House Votes To Overturn Obama Rule Restricting Gun Sales To the Severely Mentally Ill

even over in england the Queen and 'tony blair' carry guns or have taxpayer paid bodygyards that carry guns to protect the Eltes Coyote
 
More like, now senior citizens can defend themselves from nutjobs despite minor infirmities.
Infirmities so minor they cannot take care of themselves. These are people who drool on themselves and wander off naked and make the local news.

"Please help us find this old man who doesn't even know his own name. Approach with caution. He's armed."

Those people are under a conservatorship . Their gun rights are restricted under different rules. This law is designed to deprive someone of their rights because they let someone else pay their bills.

This rule is The Black Thug Protection Act keeping home invasion and the knock out game safe.
 
This is seriously fucked up.


House Votes To Overturn Obama Rule Restricting Gun Sales To the Severely Mentally Ill

According to NPR's Susan Davis, the measure being blocked from implementation would have required the Social Security Administration to send records of some beneficiaries with severe mental disabilities to the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System. About 75,000 people found mentally incapable of managing their financial affairs would have been affected.



The National Rifle Association had pushed for the repeal, and Republicans argued it infringed upon Second Amendment rights by denying due process.


Supporters of the rule argued it was designed to stop mentally ill persons from getting firearms.


"The House charged ahead with an extreme, hastily written, one-sided measure that would make the American people less safe," Rep. Elizabeth Esty, D-Conn., said, according to The Hill. Esty represents Newtown, Conn., where a mentally ill man shot and killed 20 six- and seven-year-olds and six adults.

But remember, their argument is "Gun's Don't Kill" ..yeah right!

My neighbor of 18 years wife left him , police were suppose to collect the gun from him because he was mentally unstable...well some how he got a gun and murdered his 24 year old son visiting him...he tried to get his daughter to visit the same night..
He then killed himself.

These fuc*#ing paid off people passing laws are making millions from the NRA I am sure...
But remember, their argument is "Gun's Don't Kill" ..yeah right!
u realize you say that and then go on and back it up? Lol

You just love that little smiley face icon....

captain_crabby_pants_tshirt_d235558946127871348czwn_210.jpg
:huddle:
 
More evidence the NRA is a terrorist organization, and the fools who posted #2 & #3 above who enable the NRA to put profit over the people.
statists look for any reason to take away ones liberties.

Should criminals have guns?
Should children have guns?

Depending on the crime...

Should someone that has a history of violence be allow to own a firearm?

Most likely not... But someone that was nonviolent it depends the firearm like long rifle I have no problem with them owning one.

As for kids it depend the age.

I have own shotguns since my twenties...
 
More evidence the NRA is a terrorist organization, and the fools who posted #2 & #3 above who enable the NRA to put profit over the people.
statists look for any reason to take away ones liberties.

Should criminals have guns?
Should children have guns?

Depending on the crime...

Should someone that has a history of violence be allow to own a firearm?

Most likely not... But someone that was nonviolent it depends the firearm like long rifle I have no problem with them owning one.

As for kids it depend the age.

I have own shotguns since my twenties...
Hey bruce! Ya shady ass mf'er
 
This is seriously fucked up.


House Votes To Overturn Obama Rule Restricting Gun Sales To the Severely Mentally Ill

According to NPR's Susan Davis, the measure being blocked from implementation would have required the Social Security Administration to send records of some beneficiaries with severe mental disabilities to the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System. About 75,000 people found mentally incapable of managing their financial affairs would have been affected.



The National Rifle Association had pushed for the repeal, and Republicans argued it infringed upon Second Amendment rights by denying due process.


Supporters of the rule argued it was designed to stop mentally ill persons from getting firearms.


"The House charged ahead with an extreme, hastily written, one-sided measure that would make the American people less safe," Rep. Elizabeth Esty, D-Conn., said, according to The Hill. Esty represents Newtown, Conn., where a mentally ill man shot and killed 20 six- and seven-year-olds and six adults.
Oh, that will work so well.


Let's put more guns in the hands of severely mentally ill, and then more guns into the hands of the general populace so they can kill them and solve the problem.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ nothing to do with putting more guns in the hands of the adjudacated mentally ill . Its about Taking guns from those that are being Called mentally ill with no proof Coyote .


Is it?

Here's what the article said:
According to NPR's Susan Davis, the measure being blocked from implementation would have required the Social Security Administration to send records of some beneficiaries with severe mental disabilities to the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System. About 75,000 people found mentally incapable of managing their financial affairs would have been affected.

If they are claiming social security for mental disabilities then that's either proof or fraud.
The SSA has no idea who is severely mentally ill. NPR is lying. The SSA has no idea of who has been found mentally incapable of managing their finances. The SSA does not keep those kinds of records and doesn't know. What the SSA does know is where the checks are sent and who the payee is. An older person might like to travel and allows an adult child to pay recurring bills or might have a financial advisor. That's who this law affects.

The SSA doesn't even know when someone dies, you think they will know who is mentally ill.
 
Gun control advocates lose in court and at the ballot box so they lie and scheme to erode our 2nd Amendment rights. Fortunately we are whooping their ass! :Boom2:
 
Welcome to America where you can be found mentally incompetent of handling YOUR MONEY but you can still get a gun.
Just remember that next time you try to rob a senior citizen.

This ruling had nothing to do with senior citizens. They could be crazier than a shithouse rat and Social Security would never know. The only way they would be a member of the "class" of people would be if their loved ones had initiated an action proclaiming them incompetent.

This ruling mostly applies to mentally disabled collecting SSI. They are not elderly. It has been determined that they cannot work, and they have contributed so little to Social Security that they can't collect disability. The 23 year old mentally challenged individual that holds a "completion certificate" instead of a HS diploma. Never had a job, lives at home with Mom. Not capable of making a purchase at a convenience store without assistance. But lets go ahead and allow him the ability to stroll up to the counter at a pawn shop and stroll out with an AR-15.

Beam me up Scottie, there is no intelligent life here.
 
This is seriously fucked up.


House Votes To Overturn Obama Rule Restricting Gun Sales To the Severely Mentally Ill

According to NPR's Susan Davis, the measure being blocked from implementation would have required the Social Security Administration to send records of some beneficiaries with severe mental disabilities to the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System. About 75,000 people found mentally incapable of managing their financial affairs would have been affected.



The National Rifle Association had pushed for the repeal, and Republicans argued it infringed upon Second Amendment rights by denying due process.


Supporters of the rule argued it was designed to stop mentally ill persons from getting firearms.


"The House charged ahead with an extreme, hastily written, one-sided measure that would make the American people less safe," Rep. Elizabeth Esty, D-Conn., said, according to The Hill. Esty represents Newtown, Conn., where a mentally ill man shot and killed 20 six- and seven-year-olds and six adults.
Oh, that will work so well.


Let's put more guns in the hands of severely mentally ill, and then more guns into the hands of the general populace so they can kill them and solve the problem.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ nothing to do with putting more guns in the hands of the adjudacated mentally ill . Its about Taking guns from those that are being Called mentally ill with no proof Coyote .


Is it?

Here's what the article said:
According to NPR's Susan Davis, the measure being blocked from implementation would have required the Social Security Administration to send records of some beneficiaries with severe mental disabilities to the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System. About 75,000 people found mentally incapable of managing their financial affairs would have been affected.

If they are claiming social security for mental disabilities then that's either proof or fraud.
The SSA has no idea who is severely mentally ill. NPR is lying. The SSA has no idea of who has been found mentally incapable of managing their finances. The SSA does not keep those kinds of records and doesn't know. What the SSA does know is where the checks are sent and who the payee is. An older person might like to travel and allows an adult child to pay recurring bills or might have a financial advisor. That's who this law affects.

The SSA doesn't even know when someone dies, you think they will know who is mentally ill.

Yes they do if they are claiming SS benefits for disabilities that are mental.
 
Welcome to America where you can be found mentally incompetent of handling YOUR MONEY but you can still get a gun.
Just remember that next time you try to rob a senior citizen.

This ruling had nothing to do with senior citizens. They could be crazier than a shithouse rat and Social Security would never know. The only way they would be a member of the "class" of people would be if their loved ones had initiated an action proclaiming them incompetent.

This ruling mostly applies to mentally disabled collecting SSI. They are not elderly. It has been determined that they cannot work, and they have contributed so little to Social Security that they can't collect disability. The 23 year old mentally challenged individual that holds a "completion certificate" instead of a HS diploma. Never had a job, lives at home with Mom. Not capable of making a purchase at a convenience store without assistance. But lets go ahead and allow him the ability to stroll up to the counter at a pawn shop and stroll out with an AR-15.

Beam me up Scottie, there is no intelligent life here.
If he can't make 'a purchase at a convenience store without assistance' I suspect he would be equally incapable of purchasing a gun at a pawn shop without assistance.
 
This is seriously fucked up.


House Votes To Overturn Obama Rule Restricting Gun Sales To the Severely Mentally Ill

According to NPR's Susan Davis, the measure being blocked from implementation would have required the Social Security Administration to send records of some beneficiaries with severe mental disabilities to the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System. About 75,000 people found mentally incapable of managing their financial affairs would have been affected.



The National Rifle Association had pushed for the repeal, and Republicans argued it infringed upon Second Amendment rights by denying due process.


Supporters of the rule argued it was designed to stop mentally ill persons from getting firearms.


"The House charged ahead with an extreme, hastily written, one-sided measure that would make the American people less safe," Rep. Elizabeth Esty, D-Conn., said, according to The Hill. Esty represents Newtown, Conn., where a mentally ill man shot and killed 20 six- and seven-year-olds and six adults.
Oh, that will work so well.


Let's put more guns in the hands of severely mentally ill, and then more guns into the hands of the general populace so they can kill them and solve the problem.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ nothing to do with putting more guns in the hands of the adjudacated mentally ill . Its about Taking guns from those that are being Called mentally ill with no proof Coyote .


Is it?

Here's what the article said:
According to NPR's Susan Davis, the measure being blocked from implementation would have required the Social Security Administration to send records of some beneficiaries with severe mental disabilities to the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System. About 75,000 people found mentally incapable of managing their financial affairs would have been affected.

If they are claiming social security for mental disabilities then that's either proof or fraud.
The SSA has no idea who is severely mentally ill. NPR is lying. The SSA has no idea of who has been found mentally incapable of managing their finances. The SSA does not keep those kinds of records and doesn't know. What the SSA does know is where the checks are sent and who the payee is. An older person might like to travel and allows an adult child to pay recurring bills or might have a financial advisor. That's who this law affects.

The SSA doesn't even know when someone dies, you think they will know who is mentally ill.

Of course Social Security knows who has been determined incompetent to handle their finances. They are among the first to be notified. The payee has to change to at least an FBO, special custodial accounts have to be set up, quarterly reports have to be filed. I mean good God Almighty, do you righties ever pull your head out of your ass long enough to take a breath?
 
Welcome to America where you can be found mentally incompetent of handling YOUR MONEY but you can still get a gun.
Just remember that next time you try to rob a senior citizen.

This ruling had nothing to do with senior citizens. They could be crazier than a shithouse rat and Social Security would never know. The only way they would be a member of the "class" of people would be if their loved ones had initiated an action proclaiming them incompetent.

This ruling mostly applies to mentally disabled collecting SSI. They are not elderly. It has been determined that they cannot work, and they have contributed so little to Social Security that they can't collect disability. The 23 year old mentally challenged individual that holds a "completion certificate" instead of a HS diploma. Never had a job, lives at home with Mom. Not capable of making a purchase at a convenience store without assistance. But lets go ahead and allow him the ability to stroll up to the counter at a pawn shop and stroll out with an AR-15.

Beam me up Scottie, there is no intelligent life here.
If he can't make 'a purchase at a convenience store without assistance' I suspect he would be equally incapable of purchasing a gun at a pawn shop without assistance.

Ayep, and there are plenty of gun shop owners willing to lend a hand.
 
Welcome to America where you can be found mentally incompetent of handling YOUR MONEY but you can still get a gun.
Just remember that next time you try to rob a senior citizen.

This ruling had nothing to do with senior citizens. They could be crazier than a shithouse rat and Social Security would never know. The only way they would be a member of the "class" of people would be if their loved ones had initiated an action proclaiming them incompetent.

This ruling mostly applies to mentally disabled collecting SSI. They are not elderly. It has been determined that they cannot work, and they have contributed so little to Social Security that they can't collect disability. The 23 year old mentally challenged individual that holds a "completion certificate" instead of a HS diploma. Never had a job, lives at home with Mom. Not capable of making a purchase at a convenience store without assistance. But lets go ahead and allow him the ability to stroll up to the counter at a pawn shop and stroll out with an AR-15.

Beam me up Scottie, there is no intelligent life here.
...except most on SS are elderly so let's not sweep it aside. When was the last time you bought an AR? Or gun, period? You can only walk out with a gun if you passed the NCIS check and here you'd need a CCW permit or you'd have awaiting period. That's true for most states.

But you missed the point, no one wants the truly insane to be armed, it's just that there's much better ways to go about it. A relative calling in a concern shouldn't do it.
 
Oh, that will work so well.


Let's put more guns in the hands of severely mentally ill, and then more guns into the hands of the general populace so they can kill them and solve the problem.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ nothing to do with putting more guns in the hands of the adjudacated mentally ill . Its about Taking guns from those that are being Called mentally ill with no proof Coyote .


Is it?

Here's what the article said:
According to NPR's Susan Davis, the measure being blocked from implementation would have required the Social Security Administration to send records of some beneficiaries with severe mental disabilities to the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System. About 75,000 people found mentally incapable of managing their financial affairs would have been affected.

If they are claiming social security for mental disabilities then that's either proof or fraud.
The SSA has no idea who is severely mentally ill. NPR is lying. The SSA has no idea of who has been found mentally incapable of managing their finances. The SSA does not keep those kinds of records and doesn't know. What the SSA does know is where the checks are sent and who the payee is. An older person might like to travel and allows an adult child to pay recurring bills or might have a financial advisor. That's who this law affects.

The SSA doesn't even know when someone dies, you think they will know who is mentally ill.

Of course Social Security knows who has been determined incompetent to handle their finances. They are among the first to be notified. The payee has to change to at least an FBO, special custodial accounts have to be set up, quarterly reports have to be filed. I mean good God Almighty, do you righties ever pull your head out of your ass long enough to take a breath?
So no SS fraud out there?
LOL@libtards!
 
Welcome to America where you can be found mentally incompetent of handling YOUR MONEY but you can still get a gun.
Just remember that next time you try to rob a senior citizen.

This ruling had nothing to do with senior citizens. They could be crazier than a shithouse rat and Social Security would never know. The only way they would be a member of the "class" of people would be if their loved ones had initiated an action proclaiming them incompetent.

This ruling mostly applies to mentally disabled collecting SSI. They are not elderly. It has been determined that they cannot work, and they have contributed so little to Social Security that they can't collect disability. The 23 year old mentally challenged individual that holds a "completion certificate" instead of a HS diploma. Never had a job, lives at home with Mom. Not capable of making a purchase at a convenience store without assistance. But lets go ahead and allow him the ability to stroll up to the counter at a pawn shop and stroll out with an AR-15.

Beam me up Scottie, there is no intelligent life here.
...except most on SS are elderly so let's not sweep it aside. When was the last time you bought an AR? Or gun, period? You can only walk out with a gun if you passed the NCIS check and here you'd need a CCW permit or you'd have awaiting period. That's true for most states.

But you missed the point, no one wants the truly insane to be armed, it's just that there's much better ways to go about it. A relative calling in a concern shouldn't do it.

That's irrelevant. They wouldn't be affected just by being elderly. Age has nothing to do with it. From the OP: records of some beneficiaries with severe mental disabilities
 
I was worried that the man down the street, who abuses his wife because he is suffering from dementia, and thinks that she is trying to poison him, would not be able to purchase a gun. After all, she has called the cops to come out three times, and who could blame the man for being a little paranoid, since he thinks that they are N. Korea soldiers who are still chasing him since 1953. Now, the republicans have given him his rights back. Thanks, GOP! Luckily, I am with the Sheriff's Auxiliary, and not a deputy, and we don't respond to domestic violence calls.
 
Two threads on same topic are now merged into one.
 

Forum List

Back
Top