How about some examples of this “socialism” stuff y’all are afraid of?

Well lets see do we have Americans leaving Americas capitalist society to go to socialist nations .hummm odd its really not a issue is it. I suggeat you move to Venezuela or Cuba try it out for a few months
You picked 2 extreme communist countries...why cant you pick, denmark, sweden, Switzerland. Canada,.Qatar and a long lost of countries where governments take care of their citizens and dont jand all their budget to defense contractors..
Because they are hardly anymore socialist than the United States. When you morons are talking about socialism, why can't you use an actual socialist country as an example?

Danish PM in US: Denmark is not socialist
Is what you cons like to call those countries that have extensive social welfare programs....Let me tell you something, I know those countries and i know the US very well, you guys here are fucked in the ass...they take your money spend it on Mars missions, warfare, defense contractors, secret service and other bullshit...and when it comes to health care and welfare they show you Venezuela.....trust me dude, you are raped beyond believe and you don't know it.

That’s weird...you forgot to mention the amount we spend on illegal Wetbacks and Ragheads.
The US makes more off of them. Shut up racist.

NEGATIVE....
This issue is played the fuck out...Wetbacks suck the American taxpayer tit like nobody else does...a known FACT.
 
Last edited:
You picked 2 extreme communist countries...why cant you pick, denmark, sweden, Switzerland. Canada,.Qatar and a long lost of countries where governments take care of their citizens and dont jand all their budget to defense contractors..
Because they are hardly anymore socialist than the United States. When you morons are talking about socialism, why can't you use an actual socialist country as an example?

Danish PM in US: Denmark is not socialist
Is what you cons like to call those countries that have extensive social welfare programs....Let me tell you something, I know those countries and i know the US very well, you guys here are fucked in the ass...they take your money spend it on Mars missions, warfare, defense contractors, secret service and other bullshit...and when it comes to health care and welfare they show you Venezuela.....trust me dude, you are raped beyond believe and you don't know it.

That’s weird...you forgot to mention the amount we spend on illegal Wetbacks and Ragheads.
The US makes more off of them. Shut up racist.

NEGATIVE....
This issue is played the fuck out...Wetbacks suck the American taxpayer tit like nobody else does...a know FACT.
Defense contractors, white trash suck a lot more.
 
I get it...I’m a talk radio nut. Cool, now enlighten us on how your life changes when your neighbors wealth grows and yours doesn’t.
This should be simple for you...no?
I don't know that it does.

But don't let that stop your little talking points.
.

Hold on a minute...we’re in the midldle of discussing the “talking point” fostered by the “I hate rich people crowd”.....You really can’t explain it can you? Yet you jump right in line ready to lynch the rich?
There are legitimate reasons for controlling wealth inequalities and there are illegitimate reasons for controlling wealth inequalities.

I wonder if that makes any sense to someone like you, on any level, whatsoever.
.
There really are no legitimate reasons for the government to engage in income redistribution.

The real reason for such policies is envy. That is simply indisputable.
From your hardcore right wing partisan perspective, yes.
.
You mean from the standpoint of knowing the facts. What is the justification for income redistribution - theft, that is?
 
Hold on a minute...we’re in the midldle of discussing the “talking point” fostered by the “I hate rich people crowd”.....You really can’t explain it can you? Yet you jump right in line ready to lynch the rich?
There are legitimate reasons for controlling wealth inequalities and there are illegitimate reasons for controlling wealth inequalities.

I wonder if that makes any sense to someone like you, on any level, whatsoever.
.
There really are no legitimate reasons for the government to engage in income redistribution.

The real reason for such policies is envy. That is simply indisputable.
From your hardcore right wing partisan perspective, yes.
.

This isn’t the partisan / bipartisan issue you want it to be....this is simply a begging bottom feeder vs. productive citizen thing....you can’t dare admit that though. We totally get it.
My goodness, it must be nice living in such a simplistic, shallow reality.

One or the other. This or that. Up or down. All or nothing.

Sometimes I kind of envy such child-like worldviews. But only for a moment.
.
What is your nuanced view of consuming Potassium Cyanide?
 
according to a survey by Save The Children, Nordic countries are the best at caring for the mother's well-being while the US ranked 33rd. Freeing up children from dependency on a rigged system frees them up to care for their parents, something that is unthinkable in the US, where children are dependent on their parents forever.
In Europe it's common for people to live with their parents until they are in their 30s. You obviously don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
 
I don't know that it does.

But don't let that stop your little talking points.
.

Hold on a minute...we’re in the midldle of discussing the “talking point” fostered by the “I hate rich people crowd”.....You really can’t explain it can you? Yet you jump right in line ready to lynch the rich?
There are legitimate reasons for controlling wealth inequalities and there are illegitimate reasons for controlling wealth inequalities.

I wonder if that makes any sense to someone like you, on any level, whatsoever.
.
There really are no legitimate reasons for the government to engage in income redistribution.

The real reason for such policies is envy. That is simply indisputable.
From your hardcore right wing partisan perspective, yes.
.
You mean from the standpoint of knowing the facts. What is the justification for income redistribution - theft, that is?
Absolutely. Each tribe has convinced themselves they deal only in facts and have The Truth on their side.

I think you've really nailed it.
.
 
There are legitimate reasons for controlling wealth inequalities and there are illegitimate reasons for controlling wealth inequalities.

I wonder if that makes any sense to someone like you, on any level, whatsoever.
.
There really are no legitimate reasons for the government to engage in income redistribution.

The real reason for such policies is envy. That is simply indisputable.
From your hardcore right wing partisan perspective, yes.
.

This isn’t the partisan / bipartisan issue you want it to be....this is simply a begging bottom feeder vs. productive citizen thing....you can’t dare admit that though. We totally get it.
My goodness, it must be nice living in such a simplistic, shallow reality.

One or the other. This or that. Up or down. All or nothing.

Sometimes I kind of envy such child-like worldviews. But only for a moment.
.
What is your nuanced view of consuming Potassium Cyanide?
Can't think of anything other than don't consume Potassium Cyanide, for sure.

Wait a minute...

Gosh! That must mean that there is only one way to do or think about something in every situation! And it MUST be YOUR way!

You have really opened my eyes!

Thank you so much!
.
 
There really are no legitimate reasons for the government to engage in income redistribution.

The real reason for such policies is envy. That is simply indisputable.
From your hardcore right wing partisan perspective, yes.
.

This isn’t the partisan / bipartisan issue you want it to be....this is simply a begging bottom feeder vs. productive citizen thing....you can’t dare admit that though. We totally get it.
My goodness, it must be nice living in such a simplistic, shallow reality.

One or the other. This or that. Up or down. All or nothing.

Sometimes I kind of envy such child-like worldviews. But only for a moment.
.
What is your nuanced view of consuming Potassium Cyanide?
Can't think of anything other than don't consume Potassium Cyanide, for sure.

Wait a minute...

Gosh! That must mean that there is only one way to do or think about something in every situation! And it MUST be YOUR way!

You have really opened my eyes!

Thank you so much!
.
You belief that a "nuanced view" is the preferred way to consider every situation is obviously wrong.
 
From your hardcore right wing partisan perspective, yes.
.

This isn’t the partisan / bipartisan issue you want it to be....this is simply a begging bottom feeder vs. productive citizen thing....you can’t dare admit that though. We totally get it.
My goodness, it must be nice living in such a simplistic, shallow reality.

One or the other. This or that. Up or down. All or nothing.

Sometimes I kind of envy such child-like worldviews. But only for a moment.
.
What is your nuanced view of consuming Potassium Cyanide?
Can't think of anything other than don't consume Potassium Cyanide, for sure.

Wait a minute...

Gosh! That must mean that there is only one way to do or think about something in every situation! And it MUST be YOUR way!

You have really opened my eyes!

Thank you so much!
.
You belief that a "nuanced view" is the preferred way to consider every situation is obviously wrong.
I just demonstrated that your claim is not the case.

Absolutely, positively, don't drink potassium cyanide, dammit.

But the large political issues are indeed nuanced, whether talk radio admits that to its flock or not.
.
 
Cons seem to love tagging everything they don’t like as “socialism “ . The word has lost all meaning .

How about some real life examples of American socialism? And how it’s hurt us .

I’ll give you an example : US socialism going waaaay back to the 1800s . When the gov purchased and then opened up the west and gave away land to Americans.
Well lets see do we have Americans leaving Americas capitalist society to go to socialist nations .hummm odd its really not a issue is it. I suggeat you move to Venezuela or Cuba try it out for a few months
You picked 2 extreme communist countries...why cant you pick, denmark, sweden, Switzerland. Canada,.Qatar and a long lost of countries where governments take care of their citizens and dont jand all their budget to defense contractors..
Because they are hardly anymore socialist than the United States. When you morons are talking about socialism, why can't you use an actual socialist country as an example?

Danish PM in US: Denmark is not socialist
Is what you cons like to call those countries that have extensive social welfare programs....Let me tell you something, I know those countries and i know the US very well, you guys here are fucked in the ass...they take your money spend it on Mars missions, warfare, defense contractors, secret service and other bullshit...and when it comes to health care and welfare they show you Venezuela.....trust me dude, you are raped beyond believe and you don't know it.

You don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. As an admitted mooslum whose religion was created by the catholic church? You are the last one to be sharing life lessons, dipshit. Socialism requires those that work to pay through the nose in taxes. Get a fucking job and quit being a parasite.
 
socialism.png

Guess we are all socialists!!!!!
 
Cons seem to love tagging everything they don’t like as “socialism “ . The word has lost all meaning .

How about some real life examples of American socialism? And how it’s hurt us .

I’ll give you an example : US socialism going waaaay back to the 1800s . When the gov purchased and then opened up the west and gave away land to Americans.
You clearly don’t know what socialism is
 
The post office and the sewer pipes are socialism see what are you so scared of

e012f1d849d6794e64b45a7aa236bdc5_400x400.jpeg


Classical liberals argued for what they called a minimal state, limited to the following functions:

  • A government to protect individual rights and to provide services that cannot be provided in a free market.
  • A common national defense to provide protection against foreign invaders.
  • Laws to provide protection for citizens from wrongs committed against them by other citizens, which included protection of private property, enforcement of contracts and common law.
  • Building and maintaining public institutions.
  • Public works that included a stable currency, standard weights and measures and building and upkeep of roads, canals, harbors, railways, communications and postal services.
Modern so called "liberal" are nothing but totalitarian ass wipes who want us to eat bugs instead of burgers .

racists! if ya shut down the meat packing plants where are all the illegals gonna work ?...eh
 

What does that mean?
That’s not really a secret, wealth inequality exists...especially in utopian Liberal shitholes like Loon York and Mexifornia. Weird huh?
But tell us how your neighbor having more than you changes your life?
What it comes down to is if they have so much wealth, why are we doing so much to help them increase and maintain it?
We aren't doing jack for the rich, moron.

You missed the Golden Rule Finger Boy

He who has the Gold, makes the Rules

Got to be a trust fund baby, nobody can possibly be that obtuse.
 
Cons seem to love tagging everything they don’t like as “socialism “ . The word has lost all meaning .

How about some real life examples of American socialism? And how it’s hurt us .

I’ll give you an example : US socialism going waaaay back to the 1800s . When the gov purchased and then opened up the west and gave away land to Americans.


SCARY, SCARY SOCIALISM

Paul Krugman on how Republicans are dusting off the socialist boogeyman.
New York Times

In 1961, America faced what conservatives considered a mortal threat: calls for a national health insurance program covering senior citizens. In an attempt to avert this awful fate, the American Medical Association launched what it called Operation Coffee Cup, a pioneering attempt at viral marketing.

Here’s how it worked: Doctors’ wives (hey, it was 1961) were asked to invite their friends over and play them a recording in which Ronald Reagan explained that socialized medicine would destroy American freedom. The housewives, in turn, were supposed to write letters to Congress denouncing the menace of Medicare.

Those Ronald Reagan recordings, if you haven’t heard them, are kind of amazing—in a sort of Joe McCarthy, holy s#!t way. Over the course of several years in the late 50s and 60s, Reagan did a kind of extended road show, working on what amounted to a stage act for conservatism. He tried it out at factories, and at civic organizations, and at county fairs. And by the time he was ready to run for governor of California, he had the patter down well enough to make giving someone a dime for cup of coffee sound like high treason. When you think that Republicans today couldn’t go any lower, look up Reagan’s recordings and see where they started.

Obviously the strategy didn’t work; Medicare not only came into existence, but it became so popular that these days Republicans routinely (and falsely) accuse Democrats of planning to cut the program’s funding. But the strategy — claiming that any attempt to strengthen the social safety net or limit inequality will put us on a slippery slope to totalitarianism — endures.

And so it was that Donald Trump, in his State of the Union address, briefly turned from his usual warnings about scary brown people to warnings about the threat from socialism.

What do Trump’s people, or conservatives in general, mean by “socialism”? The answer is, it depends.

Krugman gives a good baseline definition of what Republicans consider socialism now — which isn’t much different from the rant Reagan was selling fifty-some years ago. But don’t worry, by 2020 socialism will encompass breathing. Hey! Did you pay for that air, commie?
 
There are legitimate reasons for controlling wealth inequalities and there are illegitimate reasons for controlling wealth inequalities.

I wonder if that makes any sense to someone like you, on any level, whatsoever.
.
There really are no legitimate reasons for the government to engage in income redistribution.

The real reason for such policies is envy. That is simply indisputable.
From your hardcore right wing partisan perspective, yes.
.

This isn’t the partisan / bipartisan issue you want it to be....this is simply a begging bottom feeder vs. productive citizen thing....you can’t dare admit that though. We totally get it.
My goodness, it must be nice living in such a simplistic, shallow reality.

One or the other. This or that. Up or down. All or nothing.

Sometimes I kind of envy such child-like worldviews. But only for a moment.
.

There’s nothing child-like about it...It’s actually the grown up, mature, accountable position to take...That’s what real problem solvers do Mac, they simplify seemingly complicated issues.
Those who seek no resolution keep things complex and trivial.
our drug war is pure socialism on a national basis. only the right wing, Never gets it.
 
You picked 2 extreme communist countries...why cant you pick, denmark, sweden, Switzerland. Canada,.Qatar and a long lost of countries where governments take care of their citizens and dont jand all their budget to defense contractors..
Because they are hardly anymore socialist than the United States. When you morons are talking about socialism, why can't you use an actual socialist country as an example?

Danish PM in US: Denmark is not socialist
Is what you cons like to call those countries that have extensive social welfare programs....Let me tell you something, I know those countries and i know the US very well, you guys here are fucked in the ass...they take your money spend it on Mars missions, warfare, defense contractors, secret service and other bullshit...and when it comes to health care and welfare they show you Venezuela.....trust me dude, you are raped beyond believe and you don't know it.

That’s weird...you forgot to mention the amount we spend on illegal Wetbacks and Ragheads.
The US makes more off of them. Shut up racist.

NEGATIVE....
This issue is played the fuck out...Wetbacks suck the American taxpayer tit like nobody else does...a known FACT.
repubacks are worse.
 

Forum List

Back
Top