Link, if you please.
The links are embedded in the text.
"delegates" and "reported".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Link, if you please.
Actually, no. The quote is from a later report. (Today) I looked up the headline and couldn't find it.Link, if you please.
The links are embedded in the text.
"delegates" and "reported".
No, I didn't. Liar. I was pointing out to the Doc it was not called for the same face in each toss. (some reports say it was called heads each time) to his comment:[They didn't. The calls for heads / tails winner differed in different places.
Unman is so clueless/
So you claim the odds of correctly calling the correct side 6 times consecutively are better than the coin falling on the same side 6 times in a row?
No, the odds are actually exactly the same.
1/64.
I already demonstrated that isn't correct. But still your buddy PPV claims it makes a difference...
"There was no "streak" - Hillary's campaign won 6 different coin tosses in 6 different places. There's no reason to believe that all of those coins landed on the same face, either."
And you demonstrated nothing -- other than you are window-licking retarded.
Everything I have read said there were seven coin tosses. Can you provide evidence there were "over a dozen?"There were over a dozen coin tosses. Hillary got 6 called for her.
The coin tosses were used when the candidates tied, For example if they tied over A group of five delegates they each got two and flipped for the delegate that couldn't be split in two.
It isn't rocket science. Unless you are a Republican.
Awesome thread!
^ Not content to proudly display how skullfuckingly poor his math skills are, Uncens shines a red blinking light on his comprehension skills.No, I didn't. Liar. I was pointing out to the Doc it was not called for the same face in each toss. (some reports say it was called heads each time) to his comment:[They didn't. The calls for heads / tails winner differed in different places.
Unman is so clueless/
So you claim the odds of correctly calling the correct side 6 times consecutively are better than the coin falling on the same side 6 times in a row?
No, the odds are actually exactly the same.
1/64.
I already demonstrated that isn't correct. But still your buddy PPV claims it makes a difference...
"There was no "streak" - Hillary's campaign won 6 different coin tosses in 6 different places. There's no reason to believe that all of those coins landed on the same face, either."
And you demonstrated nothing -- other than you are window-licking retarded.
They didn't. The calls for heads / tails winner differed in different places.
Sure sploogy
They didn't. The calls for heads / tails winner differed in different places.
You said nothing of the kind...
OK, Ravi -- I just saw this:Everything I have read said there were seven coin tosses. Can you provide evidence there were "over a dozen?"There were over a dozen coin tosses. Hillary got 6 called for her.
The coin tosses were used when the candidates tied, For example if they tied over A group of five delegates they each got two and flipped for the delegate that couldn't be split in two.
It isn't rocket science. Unless you are a Republican.
Awesome thread!
I heard it driving on All Things ConsideredEverything I have read said there were seven coin tosses. Can you provide evidence there were "over a dozen?"There were over a dozen coin tosses. Hillary got 6 called for her.
The coin tosses were used when the candidates tied, For example if they tied over A group of five delegates they each got two and flipped for the delegate that couldn't be split in two.
It isn't rocket science. Unless you are a Republican.
Awesome thread!
No.Is this correct?
There were six coin tosses....
And candidate Hillary won every one?
^ Not content to proudly display how skullfuckingly poor his math skills are, Uncens shines a red blinking light on his comprehension skills.No, I didn't. Liar. I was pointing out to the Doc it was not called for the same face in each toss. (some reports say it was called heads each time) to his comment:So you claim the odds of correctly calling the correct side 6 times consecutively are better than the coin falling on the same side 6 times in a row?
No, the odds are actually exactly the same.
1/64.
I already demonstrated that isn't correct. But still your buddy PPV claims it makes a difference...
"There was no "streak" - Hillary's campaign won 6 different coin tosses in 6 different places. There's no reason to believe that all of those coins landed on the same face, either."
And you demonstrated nothing -- other than you are window-licking retarded.
They didn't. The calls for heads / tails winner differed in different places.
Sure sploogy
They didn't. The calls for heads / tails winner differed in different places.
You said nothing of the kind...
Waydda go, Un-man.
Link, if you please.
Is Dr. Dobbs related to Dr. Phil? Lol^ Not content to proudly display how skullfuckingly poor his math skills are, Uncens shines a red blinking light on his comprehension skills.No, I didn't. Liar. I was pointing out to the Doc it was not called for the same face in each toss. (some reports say it was called heads each time) to his comment:No, the odds are actually exactly the same.
1/64.
I already demonstrated that isn't correct. But still your buddy PPV claims it makes a difference...
"There was no "streak" - Hillary's campaign won 6 different coin tosses in 6 different places. There's no reason to believe that all of those coins landed on the same face, either."
And you demonstrated nothing -- other than you are window-licking retarded.
They didn't. The calls for heads / tails winner differed in different places.
Sure sploogy
They didn't. The calls for heads / tails winner differed in different places.
You said nothing of the kind...
Waydda go, Un-man.
Actually sploogy, i linked to Dr. Dobbs, who is slightly known, to explain it.
But you go on gloating about, um, well whatever it is you're gloating about.
I'm just here to laugh at you morons cheering what is obvious corruption.
I heard it driving on All Things ConsideredEverything I have read said there were seven coin tosses. Can you provide evidence there were "over a dozen?"There were over a dozen coin tosses. Hillary got 6 called for her.
The coin tosses were used when the candidates tied, For example if they tied over A group of five delegates they each got two and flipped for the delegate that couldn't be split in two.
It isn't rocket science. Unless you are a Republican.
Awesome thread!
Everything I have read said there were seven coin tosses. Can you provide evidence there were "over a dozen?"
So a Iowa Democrat operative told NPR that there were a dozen coin tosses and Bernie won about five. Sounds like bullshit.Everything I have read said there were seven coin tosses. Can you provide evidence there were "over a dozen?"
Update: The initial 6-for-6 report, from the Des Moines Register missed a few Sanders coin-toss wins. (There were a lot of coin tosses!) The ratio of Clinton to Sanders wins was closer to 50-50, which is what we'd expect.
Here’s just how unlikely Hillary Clinton’s 6-for-6 coin-toss victories were
In fact, there were at least a dozen tiebreakers — and "Sen. Sanders won at least a handful," an Iowa Democratic Party official told NPR.
Coin-Toss Fact Check: No, Coin Flips Did Not Win Iowa For Hillary Clinton
Gone unmentioned so far is that even if Clinton won that Miracle Six — and there were no other coin tosses — it would make little difference in the outcome. That is, in part, because of the complicated way Iowa Democrats allocate their delegates — and what was being reported on election night and what wasn't.
Given the closeness of the race and the complexity of the caucus system, you'd be forgiven for assuming that Clinton earned her four-delegate statewide margin with six delegates earned via coin toss. But she didn't. The Iowa caucus process is thoroughly complicated, from start to finish. What matters here is that the delegates that were won with the coin toss were not actual convention delegates but county delegates. The tally that Clinton won by four delegates was "state delegate equivalents," a calculation that estimates how many delegates to the state Democratic convention will result from each side's winning enough county delegates.
Omfg. 3 coin tosses and Hillary won all 3!
I smell a rat!