daws101
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #541
the traditional American family is a mythBreakdown of the traditional American family = fucked up moralsTeenage Pregnancy and PovertyMeaningless the poverty rate doesn't have any effect on teen girls getting pregnant.Bullshit teenage girls were getting pregnant and living in poverty long before welfare was invented.
Fail.
Wrong, asshole.
![]()
![]()
Damn you're ignorant.
God, you can't possibly be this stupid.
Teenage girls getting pregnant and going on welfare is the reason the poverty rate stopped declining. Kids who grow up without a father and on the dole go on to be poor, and there's a good chance they will end up in prison.
Teenage pregnancy and poverty may be linked in many people’s minds, but that doesn’t mean they know the facts. This article summarizes the research that helps establish what the relationship between teenage pregnancy and poverty really is.
Two Connections Between Teenage Pregnancy and Poverty
When considering how teenage pregnancy and poverty relate it is important to consider two distinct but important connections. First, it is important to consider poverty as a factor among others in leading to teenage pregnancy. Second, it is essential to consider poverty as an outcome of teenage pregnancy, not only for the pregnant teen, but for the teen father, the child, and other children that may be born to the teen mother subsequently.
Poverty as a Contributing Factor to Teenage Pregnancy
The connection between poverty rates and teen pregnancy rates seems inescapable even when it isn’t pointed out. In a 2010 report using 2006 data, this is the top three and their rankings in terms of both teenage pregnancy and poverty. Texas, the leader in teen pregnancy rates, is ninth in the nation in the poverty rankings. New Mexico is second in teenage pregnancy rates, and third in poverty rankings. Mississippi is third in teen pregnancies, and the highest rate of poverty in the country.
In 2005, New Mexico had been first, Nevada second, and Arizona third in teenage pregnancy rates; Texas first, New Mexico second, and Mississippi third in birthrate, and New York first, New Jersey second, and Nevada third in the abortion rate for young women 15 to 19. While the pregnancy rates among teens had been declining, and the 2005 were the lowest in over 30 years, 2006 saw an increase, as reported by the Gutmacher Institute.
Poverty as a Result of Teenage Pregnancy
It has been reported that only a third of teen mothers achieve a high school diploma and that teen father are apt to finish fewer years of school than men who become fathers when they are older, leaving both parents less equipped than they might be to earn a living. Children of teen parents had been found to have poorer school performance, and girls who were born as the result of a teen pregnancy were found to have a 22% greater than average risk of becoming teen mothers. Additionally the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy has reported that a minimum of 75% of teen mothers who are unmarried will be on welfare within 5 years of the birth of their first child.
This view is countered by a study by University of Pennsylvania’s Frank Furstenburg, who reported that women raised in poverty and bearing children later were not much more likely to escape poverty than impoverished teens who became pregnant. The study also concludes that there is little difference educationally and economically between girls raised in poverty who become mothers during their teen years and those who become mothers later.
Teenage Pregnancy and Poverty | Pregnant Teen Help
- Loving v. Virginia in a Post-Racial World: Rethinking Race, Sex and Marriage."
Updated August 9, 2012, 11:35 AM
“Family values” talk is literally fantastic, because it is utterly improbable. Just as we place hope in winged horses and caped crusaders, the rally cries of “protect marriage” and “preserve decency” only work to stir the troops. Will campaign speeches curb the divorce rate? Does a party platform make couples think twice about the morality of living together? Is prayer a reliable form of birth control? Answer to all: No, no and we wish.
Republicans have shaped a collective memory of the family based on a sepia-toned vision of Mom, America and apple pie.
“Family values” talk mobilizes voters. It identifies an enemy — which most likely is the progression of time — that allows citizens to channel frustration about the state of today’s world. Imagine: a room of people all wishing for the good ol’ days. Men worked, women cleaned, children obeyed and “everyone knew each other and we all got along.”
These are the same people that wish Stepford were a real place. They fail to notice obvious things like racial tension, gender discrimination and gay bashing. Much like forgetting the awkwardness of junior high, selective memory edits the incongruous and unpleasant. Even during the "golden family era" of the 1950s, rates of divorce were rising, people had nonmarital sex and children disobeyed their parents.
The past is not uniformly devoid of cultural tensions and political problems. Republicans have shaped a collective memory of the family based on a sepia-toned vision of Mom, America and apple pie. Supposedly, everything was better in the past. In this same supposedness, our social problems and cultural clashes would be solved if we embraced a kinder, gentler approach.
But did it really work like this? June Cleaver did not bear a Santorum-load of children, which means that some "Leave It to Beaver" writer believed in birth control. Elvis Presley’s voice and pelvis threatened national virginity, yet the morality of young girls remained intact. And even Norman Rockwell, painter of all things Ye Olde America, divorced and remarried.
Embracing the reality of a perpetually evolving culture is much harder than clinging to a retro ideal. It also means less political grandstanding.
The Myth of the Traditional Family - NYTimes.com - morality is relative
- fail.