How many of the 91 indictments against Trump will result in convictions, after all appeals? (Poll)

[kyzr]

Alvin Bragg hit Trump with 31 indictments in the hush money case
Fani Willis hit Trump with 6 indictments in the GA case
Smith hit Trump with 54 indictments in the docs & J6 cases

So after the evidence is heard, the verdicts heard, and the appeals have all been processed, how many convictions against Trump will stand?

In my humble opinion not many. This is just democrats being democrats misusing the Law to their political advantage.

The Issues at Stake in the Cases Against Trump

A guide to their timelines and the threat they pose to the former president

www.theatlantic.com

 

[lennypartiv]

Liberal Democrats don't realize that all we have to do is get one Trump supporter on the jury and that blocks the road to a conviction.

 

[Curried Goats]

Liberal Democrats don't realize that all we have to do is get one Trump supporter on the jury and that blocks the road to a conviction.

I'm not worried about you minority MAGATs.

I trust that the vast majority of Americans are decent and honest people who can judge the evidence objectively.

 

[Pete7469]

It's all bullshit. All of this shit goes away once an objective judge is on the bench.

 

[lennypartiv]

It's all bullshit. All of this shit goes away once an objective judge is on the bench.

Did you forget about all the judges who did nothing to stop the election from being stolen?

 

[Curried Goats]

Did you forget about all the judges who did nothing to stop the election from being stolen?

And because your critical thinking skills are shit to you that means all the judges are corrupt rather than Trump having no evidence.

 

[Pete7469]

Did you forget about all the judges who did nothing to stop the election from being stolen?

True.

I guess we have to wait and see.

 

[kyzr]

True.
I guess we have to wait and see.

2020 was stolen, but not by ballot stuffing, although I'm sure there was some voter fraud with the mail-in ballots. That's why France doesn't allow them.

2020 was stolen by election interference by the deep state and the hi-tech oligarchs.
1. The FBI hid evidence of Biden crimes from Hunter's laptop, money transfers, and Bobulinsky
2. Zuckerbucks bought WI, SBF stole $billions from FTX and gave $40m to democrats
3. The FBI colluded with Twitter to censor Biden crimes (see Twitter files)
4. The MSM was biased against Trump in their coverage of the election
5. With all of that, Trump only lost by 43,000 votes in WI, AZ, and GA

 

[SeaMajor7]

2020 was stolen, but not by ballot stuffing, although I'm sure there was some voter fraud with the mail-in ballots. That's why France doesn't allow them.

2020 was stolen by election interference by the deep state and the hi-tech oligarchs.
1. The FBI hid evidence from Hunter's laptop and Bobulinsky
2. Zuckerbucks bought WI
3. The FBI colluded with Twitter to censor Biden crimes (see Twitter files)
4. The MSM was biased against Trump in their coverage of the election

The multiple swing state precincts synchronized shut down of vote tabulation was the fatal blow.

 

[forkup]

Alvin Bragg hit Trump with 31 indictments in the hush money case
Fani Willis hit Trump with 6 indictments in the GA case
Smith hit Trump with 54 indictments in the docs & J6 cases

So after the evidence is heard, the verdicts heard, and the appeals have all been processed, how many convictions against Trump will stand?

In my humble opinion not many. This is just democrats being democrats misusing the Law to their political advantage.

The Issues at Stake in the Cases Against Trump

A guide to their timelines and the threat they pose to the former president

www.theatlantic.com

It's hard to judge because it depends on multiple factors.

On the face of it the documents case is the strongest. The basic facts in the indictment are unassailable in my opinion. On the other hand it's also in Southern Florida were MAGA faithful are numerous. All it takes is one juror not caring about evidence and it's all over.
I personally don't think this will happen but it is possible. So my guess he either gets a complete hung jury or found guilty across the board. Appeal-wise in this case he doesn't have a snowballs chance in hell. So that's something like 40.

Alvin Bragg's is the weakest case. I think he will be found guilty there but he probably has a decent chance to prevail on appeal.

Jan 6th is a pretty strong case and I think the charges will stick. Appeal-wise very unlikely.

Georgia is harder. Not so much because of the facts but because of the fact that a State prosecutor doesn't have the means that someone like Jack Smith has, and a case of this magnitude and complexity not to mention some potential questions concerning immunity and the likes poses a real challenge.

 

[kyzr]

The multiple swing state precincts synchronized shut down of vote tabulation was the fatal blow.

If you look at the total number of votes in 2020 compared to prior elections, its obvious that the 74m for Trump in 2020 and the 81m for Biden in 2020 are about 25m votes too many based on historical norms. (155m in 2020 vs ~130m avg)

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I've read through them. They're all politically motivated and bogus charges. The last I checked, its not against the law to contest an election, protest, or enjoy your right to free speech.

 

[The5thHorseman]

It's hard to judge because it depends on multiple factors.

On the face of it the documents case is the strongest. The basic facts in the indictment are unassailable in my opinion. On the other hand it's also in Southern Florida were MAGA faithful are numerous. All it takes is one juror not caring about evidence and it's all over.
I personally don't think this will happen but it is possible. So my guess he either gets a complete hung jury or found guilty across the board. Appeal-wise in this case he doesn't have a snowballs chance in hell. So that's something like 40.

Alvin Bragg's is the weakest case. I think he will be found guilty there but he probably has a decent chance to prevail on appeal.

Jan 6th is a pretty strong case and I think the charges will stick. Appeal-wise very unlikely.

Georgia is harder. Not so much because of the facts but because of the fact that a State prosecutor doesn't have the means that someone like Jack Smith has, and a case of this magnitude and complexity not to mention some potential questions concerning immunity and the likes poses a real challenge.

Grifty's issue in Georgia is the amount of evidence he generated, and the fact that it has a lower bar for RICO.

 

[Billiejeens]

Did you forget about all the judges who did nothing to stop the election from being stolen?

It really wasn't in the judges hands to stop the fraud.

 

[The5thHorseman]

I've read through them. They're all politically motivated and bogus charges. The last I checked, its not against the law to contest an election, protest, or enjoy your right to free speech.

No, you haven't.

You CLEARLY haven't read the Georgia indictment.

 

[The5thHorseman]

It really wasn't in the judges hands to stop the fraud.

There was no fraud.

 

[Kondor3]

Did you forget about all the judges who did nothing to stop the election from being stolen?

Maybe you(r side) should have presented actual evidence of substantial wrongdoing that they could use in jurisdictions where you had standing?

Then again, your orange-tinted con-man and some of his minions are such lying sacks-of-$hit that nobody would believe them anyway.

 

[Billiejeens]

So many posters who don't know what an indictment is -keep repeating "read the indictment."

Indictments - real world.

Imagine Child X- (the Prosecutor)
He is writing a letter to Santa Clause - his list is long and expansive and includes everything that a child would want, makes sense, he is writing to Santa.
If he is in Georgia, he has included unicorns on his list.

X gives the list to Grandma ( The Trial Judge) who has promised to mail it for him.
Grandma loves his list, says yes, I am sure that Santa can take care of these, Grandma's never say no, if they say no, they wouldn't be grandmas. (or trial Judges, we need trials to have trial judges)

Down the road a little, Grandma gives the list to DAD, (Appellate Judge, State Supreme Court Justice, maybe SCOTUS)
Dad is a serious person, Dad is not grandma, dad is dad, dad's job is to say no as often as possible.
He looks at grandma and says Mom, he has unicorns on here, why would you encourage that?
Because I am Grandma. it's your job to be strict, not mine.
So, the strict dad tells X, Santa is not bringing you any of this.

Reality hits, Child X is sad.

 

[The5thHorseman]

It's hard to judge because it depends on multiple factors.

On the face of it the documents case is the strongest. The basic facts in the indictment are unassailable in my opinion. On the other hand it's also in Southern Florida were MAGA faithful are numerous. All it takes is one juror not caring about evidence and it's all over.
I personally don't think this will happen but it is possible. So my guess he either gets a complete hung jury or found guilty across the board. Appeal-wise in this case he doesn't have a snowballs chance in hell. So that's something like 40.

Alvin Bragg's is the weakest case. I think he will be found guilty there but he probably has a decent chance to prevail on appeal.

Jan 6th is a pretty strong case and I think the charges will stick. Appeal-wise very unlikely.

Georgia is harder. Not so much because of the facts but because of the fact that a State prosecutor doesn't have the means that someone like Jack Smith has, and a case of this magnitude and complexity not to mention some potential questions concerning immunity and the likes poses a real challenge.

Alvin Bragg's is the weakest case. I think he will be found guilty there but he probably has a decent chance to prevail on appeal

It's a "records" case, so I assume the evidence is documentary. I don't know how Grifty will parry if his auditor has walked away from a decade of financial statements.

 

[CowboyTed]

2020 was stolen, but not by ballot stuffing, although I'm sure there was some voter fraud with the mail-in ballots. That's why France doesn't allow them.

2020 was stolen by election interference by the deep state and the hi-tech oligarchs.
1. The FBI hid evidence of Biden crimes from Hunter's laptop, money transfers, and Bobulinsky
2. Zuckerbucks bought WI, SBF stole $billions from FTX and gave $40m to democrats
3. The FBI colluded with Twitter to censor Biden crimes (see Twitter files)
4. The MSM was biased against Trump in their coverage of the election
5. With all of that, Trump only lost by 43,000 votes in WI, AZ, and GA

Love you point 5...
IF Trump won those three states, he still lost...

You fucking idiot...

The rest is just bullshit fed to you... Keep it up they need idiots like you..