Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're ridiculing yourself, imbecile.I hope they are. I am using your idiot illogic as an illustration to mock you.
NOT.So, Crazy Ginny , it appears, has an interest in the cases re: the Jan. 6 insurrection that will appear before the Supreme Court.
By any standard, Judge Thomas must recuse himself from those cases.
haha, you are so dumb. I imitate you, and you tell me how stupid I look. A kindergartner would outsmart you.You're ridiculing yourself, imbecile.
You're too stupid to know whether your "imitation" is accurate. You lack the capacity to commit logic.haha, you are so dumb. I imitate you, and you tell me how stupid I look. A kindergartner would outsmart you.
I don't need actual evidence. And you don't need to be guilty of the accusation. That lobotomized moron bripat9643 told me so..You're too stupid to know whether your "imitation" is accurate.
To defame someone? That's correct.I don't need actual evidence. And you don't need to be guilty of the accusation. That lobotomized moron bripat9643 told me so..
Now pay up.
No, to blackmail them. Damn son, you don't know what came out of your own mouth just minutes ago. Which means you don't know what is going to come out of it in 5 minutes from now. Just mindless, lizard brain diarrhea. I will leave you to it.To defame someone? That's correct.
Yes, that also, moron. You're a fucking idiot if you believe some government attorney determines whether someone is being blackmailed.No, to blackmail them. Damn son, you don't know what came out of your own mouth just minutes ago. Which means you don't know what is going to come out of it in 5 minutes from now. Just mindless, lizard brain diarrhea. I will leave you to it.
I'm sure Clarence Thomas understands that true American patriots should protest after an election has been stolen.So, Crazy Ginny , it appears, has an interest in the cases re: the Jan. 6 insurrection that will appear before the Supreme Court.
By any standard, Judge Thomas must recuse himself from those cases.
There is no simple answer, unless a scientist or Biologist has conducted a thorough examination and runs tests.You went the gamut of incoherent BS into "zero interest in homosexual sex" and you want someone else to take you serious?
View attachment 621252View attachment 621253View attachment 621254View attachment 621255
You based initially quoting me from one of your cohorts lies about racism and claim "hate filled political BS" to bringing up homos and your personal opinion on it; and you have claimed divisiveness when the OP is all about another judge's wife. Stick to the subject or don't comment at all.
^^^ Are you questioning Biden's new SCOTUS candidate on her leniency on pedophiles in her rulings???
Soon the guy who brags about sexual assault al licks the butthole of Putin in the world stage is afraid of what someone says about him.Yes, that also, moron. You're a fucking idiot if you believe some government attorney determines whether someone is being blackmailed.
Except he and Ginni haven't found one. There in lies the problem.I'm sure Clarence Thomas understands that true American patriots should protest after an election has been stolen.
An idiotic answer from a total retard.Nope. They are invalid votes. They should be thrown out.
The lies from the Right never stop.You think that's crazy?
Liberals think men are women!
lmao
You can't have an activist wife who was plotting to overthrow our 2020 election, and have a SC with any merit. Especially when a members wife is trying to overthrow an election.They're going to eat shit for breakfast, lunch, and dinner if they try to impeach a black man.
Bring it. Do it. Fall on your swords, go for it
Sure they have. Thomas is only one vote out of nine. Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Gorsuch have been disappointment the past 12 months.Except he and Ginni haven't found one. There in lies the problem.
How is it idiotic? If you can't verify the chain of custody, then they votes can't be accepted as genuine.An idiotic answer from a total retard.
It can easily be verified simply by asking her to pull up her dress.There is no simple answer, unless a scientist or Biologist has conducted a thorough examination and runs tests.
So the wives of SC justices don't have any 1st amendment rights?You can't have an activist wife who was plotting to overthrow our 2020 election, and have a SC with any merit. Especially when a members wife is trying to overthrow an election.
