Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On Fox Rush Etc, never. They have 2 spend all their time fighting phony scandals and misinformation. Just what all our controversy and ratings mad media gabfests love. Their policy all this time is 4 the non rich i e the workers.Yep. In the forty some years I've been following politics, I've watched my family's working class friends - basically all the people I grew up with - turn from solidly Democrat, to mostly Republicans. They're no stupider today than they were then. That's not what's changed.
The democrats unbridled adoption of identity politics has unquestionably alienated Joe Sixpack.
Um, where have you been when Trump speaks or tweets? Let's count the ways:
- Immigrants,
- college professors,
- Democrats,
- Muslims,
- Hollywood,
- liberals,
- unions,
- women,
- Obama,
- CNN,
- sanctuary cities,
- Oakland's Mayor,
- the FBI
- the Dept. of Justice,
- a Mexican judge ...!
- Etc.
That's a smorgasbord not identy politics
Define what you mean by Identity politics, please.
When in the past 10 years did democrats talk about us , the workers of the United states?
Pass the 2010 comprehensive immigration bill with a SSID card that that can't be faked, and end illegal immigration forever. The wall is a joke,As dismal as these figures are, they can and will get worse with an increase in immigration. You are being replaced, whatsamatta you don't like it?My goodness you got something right there LOL. Doesn't change the giveaway to the rich and Giant corporations the last 35 years and the resultant wreck of the Non rich and the country.And mainly tax rates on the rich that allowed for investment in the country and in Americans. Not the last 35 years.I thought you are a retired teacher???
That was how the middle class grew..WWII
Once again, no competition ...the world was destroyed .
Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = http://www.bea.gov/national/
That is just typical statistics, you idiot.My goodness you got something right there LOL. Doesn't change the giveaway to the rich and Giant corporations the last 35 years and the resultant wreck of the Non rich and the country.And mainly tax rates on the rich that allowed for investment in the country and in Americans. Not the last 35 years.I thought you are a retired teacher???
That was how the middle class grew..WWII
Once again, no competition ...the world was destroyed .
Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = http://www.bea.gov/national/
I love your bullshit stats....
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
2007 = 92%
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
2007 = 50%
I wish we could go back to 1950, when the top 10% plus Labor received
136% of our national income...…..DURR
Or even 2007, where they shared 142% of national income.
The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a blow (5 to 4 along Party lines) to the rights of workers on Monday by allowing companies to require them to sign away their ability to bring class-action claims against management, agreements already in place for about 25 million employees.
High court backs companies over worker class-action claims
.
Workers are being fukked... Cut corporate and high earners taxes (re: business men); allow immediate "expensing" for business
That is just typical statistics, you idiot.My goodness you got something right there LOL. Doesn't change the giveaway to the rich and Giant corporations the last 35 years and the resultant wreck of the Non rich and the country.And mainly tax rates on the rich that allowed for investment in the country and in Americans. Not the last 35 years.
Once again, no competition ...the world was destroyed .
Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = http://www.bea.gov/national/
I love your bullshit stats....
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
2007 = 92%
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
2007 = 50%
I wish we could go back to 1950, when the top 10% plus Labor received
136% of our national income...…..DURR
Or even 2007, where they shared 142% of national income.
It is only when you include blacks that there is any any difference between Democrats and Republicans. Blacks want jobs 2 but get sick of dealing with racists.... Super dupe.The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a blow (5 to 4 along Party lines) to the rights of workers on Monday by allowing companies to require them to sign away their ability to bring class-action claims against management, agreements already in place for about 25 million employees.
High court backs companies over worker class-action claims
.
Workers are being fukked... Cut corporate and high earners taxes (re: business men); allow immediate "expensing" for business
The last election answered that for you.
The workers who want jobs handed Trump the Midwest and the election.
The "workers" who didn't want jobs stayed loyal to Hillary and helped you pad your votes in deep blue States.
What happened that you don't know that? You slept through the election, Rip Van Winkle?
Facts are facts. GOP ones don't exist, just b*******.That is just typical statistics, you idiot.My goodness you got something right there LOL. Doesn't change the giveaway to the rich and Giant corporations the last 35 years and the resultant wreck of the Non rich and the country.Once again, no competition ...the world was destroyed .
Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = http://www.bea.gov/national/
I love your bullshit stats....
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
2007 = 92%
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
2007 = 50%
I wish we could go back to 1950, when the top 10% plus Labor received
136% of our national income...…..DURR
Or even 2007, where they shared 142% of national income.
Liberal statistics, that's why I'm mocking you......
Blue wave my ass!
Republicans up by 6%! MAGA Baby.
Come November and the Moon Bats will be looking at the Republicans keeping the House, picking up seats in the Senate and Trump will still be President. Unlike in 2010 when the filthy ass Democrats lost the House and lost seats in the Senate.
Time for more marching around in their pink pussy hats, howling at the sky and wondering why life isn't fair.
Follow the latest Reuters/Ipsos polls on everything from politics and elections, to social issues and current events.
Facts are facts. GOP ones don't exist, just b*******.That is just typical statistics, you idiot.My goodness you got something right there LOL. Doesn't change the giveaway to the rich and Giant corporations the last 35 years and the resultant wreck of the Non rich and the country.
Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = http://www.bea.gov/national/
I love your bullshit stats....
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
2007 = 92%
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
2007 = 50%
I wish we could go back to 1950, when the top 10% plus Labor received
136% of our national income...…..DURR
Or even 2007, where they shared 142% of national income.
Liberal statistics, that's why I'm mocking you......
Actually, super dupe, that is only on your disgraceful propaganda machine. Real journalists in America try to point out you believe a pile a crap. Hillary is evil the rich pay too much in taxes, asking for benefits and pay is communist. You people are idiots.Blue wave my ass!
Republicans up by 6%! MAGA Baby.
Come November and the Moon Bats will be looking at the Republicans keeping the House, picking up seats in the Senate and Trump will still be President. Unlike in 2010 when the filthy ass Democrats lost the House and lost seats in the Senate.
Time for more marching around in their pink pussy hats, howling at the sky and wondering why life isn't fair.
Follow the latest Reuters/Ipsos polls on everything from politics and elections, to social issues and current events.
What? You mean the "You're all stupid racists!" campaign isn't winning their hearts and minds?
So you don't understand statistics. Fine. typical Republican anywayFacts are facts. GOP ones don't exist, just b*******.That is just typical statistics, you idiot.Over the past 35 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg (image)
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = http://www.bea.gov/national/
I love your bullshit stats....
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
2007 = 92%
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
2007 = 50%
I wish we could go back to 1950, when the top 10% plus Labor received
136% of our national income...…..DURR
Or even 2007, where they shared 142% of national income.
Liberal statistics, that's why I'm mocking you......
I love your bullshit stats....
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
2007 = 92%
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
2007 = 50%
I wish we could go back to 1950, when the top 10% plus Labor received
136% of our national income...…..DURR
Or even 2007, when they shared 142% of national income.
You enjoy the fact that after 35 years of GOP rule, basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans? Great job super duper.Blue wave my ass!
Republicans up by 6%! MAGA Baby.
Come November and the Moon Bats will be looking at the Republicans keeping the House, picking up seats in the Senate and Trump will still be President. Unlike in 2010 when the filthy ass Democrats lost the House and lost seats in the Senate.
Time for more marching around in their pink pussy hats, howling at the sky and wondering why life isn't fair.
Follow the latest Reuters/Ipsos polls on everything from politics and elections, to social issues and current events.
You are not stupid, you are brainwashed and only half of you are serious racists... We Democrats do not have a propaganda machine. CNN MSNBC are corporate gabfests that only care about ratings. No news arrrggghhh.Blue wave my ass!
Republicans up by 6%! MAGA Baby.
Come November and the Moon Bats will be looking at the Republicans keeping the House, picking up seats in the Senate and Trump will still be President. Unlike in 2010 when the filthy ass Democrats lost the House and lost seats in the Senate.
Time for more marching around in their pink pussy hats, howling at the sky and wondering why life isn't fair.
Follow the latest Reuters/Ipsos polls on everything from politics and elections, to social issues and current events.
What? You mean the "You're all stupid racists!" campaign isn't winning their hearts and minds?
So you don't understand statistics. Fine. typical Republican anywayFacts are facts. GOP ones don't exist, just b*******.That is just typical statistics, you idiot.I love your bullshit stats....
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
2007 = 92%
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
2007 = 50%
I wish we could go back to 1950, when the top 10% plus Labor received
136% of our national income...…..DURR
Or even 2007, where they shared 142% of national income.
Liberal statistics, that's why I'm mocking you......
I love your bullshit stats....
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
2007 = 92%
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
2007 = 50%
I wish we could go back to 1950, when the top 10% plus Labor received
136% of our national income...…..DURR
Or even 2007, when they shared 142% of national income.
The 142% is only in comparison to a certain year, the constant. That is statistics that a normal person can understand. As opposed to a Republican dupe.So you don't understand statistics. Fine. typical Republican anywayFacts are facts. GOP ones don't exist, just b*******.That is just typical statistics, you idiot.
Liberal statistics, that's why I'm mocking you......
I love your bullshit stats....
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
2007 = 92%
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
2007 = 50%
I wish we could go back to 1950, when the top 10% plus Labor received
136% of our national income...…..DURR
Or even 2007, when they shared 142% of national income.
Explain them to me. Use your liberal, Blue State math.
How did the top 10% plus all the workers end up with 142% of the national income?
Spell it out, your liberal genius can do it easily.....
You enjoy the fact that after 35 years of GOP rule, basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans? Great job super duper.Blue wave my ass!
Republicans up by 6%! MAGA Baby.
Come November and the Moon Bats will be looking at the Republicans keeping the House, picking up seats in the Senate and Trump will still be President. Unlike in 2010 when the filthy ass Democrats lost the House and lost seats in the Senate.
Time for more marching around in their pink pussy hats, howling at the sky and wondering why life isn't fair.
Follow the latest Reuters/Ipsos polls on everything from politics and elections, to social issues and current events.
The 142% is only in comparison to a certain year, the constant. That is statistics that a normal person can understand. As opposed to a Republican dupe.So you don't understand statistics. Fine. typical Republican anywayFacts are facts. GOP ones don't exist, just b*******.Liberal statistics, that's why I'm mocking you......
I love your bullshit stats....
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
2007 = 92%
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
2007 = 50%
I wish we could go back to 1950, when the top 10% plus Labor received
136% of our national income...…..DURR
Or even 2007, when they shared 142% of national income.
Explain them to me. Use your liberal, Blue State math.
How did the top 10% plus all the workers end up with 142% of the national income?
Spell it out, your liberal genius can do it easily.....
.
Because Republicans can cut taxes for the rich with only 51 votes, also when cutting many services. The Democrats can be blocked on their reforms because they need 60 votes. You want a diagram?You enjoy the fact that after 35 years of GOP rule, basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans? Great job super duper.Blue wave my ass!
Republicans up by 6%! MAGA Baby.
Come November and the Moon Bats will be looking at the Republicans keeping the House, picking up seats in the Senate and Trump will still be President. Unlike in 2010 when the filthy ass Democrats lost the House and lost seats in the Senate.
Time for more marching around in their pink pussy hats, howling at the sky and wondering why life isn't fair.
Follow the latest Reuters/Ipsos polls on everything from politics and elections, to social issues and current events.
after 35 years of rule basically same tax rates Etc, you enjoy the injustice and ruin of America and Americans?
16 of those years Clinton or Obama were president. Why are we in ruin?
That means it was higher or lower than the constant. You can tell whether things are getting better or worse, worse if you're talking the last 35 years.The 142% is only in comparison to a certain year, the constant. That is statistics that a normal person can understand. As opposed to a Republican dupe.So you don't understand statistics. Fine. typical Republican anywayFacts are facts. GOP ones don't exist, just b*******.
I love your bullshit stats....
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
2007 = 92%
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
2007 = 50%
I wish we could go back to 1950, when the top 10% plus Labor received
136% of our national income...…..DURR
Or even 2007, when they shared 142% of national income.
Explain them to me. Use your liberal, Blue State math.
How did the top 10% plus all the workers end up with 142% of the national income?
Spell it out, your liberal genius can do it easily.....
.
The 142% is only in comparison to a certain year.
Thanks for admitting it's a useless statistic.
