How Far Will the SCOTUS Go On Behalf of Muslims ?

[JakeStarkey]

RV and Protectionist, this is about religious freedom at work not fashion wear or accessories, such as Walthers or AKs or Berettas..

Not really. It's about special privilege for state approved religions. Real religious freedom would respect the business owner's right to hire people based on religion.

Nope. Next.

 

[dblack]

RV and Protectionist, this is about religious freedom at work not fashion wear or accessories, such as Walthers or AKs or Berettas..

Not really. It's about special privilege for state approved religions. Real religious freedom would respect the business owner's right to hire people based on religion.

Nope. Next.

Heh. "Move along. Nothing to see here."

What are you afraid of, Fakey?

 

[JakeStarkey]

RV and Protectionist, this is about religious freedom at work not fashion wear or accessories, such as Walthers or AKs or Berettas..

Not really. It's about special privilege for state approved religions. Real religious freedom would respect the business owner's right to hire people based on religion.

Nope. Next.

Heh. "Move along. Nothing to see here."What are you afraid of, Fakey?

You don't have anything except a silly opinion. You sound suspiciously ill with libertarianitis. It is an incurable brain disease.

 

[RandomVariable]

RV and Protectionist, this is about religious freedom at work not fashion wear or accessories, such as Walthers or AKs or Berettas..

Please grow up.

So if some female working at Victoria Secret gets hit by the dark spirit of islam one night and feels she must wear a Burqa to work the rest of her life Victoria Secret can say nothing about it?

 

[pwjohn]

Today the US Supreme Court overruled lawyers for the clothing company Abercrombie & Fitch, and ruled in favor of a Muslim woman who was turned down from a job for wearing a headscarf (hijab). The company had maintained that they had a "look policy" for their sales staff, and that the hijab did not conform to it.

The Muslim woman, Samantha Elauf, claimed that she was being discriminated against on religious grounds. The court ruled against the company, and in favor of Elauf, 8-1, with only Clarence Thomas dissenting.

I must say, I am totally with the company on this one. This dopey court doesn't seem to get it that their is a war going on between Islam (call it radical or not) and Western civilization. This international jihad war is more than bullet and bombs. it also is in the courtrooms, where jihadists of the Muslim Brotherhood have frequently taken it, relying on dum dum judges to use our own laws against us. The Brotherhood has openly expressed this in their declaration of war against America, and all of Western civilization, since 1991 in their document known as the Explanatory Memorandum >>

The store should have the right to conduct its business as it sees fit. And the hijab, while it may be a religious attire, is against the store's rules for something that has nothing to do with religion, but rather was part of a policy intended to promote the brand's East Coast collegiate image. It is sad to see "our" courts ruling against us in America, and the way we conduct our business, to accomodate a foreign culture, masquerading as a religion.

American should beseige the court with protest over this, and not let this latest instance of Islamization go unprotested. The Muslim Brotherhood is working diligently to Islamize America. Our own Supreme court shouldn't be helping them to do that. Three cheers for the appeals court which earlier, had ruled in favor of Abercrombie & Fitch, before the SCOTUS got involved and screwed it up.

So what's next. As a longtime student of Islamization, I can assure you that stealth jihad muslims aren't going to rest on this level. Now that they've gotten this, are they going to push for forcing US businesses to allow niqabs too ? (which cover the entire face except the eyes) That would be a disastrous (and idiotic) blow against our national security.

How for the court goes in this matter is determined by how far the company goes to allow others to express their beliefs while working.

That's the answer to your question.

 

[dblack]

RV and Protectionist, this is about religious freedom at work not fashion wear or accessories, such as Walthers or AKs or Berettas..

Not really. It's about special privilege for state approved religions. Real religious freedom would respect the business owner's right to hire people based on religion.

Nope. Next.

Heh. "Move along. Nothing to see here."What are you afraid of, Fakey?

You don't have anything except a silly opinion. You sound suspiciously ill with libertarianitis. It is an incurable brain disease.

There's no need to fear libertarians Jakey. It's gonna be ok.

 

[JakeStarkey]

RV and Protectionist, this is about religious freedom at work not fashion wear or accessories, such as Walthers or AKs or Berettas..

Please grow up.

So if some female working at Victoria Secret gets hit by the dark spirit of islam one night and feels she must wear a Burqa to work the rest of her life Victoria Secret can say nothing about it?

That is your thinking; it is wrong.

 

[JakeStarkey]

RV and Protectionist, this is about religious freedom at work not fashion wear or accessories, such as Walthers or AKs or Berettas..

Not really. It's about special privilege for state approved religions. Real religious freedom would respect the business owner's right to hire people based on religion.

Nope. Next.

Heh. "Move along. Nothing to see here."What are you afraid of, Fakey?

You don't have anything except a silly opinion. You sound suspiciously ill with libertarianitis. It is an incurable brain disease.

There's no need to fear libertarians Jakey. It's gonna be ok.

No one fears your silly opinion or ideology; it's for grin and chuckles.

 

[dblack]

Not really. It's about special privilege for state approved religions. Real religious freedom would respect the business owner's right to hire people based on religion.

Nope. Next.

Heh. "Move along. Nothing to see here."What are you afraid of, Fakey?

You don't have anything except a silly opinion. You sound suspiciously ill with libertarianitis. It is an incurable brain disease.

There's no need to fear libertarians Jakey. It's gonna be ok.

No one fears your silly opinion or ideology; it's for grin and chuckles.

There ya go! Everything's fine.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nope. Next.

Heh. "Move along. Nothing to see here."What are you afraid of, Fakey?

You don't have anything except a silly opinion. You sound suspiciously ill with libertarianitis. It is an incurable brain disease.

There's no need to fear libertarians Jakey. It's gonna be ok.

No one fears your silly opinion or ideology; it's for grin and chuckles.

There ya go! Everything's fine.

See, you have nothing to fear.

 

[RandomVariable]

RV and Protectionist, this is about religious freedom at work not fashion wear or accessories, such as Walthers or AKs or Berettas..

Please grow up.

So if some female working at Victoria Secret gets hit by the dark spirit of islam one night and feels she must wear a Burqa to work the rest of her life Victoria Secret can say nothing about it?

That is your thinking; it is wrong.

How so?

 

[JakeStarkey]

RV and Protectionist, this is about religious freedom at work not fashion wear or accessories, such as Walthers or AKs or Berettas..

Please grow up.

So if some female working at Victoria Secret gets hit by the dark spirit of islam one night and feels she must wear a Burqa to work the rest of her life Victoria Secret can say nothing about it?

That is your thinking; it is wrong.

How so?

It's not my thinking. You wrote it, so it is yours.

 

[RandomVariable]

RV and Protectionist, this is about religious freedom at work not fashion wear or accessories, such as Walthers or AKs or Berettas..

Please grow up.

So if some female working at Victoria Secret gets hit by the dark spirit of islam one night and feels she must wear a Burqa to work the rest of her life Victoria Secret can say nothing about it?

That is your thinking; it is wrong.

How so?

It's not my thinking. You wrote it, so it is yours.

Ha, ha, ha, I get it. Actually, no, I do not get it? WTF are you talking about?

 

[protectionist]

Christianity is longer running....FYI

I didn't say it wasn't.

 

[protectionist]

Protectionist and RV can make all the allegations they want, but without solid evidence, they have only assertions, which mean nothing.

"Solid evidence" of WHAT ? WHAT "allegations" ?

Your allegations, bub. Yes, this was a religious freedom issue; yes, Islam is a religion;yes, Islam gets the same level of civil rights protection as Christianity or any other religion.

Hint: look up definition of 'hat'.

Headwear, if that makes you feel better,

As for the statements I made, they all have solid evidence, And I have supplied that evidence many times throughout this thread, and YOU KNOW it.

 

[protectionist]

RV and Protectionist, this is about religious freedom at work not fashion wear or accessories, such as Walthers or AKs or Berettas..

Please grow up.

YOU do the growing up. A & F don't give a rats as about Elauf's Islamism, "religion", or whatever you want to label it. They have a policy about things worn on the head, and they don't make their policies without a good reason.And they expect everyone to abide by that policy, and up to now, everyone has, EXCEPT A PUSHY ISLAMIST, who as a group think they are entitled to special priviliges, just by conning everyone into thinking that their vile, organized criminality is a religion.

 

[Coyote]

Hey, all you Muslim ass-kissers!! Have you forgotten my question from the OP ? Here it is again. You don't get away with not answering it. >>

"So what's next ? As a longtime student of Islamization, I can assure you that stealth jihad Muslims aren't going to rest on this level. Now that they've gotten this, are they going to push for forcing US businesses to allow niqabs too ? (which cover the entire face except the eyes) That would be a disastrous (and idiotic) blow against our national security.

Niqab

No. We're talking "reasonable accommodation"

You seem to keep missing that critical factor.

 

[Coyote]

The SCOTUS decision in this A & F case opens up a horrific pandora's box of Islamization. It opens the door for the Muslim Brotherhood to do just what it has been waiting for, for 24 years. To force Islam down America's throat, Islamize the country, and essentially conquer it from within the Supreme Court, and other courts.

How soon before MB front groups start insisting that all descriptions of pigs be banned ? Or that dog walking not be allowed ? Or that alcoholic beverages be banned from here or there ? Or that music be banned ? Or that woman be banned from driving ? Or that Muslim husbands who beat their wives be allowed to do so ? Or that people be fired from jobs for bringing pork products to work ? Or that people be fired for saying anything against Islam ? etc. etc. etc.

 

[protectionist]

How far the court goes in this matter is determined by how far the company goes to allow others to express their beliefs while working.

That's the answer to your question.

Not at all. All you've done is switch the onus to adjust, on to the company, and away from the sales clerks. The court should respect the company's rule, that everyone else has seen fit to abide by. The court, and all courts need to stop being Muslim ass-kissers.

 

[Coyote]

What "most of the people of the world" are you talking about?

The ones who say that Islam is not a religion.

Can't find any statistics showing that - got a link?

I don't have A link but I have 25 of them in Post # 209 (each one with thousands of people behind them)

There's over 7.3 billion people. Where's this "most" hmmm?