Well it's not just my perspective. Your own beloved government - you know the one you worship at its altar - also recommends that children have a male and female role model.Fuck perspective. Yours is rotten, nasty and inhuman.I hope you don't mind if i see it differently. From my perspective it is not in a child's best interest or our society's best interest. From my perspective, you are trying to force your religion of socialism upon us. The religion of socialism worships big government and social policy. Gay marriage and transsexual bathrooms are social policies of socialist and in effect your religious beliefs. They are based on atheism and deification of man and proceeds from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements such as gay marriage and transsexual bathrooms.Look at what you wrote:What we permit in a democratic society hinges on whether or not it causes harm.
Do you mean like abortion?
Same sex marriage does no harm.
I've already explained to you how it does in posts #12, #20, #41 and #45.
Normalization of deviance leads to predictable surprises. What happens when a standard is lowered? Usually nothing right away. It takes time to realize why the standard was established in the first place. In this instance, it is the children who will be harmed. Nature has established that male/female unions is how natural selection is passed down from generation to generation. That's the rule. That's the standard. Children need a male and a female role model in their lives. Does this mean that every child who does not have a male and female role model in their lives will be harmed? No. It means that as a rule, those children who do will be better served. So you can argue the exceptions all day long, but it will never change the rule, that a child's best interest is served by having a male and a female role model.
That's some fucked up shit. Where are you getting these asshole "rules". Pulling them out yer butt? This is why your kind is so dangerous to America. That's not just speculation, it's delusion backed up with no facts. Just delusion.
Come back with facts and not just a "feeling".
You remind me of Phyllis Schlafly, the mother of the American conservative movement. She said she did everything right. Bowed to her husband. Homeschooled the kids. Kept them isolated and insulated from anything not conservative. And still her son was gay. She said she can't figure out what went wrong.
http://www.qrd.org/qrd/misc/text/schlafly.outing.reaction-KNIGHT.RIDDER