And, as was proven here, Jesus was not a legal descendant of king David and of course he never was a king.I'm not trying to establish theology here. I'm just trying to establish what the Jewish expectation was for the Messiah. As near as I can tell David was promised that one of his descendants would be it and that it was his belief that they would be King of the Jews like David. Right?
PS it is not entirely clear to me that THE MESSIAH----according to jewish thought-----IS GOING TO
BE THE KING anyone?
The messiah described in deuteronomy 18:18 is not a king by any stretch of the imagination. "I will put my words into his mouth and he shall convey all of my commands."
Jesus said to pilate, "King is your word. My task is to bear witness to the truth."
The messiah was supposed to be "the seed of David" which is not necessarily about physical descent anymore than when Jesus said that he was the sower of the good seed he was talking about impregnating women....
it is not clear to me why you imagine that a KING cannot also be a "prophet" I do not believe that the
two conditions are mutually exclusive. What is true is that a KING cannot be a LEVITE ---(I think---
don't quote me) Levites are people of the same tribe as is Moses and Aaron. David was of the tribe
of Judah-------the NT provides a lineage for Jesus indicating that HE was of the tribe of Judah and was
even born in the same town ---ie Bethlehem. Historically-----some of the Prophets-----like Jeremiah
(I think----don't quote me) were levites. It is the NT that makes the case for Jesus as KING. ----maybe
that was a mistake on the part of the writers