Homosexual Agenda Is Greatest Threat To Liberty

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Here's part 2 of the video exposing Kinsey as a horrific Advocate of the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality.



This one is not quite an Hour... but it really gets down to who and what Alfred Kinsey and the Kinsey Institute is all about.

*Warning: The video below is contains graphic descriptions of the processes that Kinsey used in his 'experiments', and those he contracted for such.

 

[Skylar]

Oh, I am advocating for the children, as all moral people do.

Then consider the harm done to the children of gay parents. As the courts certainly do:

And it humiliates tens of thousands of children now being raised by same-sex couples. The law
in question makes it even more difficult for the children to understand the integrity and closeness of their own family and its concord with other families in their community and in their daily lives....

....DOMA also brings financial harm to children of same sex couples. It raises the cost of health care for familiesby taxing health benefits provided by employers to their workers’ same-sex spouses. And it denies or reduces benefits allowed to families upon the loss of a spouse and parent, benefits that are an integral part of familysecurity. See Social Security Administration, Social Security Survivors Benefits 5 (2012) (benefits available to a surviving spouse caring for the couple’s child), online at http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10084.pdf

Windsor V. US
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-307_6j37.pdf

Its good to remember that there is a tangible cost to demeaning people, to treating them as less, to degrading them. And often that price is paid by their children.

But to deliberately create such circumstances, to put a child in a family that lacks a father or mother by design is just wrong; something that moral people understand, but reprobate, depraved minds miss altogether.

I can see the reasoning of denying a child the love of a parent. But in same sex households, a child isn't denied that love. They have two parents who care for them, emotionally support them, take care of them when they are sick, attend their school plays, walk with them at Halloween.

You know, all the stuff parents everywhere do. And there's nothing 'wrong' or 'depraved' about it.

I think the main reason your ilk are losing the issue in the popular mind is that more and more gays and lesbians are raising families. And their fellow citizens get a chance to know them, know their families, attend their Thanksgivings, exchange Christmas cards, and see how they actually are. And its all rather....unremarkable. Its plain old family life. Just like everyone else.

And when comparing what they actually see of same sex lead families to the melodramatic, hateful descriptions of those who oppose gay marriage and homosexuality.....the warmth and love of family that folks see is far more compelling than some random pronouncement that its 'wrong' or 'depraved' or 'abhorred' or 'evil'.

Letting queers adopt children is more than just an exercise in self delusion, making an unholy union look like a "family", but it also sucks an innocent child into a world of illusion that adults created for themselves to feign legitimacy for their illegitimate behavior.

No more 'illegitimate' that any adoption. Or any IVF or surrogacy for a straight couple. There's nothing depraved about family. About raising your kids. About changing diapers or going to PTA meetings.

Which more and more people are made aware as they come in contact with more and more gay and lesbian couples raise kids. Family is family. And your descriptions don't have anything to do with the reality folks are seeing.

Spend some time with a gay or lesbian couple. They feed their kids the same baby food as everyone else. They're just as sick of their daughter singing 'Let it Go!' as anyone else. They are just as bummed when they have to give up the sexy sedan for the mini-van as anyone else would be.

Its remarkably unremarkable.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Here's part 2 of the video exposing Kinsey as a horrific Advocate of the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality.

What rightwing faggot-hater website did you get this from?

 

[Silhouette]

You have marriage confused with 'right'. It isn't.

The courts disagree, especially the Supreme Court, and it's why you're fucked.

Windsor 2013, the most recent Supreme Court Decision on the specific question of whether or not states get to choose to allow or deny gay marriage, agreed that at its signing, only a small number of states had legal gay marriage.

That is not a disagreement with me. That is an agreement that when it comes to gay marriage, states have the final say until otherwise stated. So far, there has been no other statement upon that specific question of law by The Supreme Court.

And that's why people getting "gay married" in states forced by lower circuit courts to "allow it" (in contempt of Windsor 2013) are "fucked"...because their marriage-licenses are not worth the paper they're written on.

 

[Syriusly]

You mean those who adopt children abandoned by their fine heterosexual parents? You know the only ones really qualified to raise children in the minds of homophobes?

Those are the ones. The war is so over and yet they fight on. It just goes to show how their ideology lacks common sense and they don't have any either. If they did they'd move on and find something else to obsess over, like the evil of women wearing pants or working outside the home.

Or maybe if those who decry the horrors of gay marriage- to 'protect the children'- would actually do something to protect the children.

Like maybe not get divorced. Or abandon their kids. Or kick them out of the house for being gay.

Or maybe just do anything actually for kids- rather than trying to prevent the children of gay parents from having married parents.

Seriously -pretty lame - is that the best you've got ? Gay couples have a much higher rate of "divorce" and go through ridiculously larger amounts of partners in their lifetimes than do mentally healthy heterosexual couples.

And meanwhile back to my point- homosexuals adopt the children abandoned by their heterosexuals parents.

You know the parents you consider the 'real parents'- the fine upstanding heterosexual citizens who create babies then abandon them to society.

When are homophobes like yourself going to actually argue for something for children- and not just use children as a tool to attack homosexuals?

Oh, I am advocating for the children, as all moral people do.

And when a child is deprived of a mother or a father because of death or prison, it's a terrible thing.

But to deliberately create such circumstances, to put a child in a family that lacks a father or mother by design is just wrong; something that moral people understand, but reprobate, depraved minds miss altogether.

Letting queers adopt children is more than just an exercise in self delusion, making an unholy union look like a "family", but it also sucks an innocent child into a world of illusion that adults created for themselves to feign legitimacy for their illegitimate behavior. Children need both a mother and a father, and that doesn't mean a man and another man who kind of acts like a woman. Deprived of this, they are unable to develop psychologically as they would with a mother and father. It's selfish to sculpt a homosexual liaison into what perversely appears to be a "family" for the ego gratification of the adults while entirely dismissing the needs of every child to have an intact mother father home.

So you think leaving children abandoned by the their heterosexual parents, unadopted, is better for the children than allowing them to be adopted by a loving couple who wants to raise those children as their own- who happens to be homosexual?

Do you really hate these children that much? Or just homosexuals?

Facts and Statistics

In the U.S. 397,122 children are living without permanent families in the foster care system. 101,666 of these children are eligible for adoption, but nearly 32% of these children will wait over three years in foster care before being adopted.

Almost 400,000 children abandoned by their heterosexuals parents- 101,000 waiting for adoption- 32,000 will be in foster care over 3 years before being adopted.

To you that is all better than for the children than being adopted by a loving homosexual couple.

In 2012, 23,396 youth aged out of the U.S. foster care system without the emotional and financial support necessary to succeed. Nearly 40% had been homeless or couch surfed, nearly 60% of young men had been convicted of a crime, and only 48% were employed. 75% of women and 33% of men receive government benefits to meet basic needs. 50% of all youth who aged out were involved in substance use and 17% of the females were pregnant.

Thats right- 23,000 kids aging out of the system without any family to support them emotionally or financially.

You believe this too is preferable to those kids being adopted by homosexuals.

I applaud anyone who is brave enough to adopt children and raise them as their own. I know parents how are doing so- and man, they are just superior human beings.

Kids deserve parents. I have no objection to the concept that it would be best for children to have both a mother and a father- but the reality is that children are better off with a parent- or parents- than without them.

We cannot prevent irresponsible heterosexuals from having children and abandoning them. At least when homosexuals attempt to have children- they want those children and the children are brought into homes that welcome them.

There is no guarantee that any parent is going to be a 'fit' parent- but those who want to be parents at least are starting off with the right intentions.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You have marriage confused with 'right'. It isn't.

The courts disagree, especially the Supreme Court, and it's why you're fucked.

Windsor 2013, the most recent Supreme Court Decision on the specific question of whether or not states get to choose to allow or deny gay marriage, agreed that at its signing, only a small number of states had legal gay marriage.

That is not a disagreement with me. That is an agreement that when it comes to gay marriage, states have the final say until otherwise stated. So far, there has been no other statement upon that specific question of law by The Supreme Court.

The court spoke very clearly when it let the will of the voters get tossed and gay marriage stand. How long before you figure that out?

 

[Silhouette]

The court spoke very clearly when it let the will of the voters get tossed and gay marriage stand. How long before you figure that out?

Give me the link, page number & quote from the most recent SCOTUS decision that supports what you just claimed.

 

[Syriusly]

You have marriage confused with 'right'. It isn't.

The courts disagree, especially the Supreme Court, and it's why you're fucked.

Windsor 2013, the most recent Supreme Court Decision on the specific question of whether or not states get to choose to allow or deny gay marriage, agreed that at its signing, only a small number of states had legal gay marriage.

That is not a disagreement with me. That is an agreement that when it comes to gay marriage, states have the final say until otherwise stated. So far, there has been no other statement upon that specific question of law by The Supreme Court.

Once again you are wrong. The Supreme Court has answered that marriage is indeed a right at least three times.

The only thing that the Supreme Court hasn't answered is whether that applies to same gender couples.

Windsor applies only to the Federal government not being able to legislate marriage laws for the states. But Windsor specifically stated that state marriage laws are subject to the Constitution- which is why the Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws at least 3 times. before.

 

[Skylar]

There are to this day people who snicker behind the backs of mixed race married couples.

They, like you, are the real idiots.

The gay lifestyle and aggressive cult is not the same as race.

And yet the arguments against gay marriage are nearly identical to those against interracial marriage.

If you're going to deny someone a fundamental right, you need a good reason. Not simply the power to do so. And denying gays and lesbians the right to marry serves no state interest, it has no rational reason.

That's not good enough.

Remember, Silo....you're motivated by your religion. And to someone who doesn't share your religious beliefs, your argument is meaningless. The courts certainly don't give a shit that 'god said it' is the reason you oppose gays and gay marriage. And this is why you fail: you can't offer a rational or logical argument for why you believe as you do.

All you can do is offer a religious one that only works with people that already think exactly as you do. And is utter nonsense to those that don't.

 

[Skylar]

"Pseudo-masochistic homosexual"

"Alfred Kinsey was interested in having sex with men, children, and animals"

Esther White, direct victim of Alfred Kinsey, says, "He took away my innocence that I didn't even know I had".

Oh, accusations there are in spades. It the evidence to support those accusations where you run into problems.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The court spoke very clearly when it let the will of the voters get tossed and gay marriage stand. How long before you figure that out?

Give me the link, page number & quote from the most recent SCOTUS decision that supports what you just claimed.

Go look up any single sentence they posted saying we decline to hear this appeal. There are several.

High court ruling may lead to gay marriage in 30 states

 

[Skylar]

Hey ****, you've lost at every step but one, and you are about to lose again where this becomes legal in all 50 states. Count on it, it's in the bag.

I don't consider Windsor 2013 "states' choice" on the specific question of gay marriage " a loss". You're so certain SCOTUS will overturn itself in less than 3 years' time? I'm not so sure about that.

On a side note, the cultees are really quite heated in this debate. Something's got them running scared for sure. Maybe the new Congress?...

Well in their defense, they DID just cause the loss of nearly their entire legislative support, in nearly every state and at the Federal Level. And what's more, most of the Leftist replaced were not replaced with Prog Republicans, a majority of those Republicans are Americans.

And there's no Good "homo-news" there...

Which might be relevant if the legislatures were where this issue is being decided. Its the federal judiciary that's deciding the issue. And overwhelmingly, its siding with gay marriage.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Those are the ones. The war is so over and yet they fight on. It just goes to show how their ideology lacks common sense and they don't have any either. If they did they'd move on and find something else to obsess over, like the evil of women wearing pants or working outside the home.

Or maybe if those who decry the horrors of gay marriage- to 'protect the children'- would actually do something to protect the children.

Like maybe not get divorced. Or abandon their kids. Or kick them out of the house for being gay.

Or maybe just do anything actually for kids- rather than trying to prevent the children of gay parents from having married parents.

Seriously -pretty lame - is that the best you've got ? Gay couples have a much higher rate of "divorce" and go through ridiculously larger amounts of partners in their lifetimes than do mentally healthy heterosexual couples.

And meanwhile back to my point- homosexuals adopt the children abandoned by their heterosexuals parents.

You know the parents you consider the 'real parents'- the fine upstanding heterosexual citizens who create babies then abandon them to society.

When are homophobes like yourself going to actually argue for something for children- and not just use children as a tool to attack homosexuals?

Oh, I am advocating for the children, as all moral people do.

And when a child is deprived of a mother or a father because of death or prison, it's a terrible thing.

But to deliberately create such circumstances, to put a child in a family that lacks a father or mother by design is just wrong; something that moral people understand, but reprobate, depraved minds miss altogether.

Letting queers adopt children is more than just an exercise in self delusion, making an unholy union look like a "family", but it also sucks an innocent child into a world of illusion that adults created for themselves to feign legitimacy for their illegitimate behavior. Children need both a mother and a father, and that doesn't mean a man and another man who kind of acts like a woman. Deprived of this, they are unable to develop psychologically as they would with a mother and father. It's selfish to sculpt a homosexual liaison into what perversely appears to be a "family" for the ego gratification of the adults while entirely dismissing the needs of every child to have an intact mother father home.

So you think leaving children abandoned by the their heterosexual parents, unadopted, is better for the children than allowing them to be adopted by a loving couple who wants to raise those children as their own- who happens to be homosexual?

Do you really hate these children that much? Or just homosexuals?

Facts and Statistics

In the U.S. 397,122 children are living without permanent families in the foster care system. 101,666 of these children are eligible for adoption, but nearly 32% of these children will wait over three years in foster care before being adopted.

Almost 400,000 children abandoned by their heterosexuals parents- 101,000 waiting for adoption- 32,000 will be in foster care over 3 years before being adopted.

To you that is all better than for the children than being adopted by a loving homosexual couple.

In 2012, 23,396 youth aged out of the U.S. foster care system without the emotional and financial support necessary to succeed. Nearly 40% had been homeless or couch surfed, nearly 60% of young men had been convicted of a crime, and only 48% were employed. 75% of women and 33% of men receive government benefits to meet basic needs. 50% of all youth who aged out were involved in substance use and 17% of the females were pregnant.

Thats right- 23,000 kids aging out of the system without any family to support them emotionally or financially.

You believe this too is preferable to those kids being adopted by homosexuals.

I applaud anyone who is brave enough to adopt children and raise them as their own. I know parents how are doing so- and man, they are just superior human beings.

Kids deserve parents. I have no objection to the concept that it would be best for children to have both a mother and a father- but the reality is that children are better off with a parent- or parents- than without them.

We cannot prevent irresponsible heterosexuals from having children and abandoning them. At least when homosexuals attempt to have children- they want those children and the children are brought into homes that welcome them.

There is no guarantee that any parent is going to be a 'fit' parent- but those who want to be parents at least are starting off with the right intentions.

No, I think that although less than ideal situations exist for the raising of children, deliberately creating those situations and depriving a child of a mother father home on purpose is wrong.

Gays don't want to wait in line behind legitimate mother/father adoption candidates, they want to be in front of the line, often pushing for an "affirmative action" to give them a greater chance of adopting than a mother and father who want to adopt. This is just wrong.

Your argument is absurd. You claim that because divorce, death, prison, or other factors impose upon some children less than ideal conditions for their upbringing, that justifies creating a deliberate construct that excludes a mother or father that the child needs.

You people are selfish. It isn't about the child, it's about your own egos, wanting to have the appearance of "family" no matter who it hurts.

You are the immoral Left.

 

[Skylar]

Here's part 2 of the video exposing Kinsey as a horrific Advocate of the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality.

What rightwing faggot-hater website did you get this from?

Hey, if youtube said it, it has to be true!

But then, Keyes is a rampant Birther. So you can hardly be surprised that he'll swallow any conspiracy he comes across that says what he wants to believe.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The court spoke very clearly when it let the will of the voters get tossed and gay marriage stand. How long before you figure that out?

Give me the link, page number & quote from the most recent SCOTUS decision that supports what you just claimed.

PMH doesn't debate, she's incapable of it.

 

[Skylar]

The court spoke very clearly when it let the will of the voters get tossed and gay marriage stand. How long before you figure that out?

Give me the link, page number & quote from the most recent SCOTUS decision that supports what you just claimed.

PMH doesn't debate, she's incapable of it.

You're aware that the USSC has preserved *every* ruling overturning gay marriage bans, right? And that the USSC has overturned key provisions in DOMA?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The court spoke very clearly when it let the will of the voters get tossed and gay marriage stand. How long before you figure that out?

Give me the link, page number & quote from the most recent SCOTUS decision that supports what you just claimed.

PMH doesn't debate, she's incapable of it.

Her request is as stupid as you are. They don't have to decide to decide you dumbass. All they have to do is let a lower-court ruling stand, and they have ruled as far as it matters.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Or maybe if those who decry the horrors of gay marriage- to 'protect the children'- would actually do something to protect the children.

Like maybe not get divorced. Or abandon their kids. Or kick them out of the house for being gay.

Or maybe just do anything actually for kids- rather than trying to prevent the children of gay parents from having married parents.

Seriously -pretty lame - is that the best you've got ? Gay couples have a much higher rate of "divorce" and go through ridiculously larger amounts of partners in their lifetimes than do mentally healthy heterosexual couples.

And meanwhile back to my point- homosexuals adopt the children abandoned by their heterosexuals parents.

You know the parents you consider the 'real parents'- the fine upstanding heterosexual citizens who create babies then abandon them to society.

When are homophobes like yourself going to actually argue for something for children- and not just use children as a tool to attack homosexuals?

Oh, I am advocating for the children, as all moral people do.

And when a child is deprived of a mother or a father because of death or prison, it's a terrible thing.

But to deliberately create such circumstances, to put a child in a family that lacks a father or mother by design is just wrong; something that moral people understand, but reprobate, depraved minds miss altogether.

Letting queers adopt children is more than just an exercise in self delusion, making an unholy union look like a "family", but it also sucks an innocent child into a world of illusion that adults created for themselves to feign legitimacy for their illegitimate behavior. Children need both a mother and a father, and that doesn't mean a man and another man who kind of acts like a woman. Deprived of this, they are unable to develop psychologically as they would with a mother and father. It's selfish to sculpt a homosexual liaison into what perversely appears to be a "family" for the ego gratification of the adults while entirely dismissing the needs of every child to have an intact mother father home.

So you think leaving children abandoned by the their heterosexual parents, unadopted, is better for the children than allowing them to be adopted by a loving couple who wants to raise those children as their own- who happens to be homosexual?

Do you really hate these children that much? Or just homosexuals?

Facts and Statistics

In the U.S. 397,122 children are living without permanent families in the foster care system. 101,666 of these children are eligible for adoption, but nearly 32% of these children will wait over three years in foster care before being adopted.

Almost 400,000 children abandoned by their heterosexuals parents- 101,000 waiting for adoption- 32,000 will be in foster care over 3 years before being adopted.

To you that is all better than for the children than being adopted by a loving homosexual couple.

In 2012, 23,396 youth aged out of the U.S. foster care system without the emotional and financial support necessary to succeed. Nearly 40% had been homeless or couch surfed, nearly 60% of young men had been convicted of a crime, and only 48% were employed. 75% of women and 33% of men receive government benefits to meet basic needs. 50% of all youth who aged out were involved in substance use and 17% of the females were pregnant.

Thats right- 23,000 kids aging out of the system without any family to support them emotionally or financially.

You believe this too is preferable to those kids being adopted by homosexuals.

I applaud anyone who is brave enough to adopt children and raise them as their own. I know parents how are doing so- and man, they are just superior human beings.

Kids deserve parents. I have no objection to the concept that it would be best for children to have both a mother and a father- but the reality is that children are better off with a parent- or parents- than without them.

We cannot prevent irresponsible heterosexuals from having children and abandoning them. At least when homosexuals attempt to have children- they want those children and the children are brought into homes that welcome them.

There is no guarantee that any parent is going to be a 'fit' parent- but those who want to be parents at least are starting off with the right intentions.

No, I think that although less than ideal situations exist for the raising of children, deliberately creating those situations and depriving a child of a mother father home on purpose is wrong.

Gays don't want to wait in line behind legitimate mother/father adoption candidates, they want to be in front of the line, often pushing for an "affirmative action" to give them a greater chance of adopting than a mother and father who want to adopt. This is just wrong.

Your argument is absurd. You claim that because divorce, death, prison, or other factors impose upon some children less than ideal conditions for their upbringing, that justifies creating a deliberate construct that excludes a mother or father that the child needs.

You people are selfish. It isn't about the child, it's about your own egos, wanting to have the appearance of "family" no matter who it hurts.

You are the immoral Left.

What they are, is sociopaths. Again... the Homosexual mind is a disordered mind; a sick mind, reasoning outside the norm of human reasoning.

Thus it follows that people so afflicted, would be inclined to advocate for behavior which also deviates from normality.

And in that, you have the making of the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Here's part 2 of the video exposing Kinsey as a horrific Advocate of the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality.

What rightwing faggot-hater website did you get this from?

Hey, if youtube said it, it has to be true!

But then, Keyes is a rampant Birther. So you can hardly be surprised that he'll swallow any conspiracy he comes across that says what he wants to believe.

Obama has not been able to prove his eligibility to be president via a genuine, unforged long form birth certificate.

That's not a conspiracy, that's a fact.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Here's part 2 of the video exposing Kinsey as a horrific Advocate of the Normalization of Sexual Abnormality.

What rightwing faggot-hater website did you get this from?

Hey, if youtube said it, it has to be true!

But then, Keyes is a rampant Birther. So you can hardly be surprised that he'll swallow any conspiracy he comes across that says what he wants to believe.

Obama has not been able to prove his eligibility to be president via a genuine, unforged long form birth certificate.

That's not a conspiracy, that's a fact.

Even Ann Coulter gave that bullshit up long ago. When even Coulter is ahead of you you are way too fucking far behind.