Holy crap - this has to stop!

[PoliticalChic]

Keep digging.

You're still completely and I'm sure deliberately avoiding the actual point

You realize, don't you, that those people who came south to help register people to vote were northern liberals?

Indeed they were. Some of my older friends were among them including one who was a longtime friend of Pete Seeger. Pete famously had an inscription on the headstock of his banjo which read "this machine surrounds hate and forces it to surrender". We miss his spirit.

Pete Seeger was one of my heros...I saw him and Arlo Guthrie in concert several times....I'll never forget it

Most outrageous post of the day was some imbecile claiming that the KKK slayings of the three civil rights workers was by Republicans!!!!


Oh...wait....that was you, wasn't it.

-------------- link?

PC is getting frantic .... and I'm out of popcorn...I hope she brought some more.

Well, Betty and Moronica, let's review the facts.

1. Democrats demanded slavery and segregation. To fight them, Republicans formed their party to fight those iniquities.

2. Violence has always been the default of the Democrats, so they formed the KKK.

3. These three were murdered by KKK Democrats.

4. The imbecile, Coyote, claimed it was Republicans who killed them...post #1872

5. The judge appointed by Democrat JFK gave them light sentences.
He was, of course, a Democrat, and KKK sympathizer.

6. Even the Washington Post had to grudgingly admit this: "Although there is some historical link between Democrats and the KKK, ...."

7. Democrats blocked every anti-lynching bill that the Republicans brought to Congress.

8. The Democrat Party has always been, and is to this day, the party of slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.
Arguably one of the most popular Democrats, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.

Protest outside the 1964 Democratic National Convention; some hold signs with portraits of slain civil rights workers, 24 August 1964
Murders of Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner - Wikipedia




As is always the case.....everything I post is 100% accurate and correct.



Now...please, remind me.....
I can never remember....which of you is flotsam and which is jetsam?

 

[Coyote]

Indeed they were. Some of my older friends were among them including one who was a longtime friend of Pete Seeger. Pete famously had an inscription on the headstock of his banjo which read "this machine surrounds hate and forces it to surrender". We miss his spirit.

Pete Seeger was one of my heros...I saw him and Arlo Guthrie in concert several times....I'll never forget it

Most outrageous post of the day was some imbecile claiming that the KKK slayings of the three civil rights workers was by Republicans!!!!


Oh...wait....that was you, wasn't it.

-------------- link?

PC is getting frantic .... and I'm out of popcorn...I hope she brought some more.

Well, Betty and Moronica, let's review the facts.

1. Democrats demanded slavery and segregation. To fight them, Republicans formed their party to fight those iniquities.

2. Violence has always been the default of the Democrats, so they formed the KKK.

3. These three were murdered by KKK Democrats.

4. The imbecile, Coyote, claimed it was Republicans who killed them.

5. The judge appointed by Democrat JFK gave them light sentences.
He was, of course, a Democrat, and KKK sympathizer.

6. Even the Washington Post had to grudgingly admit this: "Although there is some historical link between Democrats and the KKK, ...."

7. Democrats blocked every anti-lynching bill that the Republicans brought to Congress.

8. The Democrat Party has always been, and is to this day, the party of slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.
Arguably one of the most popular Democrats, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.



As is always the case.....everything I post is 100% accurate and correct.



Now...please, remind me.....
I can never remember....which of you is flotsam and which is jetsam?

Can you pass me some popcorn please?

 

[francoHFW]

Rev. Moon's Times and the GOP Senate witch hunt? Amazing....That's a fact then...lol. At least they're they're getting something done...

The Senate's Witch Hunt, Herr Himmler? Say, isn't that the witch hunt you NAZI motherfuckers launched in your quest to pin something, ANYTHING, doesn't matter what it is, on Trump? Isn't it a result of the Comey testimony BACKFIRING on you filthy fascists as you tried to fabricate shit against Trump?

In fact it is, Nazi boi.

It's the FBI and a GOP majority congress DUHHHH. Seems to be an interest in Russians wrecking our election, along with some Trumpers...Calling Dems Nazis just shows you're out of your tiny mind to everyone, hater dupe.

 

[francoHFW]

Seriously. This toxic partisan political culture is poisoning civil society.

What the hell is wrong with us?

The left and the right pulling hair and screeching their bumpersticker slogans and broad brush pig ignorant partisan blamegaming? What's wrong with us?

I'm no youngster. I've never seen such a dangerous ambient.

We have someone shooting at one of our few remaining bipartisan non political fun charitable events because he wants to kill a bunch of (insert political party).

The rhetoric flooding the country is poisoning us. And no one wants to take responsibility for stepping up and saying "enough already". For changing it.

Our representatives are colleagues first and foremost. Political opponents second. They recognize it. That violence against one is violence against the others and against our very institutions. Why are we unable to recognize that?

Actually you must be a youngster. You don't remember the "days of rage"? Weather Underground"? Sybionese Liberation Army? Leftists have been trying to empower Democrats and overthrow civil society for decades now.
This is nothing new. What is new, and follow me carefully, is media control. The media was first in the hands of Americans and we watched them bomb and burn their way across America. Then they seized control of the media and it seemed to get quiet.
Today we have alternatives to the media so they are exposed again.
And that is the only reason you see it as an uptick. But it is actually what they have been doing all along.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I was a child at the time and we lived overseas. But I talked with people who remember it at the time and it's nothing like now where the goal isn't to change but to dismantle.

Speaking of overthrowing civil society I am surprised you forget about the efforts from the right...Mississippi burning, blowing up churches, adults attacking children trying to go to school, turning police dogs on civilians
.

Mississippi burning was from the right? Those scumbag democrats were on the RIGHT?

Lie much?

For today's lesson, a trip down Democrat Memory Lane...an anniversary of sorts:

Murder in Mississippi | American Experience - WGBH | PBS



Democrat handiwork.

Southern racists. Now GOP ZZZZZZ

 

[francoHFW]

What happened to lock her up, hater dupe? Thanks for the meltdown and 9/11...great job!

Mafia Boss Hillary Clinton belongs in prison, no question about it. Now because of the Comey testimony we KNOW with absolute EVIDENCE that there was collusion by the AG and OBAMA to obstruct justice to allow Don Hillary to avoid prosecution.

You are stupid as dirt.

because of the Comey testimony we KNOW with absolute EVIDENCE that there was collusion by the AG and OBAMA to obstruct justice to allow Don Hillary to avoid prosecution.
I'm pretty sure I watched that testimony. Where did his testimony say that?

I suspect you watched MSNBC to find out what you THOUGHT about the testimony..

{Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said Sunday during an interview on CNN that the Senate Judiciary Committee should investigate former FBI Director James Comey’s allegation that former Attorney General Loretta Lynch directed him to downplay the bureau’s probe into former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.}

Democratic senator calls for Lynch investigation after Comey testimony

BS.
Sources: Comey acted on Russian intelligence he knew was fake ...
www.cnn.com/2017/05/26/politics/james-comey-fbi...fake-russian.../index.html
May 26, 2017 - Then-FBI Director James Comey knew that a critical piece of information ... Sources:Comey acted on Russian intelligence he knew was fake ..... then-Attorney General Lynch had been compromised in the Clinton investigation. ... UPDATE AND CLARIFICATION: This story has been updated to reflect that ...
How a dubious Russian document influenced the FBI's handling of the ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/...russian.../f375c07c-3a95-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69...
May 24, 2017 - How a dubious Russian document influenced the FBI's handling of the Clinton probe ... has long been viewed within the FBI as unreliable and possibly a fake, according .... Aides to Comey said he decided to act alone after Lynch met .... He joined the newspaper in 2017 after 15 years with The Wall Street ...
James Comey's fake Russian document handling baffles former ...
www.businessinsider.com/james-comey-fake-document-russia-fbi-clinton-email-2017-5
May 31, 2017 - ... reports that a fake Russian document affected James Comey's handling of ... FBI officials briefed Lynch on the existence of the document one ...
Graham on Document Proving Clinton-Lynch Collusion: Comey ...
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/.../graham_on_document_proving_clinton-lynch_c...
Jun 11, 2017 - He doesn't believe he did anything wrong with the Russians, and I tend to believe him. ... Clinton-Lynch Collusion: Comey "Never Mentioned It Was A Fake" ... Louie Gohmert (TX-01) talked to Julie Banderas on Fox News ...

Wait, you Nazi fucks were outraged, OUTRAGED I TELLS YA that such an honorable man as Comey was fired, it was OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE according to you vile scum..

But now he's just a liar, huh Herr Himmler?

A GOPer, after all. Keep up the Dems are Nazi thing- RWNJs like you are the best....

 

[PoliticalChic]

Seriously. This toxic partisan political culture is poisoning civil society.

What the hell is wrong with us?

The left and the right pulling hair and screeching their bumpersticker slogans and broad brush pig ignorant partisan blamegaming? What's wrong with us?

I'm no youngster. I've never seen such a dangerous ambient.

We have someone shooting at one of our few remaining bipartisan non political fun charitable events because he wants to kill a bunch of (insert political party).

The rhetoric flooding the country is poisoning us. And no one wants to take responsibility for stepping up and saying "enough already". For changing it.

Our representatives are colleagues first and foremost. Political opponents second. They recognize it. That violence against one is violence against the others and against our very institutions. Why are we unable to recognize that?

Actually you must be a youngster. You don't remember the "days of rage"? Weather Underground"? Sybionese Liberation Army? Leftists have been trying to empower Democrats and overthrow civil society for decades now.
This is nothing new. What is new, and follow me carefully, is media control. The media was first in the hands of Americans and we watched them bomb and burn their way across America. Then they seized control of the media and it seemed to get quiet.
Today we have alternatives to the media so they are exposed again.
And that is the only reason you see it as an uptick. But it is actually what they have been doing all along.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I was a child at the time and we lived overseas. But I talked with people who remember it at the time and it's nothing like now where the goal isn't to change but to dismantle.

Speaking of overthrowing civil society I am surprised you forget about the efforts from the right...Mississippi burning, blowing up churches, adults attacking children trying to go to school, turning police dogs on civilians
.

Mississippi burning was from the right? Those scumbag democrats were on the RIGHT?

Lie much?

For today's lesson, a trip down Democrat Memory Lane...an anniversary of sorts:

Murder in Mississippi | American Experience - WGBH | PBS



Democrat handiwork.

Southern racists. Now GOP ZZZZZZ

1. "Southern racists" are and have always been Democrats.

1. The so-called “Dixiecrats” remained Democrats and did not migrate to the Republican Party. The Dixiecrats were a group of Southern Democrats who, in the 1948 national election, formed a third party, the State’s Rights Democratic Party with the slogan: “Segregation Forever!” Even so, they continued to be Democrats for all local and state elections, as well as for all future national elections. http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#The__Dixiecrats__Remained_Democrats
2. While all Democrats weren’t segregationists, all segregationists were Democrats.
3. Klan members and racists including Hugo Black, George Wallace, ‘Bull’ Connor, Orval Faubus, Lester Maddox, etc.
4. And, Hugo Black's anti-Catholic bias, which showed up in his actions on the Supreme Court:

"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Egnorance: Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"


Hugo Black was Franklin Roosevelt's first pick for the Supreme Court.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Seriously. This toxic partisan political culture is poisoning civil society.

What the hell is wrong with us?

The left and the right pulling hair and screeching their bumpersticker slogans and broad brush pig ignorant partisan blamegaming? What's wrong with us?

I'm no youngster. I've never seen such a dangerous ambient.

We have someone shooting at one of our few remaining bipartisan non political fun charitable events because he wants to kill a bunch of (insert political party).

The rhetoric flooding the country is poisoning us. And no one wants to take responsibility for stepping up and saying "enough already". For changing it.

Our representatives are colleagues first and foremost. Political opponents second. They recognize it. That violence against one is violence against the others and against our very institutions. Why are we unable to recognize that?

Actually you must be a youngster. You don't remember the "days of rage"? Weather Underground"? Sybionese Liberation Army? Leftists have been trying to empower Democrats and overthrow civil society for decades now.
This is nothing new. What is new, and follow me carefully, is media control. The media was first in the hands of Americans and we watched them bomb and burn their way across America. Then they seized control of the media and it seemed to get quiet.
Today we have alternatives to the media so they are exposed again.
And that is the only reason you see it as an uptick. But it is actually what they have been doing all along.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I was a child at the time and we lived overseas. But I talked with people who remember it at the time and it's nothing like now where the goal isn't to change but to dismantle.

Speaking of overthrowing civil society I am surprised you forget about the efforts from the right...Mississippi burning, blowing up churches, adults attacking children trying to go to school, turning police dogs on civilians
.

Mississippi burning was from the right? Those scumbag democrats were on the RIGHT?

Lie much?

For today's lesson, a trip down Democrat Memory Lane...an anniversary of sorts:

Murder in Mississippi | American Experience - WGBH | PBS



Democrat handiwork.

It seems that two Democrat partisans used emoticons to disagree with the statement that the murders were Democrat handiwork.


Perhaps this will help:

1. Among those found guilty on October 20, 1967, were Klan Imperial Wizard Samuel Bowers, a Democrat KKKer

2 His grandfather was Congressman Eaton J. Bowers, a four-term Democrat Congressman from Mississippi's Gulf Coast.

Bowers explained the Democrat view of life:
Representative Bowers was an explicitly virulent opponent of equality for African Americans. In a speech to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1904, during his freshman term, he said: "Let me say to the gentleman from Massachusetts that it is evident that we have at least two theories as to how the negro should be dealt with. One may be termed his idea of the development by higher education, social equality, and the like, while the other might be dominated [sic] the Southern idea of the absolute segregation of the two races, the fitting the negro for that sphere and station which, based upon an experience born of more than a century's knowledge of him as a slave and nearly forty years' experience with him as a freedman, we believe he can acceptably and worthily fill, with absolute denial of social intercourse and with every restriction on his participation in political affairs and government that is permissible under the Federal Constitution... The restriction of suffrage was the wisest statesmanship ever exhibited in that proud Commonwealth... We have disfranchised not only the ignorant and vicious black but the ignorant and vicious white as well..."
Samuel Bowers - Wikipedia


3. The same political relationship, and view of race relations, will be found with the other KKK murderers.


4. One can sense the very same sentiment here:
Bill Clinton on Obama: 'A Few Years Ago, This Guy Would Have Been Carrying Our Bags'
Bill Clinton on Obama: 'A Few Years Ago, This Guy Would Have Been Carrying Our Bags'


Clinton opined this, wistfully, in 2008.

 

[guno]

Actually you must be a youngster. You don't remember the "days of rage"? Weather Underground"? Sybionese Liberation Army? Leftists have been trying to empower Democrats and overthrow civil society for decades now.
This is nothing new. What is new, and follow me carefully, is media control. The media was first in the hands of Americans and we watched them bomb and burn their way across America. Then they seized control of the media and it seemed to get quiet.
Today we have alternatives to the media so they are exposed again.
And that is the only reason you see it as an uptick. But it is actually what they have been doing all along.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I was a child at the time and we lived overseas. But I talked with people who remember it at the time and it's nothing like now where the goal isn't to change but to dismantle.

Speaking of overthrowing civil society I am surprised you forget about the efforts from the right...Mississippi burning, blowing up churches, adults attacking children trying to go to school, turning police dogs on civilians
.

Mississippi burning was from the right? Those scumbag democrats were on the RIGHT?

Lie much?

For today's lesson, a trip down Democrat Memory Lane...an anniversary of sorts:

Murder in Mississippi | American Experience - WGBH | PBS



Democrat handiwork.

Southern racists. Now GOP ZZZZZZ

1. "Southern racists" are and have always been Democrats.

1. The so-called “Dixiecrats” remained Democrats and did not migrate to the Republican Party. The Dixiecrats were a group of Southern Democrats who, in the 1948 national election, formed a third party, the State’s Rights Democratic Party with the slogan: “Segregation Forever!” Even so, they continued to be Democrats for all local and state elections, as well as for all future national elections. http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#The__Dixiecrats__Remained_Democrats
2. While all Democrats weren’t segregationists, all segregationists were Democrats.
3. Klan members and racists including Hugo Black, George Wallace, ‘Bull’ Connor, Orval Faubus, Lester Maddox, etc.
4. And, Hugo Black's anti-Catholic bias, which showed up in his actions on the Supreme Court:

"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Egnorance: Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"


Hugo Black was Franklin Roosevelt's first pick for the Supreme Court.

Amazing that a Korean adoptee not old enough to know what went on in this country and having no literal family connection to this country spews her ignorance on things she knows nothing about

 

[Uncensored2008]

Keep digging.

You're still completely and I'm sure deliberately avoiding the actual point

You realize, don't you, that those people who came south to help register people to vote were northern liberals?

Keep digging at the wound you have that you think your absurd lies will heal? We plan to.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
Once you start invoking Nazi comparisons to modern american political figures or politics you've lost credability if not the argument. People do the use it to talk about economics. They use to invoke genocidal ideologies as you well know.

So "you lie" is right in your mind. And justifies rude. Eh a I or towards the president. Do any that to Trump as well?

Why?

You progressives are virtually identical to the Nazi movement in the early and mid-1920's. Your use of Brown Shirts to riot and intimidate those you hate, your use of names like "homophobe, tea bagger, christian" and the rest of what you term those whom your part so desperately hates. Your demand for total government control of every aspect of the lives of people, what they eat, drive, smoke (tobacco, you love your pot). The way you silence dissent from any who dare disagree with the party through riots and open assault along with expulsion from schools and jobs should the Juden think or say things you don't allow.

You ARE indeed Nazis, it is simple fact. Own what it is you are.

If you really think so, you are either ignorant of history or such a snowflake you can't distinguish name calling from concentration camps.

There is no modern political party or mainstream ideology that is remotely like the Nazi's. Not even you rightwing loons. Get a grip.

You are Nazis, pure fact. Own what it is you are.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I was a child at the time and we lived overseas. But I talked with people who remember it at the time and it's nothing like now where the goal isn't to change but to dismantle.

Speaking of overthrowing civil society I am surprised you forget about the efforts from the right...Mississippi burning, blowing up churches, adults attacking children trying to go to school, turning police dogs on civilians
.

Mississippi burning was from the right? Those scumbag democrats were on the RIGHT?

Lie much?

For today's lesson, a trip down Democrat Memory Lane...an anniversary of sorts:

Murder in Mississippi | American Experience - WGBH | PBS



Democrat handiwork.

Southern racists. Now GOP ZZZZZZ

1. "Southern racists" are and have always been Democrats.

1. The so-called “Dixiecrats” remained Democrats and did not migrate to the Republican Party. The Dixiecrats were a group of Southern Democrats who, in the 1948 national election, formed a third party, the State’s Rights Democratic Party with the slogan: “Segregation Forever!” Even so, they continued to be Democrats for all local and state elections, as well as for all future national elections. http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#The__Dixiecrats__Remained_Democrats
2. While all Democrats weren’t segregationists, all segregationists were Democrats.
3. Klan members and racists including Hugo Black, George Wallace, ‘Bull’ Connor, Orval Faubus, Lester Maddox, etc.
4. And, Hugo Black's anti-Catholic bias, which showed up in his actions on the Supreme Court:

"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Egnorance: Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"


Hugo Black was Franklin Roosevelt's first pick for the Supreme Court.

Amazing that a Korean adoptee not old enough to know what went on in this country and having no literal family connection to this country spews her ignorance on things she knows nothing about

Thanks Herr Himmler, your opinion from the perspective of a Nazi fuck, is so very important.

 

[Pogo]

Indeed they were. Some of my older friends were among them including one who was a longtime friend of Pete Seeger. Pete famously had an inscription on the headstock of his banjo which read "this machine surrounds hate and forces it to surrender". We miss his spirit.

Pete Seeger was one of my heros...I saw him and Arlo Guthrie in concert several times....I'll never forget it

Most outrageous post of the day was some imbecile claiming that the KKK slayings of the three civil rights workers was by Republicans!!!!


Oh...wait....that was you, wasn't it.

-------------- link?

PC is getting frantic .... and I'm out of popcorn...I hope she brought some more.

Well, Betty and Moronica, let's review the facts.

1. Democrats demanded slavery and segregation. To fight them, Republicans formed their party to fight those iniquities.

2. Violence has always been the default of the Democrats, so they formed the KKK.

3. These three were murdered by KKK Democrats.

4. The imbecile, Coyote, claimed it was Republicans who killed them.

5. The judge appointed by Democrat JFK gave them light sentences.
He was, of course, a Democrat, and KKK sympathizer.

6. Even the Washington Post had to grudgingly admit this: "Although there is some historical link between Democrats and the KKK, ...."

7. Democrats blocked every anti-lynching bill that the Republicans brought to Congress.

8. The Democrat Party has always been, and is to this day, the party of slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.
Arguably one of the most popular Democrats, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.

As is always the case.....everything I post is 100% accurate and correct.

Whelp --- apparently not. But it is usually fallacious, if not outright jest plain made up.

Let us proceed. Scalpel please.

1. Democrats demanded slavery and segregation. To fight them, Republicans formed their party to fight those iniquities.

Republicans formed their party largely on Abolition, yes. And yet they ran no candidate in the South before or during the Civil War. And when they struck on a successful candidate in 1860, the Democrat pulled exactly the same number of the South's 88 electoral votes as Lincoln did --- Zero. And Lincoln's name wasn't even on a ballot. Douglas, the Democrat, finished fourth winning a total of one, count 'em, one state. And between his defeat and his untimely death a few months later, he worked on Lincoln's behalf to preserve the Union and prevent the Confederacy from happening. Those who wanted slavery gave Douglas zero votes. They had already driven the Democratic convention out of the South.

2. Violence has always been the default of the Democrats, so they formed the KKK.

False. Already documented many times over. Those who actually did form the KKK (both of them) have been named in full. There is no history of political connections for any of them. Period.

The challenge to prove this wrong by showing any such evidence has been on the table in this thread twice, and on this site for literally years. No has yet met it. Which is understandable, since none exists.

3. These three were murdered by KKK Democrats.

4. The imbecile, Coyote, claimed it was Republicans who killed them.

And what I asked you was ---- "link?" And you ran away and tried to obscure the question out of existence with, apparently, appeal to emotion. YOU HAVE NO LINK. You pulled it out of your ass and are thus exposed as a fraud. Next...

5. The judge appointed by Democrat JFK gave them light sentences.
He was, of course, a Democrat, and KKK sympathizer.

Link?
Not a link to the Association Fallacy mind you --- a link to this judge being a "KKK sympathizer".

I imagine it's in the same place.

6. Even the Washington Post had to grudgingly admit this: "Although there is some historical link between Democrats and the KKK, ...."

Geographically, at first.

Then again there's this --- I'll see your historian Eric Foner and raise you another historian, Elaine Franz Parsons

>> "Lifting the Klan mask [19th Century version] revealed a chaotic multitude of antiblack vigilante groups, disgruntled poor white farmers, wartime guerrilla bands, displaced Democratic politicians, illegal whiskey distillers, coercive moral reformers, bored young men, sadists, rapists, white workmen fearful of black competition, employers trying to enforce labor discipline, common thieves, neighbors with decades-old grudges, and even a few freedmen and white Republicans who allied with Democratic whites or had criminal agendas of their own." --- Elaine Frantz Parsons PhD, "Ku Klux: The Birth of the Klan During Reconstruction" (UNC Press) p. 816) <<
​

--- which is FAR more in line with a self-styled social police force that the Klan WAS, rather than the political arm that appears in your self-drawn comic books, since it wasn't politics they were engaged in.

Moreover it's worth noting that Lester, Kennedy, Crowe, McCord, Jones and Reed were all twentysomethings when they formed the Klan, and likely had never been old enough to vote in the preceding elections anyway, not that anyone living in 1865 Tennessee, which was then outside the United States, could vote anyway.

Finally, there's this cute little turdlet (plop plop fizz fizz oh what a deceit it is...)

8. The Democrat Party has always been, and is to this day, the party of slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.
Arguably one of the most popular Democrats, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.

You can "argue" all you like about the ability to read the mind of a party you don't know. I'm sure it will be entertaining. No doubt it includes yet another hackneyed photoshop of a fake campaign button with a Stars & Bars on it. I'm sure these are entertaining in Duh Bubble where reality has no meaning. But here outside of it, I'm afraid Duh Bubble where reality "doesn't count" -- has no meaning. And even if you could read that mind and prove your point valid ----- it would amount to yet another Composition Fallacy. "Person X is a racist; Person X is a Democrat; therefore all Democrats are racists". Funny thing about Composition Fallacies --- you want to count them when the compositor is a Clinton or a Wallace or a Thurmond --- yet when the compositor is a David Duke or a Stetson Kennedy or a D.C Stephenson or an Oscar Underwood --- suddenly the Composition Fallacy fall down go boom and exits the scene wid a quickness.

-- which says much about dishonest argument.

Back in the world of reality though, slavery on the other hand is a social construct --- not a political ideal. It has existed worldwide for thousands of years, on every continent save Antarctica, and in its transatlantic form since the 1530s when Spanish merchants brought about 150 Africans to what is now South Carolina. That's five hundred years ago.

But of course in 1530 it wasn't "South Carolina", because the United States didn't exist yet, and wouldn't exist for another two and a half centuries, and the Democratic party wouldn't be formed for three hundred years (1834*). Yet in the interim slavery -- the African imported version --- existed and flourished throughout the Americas. And while it did in this country, those "night patrols" formed to hunt down escaped slaves and operated for generations---- finally infiltrating the Klan starting in 1866 and giving an organizational structure to what had theretofore been a loose practice of ad hoc posses.

Which brings us full circle.

* and the guy that formed that Democratic Party, Marin van Buren by organizing a loose faction of Jacksonians, was himself an Abolitionist who later ran again for President on the Free Soil ticket.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Rev. Moon's Times and the GOP Senate witch hunt? Amazing....That's a fact then...lol. At least they're they're getting something done...

The Senate's Witch Hunt, Herr Himmler? Say, isn't that the witch hunt you NAZI motherfuckers launched in your quest to pin something, ANYTHING, doesn't matter what it is, on Trump? Isn't it a result of the Comey testimony BACKFIRING on you filthy fascists as you tried to fabricate shit against Trump?

In fact it is, Nazi boi.

It's the FBI and a GOP majority congress DUHHHH. Seems to be an interest in Russians wrecking our election, along with some Trumpers...Calling Dems Nazis just shows you're out of your tiny mind to everyone, hater dupe.

What did the find stupid? Collusion by Trump?

Nope, rather they found obstruction of Justice by Lynch.

Jeff Sessions, an honest man, is AG - Lynch could be facing SERIOUS charges. I SERIOUSLY hope the Trump administration has the courage to start putting you criminal scum in prison, just like regular people would be put in prison. Lynch faces 2 to 5 for her obstruction on behalf of Mafia Boss Hillay.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Pete Seeger was one of my heros...I saw him and Arlo Guthrie in concert several times....I'll never forget it

Most outrageous post of the day was some imbecile claiming that the KKK slayings of the three civil rights workers was by Republicans!!!!


Oh...wait....that was you, wasn't it.

-------------- link?

PC is getting frantic .... and I'm out of popcorn...I hope she brought some more.

Well, Betty and Moronica, let's review the facts.

1. Democrats demanded slavery and segregation. To fight them, Republicans formed their party to fight those iniquities.

2. Violence has always been the default of the Democrats, so they formed the KKK.

3. These three were murdered by KKK Democrats.

4. The imbecile, Coyote, claimed it was Republicans who killed them.

5. The judge appointed by Democrat JFK gave them light sentences.
He was, of course, a Democrat, and KKK sympathizer.

6. Even the Washington Post had to grudgingly admit this: "Although there is some historical link between Democrats and the KKK, ...."

7. Democrats blocked every anti-lynching bill that the Republicans brought to Congress.

8. The Democrat Party has always been, and is to this day, the party of slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.
Arguably one of the most popular Democrats, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.

As is always the case.....everything I post is 100% accurate and correct.

Whelp --- apparently not. But it is usually fallacious, if not outright jest plain made up.

Let us proceed. Scalpel please.

1. Democrats demanded slavery and segregation. To fight them, Republicans formed their party to fight those iniquities.

Republicans formed their party largely on Abolition, yes. And yet they ran no candidate in the South before or during the Civil War. And when they struck on a successful candidate in 1860, the Democrat pulled exactly the same number of the South's 88 electoral votes as Lincoln did --- Zero. And Lincoln's name wasn't even on a ballot. Douglas, the Democrat, finished fourth winning a total of one, count 'em, one state. And between his defeat and his untimely death a few months later, he worked on Lincoln's behalf to preserve the Union and prevent the Confederacy from happening. Those who wanted slavery gave Douglas zero votes. They had already driven the Democratic convention out of the South.

2. Violence has always been the default of the Democrats, so they formed the KKK.

False. Already documented many times over. Those who actually did form the KKK (both of them) have been named in full. There is no history of political connections for any of them. Period.

The challenge to prove this wrong by showing any such evidence has been on the table in this thread twice, and on this site for literally years. No has yet met it. Which is understandable, since none exists.

3. These three were murdered by KKK Democrats.

4. The imbecile, Coyote, claimed it was Republicans who killed them.

And what I asked you was ---- "link?" And you ran away and tried to obscure the question out of existence with, apparently, appeal to emotion. YOU HAVE NO LINK. You pulled it out of your ass and are thus exposed as a fraud. Next...

5. The judge appointed by Democrat JFK gave them light sentences.
He was, of course, a Democrat, and KKK sympathizer.

Link?
Not a link to the Association Fallacy mind you --- a link to this judge being a "KKK sympathizer".

I imagine it's in the same place.

6. Even the Washington Post had to grudgingly admit this: "Although there is some historical link between Democrats and the KKK, ...."

Geographically, at first.

Then again there's this --- I'll see your historian Eric Foner and raise you another historian, Elaine Franz Parsons

>> "Lifting the Klan mask [19th Century version] revealed a chaotic multitude of antiblack vigilante groups, disgruntled poor white farmers, wartime guerrilla bands, displaced Democratic politicians, illegal whiskey distillers, coercive moral reformers, bored young men, sadists, rapists, white workmen fearful of black competition, employers trying to enforce labor discipline, common thieves, neighbors with decades-old grudges, and even a few freedmen and white Republicans who allied with Democratic whites or had criminal agendas of their own." --- Elaine Frantz Parsons PhD, "Ku Klux: The Birth of the Klan During Reconstruction" (UNC Press) p. 816) <<
​

--- which is FAR more in line with a self-styled social police force that the Klan WAS, rather than the political arm that appears in your self-drawn comic books, since it wasn't politics they were engaged in.

Moreover it's worth noting that Lester, Kennedy, Crowe, McCord, Jones and Reed were all twentysomethings when they formed the Klan, and likely had never been old enough to vote in the preceding elections anyway, not that anyone living in 1865 Tennessee, which was then outside the United States, could vote anyway.

Finally, there's this cute little turdlet (plop plop fizz fizz oh what a deceit it is...)

8. The Democrat Party has always been, and is to this day, the party of slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.
Arguably one of the most popular Democrats, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.

You can "argue" all you like about the ability to read the mind of a party you don't know. I'm sure it will be entertaining. No doubt it includes yet another hackneyed photoshop of a fake campaign button with a Stars & Bars on it. I'm sure these are entertaining in Duh Bubble where reality has no meaning. But here outside of it, I'm afraid Duh Bubble where reality "doesn't count" -- has no meaning. And even if you could read that mind and prove your point valid ----- it would amount to yet another Composition Fallacy. "Person X is a racist; Person X is a Democrat; therefore all Democrats are racists". Funny thing about Composition Fallacies --- you want to count them when the compositor is a Clinton or a Wallace or a Thurmond --- yet when the compositor is a David Duke or a Stetson Kennedy or a D.C Stephenson or an Oscar Underwood --- suddenly the Composition Fallacy fall down go boom and exits the scene wid a quickness.

-- which says much about dishonest argument.

Back in the world of reality though, slavery on the other hand is a social construct --- not a political ideal. It has existed worldwide for thousands of years, on every continent save Antarctica, and in its transatlantic form since the 1530s when Spanish merchants brought about 150 Africans to what is now South Carolina. That's five hundred years ago.

But of course in 1530 it wasn't "South Carolina", because the United States didn't exist yet, and wouldn't exist for another two and a half centuries, and the Democratic party wouldn't be formed for three hundred years (1834*). Yet in the interim slavery -- the African imported version --- existed and flourished throughout the Americas. And while it did in this country, those "night patrols" formed to hunt down escaped slaves and operated for generations---- finally infiltrating the Klan starting in 1866 and giving an organizational structure to what had theretofore been a loose practice of ad hoc posses.

Which brings us full circle.

* and the guy that formed that Democratic Party, Marin van Buren by organizing a loose faction of Jacksonians, was himself an Abolitionist who later ran again for President on the Free Soil ticket.

Other than the freshmen in the JC class you teach, who must regurgitate your complete bullshit to pass the class you misteach, is there a single person on earth who actually believes the utter and complete lies you vomit?

 

[Pogo]

Most outrageous post of the day was some imbecile claiming that the KKK slayings of the three civil rights workers was by Republicans!!!!


Oh...wait....that was you, wasn't it.

-------------- link?

PC is getting frantic .... and I'm out of popcorn...I hope she brought some more.

Well, Betty and Moronica, let's review the facts.

1. Democrats demanded slavery and segregation. To fight them, Republicans formed their party to fight those iniquities.

2. Violence has always been the default of the Democrats, so they formed the KKK.

3. These three were murdered by KKK Democrats.

4. The imbecile, Coyote, claimed it was Republicans who killed them.

5. The judge appointed by Democrat JFK gave them light sentences.
He was, of course, a Democrat, and KKK sympathizer.

6. Even the Washington Post had to grudgingly admit this: "Although there is some historical link between Democrats and the KKK, ...."

7. Democrats blocked every anti-lynching bill that the Republicans brought to Congress.

8. The Democrat Party has always been, and is to this day, the party of slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.
Arguably one of the most popular Democrats, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.

As is always the case.....everything I post is 100% accurate and correct.

Whelp --- apparently not. But it is usually fallacious, if not outright jest plain made up.

Let us proceed. Scalpel please.

1. Democrats demanded slavery and segregation. To fight them, Republicans formed their party to fight those iniquities.

Republicans formed their party largely on Abolition, yes. And yet they ran no candidate in the South before or during the Civil War. And when they struck on a successful candidate in 1860, the Democrat pulled exactly the same number of the South's 88 electoral votes as Lincoln did --- Zero. And Lincoln's name wasn't even on a ballot. Douglas, the Democrat, finished fourth winning a total of one, count 'em, one state. And between his defeat and his untimely death a few months later, he worked on Lincoln's behalf to preserve the Union and prevent the Confederacy from happening. Those who wanted slavery gave Douglas zero votes. They had already driven the Democratic convention out of the South.

2. Violence has always been the default of the Democrats, so they formed the KKK.

False. Already documented many times over. Those who actually did form the KKK (both of them) have been named in full. There is no history of political connections for any of them. Period.

The challenge to prove this wrong by showing any such evidence has been on the table in this thread twice, and on this site for literally years. No has yet met it. Which is understandable, since none exists.

3. These three were murdered by KKK Democrats.

4. The imbecile, Coyote, claimed it was Republicans who killed them.

And what I asked you was ---- "link?" And you ran away and tried to obscure the question out of existence with, apparently, appeal to emotion. YOU HAVE NO LINK. You pulled it out of your ass and are thus exposed as a fraud. Next...

5. The judge appointed by Democrat JFK gave them light sentences.
He was, of course, a Democrat, and KKK sympathizer.

Link?
Not a link to the Association Fallacy mind you --- a link to this judge being a "KKK sympathizer".

I imagine it's in the same place.

6. Even the Washington Post had to grudgingly admit this: "Although there is some historical link between Democrats and the KKK, ...."

Geographically, at first.

Then again there's this --- I'll see your historian Eric Foner and raise you another historian, Elaine Franz Parsons

>> "Lifting the Klan mask [19th Century version] revealed a chaotic multitude of antiblack vigilante groups, disgruntled poor white farmers, wartime guerrilla bands, displaced Democratic politicians, illegal whiskey distillers, coercive moral reformers, bored young men, sadists, rapists, white workmen fearful of black competition, employers trying to enforce labor discipline, common thieves, neighbors with decades-old grudges, and even a few freedmen and white Republicans who allied with Democratic whites or had criminal agendas of their own." --- Elaine Frantz Parsons PhD, "Ku Klux: The Birth of the Klan During Reconstruction" (UNC Press) p. 816) <<
​

--- which is FAR more in line with a self-styled social police force that the Klan WAS, rather than the political arm that appears in your self-drawn comic books, since it wasn't politics they were engaged in.

Moreover it's worth noting that Lester, Kennedy, Crowe, McCord, Jones and Reed were all twentysomethings when they formed the Klan, and likely had never been old enough to vote in the preceding elections anyway, not that anyone living in 1865 Tennessee, which was then outside the United States, could vote anyway.

Finally, there's this cute little turdlet (plop plop fizz fizz oh what a deceit it is...)

8. The Democrat Party has always been, and is to this day, the party of slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.
Arguably one of the most popular Democrats, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.

You can "argue" all you like about the ability to read the mind of a party you don't know. I'm sure it will be entertaining. No doubt it includes yet another hackneyed photoshop of a fake campaign button with a Stars & Bars on it. I'm sure these are entertaining in Duh Bubble where reality has no meaning. But here outside of it, I'm afraid Duh Bubble where reality "doesn't count" -- has no meaning. And even if you could read that mind and prove your point valid ----- it would amount to yet another Composition Fallacy. "Person X is a racist; Person X is a Democrat; therefore all Democrats are racists". Funny thing about Composition Fallacies --- you want to count them when the compositor is a Clinton or a Wallace or a Thurmond --- yet when the compositor is a David Duke or a Stetson Kennedy or a D.C Stephenson or an Oscar Underwood --- suddenly the Composition Fallacy fall down go boom and exits the scene wid a quickness.

-- which says much about dishonest argument.

Back in the world of reality though, slavery on the other hand is a social construct --- not a political ideal. It has existed worldwide for thousands of years, on every continent save Antarctica, and in its transatlantic form since the 1530s when Spanish merchants brought about 150 Africans to what is now South Carolina. That's five hundred years ago.

But of course in 1530 it wasn't "South Carolina", because the United States didn't exist yet, and wouldn't exist for another two and a half centuries, and the Democratic party wouldn't be formed for three hundred years (1834*). Yet in the interim slavery -- the African imported version --- existed and flourished throughout the Americas. And while it did in this country, those "night patrols" formed to hunt down escaped slaves and operated for generations---- finally infiltrating the Klan starting in 1866 and giving an organizational structure to what had theretofore been a loose practice of ad hoc posses.

Which brings us full circle.

* and the guy that formed that Democratic Party, Marin van Buren by organizing a loose faction of Jacksonians, was himself an Abolitionist who later ran again for President on the Free Soil ticket.

Other than the freshmen in the JC class you teach, who must regurgitate your complete bullshit to pass the class you misteach, is there a single person on earth who actually believes the utter and complete lies you vomit?

This is exactly the type of stunned-look "oh yeah well you're just a big stupid!" troll post I expect in answer whenever I post these annoyances of "factual history". No refutations, no links, no counter-anythings, just "you lie" and here, "you vomit". Got it from PC earlier today, now here comes Pothead with what he apparently thinks is "original" snark.

Speak of the devil, Pothead, I just invoked your name in this thread. Ain'tcha flattered that I thought of you right away?

 

[francoHFW]

Seriously. This toxic partisan political culture is poisoning civil society.

What the hell is wrong with us?

The left and the right pulling hair and screeching their bumpersticker slogans and broad brush pig ignorant partisan blamegaming? What's wrong with us?

I'm no youngster. I've never seen such a dangerous ambient.

We have someone shooting at one of our few remaining bipartisan non political fun charitable events because he wants to kill a bunch of (insert political party).

The rhetoric flooding the country is poisoning us. And no one wants to take responsibility for stepping up and saying "enough already". For changing it.

Our representatives are colleagues first and foremost. Political opponents second. They recognize it. That violence against one is violence against the others and against our very institutions. Why are we unable to recognize that?

Actually you must be a youngster. You don't remember the "days of rage"? Weather Underground"? Sybionese Liberation Army? Leftists have been trying to empower Democrats and overthrow civil society for decades now.
This is nothing new. What is new, and follow me carefully, is media control. The media was first in the hands of Americans and we watched them bomb and burn their way across America. Then they seized control of the media and it seemed to get quiet.
Today we have alternatives to the media so they are exposed again.
And that is the only reason you see it as an uptick. But it is actually what they have been doing all along.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I was a child at the time and we lived overseas. But I talked with people who remember it at the time and it's nothing like now where the goal isn't to change but to dismantle.

Speaking of overthrowing civil society I am surprised you forget about the efforts from the right...Mississippi burning, blowing up churches, adults attacking children trying to go to school, turning police dogs on civilians
.

Mississippi burning was from the right? Those scumbag democrats were on the RIGHT?

Lie much?

For today's lesson, a trip down Democrat Memory Lane...an anniversary of sorts:

Murder in Mississippi | American Experience - WGBH | PBS



Democrat handiwork.

It seems that two Democrat partisans used emoticons to disagree with the statement that the murders were Democrat handiwork.


Perhaps this will help:

1. Among those found guilty on October 20, 1967, were Klan Imperial Wizard Samuel Bowers, a Democrat KKKer

2 His grandfather was Congressman Eaton J. Bowers, a four-term Democrat Congressman from Mississippi's Gulf Coast.

Bowers explained the Democrat view of life:
Representative Bowers was an explicitly virulent opponent of equality for African Americans. In a speech to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1904, during his freshman term, he said: "Let me say to the gentleman from Massachusetts that it is evident that we have at least two theories as to how the negro should be dealt with. One may be termed his idea of the development by higher education, social equality, and the like, while the other might be dominated [sic] the Southern idea of the absolute segregation of the two races, the fitting the negro for that sphere and station which, based upon an experience born of more than a century's knowledge of him as a slave and nearly forty years' experience with him as a freedman, we believe he can acceptably and worthily fill, with absolute denial of social intercourse and with every restriction on his participation in political affairs and government that is permissible under the Federal Constitution... The restriction of suffrage was the wisest statesmanship ever exhibited in that proud Commonwealth... We have disfranchised not only the ignorant and vicious black but the ignorant and vicious white as well..."
Samuel Bowers - Wikipedia


3. The same political relationship, and view of race relations, will be found with the other KKK murderers.


4. One can sense the very same sentiment here:
Bill Clinton on Obama: 'A Few Years Ago, This Guy Would Have Been Carrying Our Bags'
Bill Clinton on Obama: 'A Few Years Ago, This Guy Would Have Been Carrying Our Bags'


Clinton opined this, wistfully, in 2008.

Brainwashed RW idiocy. Dems are Nazi racists. Gotcha. Just because 44% of the party are minorities at the convention. Only ignorant rubes who watch and read bs RW GOP propaganda know the truth...

 

[Uncensored2008]

This is exactly the type of stunned-look "oh yeah well you're just a big stupid!" troll post I expect in answer whenever I post these annoyances of "factual history". No refutations, no links, no counter-anythings, just "you lie" and here, "you vomit". Got it from PC earlier today, now here comes Pothead with what he apparently thinks is "original" snark.

Speak of the devil, Pothead, I just invoked your name in this thread. Ain'tcha flattered that I thought of you right away?

The problem paint huffer is that you DO lie;

Here is a simple example;

{You can "argue" all you like about the ability to read the mind of a party you don't know. I'm sure it will be entertaining. No doubt it includes yet another hackneyed photoshop of a fake campaign button with a Stars & Bars on it. }

So we note your claim that the Clinton/Gore campaign posters are "photoshopped," which you and I argued about years ago. What does far left Snopes say about it?

{ was likely a privately-made or other local item not authorized by the national campaign. A longtime Clinton aide and 1992 campaign operative stated that this was not an official Clinton-Gore campaign button:}

Privately made and not officially authorized? But wait, you just lied that it was a photoshop job?

Oh, let's do have a chat about social constructs. Is slavery a social construct? Certainly it is; but does that preclude it from being a political issue? Given that the nation fought it's first civil war over the question (queue for you to pull out the old "the Civil War was fought over economics" line), that is a farcical proposition. Is the homosexuality that your party promotes a social construct, or a political issue? You of the fascist left have made a political issue out of a social question

I understand you, you teach lower level college and are never challenged on you partisan nonsense as if you were Moses coming down off Mount Sinai. But here is the deal hack, I have already earned my doctorate, I have no need to reflect back the fabricated nonsense you promote, Back when I was an undergrad I ran into plenty of blowhards like you; I have no tolerance for the type partisan advocacy that is bullied on threat of a grade that you engage in.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
Brainwashed RW idiocy. Dems are Nazi racists. Gotcha. Just because 44% of the party are minorities at the convention. Only ignorant rubes who watch and read bs RW GOP propaganda know the truth...

Yes, the democratic party of today is virtually indistinguishable from the Nazi of 1923. You ran like the little bitch you are when I presented the party platform and asked you to point out where the Nazi platform deviated from the DNC platform of today.

And racist? Are you fucking kidding? Who is the DNC chair? Who was the other possible candidate? Keith "kill whitey" Ellison and Thomas "white just ain't right" Perez?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Pete Seeger was one of my heros...I saw him and Arlo Guthrie in concert several times....I'll never forget it

Most outrageous post of the day was some imbecile claiming that the KKK slayings of the three civil rights workers was by Republicans!!!!


Oh...wait....that was you, wasn't it.

-------------- link?

PC is getting frantic .... and I'm out of popcorn...I hope she brought some more.

Well, Betty and Moronica, let's review the facts.

1. Democrats demanded slavery and segregation. To fight them, Republicans formed their party to fight those iniquities.

2. Violence has always been the default of the Democrats, so they formed the KKK.

3. These three were murdered by KKK Democrats.

4. The imbecile, Coyote, claimed it was Republicans who killed them.

5. The judge appointed by Democrat JFK gave them light sentences.
He was, of course, a Democrat, and KKK sympathizer.

6. Even the Washington Post had to grudgingly admit this: "Although there is some historical link between Democrats and the KKK, ...."

7. Democrats blocked every anti-lynching bill that the Republicans brought to Congress.

8. The Democrat Party has always been, and is to this day, the party of slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.
Arguably one of the most popular Democrats, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.



As is always the case.....everything I post is 100% accurate and correct.



Now...please, remind me.....
I can never remember....which of you is flotsam and which is jetsam?

Can you pass me some popcorn please?

I passed you a looooonnnnnggggg time ago.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Pete Seeger was one of my heros...I saw him and Arlo Guthrie in concert several times....I'll never forget it

Most outrageous post of the day was some imbecile claiming that the KKK slayings of the three civil rights workers was by Republicans!!!!


Oh...wait....that was you, wasn't it.

-------------- link?

PC is getting frantic .... and I'm out of popcorn...I hope she brought some more.

Well, Betty and Moronica, let's review the facts.

1. Democrats demanded slavery and segregation. To fight them, Republicans formed their party to fight those iniquities.

2. Violence has always been the default of the Democrats, so they formed the KKK.

3. These three were murdered by KKK Democrats.

4. The imbecile, Coyote, claimed it was Republicans who killed them.

5. The judge appointed by Democrat JFK gave them light sentences.
He was, of course, a Democrat, and KKK sympathizer.

6. Even the Washington Post had to grudgingly admit this: "Although there is some historical link between Democrats and the KKK, ...."

7. Democrats blocked every anti-lynching bill that the Republicans brought to Congress.

8. The Democrat Party has always been, and is to this day, the party of slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.
Arguably one of the most popular Democrats, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.

As is always the case.....everything I post is 100% accurate and correct.

Whelp --- apparently not. But it is usually fallacious, if not outright jest plain made up.

Let us proceed. Scalpel please.

1. Democrats demanded slavery and segregation. To fight them, Republicans formed their party to fight those iniquities.

Republicans formed their party largely on Abolition, yes. And yet they ran no candidate in the South before or during the Civil War. And when they struck on a successful candidate in 1860, the Democrat pulled exactly the same number of the South's 88 electoral votes as Lincoln did --- Zero. And Lincoln's name wasn't even on a ballot. Douglas, the Democrat, finished fourth winning a total of one, count 'em, one state. And between his defeat and his untimely death a few months later, he worked on Lincoln's behalf to preserve the Union and prevent the Confederacy from happening. Those who wanted slavery gave Douglas zero votes. They had already driven the Democratic convention out of the South.

2. Violence has always been the default of the Democrats, so they formed the KKK.

False. Already documented many times over. Those who actually did form the KKK (both of them) have been named in full. There is no history of political connections for any of them. Period.

The challenge to prove this wrong by showing any such evidence has been on the table in this thread twice, and on this site for literally years. No has yet met it. Which is understandable, since none exists.

3. These three were murdered by KKK Democrats.

4. The imbecile, Coyote, claimed it was Republicans who killed them.

And what I asked you was ---- "link?" And you ran away and tried to obscure the question out of existence with, apparently, appeal to emotion. YOU HAVE NO LINK. You pulled it out of your ass and are thus exposed as a fraud. Next...

5. The judge appointed by Democrat JFK gave them light sentences.
He was, of course, a Democrat, and KKK sympathizer.

Link?
Not a link to the Association Fallacy mind you --- a link to this judge being a "KKK sympathizer".

I imagine it's in the same place.

6. Even the Washington Post had to grudgingly admit this: "Although there is some historical link between Democrats and the KKK, ...."

Geographically, at first.

Then again there's this --- I'll see your historian Eric Foner and raise you another historian, Elaine Franz Parsons

>> "Lifting the Klan mask [19th Century version] revealed a chaotic multitude of antiblack vigilante groups, disgruntled poor white farmers, wartime guerrilla bands, displaced Democratic politicians, illegal whiskey distillers, coercive moral reformers, bored young men, sadists, rapists, white workmen fearful of black competition, employers trying to enforce labor discipline, common thieves, neighbors with decades-old grudges, and even a few freedmen and white Republicans who allied with Democratic whites or had criminal agendas of their own." --- Elaine Frantz Parsons PhD, "Ku Klux: The Birth of the Klan During Reconstruction" (UNC Press) p. 816) <<
​

--- which is FAR more in line with a self-styled social police force that the Klan WAS, rather than the political arm that appears in your self-drawn comic books, since it wasn't politics they were engaged in.

Moreover it's worth noting that Lester, Kennedy, Crowe, McCord, Jones and Reed were all twentysomethings when they formed the Klan, and likely had never been old enough to vote in the preceding elections anyway, not that anyone living in 1865 Tennessee, which was then outside the United States, could vote anyway.

Finally, there's this cute little turdlet (plop plop fizz fizz oh what a deceit it is...)

8. The Democrat Party has always been, and is to this day, the party of slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.
Arguably one of the most popular Democrats, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.

You can "argue" all you like about the ability to read the mind of a party you don't know. I'm sure it will be entertaining. No doubt it includes yet another hackneyed photoshop of a fake campaign button with a Stars & Bars on it. I'm sure these are entertaining in Duh Bubble where reality has no meaning. But here outside of it, I'm afraid Duh Bubble where reality "doesn't count" -- has no meaning. And even if you could read that mind and prove your point valid ----- it would amount to yet another Composition Fallacy. "Person X is a racist; Person X is a Democrat; therefore all Democrats are racists". Funny thing about Composition Fallacies --- you want to count them when the compositor is a Clinton or a Wallace or a Thurmond --- yet when the compositor is a David Duke or a Stetson Kennedy or a D.C Stephenson or an Oscar Underwood --- suddenly the Composition Fallacy fall down go boom and exits the scene wid a quickness.

-- which says much about dishonest argument.

Back in the world of reality though, slavery on the other hand is a social construct --- not a political ideal. It has existed worldwide for thousands of years, on every continent save Antarctica, and in its transatlantic form since the 1530s when Spanish merchants brought about 150 Africans to what is now South Carolina. That's five hundred years ago.

But of course in 1530 it wasn't "South Carolina", because the United States didn't exist yet, and wouldn't exist for another two and a half centuries, and the Democratic party wouldn't be formed for three hundred years (1834*). Yet in the interim slavery -- the African imported version --- existed and flourished throughout the Americas. And while it did in this country, those "night patrols" formed to hunt down escaped slaves and operated for generations---- finally infiltrating the Klan starting in 1866 and giving an organizational structure to what had theretofore been a loose practice of ad hoc posses.

Which brings us full circle.

* and the guy that formed that Democratic Party, Marin van Buren by organizing a loose faction of Jacksonians, was himself an Abolitionist who later ran again for President on the Free Soil ticket.

You're a really slow learner, huh?

Actually you must be a youngster. You don't remember the "days of rage"? Weather Underground"? Sybionese Liberation Army? Leftists have been trying to empower Democrats and overthrow civil society for decades now.
This is nothing new. What is new, and follow me carefully, is media control. The media was first in the hands of Americans and we watched them bomb and burn their way across America. Then they seized control of the media and it seemed to get quiet.
Today we have alternatives to the media so they are exposed again.
And that is the only reason you see it as an uptick. But it is actually what they have been doing all along.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

I was a child at the time and we lived overseas. But I talked with people who remember it at the time and it's nothing like now where the goal isn't to change but to dismantle.

Speaking of overthrowing civil society I am surprised you forget about the efforts from the right...Mississippi burning, blowing up churches, adults attacking children trying to go to school, turning police dogs on civilians
.

Mississippi burning was from the right? Those scumbag democrats were on the RIGHT?

Lie much?

For today's lesson, a trip down Democrat Memory Lane...an anniversary of sorts:

Murder in Mississippi | American Experience - WGBH | PBS



Democrat handiwork.

It seems that two Democrat partisans used emoticons to disagree with the statement that the murders were Democrat handiwork.


Perhaps this will help:

1. Among those found guilty on October 20, 1967, were Klan Imperial Wizard Samuel Bowers, a Democrat KKKer

2 His grandfather was Congressman Eaton J. Bowers, a four-term Democrat Congressman from Mississippi's Gulf Coast.

Bowers explained the Democrat view of life:
Representative Bowers was an explicitly virulent opponent of equality for African Americans. In a speech to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1904, during his freshman term, he said: "Let me say to the gentleman from Massachusetts that it is evident that we have at least two theories as to how the negro should be dealt with. One may be termed his idea of the development by higher education, social equality, and the like, while the other might be dominated [sic] the Southern idea of the absolute segregation of the two races, the fitting the negro for that sphere and station which, based upon an experience born of more than a century's knowledge of him as a slave and nearly forty years' experience with him as a freedman, we believe he can acceptably and worthily fill, with absolute denial of social intercourse and with every restriction on his participation in political affairs and government that is permissible under the Federal Constitution... The restriction of suffrage was the wisest statesmanship ever exhibited in that proud Commonwealth... We have disfranchised not only the ignorant and vicious black but the ignorant and vicious white as well..."
Samuel Bowers - Wikipedia


3. The same political relationship, and view of race relations, will be found with the other KKK murderers.


4. One can sense the very same sentiment here:
Bill Clinton on Obama: 'A Few Years Ago, This Guy Would Have Been Carrying Our Bags'
Bill Clinton on Obama: 'A Few Years Ago, This Guy Would Have Been Carrying Our Bags'


Clinton opined this, wistfully, in 2008.

Brainwashed RW idiocy. Dems are Nazi racists. Gotcha. Just because 44% of the party are minorities at the convention. Only ignorant rubes who watch and read bs RW GOP propaganda know the truth...

Well, Betty and Moronica, let's review the facts.

1. Democrats demanded slavery and segregation. To fight them, Republicans formed their party to fight those iniquities.

2. Violence has always been the default of the Democrats, so they formed the KKK.

3. These three were murdered by KKK Democrats.

4. The imbecile, Coyote, claimed it was Republicans who killed them...post #1872

5. The judge appointed by Democrat JFK gave them light sentences.
He was, of course, a Democrat, and KKK sympathizer.

6. Even the Washington Post had to grudgingly admit this: "Although there is some historical link between Democrats and the KKK, ...."

7. Democrats blocked every anti-lynching bill that the Republicans brought to Congress.

8. The Democrat Party has always been, and is to this day, the party of slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.
Arguably one of the most popular Democrats, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.

Protest outside the 1964 Democratic National Convention; some hold signs with portraits of slain civil rights workers, 24 August 1964
Murders of Chaney, Goodman, and Schwerner - Wikipedia




As is always the case.....everything I post is 100% accurate and correct.



Now...please, remind me.....
I can never remember....which of you is flotsam and which is jetsam?


" Dems are Nazi racists."

You betcha'!!!



In this classroom, we begin by explaining terms.

a. Liberal and Progressive and Democrat are used interchangeably in general parlance...And a 2012 Gallup poll found that 53 percent of Democrats and 39 percent of Americans more generally had a positive reaction to the word socialism.

Democrats, Republicans Diverge on Capitalism, Federal Gov't

Liberals are admitted socialists.

["Liberals care less - Pew divided their sample into different categories across the left-right political spectrum. When asked if respondents “often feel proud to be American,” a majority of strong liberals, 60 percent, said no.
The only group that solidly agreed with the statement was conservatives, ranging from 72 percent to 81 percent."
Stunner: 44 percent not proud to be American | WashingtonExaminer.com]


b. Even Marx admitted that true communism could not come about without revolution. So the statement -- "A communist is a socialist with a gun" can be accepted as a truism.
So....Liberals, Progressives, Socialists = Communists.

c. Nazis, falsely called Rightwing, are National Socialists....hence, Leftwing.
So....So....Liberals, Progressives, Communists, Socialists = Nazis.

d. Since Fascists and Nazis were allies,and basically the same....

...Liberals, Progressives, Communists, Socialists, Democrats.....and Fascists and Nazis...peas in the same pod.