe the Petreus prosecutor before I'll believe an anony-mouse meathead.

 

[paperview]

Not using email incorrectly, having incorrect information in her email. Why must the left spin everything, oh right because the truth seldom works. Bill wasn't impeached because of a BJ, he lied under oath. Mrs. Tuluza is not being investigated for using a personal server, she is being investigated for having classified information on a personal server. Which would be, and probably was, easy to hack.

So essentially, you want to prosecute her for what other people did (sent her e-mails over the wrong system) because of what other people MIGHT have done (Hacked her server if they were aware it existed).

So what did SHE actually do that was criminal? Not what other people did that might have caused inadvertant criminality on her part.

Sending and receiving TS SAP information. They have emails that show her directing her staff to remove classification markers.

BTW, do you know what General Petraeus was busted for?

Sharing his schedule with a person who was not holding a clearance.

That's about it. For that he was fined, fired, and his clearance revoked.

How bad does discussing the attack on Benghazi with foreign leaders and her daughter compare to that? How about satellite pictures in the Middle East? How about discussing removing classified markers? Some were so sensitive that they couldn't be revealed to the public, but there they were on a unsecured server for any hacker to look at.

I seem to recall that the General shared classified material with his girl friend that was a Major in the reserves and most certainly did have a clearance at one time.

You have poor recollection.



Petraeus prosecutor: Clinton committed no crime

Unlike Petraeus, Clinton did not "knowingly" store or share classified information in violation of the law.

"As the former U.S. attorney for the Western District of North Carolina, I oversaw the prosecution of Gen. Petraeus, and I can say, based on the known facts, this comparison has no merit. The key element that distinguishes Secretary Clinton’s email retention practices from Petraeus’ sharing of classified information is that Petraeus knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct, and that was the basis of his criminal liability."

<snip>

Importantly, Petraeus was well aware of the classified contents in his journals, saying to his biographer, Paula Broadwell on tape, “I mean, they are highly classified, some of them. They don’t have it on it, but I mean there’s code word stuff in there.”

When questioned by the FBI, Petraeus lied to agents in responding that he had neither improperly stored nor improperly provided classified information to his biographer.

As Mukasey also highlighted, the key element is that Petraeus’ conduct was done “knowingly.” That is, when he stored his journals containing “highly classified” information at his home, he did so knowingly. Petraeus knew at that time that there was classified information in the journals, and he knew they were stored improperly.

In sharp contrast, Clinton is not being investigated for knowingly sending or receiving classified materials improperly."

My memory was flawless. Paula Broadwell graduated with honors from West Point and attained the rank of Major, eventually becoming an expert on military intelligence. Broadwell lived, worked or traveled in more than 60 countries during more than 15 years of military service and worked in geopolitical analysis and counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations.

As flawless as a cutten paste.



She wasn't cleared to see the top secret information, much less take possession of it.

Your "memorable" C&P bio of the adulterer notwithstanding.

 

[mudwhistle]

So essentially, you want to prosecute her for what other people did (sent her e-mails over the wrong system) because of what other people MIGHT have done (Hacked her server if they were aware it existed).

So what did SHE actually do that was criminal? Not what other people did that might have caused inadvertant criminality on her part.

Sending and receiving TS SAP information. They have emails that show her directing her staff to remove classification markers.

BTW, do you know what General Petraeus was busted for?

Sharing his schedule with a person who was not holding a clearance.

That's about it. For that he was fined, fired, and his clearance revoked.

How bad does discussing the attack on Benghazi with foreign leaders and her daughter compare to that? How about satellite pictures in the Middle East? How about discussing removing classified markers? Some were so sensitive that they couldn't be revealed to the public, but there they were on a unsecured server for any hacker to look at.

I seem to recall that the General shared classified material with his girl friend that was a Major in the reserves and most certainly did have a clearance at one time.

You have poor recollection.



Petraeus prosecutor: Clinton committed no crime

Unlike Petraeus, Clinton did not "knowingly" store or share classified information in violation of the law.

"As the former U.S. attorney for the Western District of North Carolina, I oversaw the prosecution of Gen. Petraeus, and I can say, based on the known facts, this comparison has no merit. The key element that distinguishes Secretary Clinton’s email retention practices from Petraeus’ sharing of classified information is that Petraeus knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct, and that was the basis of his criminal liability."

<snip>

Importantly, Petraeus was well aware of the classified contents in his journals, saying to his biographer, Paula Broadwell on tape, “I mean, they are highly classified, some of them. They don’t have it on it, but I mean there’s code word stuff in there.”

When questioned by the FBI, Petraeus lied to agents in responding that he had neither improperly stored nor improperly provided classified information to his biographer.

As Mukasey also highlighted, the key element is that Petraeus’ conduct was done “knowingly.” That is, when he stored his journals containing “highly classified” information at his home, he did so knowingly. Petraeus knew at that time that there was classified information in the journals, and he knew they were stored improperly.

In sharp contrast, Clinton is not being investigated for knowingly sending or receiving classified materials improperly."

My memory was flawless. Paula Broadwell graduated with honors from West Point and attained the rank of Major, eventually becoming an expert on military intelligence. Broadwell lived, worked or traveled in more than 60 countries during more than 15 years of military service and worked in geopolitical analysis and counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations.

As flawless as a cutten paste.



She wasn't cleared to see the top secret information, much less take possession of it.

Your "memorable" C&P bio of the adulterer notwithstanding.

General Petraeus's schedule was Top Secret????

 

[Meathead]

Sorry, I'll believe the Petreus prosecutor before I'll believe an anony-mouse meathead.

In sharp contrast, Clinton is not being investigated for knowingly sending or receiving classified materials improperly. You are not quoting the prosecutor, but the author of the article, this woman:
Anne M. Tompkins is a partner at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and former United States attorney for the Western District of North Carolina. She is a donor to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.

That you would accept Hillary's word and your semi literacy pretty much precludes you from any serious discourse anyway. Dingbat!

 

[TooTall]

In sharp contrast, Clinton is not being investigated for knowingly sending or receiving classified materials improperly."

That is as patently stupid as it is untrue. It is exactly what the FBI is investigating.

Sorry, I'll believe the Petreus prosecutor before I'll believe an anony-mouse meathead.

"Hillary Clinton wrote 104 emails that she sent using her private server while secretary of state that the government has since said contain classified information, according to a new Washington Post analysis of Clinton’s publicly released correspondence."
Clinton, on her private server, wrote 104 emails the government says are classified

 

[TooTall]

So essentially, you want to prosecute her for what other people did (sent her e-mails over the wrong system) because of what other people MIGHT have done (Hacked her server if they were aware it existed).

So what did SHE actually do that was criminal? Not what other people did that might have caused inadvertant criminality on her part.

Sending and receiving TS SAP information. They have emails that show her directing her staff to remove classification markers.

BTW, do you know what General Petraeus was busted for?

Sharing his schedule with a person who was not holding a clearance.

That's about it. For that he was fined, fired, and his clearance revoked.

How bad does discussing the attack on Benghazi with foreign leaders and her daughter compare to that? How about satellite pictures in the Middle East? How about discussing removing classified markers? Some were so sensitive that they couldn't be revealed to the public, but there they were on a unsecured server for any hacker to look at.

I seem to recall that the General shared classified material with his girl friend that was a Major in the reserves and most certainly did have a clearance at one time.

You have poor recollection.



Petraeus prosecutor: Clinton committed no crime

Unlike Petraeus, Clinton did not "knowingly" store or share classified information in violation of the law.

"As the former U.S. attorney for the Western District of North Carolina, I oversaw the prosecution of Gen. Petraeus, and I can say, based on the known facts, this comparison has no merit. The key element that distinguishes Secretary Clinton’s email retention practices from Petraeus’ sharing of classified information is that Petraeus knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct, and that was the basis of his criminal liability."

<snip>

Importantly, Petraeus was well aware of the classified contents in his journals, saying to his biographer, Paula Broadwell on tape, “I mean, they are highly classified, some of them. They don’t have it on it, but I mean there’s code word stuff in there.”

When questioned by the FBI, Petraeus lied to agents in responding that he had neither improperly stored nor improperly provided classified information to his biographer.

As Mukasey also highlighted, the key element is that Petraeus’ conduct was done “knowingly.” That is, when he stored his journals containing “highly classified” information at his home, he did so knowingly. Petraeus knew at that time that there was classified information in the journals, and he knew they were stored improperly.

In sharp contrast, Clinton is not being investigated for knowingly sending or receiving classified materials improperly."

My memory was flawless. Paula Broadwell graduated with honors from West Point and attained the rank of Major, eventually becoming an expert on military intelligence. Broadwell lived, worked or traveled in more than 60 countries during more than 15 years of military service and worked in geopolitical analysis and counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations.

As flawless as a cutten paste.



She wasn't cleared to see the top secret information, much less take possession of it.

Your "memorable" C&P bio of the adulterer notwithstanding.

This is what I posted and an ignorant pissant like you didn't believe it.

"I seem to recall that the General shared classified material with his girl friend that was a Major in the reserves and most certainly did have a clearance at one time."

 

[theHawk]

She is guilty, no question about it. Everyone who handles classified material knows the rules. If it was anyone else they'd already be in jail.

Please cite a case where someone went to jail for using the wrong kind of server.

Thanks.

I keep asking for you guys to find me a case where someone did what Hillary did and went to jail for it and you never do.

No one has ever committed mishandling of classified material on this scale except for bonafide traitors that did it on purpose. Sandy Berger of course got caught stealing classified documents, but since he was a Clinton stooge himself, he got a slap on the wrist. Another man, John Deutch got caught too, but was pardoned by none other than President BJ Clinton. Starting to see a trend here? The Clintons are the most untrustworthy people when it comes to classified information.

 

[Freewill]

Truth is we all know that Mrs. Clinton at least violated policy. Now the question is, did she do it voluntary or involuntary. My opinon, she didn't give a crap. Never thought it would be a problem. Probably thought, and was the reason to have a private server, that no one would ever find out and if they did she would be within her rights to deny access. Why else have a private server?

Can anything be believed she told the American citizens? I would say she needs to prove everything she says. Anyone who lies like she did about sniper fire, and laughing and smiling while she is doing it, can't be trusted.

 

[paperview]

Sorry, I'll believe the Petreus prosecutor before I'll believe an anony-mouse meathead.

In sharp contrast, Clinton is not being investigated for knowingly sending or receiving classified materials improperly. You are not quoting the prosecutor....!

Yes, I am...."Anne was the United States Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina from April 2010 to March 2015. She led numerous high-profile, complex criminal and civil investigations during her tenure, including a public corruption case involving the former mayor of Charlotte, the national security case against former general and CIA Director David Petraeus, numerous securities and financial fraud cases, as well as significant matters in the mortgage-backed securities business. Anne served on the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee, which acts on behalf of all of the other U.S. Attorneys in providing advice and counsel to the Attorney General. "

Anne Tompkins | Cadwalader

 

[paperview]

Sending and receiving TS SAP information. They have emails that show her directing her staff to remove classification markers.

BTW, do you know what General Petraeus was busted for?

Sharing his schedule with a person who was not holding a clearance.

That's about it. For that he was fined, fired, and his clearance revoked.

How bad does discussing the attack on Benghazi with foreign leaders and her daughter compare to that? How about satellite pictures in the Middle East? How about discussing removing classified markers? Some were so sensitive that they couldn't be revealed to the public, but there they were on a unsecured server for any hacker to look at.

I seem to recall that the General shared classified material with his girl friend that was a Major in the reserves and most certainly did have a clearance at one time.

You have poor recollection.



Petraeus prosecutor: Clinton committed no crime

Unlike Petraeus, Clinton did not "knowingly" store or share classified information in violation of the law.

"As the former U.S. attorney for the Western District of North Carolina, I oversaw the prosecution of Gen. Petraeus, and I can say, based on the known facts, this comparison has no merit. The key element that distinguishes Secretary Clinton’s email retention practices from Petraeus’ sharing of classified information is that Petraeus knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct, and that was the basis of his criminal liability."

<snip>

Importantly, Petraeus was well aware of the classified contents in his journals, saying to his biographer, Paula Broadwell on tape, “I mean, they are highly classified, some of them. They don’t have it on it, but I mean there’s code word stuff in there.”

When questioned by the FBI, Petraeus lied to agents in responding that he had neither improperly stored nor improperly provided classified information to his biographer.

As Mukasey also highlighted, the key element is that Petraeus’ conduct was done “knowingly.” That is, when he stored his journals containing “highly classified” information at his home, he did so knowingly. Petraeus knew at that time that there was classified information in the journals, and he knew they were stored improperly.

In sharp contrast, Clinton is not being investigated for knowingly sending or receiving classified materials improperly."

My memory was flawless. Paula Broadwell graduated with honors from West Point and attained the rank of Major, eventually becoming an expert on military intelligence. Broadwell lived, worked or traveled in more than 60 countries during more than 15 years of military service and worked in geopolitical analysis and counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations.

As flawless as a cutten paste.



She wasn't cleared to see the top secret information, much less take possession of it.

Your "memorable" C&P bio of the adulterer notwithstanding.

General Petraeus's schedule was Top Secret????

If you think he only shared his schedule, you are a dumber fuck than I ever imagined, and that's saying a lot.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

It appears that a Grand Jury has been convened in secret to look at evidence that Hillary, or somebody they want to make out as a fall guy, mishandled Tops Secret information on Hillary Clinton's personal server. Fux Noise spokesman Judge Nepolitano said this was going on under the radar. One of Hillary's employees has already been granted immunity and the case is going forward. What this means is an indictment or indictments have been recommended, and it's just a matter of the DoJ announcing if they are going to take up the case.

Figure the odds that Obama is going to destroy the Democrat's chances of winning the White House. However, if he doesn't allow the crime to be prosecuted, it will be a scandal even worse than Watergate, and will hound him the rest of his administration and beyond.

If he was a Republican president, he would be toast. I doubt the media will even acknowledge any of this is real. This is corruption at it's worst. It is widely reported that Hillary even offered a Supreme Court seat to Obama as a bribe to convince him not to go forward with the case. I'm sure he'd love that.......but it would be an outright embarrassment to the court to have him playing video games on his cell phone while everyone else is writing their briefs on court decisions.

Links
FBI recommends DoJ to indict Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified info

Why the Justice Department Won’t Work with the FBI on Clinton’s E-mail Case, by Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review

Report: FBI Probing Whether Clinton Aides ‘Cut and Pasted’ Intel

Which prosecutorial entity empaneled or convened this alleged Grand Jury?

The FBI cannot do so on its own.

I doubt that anybody in the Miscarriage of Justice Department has done so.

There has been no authorization by anybody (a court, an attorney general or an act of Congress) for the appointment of any "special" prosecutor, either.

Maybe Shrillary does deserve to be prosecuted. But as far as I know, nobody has commenced any such thing.

 

[ogibillm]

Sending and receiving TS SAP information. They have emails that show her directing her staff to remove classification markers.

BTW, do you know what General Petraeus was busted for?

Sharing his schedule with a person who was not holding a clearance.

That's about it. For that he was fined, fired, and his clearance revoked.

How bad does discussing the attack on Benghazi with foreign leaders and her daughter compare to that? How about satellite pictures in the Middle East? How about discussing removing classified markers? Some were so sensitive that they couldn't be revealed to the public, but there they were on a unsecured server for any hacker to look at.

I seem to recall that the General shared classified material with his girl friend that was a Major in the reserves and most certainly did have a clearance at one time.

You have poor recollection.



Petraeus prosecutor: Clinton committed no crime

Unlike Petraeus, Clinton did not "knowingly" store or share classified information in violation of the law.

"As the former U.S. attorney for the Western District of North Carolina, I oversaw the prosecution of Gen. Petraeus, and I can say, based on the known facts, this comparison has no merit. The key element that distinguishes Secretary Clinton’s email retention practices from Petraeus’ sharing of classified information is that Petraeus knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct, and that was the basis of his criminal liability."

<snip>

Importantly, Petraeus was well aware of the classified contents in his journals, saying to his biographer, Paula Broadwell on tape, “I mean, they are highly classified, some of them. They don’t have it on it, but I mean there’s code word stuff in there.”

When questioned by the FBI, Petraeus lied to agents in responding that he had neither improperly stored nor improperly provided classified information to his biographer.

As Mukasey also highlighted, the key element is that Petraeus’ conduct was done “knowingly.” That is, when he stored his journals containing “highly classified” information at his home, he did so knowingly. Petraeus knew at that time that there was classified information in the journals, and he knew they were stored improperly.

In sharp contrast, Clinton is not being investigated for knowingly sending or receiving classified materials improperly."

My memory was flawless. Paula Broadwell graduated with honors from West Point and attained the rank of Major, eventually becoming an expert on military intelligence. Broadwell lived, worked or traveled in more than 60 countries during more than 15 years of military service and worked in geopolitical analysis and counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations.

As flawless as a cutten paste.



She wasn't cleared to see the top secret information, much less take possession of it.

Your "memorable" C&P bio of the adulterer notwithstanding.

This is what I posted and an ignorant pissant like you didn't believe it.

"I seem to recall that the General shared classified material with his girl friend that was a Major in the reserves and most certainly did have a clearance at one time."

why did you think that mattered?

 

[Oldstyle]

Not using email incorrectly, having incorrect information in her email. Why must the left spin everything, oh right because the truth seldom works. Bill wasn't impeached because of a BJ, he lied under oath. Mrs. Tuluza is not being investigated for using a personal server, she is being investigated for having classified information on a personal server. Which would be, and probably was, easy to hack.

So essentially, you want to prosecute her for what other people did (sent her e-mails over the wrong system) because of what other people MIGHT have done (Hacked her server if they were aware it existed).

So what did SHE actually do that was criminal? Not what other people did that might have caused inadvertant criminality on her part.

She had two private email servers installed in her private residence so that she could conduct State Department business without anyone being able to see how she was doing it. It's the kind of thing you need to have when you're extorting millions in bribes from people because they think you might be the next President!

 

[longknife]

No amount of posts will ever convince any of the Shrillary shills on here of her innocence. By their standards, the worst thing she did was not openly sharing those emails with China and Iran.

 

[JoeB131]

She had two private email servers installed in her private residence so that she could conduct State Department business without anyone being able to see how she was doing it. It's the kind of thing you need to have when you're extorting millions in bribes from people because they think you might be the next President!

Okay, guy, if you say so. Let me know when you get evidence to that effect.

 

[Conservative65]

When you can prove it, continue to make that claim.

The reason people are on welfare is because they offer nothing of value in the way of skills. That's their own fault.

I kind of don't have to prove it. Your own words indicated your lack of education or mental stability... which indicates marginal employ-ability at best.

All that said, the fact is,half the country, mostly white people, are receiving some kind of entitlement. It's just that you pretend White people Welfare of Social Security, Medicare and Unemployment insurance is "earned",while food stamps are not.

But the guy on Unemployment who plays out his full 26 weeks and asks is producing less of value than the lady working on Walmart who qualifies for SNAP benefits.

So, here's the thing. Since you've now said socialism is okay, maybe you can stop whining about it.

If YOU make the claim, YOU have to prove it. The argument you gave that you think something because of (fill in the blank) is a puss argument because you know you can't prove it.

If someone pays into SS/Medicare and they get it back later, they're getting something out they put in. I'm fully aware there isn't an account with someone's name but records are kept about contributions to determine distributions. With food stamps, if someone gets, they aren't putting into the pot that funds. The number simply don't add up.

I didn't say socialism was OK. That's your moronic viewpoint. Since you haven't proven your claim about income, we'll take it as you don't since you can't. Until valid proof is provided, we'll all continue to look at you as someone who can't keep a job, by your own words, and who lies to make himself feel better. Either show the numbers or take the classification. Your choice.

 

[Conservative65]

She had two private email servers installed in her private residence so that she could conduct State Department business without anyone being able to see how she was doing it. It's the kind of thing you need to have when you're extorting millions in bribes from people because they think you might be the next President!

Okay, guy, if you say so. Let me know when you get evidence to that effect.

When you show proof of YOUR claim about income. Deal?