Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How would poor kids get an education if private schools were the only option?
You Marxist liberals would pay for their education? Right?
So the entire country is Marxist Liberal? You understand that we see the education of ALL our children as an obligation, don't you? You don't think that is a good idea?Education yes, liberal indoctrination no. You are a prime example of the failing public school system that didn't teach you about the USSR , East Germany and Cuba...You understand that we see the education of ALL our children as an obligation,
Why?That is one of the dumbest RWNJ statements I ever heard.
Put a lion in a cage and feed him regularly for several years, and what do you get?
Not the same thing , idiot.
actually its a very good analogy.
I laugh at mentally challenged people, who think they are smarter than me. Especially if I have posted the TRUTH many times. Don't like it, Cuba is open for you.View attachment 170522You mean how people take from the labors of others to profit from?
That's bullshit. There were all sorts of capitalist enterprises that used slaves for their labor.Bwaaaaahhhhhaaaaahhhhaaaaa....Republicans ended slavery not government. They went to war with the sorry ass democrats who wanted to keep blacks as slaves..Today the democrats still have blacks as slaves by giving them just enough to survive or the lose their welfare..Capitalism has done the most for the most. Without question. But there will always be those who prefer being serfs who will lean the socialist way.
Nonsense. Slavery wasn't ended by the capitalists. Government ended slavery.
Blog: The black thing
And yet, more than ever, blacks are enslaved to the Democratic Party and addicted to government dependency. Blacks believe they are eternal victims, despite the blessing of being born in our exceptional country, where any dream can be realized.
One of the all time dumbest posts I've ever read and you topped it off with a condescending 'bwaahaahaa'.
That's not the issue. The issue is efficiency.So the entire country is Marxist Liberal? You understand that we see the education of ALL our children as an obligation, don't you? You don't think that is a good idea?
Then tell us how the private sector would efficiently educate the poor, if the private sector was given free rein in education.
Why?That is one of the dumbest RWNJ statements I ever heard.
Put a lion in a cage and feed him regularly for several years, and what do you get?
Not the same thing , idiot.
actually its a very good analogy.
Only if you consider poor people to be animals/
Some, yes.Why?That is one of the dumbest RWNJ statements I ever heard.
Put a lion in a cage and feed him regularly for several years, and what do you get?
Not the same thing , idiot.
actually its a very good analogy.
Only if you consider poor people to be animals/
"…You didn't build that!...."
And, the corollary for all socialists…..'You don't own that.' In all Leftist beliefs, there is no private property.
5. One necessarily associates this phrase with our history and inception…"Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness."
Those who read know that the earlier iteration of that phrase was slightly different: Property rights precede liberty. Perhaps some know that before it became “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” in our Declaration of Independence, John Locke wrote that man has a right to “life, liberty, and property.” Property Rights Have Personal Parallels
6. "A number of times throughout history, tyranny has stimulated breakthrough thinking about liberty. ...John Locke....expressed the radical view that government is morally obliged to serve people, namely by protecting life, liberty, and property. He explained the principle of checks and balances to limit government power. He favored representative government and a rule of law. He denounced tyranny. He insisted that when government violates individual rights, people may legitimately rebel." John Locke Natural Rights to Life Liberty and Property The Freeman Foundation for Economic Education
No private property means no liberty.
Projecting much? Ad hominems are considered fallacies, not valid arguments.The socialist movement was largely inspired by the abuses of the people by the capitalists of, for example, the 19th century Industrial Revolution.Socialism starts with a social contract, not a capital contract.Only the right wing is that ignorant. We have a mixed-market economy not true capitalism. Government is socialism and the mixer in our economy.
Oh it must be "true" capitalism?
What an idiot.
Why?That is one of the dumbest RWNJ statements I ever heard.
Put a lion in a cage and feed him regularly for several years, and what do you get?
Not the same thing , idiot.
actually its a very good analogy.
Only if you consider poor people to be animals/
its not about rich or poor, its about creating dependency.
And which part of our constitution did John Locke write?
That's not the issue. The issue is efficiency.So the entire country is Marxist Liberal? You understand that we see the education of ALL our children as an obligation, don't you? You don't think that is a good idea?
Then tell us how the private sector would efficiently educate the poor, if the private sector was given free rein in education.
take all the money spent on government education and contract it out to private firms. you would get a better product for less money. the government never does anything efficiently-----------------DOD, VA, IRS, FEMA, FBI, et. al.
You are just jealous that other people have more stuff than you, so much go on ranting and raving how unfair life is. So instead of pulling up your man pants, you want the federal government to punish the successful people, so then everyone can be equal. Equally poor and equally miserable. Did you feel better when Obama stopped all those billionaires from making more billions? Oh yeah, he made those billiionaires much richer, while making more in poverty, like you?How would poor kids get an education if private schools were the only option?
You Marxist liberals would pay for their education? Right?
So the entire country is Marxist Liberal? You understand that we see the education of ALL our children as an obligation, don't you? You don't think that is a good idea?Education yes, liberal indoctrination no. You are a prime example of the failing public school system that didn't teach you about the USSR , East Germany and Cuba...You understand that we see the education of ALL our children as an obligation,
Wouldn't it be easier for you to just number those trite RWNJ talking points?
And which part of our constitution did John Locke write?
You are an idiot...but this time i have to add "uneducated idiot."
I laugh at mentally challenged people, who think they are smarter than me. Especially if I have posted the TRUTH many times. Don't like it, Cuba is open for you.View attachment 170522You mean how people take from the labors of others to profit from?
That's bullshit. There were all sorts of capitalist enterprises that used slaves for their labor.Bwaaaaahhhhhaaaaahhhhaaaaa....Republicans ended slavery not government. They went to war with the sorry ass democrats who wanted to keep blacks as slaves..Today the democrats still have blacks as slaves by giving them just enough to survive or the lose their welfare..Capitalism has done the most for the most. Without question. But there will always be those who prefer being serfs who will lean the socialist way.
Nonsense. Slavery wasn't ended by the capitalists. Government ended slavery.
Blog: The black thing
And yet, more than ever, blacks are enslaved to the Democratic Party and addicted to government dependency. Blacks believe they are eternal victims, despite the blessing of being born in our exceptional country, where any dream can be realized.
One of the all time dumbest posts I've ever read and you topped it off with a condescending 'bwaahaahaa'.
You mean how people take from the labors of others to profit from?
free full body massage for right wing women willing to vote blue!Why?
Put a lion in a cage and feed him regularly for several years, and what do you get?
Not the same thing , idiot.
actually its a very good analogy.
Only if you consider poor people to be animals/
its not about rich or poor, its about creating dependency.
Why are you still here?I laugh at mentally challenged people, who think they are smarter than me. Especially if I have posted the TRUTH many times. Don't like it, Cuba is open for you.View attachment 170522You mean how people take from the labors of others to profit from?
That's bullshit. There were all sorts of capitalist enterprises that used slaves for their labor.Bwaaaaahhhhhaaaaahhhhaaaaa....Republicans ended slavery not government. They went to war with the sorry ass democrats who wanted to keep blacks as slaves..Today the democrats still have blacks as slaves by giving them just enough to survive or the lose their welfare..Capitalism has done the most for the most. Without question. But there will always be those who prefer being serfs who will lean the socialist way.
Nonsense. Slavery wasn't ended by the capitalists. Government ended slavery.
Blog: The black thing
And yet, more than ever, blacks are enslaved to the Democratic Party and addicted to government dependency. Blacks believe they are eternal victims, despite the blessing of being born in our exceptional country, where any dream can be realized.
One of the all time dumbest posts I've ever read and you topped it off with a condescending 'bwaahaahaa'.
It's probably more than 'think', but if you're on the bandwagon that the government didn't end slavery then there is nothing about you to take seriously.
What effect does anything John Locke might have said have to do with what is written in our constitution?
You are just jealous that other people have more stuff than you, so much go on ranting and raving how unfair life is. So instead of pulling up your man pants, you want the federal government to punish the successful people, so then everyone can be equal. Equally poor and equally miserable. Did you feel better when Obama stopped all those billionaires from making more billions? Oh yeah, he made those billiionaires much richer, while making more in poverty, like you?How would poor kids get an education if private schools were the only option?
You Marxist liberals would pay for their education? Right?
So the entire country is Marxist Liberal? You understand that we see the education of ALL our children as an obligation, don't you? You don't think that is a good idea?Education yes, liberal indoctrination no. You are a prime example of the failing public school system that didn't teach you about the USSR , East Germany and Cuba...You understand that we see the education of ALL our children as an obligation,
Wouldn't it be easier for you to just number those trite RWNJ talking points?
