Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This was the question that Washington Post columnist and associate editor Eugene Robinson asked on MSNBC's Ari Melber show, The Beat, a few hours ago.
How much more does Trump have to do to warrant impeachment? Shoot someone on 5th Avenue?
What do you think?
Mueller Reiterates Investigation Didn’t Exonerate Trump, Hints At Impeachment
Mueller report - Department of Justice
Bad enough that the person leading the investigation of said president clearly indicates a crime committed. How about we start there? :
Mueller can indicate all he wants, but he needs sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that a crime was committed by Trump.
What Mueller failed to include in his hatchet job were probable legal defenses to the crime of attempted obstruction. Kind of like self defense is a defense to a charge of murder.
The prosecutor is required to prove each and every element of the criminal statute that he/she is charging. A defense to a single element is sufficient to nullify the presence of a crime.
Why are you so uninformed? You neglected to mention that Barr has NOT released the complete unredacted Mueller report along with all the hundreds or thousands of pages of supporting evidence. Congress is still fighting to get this valuable information that Barr is withholding.
In reference to the thread title...
The Bar for Impeachment must be pretty high, because that worthless piece of black shit this country had to endure
for 8 years never got impeached.
You mean for being president while black?
A President who has the DOJ spy on political opponents should be impeached.
Just sayin'.
Good question. As we all know, Obama set a very high bar for Impeachment. Empowering a Terrorist state, failing to protect Americans under attack as Commander-In-Chief, providing arms to the Mexican drug Cartel, etc etc. So to answer your question a president would have to be worse than Obama at a minimum and whoo boy that is a tall task indeed.
This was the question that Washington Post columnist and associate editor Eugene Robinson asked on MSNBC's Ari Melber show, The Beat, a few hours ago.
How much more does Trump have to do to warrant impeachment? Shoot someone on 5th Avenue?
What do you think?
Mueller Reiterates Investigation Didn’t Exonerate Trump, Hints At Impeachment
Mueller report - Department of Justice
This was the question that Washington Post columnist and associate editor Eugene Robinson asked on MSNBC's Ari Melber show, The Beat, a few hours ago.
How much more does Trump have to do to warrant impeachment? Shoot someone on 5th Avenue?
What do you think?
Mueller Reiterates Investigation Didn’t Exonerate Trump, Hints At Impeachment
Mueller report - Department of Justice
Bad enough that the person leading the investigation of said president clearly indicates a crime committed. How about we start there? :
Mueller can indicate all he wants, but he needs sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that a crime was committed by Trump.
What Mueller failed to include in his hatchet job were probable legal defenses to the crime of attempted obstruction. Kind of like self defense is a defense to a charge of murder.
The prosecutor is required to prove each and every element of the criminal statute that he/she is charging. A defense to a single element is sufficient to nullify the presence of a crime.
Why are you so uninformed? You neglected to mention that Barr has NOT released the complete unredacted Mueller report along with all the hundreds or thousands of pages of supporting evidence. Congress is still fighting to get this valuable information that Barr is withholding.
Do you honestly believe that you or congress have the ability to find a crime in those thousands of pages of raw evidence that 18 prosecutors and over 50 FBI agents couldn't find in over two years.
An obstruction charge against Donald Trump would require the congress to prove a corrupt intent. Very hard to do in any case, and almost impossible to do to a president, who is the boss of the Attorney General.
This was the question that Washington Post columnist and associate editor Eugene Robinson asked on MSNBC's Ari Melber show, The Beat, a few hours ago.
How much more does Trump have to do to warrant impeachment? Shoot someone on 5th Avenue?
What do you think?
Mueller Reiterates Investigation Didn’t Exonerate Trump, Hints At Impeachment
Mueller report - Department of Justice
Bad enough that the person leading the investigation of said president clearly indicates a crime committed. How about we start there? :
Mueller can indicate all he wants, but he needs sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that a crime was committed by Trump.
What Mueller failed to include in his hatchet job were probable legal defenses to the crime of attempted obstruction. Kind of like self defense is a defense to a charge of murder.
The prosecutor is required to prove each and every element of the criminal statute that he/she is charging. A defense to a single element is sufficient to nullify the presence of a crime.
Why are you so uninformed? You neglected to mention that Barr has NOT released the complete unredacted Mueller report along with all the hundreds or thousands of pages of supporting evidence. Congress is still fighting to get this valuable information that Barr is withholding.
Do you honestly believe that you or congress have the ability to find a crime in those thousands of pages of raw evidence that 18 prosecutors and over 50 FBI agents couldn't find in over two years.
An obstruction charge against Donald Trump would require the congress to prove a corrupt intent. Very hard to do in any case, and almost impossible to do to a president, who is the boss of the Attorney General.
You think it's hard to prove corrupt intent when a person asks another person to lie to a federal prosecutor? You think it's hard to prove corrupt intent when you have 11 different instances of obstruction of justice. Information does not exist in a vacuum you do realize this? It's beyond REASONABLE doubt, not any doubt. You do realize the difference between the two?
You guys are simply funny. Asking someone to lie is not "refusing to cooperate", it is obstruction. Something he would have been charged with if not for his office. No amount of spin will change that.You think it's hard to prove corrupt intent when a person asks another person to lie to a federal prosecutor? You think it's hard to prove corrupt intent when you have 11 different instances of obstruction of justice. Information does not exist in a vacuum you do realize this? It's beyond REASONABLE doubt, not any doubt. You do realize the difference between the two?Bad enough that the person leading the investigation of said president clearly indicates a crime committed. How about we start there? :
Mueller can indicate all he wants, but he needs sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that a crime was committed by Trump.
What Mueller failed to include in his hatchet job were probable legal defenses to the crime of attempted obstruction. Kind of like self defense is a defense to a charge of murder.
The prosecutor is required to prove each and every element of the criminal statute that he/she is charging. A defense to a single element is sufficient to nullify the presence of a crime.
Why are you so uninformed? You neglected to mention that Barr has NOT released the complete unredacted Mueller report along with all the hundreds or thousands of pages of supporting evidence. Congress is still fighting to get this valuable information that Barr is withholding.
Do you honestly believe that you or congress have the ability to find a crime in those thousands of pages of raw evidence that 18 prosecutors and over 50 FBI agents couldn't find in over two years.
An obstruction charge against Donald Trump would require the congress to prove a corrupt intent. Very hard to do in any case, and almost impossible to do to a president, who is the boss of the Attorney General.
Uh, bub:
1. There was no crime to cover up.
2. Refusing to cooperate in a political hit job designed to destroy one's life is not obstruction; it is self-preservation.
This was the question that Washington Post columnist and associate editor Eugene Robinson asked on MSNBC's Ari Melber show, The Beat, a few hours ago.
How much more does Trump have to do to warrant impeachment? Shoot someone on 5th Avenue?
What do you think?
Mueller Reiterates Investigation Didn’t Exonerate Trump, Hints At Impeachment
Mueller report - Department of Justice
You guys are simply funny. Asking someone to lie is not "refusing to cooperate", it is obstruction. Something he would have been charged of of not for his office. No amount of spin will change that.You think it's hard to prove corrupt intent when a person asks another person to lie to a federal prosecutor? You think it's hard to prove corrupt intent when you have 11 different instances of obstruction of justice. Information does not exist in a vacuum you do realize this? It's beyond REASONABLE doubt, not any doubt. You do realize the difference between the two?Mueller can indicate all he wants, but he needs sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that a crime was committed by Trump.
What Mueller failed to include in his hatchet job were probable legal defenses to the crime of attempted obstruction. Kind of like self defense is a defense to a charge of murder.
The prosecutor is required to prove each and every element of the criminal statute that he/she is charging. A defense to a single element is sufficient to nullify the presence of a crime.
Why are you so uninformed? You neglected to mention that Barr has NOT released the complete unredacted Mueller report along with all the hundreds or thousands of pages of supporting evidence. Congress is still fighting to get this valuable information that Barr is withholding.
Do you honestly believe that you or congress have the ability to find a crime in those thousands of pages of raw evidence that 18 prosecutors and over 50 FBI agents couldn't find in over two years.
An obstruction charge against Donald Trump would require the congress to prove a corrupt intent. Very hard to do in any case, and almost impossible to do to a president, who is the boss of the Attorney General.
Uh, bub:
1. There was no crime to cover up.
2. Refusing to cooperate in a political hit job designed to destroy one's life is not obstruction; it is self-preservation.
This was the question that Washington Post columnist and associate editor Eugene Robinson asked on MSNBC's Ari Melber show, The Beat, a few hours ago.
How much more does Trump have to do to warrant impeachment? Shoot someone on 5th Avenue?
What do you think?
Mueller Reiterates Investigation Didn’t Exonerate Trump, Hints At Impeachment
Mueller report - Department of Justice
This was the question that Washington Post columnist and associate editor Eugene Robinson asked on MSNBC's Ari Melber show, The Beat, a few hours ago.
How much more does Trump have to do to warrant impeachment? Shoot someone on 5th Avenue?
What do you think?
Mueller Reiterates Investigation Didn’t Exonerate Trump, Hints At Impeachment
Mueller report - Department of Justice
Bad enough that the person leading the investigation of said president clearly indicates a crime committed. How about we start there? :
Mueller can indicate all he wants, but he needs sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that a crime was committed by Trump.
What Mueller failed to include in his hatchet job were probable legal defenses to the crime of attempted obstruction. Kind of like self defense is a defense to a charge of murder.
The prosecutor is required to prove each and every element of the criminal statute that he/she is charging. A defense to a single element is sufficient to nullify the presence of a crime.
Why are you so uninformed? You neglected to mention that Barr has NOT released the complete unredacted Mueller report along with all the hundreds or thousands of pages of supporting evidence. Congress is still fighting to get this valuable information that Barr is withholding.
