Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many innocent cops will die because of the Judge in Cleveland, that acquitted the cop who shot two unarmed people in their car? 150 shots fired at these two unarmed people, really? The cop stood on the hood of the car and fired like 43 shots. How many times did he have to reload? How many clips to cops carry?
That judge gave no thought to "no justice, no peace". How many blacks are going to kill innocent cops for revenge? That judge didn't give a solution, he created a problem. And that problem will probably spread to more than just Cleveland.
That's -exactly- what she thinks.[
Wait...so he should've found him guilty to honor "No justice No peace"?
That's -exactly- what she thinks.[
Wait...so he should've found him guilty to honor "No justice No peace"?
Juries decide guilt or innocence.NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.
A jury found them not guilty, system works.
OJ SimpsonWhich makes me wonder why he's claiming a judge acquitted the cop. Isn't it the jury supposed to do that? And since when do juries base their decisions on what makes black people angry?why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.
A jury found them not guilty, system works.
Not in all cases. Many times you can opt to be tried by a judge. A jury is your right, it is not necessarily mandatory.Juries decide guilt or innocence.NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.
A jury found them not guilty, system works.
I still haven't seen evidence that this was a bench trial though. It wouldn't surprise me if that was bullshit too.Not in all cases. Many times you can opt to be tried by a judge. A jury is your right, it is not necessarily mandatory.Juries decide guilt or innocence.NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.
A jury found them not guilty, system works.
Op is still a steaming pile of shit tho
Why do you believe the potential reaction of thugs and miscreants should have some bearing on the outcome of a criminal trial?NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.
I love it when a six year old in the sandbox tries to insult me. he tries to sound soooo grown up.Not in all cases. Many times you can opt to be tried by a judge. A jury is your right, it is not necessarily mandatory.Juries decide guilt or innocence.NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.
A jury found them not guilty, system works.
Op is still a steaming pile of shit tho
I love it when a six year old in the sandbox tries to insult me. he tries to sound soooo grown up.Not in all cases. Many times you can opt to be tried by a judge. A jury is your right, it is not necessarily mandatory.Juries decide guilt or innocence.NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.
A jury found them not guilty, system works.
Op is still a steaming pile of shit tho
Your friends insult you? Huh.I love it when a six year old in the sandbox tries to insult me.Not in all cases. Many times you can opt to be tried by a judge. A jury is your right, it is not necessarily mandatory.Juries decide guilt or innocence.NOT! No jury, just a corrupt judge.why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.
A jury found them not guilty, system works.
Op is still a steaming pile of shit tho
How many innocent cops will die because of the Judge in Cleveland, that acquitted the cop who shot two unarmed people in their car? 150 shots fired at these two unarmed people, really? The cop stood on the hood of the car and fired like 43 shots. How many times did he have to reload? How many clips to cops carry?
That judge gave no thought to "no justice, no peace". How many blacks are going to kill innocent cops for revenge? That judge didn't give a solution, he created a problem. And that problem will probably spread to more than just Cleveland.
Bench trial. No jury.Which makes me wonder why he's claiming a judge acquitted the cop. Isn't it the jury supposed to do that? And since when do juries base their decisions on what makes black people angry?why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.
A jury found them not guilty, system works.
And no link. You're just another shill claiming it was a bench trial. Maybe it was or maybe there's a reason no link is forthcoming.Bench trial. No jury.Which makes me wonder why he's claiming a judge acquitted the cop. Isn't it the jury supposed to do that? And since when do juries base their decisions on what makes black people angry?why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.
A jury found them not guilty, system works.
I live in Cleveland dickhead.And no link. You're just another shill claiming it was a bench trial. Maybe it was or maybe there's a reason no link is forthcoming.Bench trial. No jury.Which makes me wonder why he's claiming a judge acquitted the cop. Isn't it the jury supposed to do that? And since when do juries base their decisions on what makes black people angry?why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.
A jury found them not guilty, system works.
Still no link?I live in Cleveland dickhead.And no link. You're just another shill claiming it was a bench trial. Maybe it was or maybe there's a reason no link is forthcoming.Bench trial. No jury.Which makes me wonder why he's claiming a judge acquitted the cop. Isn't it the jury supposed to do that? And since when do juries base their decisions on what makes black people angry?why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.
A jury found them not guilty, system works.
Look it up on cleveland.com from Saturday and his explanation for aquittal is clear.
It could not be determine through the evidence that any of Brelos shots were the kill shots.
And a motor vehicle can also be used as a deadly weapon.....just sayin'.
Still no comment?Still no link?I live in Cleveland dickhead.And no link. You're just another shill claiming it was a bench trial. Maybe it was or maybe there's a reason no link is forthcoming.Bench trial. No jury.Which makes me wonder why he's claiming a judge acquitted the cop. Isn't it the jury supposed to do that? And since when do juries base their decisions on what makes black people angry?why do you idiotic liberals believe police aren't afforded the same Constitutional protections as everyone else.
A jury found them not guilty, system works.
Look it up on cleveland.com from Saturday and his explanation for aquittal is clear.
It could not be determine through the evidence that any of Brelos shots were the kill shots.
And a motor vehicle can also be used as a deadly weapon.....just sayin'.