How Much Prison Time Should You Get For Having An Abortion?

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. The way I have *ALWAYS* seen abortion, is its legalized murder, liberals have the federal laws to protect them to kill a perfectly innocent human being, *a baby*, which is immoral, if anythings immoral, to murder a baby floating around in a woman's womb.
2. So, in so doing, in my view *ALL* murder should be legal, if you make legal the murdering of the unborn baby.
3. Make murder legal, there are way more reasons to murder a person on two feet on the ground, rather than an innocent baby floating around in a woman's womb.
4, If you are a heartless bastard or bitch you will disagree with my logic.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[whitehall]

A woman would be held on a charge of manslaughter if a newly born baby was found in the garbage but lefties have rigged the system that a baby can be murdered if it is about four inches away from being born while it's head is held long enough in the birth canal by desperate technicians to successfully perform a partial birth abortion aka late term abortion. How many technicians say "what the hell" and execute the little bloody squirming infant if it is accidentally dropped on the table?

 

[Vastator]

Sorry bout that,

1. The way I have *ALWAYS* seen abortion, is its legalized murder, liberals have the federal laws to protect them to kill a perfectly innocent human being, *a baby*, which is immoral, if anythings immoral, to murder a baby floating around in a woman's womb.
2. So, in so doing, in my view *ALL* murder should be legal, if you make legal the murdering of the unborn baby.
3. Make murder legal, there are way more reasons to murder a person on two feet on the ground, rather than an innocent baby floating around in a woman's womb.
4, If you are a heartless bastard or bitch you will disagree with my logic.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Give every one one freebie on murder. Sounds fair enough. They get their reasons; we get ours. Compromise, anyone?

 

[OldLady]

That whole “responsibility” thing really pisses you selfish abortionists off doesn’t it?

So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:

It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.

Check

Don’t get ahead of yourself. The decision to engage in behavior that is known to result in pregnancy is also their responsibility. They are in full control. Short of rape; no one gets “sympathy” for becoming pregnant. It’s scienfically proven cause and effect. And the effects are well known.

So lets see you are anti abortion and yet you do not believe in helping infants if in need of food, healthcare, or a roof over their head, or even a clean environment (I am talking about Hud) conducive for them to become healthy and happy productive well educated adults?

I'd say your responsible is to keep your opinions to yourself then, you have no right to be anti abortion due to the fact you are not pro life.

Can't afford a kid. Easy solution. Don't have sex.

No - PROTECT YOURSELF.
Sadly, the states that promote abstinence only education have the highest rates of teen pregnancy.

Just ask Bristol Palin how abstinence works.

Abstinence has never worked. The number of six month term babies born to newlyweds has been constant since the beginning of marriage. Really big healthy six month babies. It happened in colonial America. It happened in my parents' generation and it still happens now. The trick is, do you take responsibility for what you have done? Do you find a way to bring this child into a world where it will be provided for and loved, raised with commitment, or do you terminate this seed of potential as the kinder and more responsible thing to do? Neither is an easy decision, and people don't ADVOCATE abortion--the advocate the right of CHOICE.

I wouldn't be opposed to changing the on-demand term limit to five months, unless the child or mother's life is a serious factor.

 

[Slyhunter]

That whole “responsibility” thing really pisses you selfish abortionists off doesn’t it?

So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:

It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.

Check

Don’t get ahead of yourself. The decision to engage in behavior that is known to result in pregnancy is also their responsibility. They are in full control. Short of rape; no one gets “sympathy” for becoming pregnant. It’s scienfically proven cause and effect. And the effects are well known.

So lets see you are anti abortion and yet you do not believe in helping infants if in need of food, healthcare, or a roof over their head, or even a clean environment (I am talking about Hud) conducive for them to become healthy and happy productive well educated adults?

I'd say your responsible is to keep your opinions to yourself then, you have no right to be anti abortion due to the fact you are not pro life.

Can't afford a kid. Easy solution. Don't have sex.

No - PROTECT YOURSELF.
Sadly, the states that promote abstinence only education have the highest rates of teen pregnancy.

Just ask Bristol Palin how abstinence works.

I don't have to ask Bristol Palin how abstinence works, I know from first hand knowledge.
I haven't had sex since 1987 and I haven't gotten anyone pregnant.

 

[Slyhunter]

So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:

It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.

Check

Don’t get ahead of yourself. The decision to engage in behavior that is known to result in pregnancy is also their responsibility. They are in full control. Short of rape; no one gets “sympathy” for becoming pregnant. It’s scienfically proven cause and effect. And the effects are well known.

So lets see you are anti abortion and yet you do not believe in helping infants if in need of food, healthcare, or a roof over their head, or even a clean environment (I am talking about Hud) conducive for them to become healthy and happy productive well educated adults?

I'd say your responsible is to keep your opinions to yourself then, you have no right to be anti abortion due to the fact you are not pro life.

Can't afford a kid. Easy solution. Don't have sex.

No - PROTECT YOURSELF.
Sadly, the states that promote abstinence only education have the highest rates of teen pregnancy.

Just ask Bristol Palin how abstinence works.

Abstinence has never worked. The number of six month term babies born to newlyweds has been constant since the beginning of marriage. Really big healthy six month babies. It happened in colonial America. It happened in my parents' generation and it still happens now. The trick is, do you take responsibility for what you have done? Do you find a way to bring this child into a world where it will be provided for and loved, raised with commitment, or do you terminate this seed of potential as the kinder and more responsible thing to do? Neither is an easy decision, and people don't ADVOCATE abortion--the advocate the right of CHOICE.

I wouldn't be opposed to changing the on-demand term limit to five months, unless the child or mother's life is a serious factor.

Abstinence does work if it's actually applied. don't have sex don't have babies. it really is that simple.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That whole “responsibility” thing really pisses you selfish abortionists off doesn’t it?

So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:

It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.

Check

"....because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood ..."

If only.

Planned Parenthood prevents abortions. Big time. Why would Pro-Lifers not want them to continue?

In a constellation of stupid posts....this may be the most stupid.


TOTAL ABORTIONS SINCE 1973:
59,115,995

Based on numbers reported by the Guttmacher Institute 1973-2014, with projections of 926,190 for 2015-16. GI estimates a possible 3 percent under reporting rate, which is factored into the overall total. [1/17]

Christian Life Resources



Did I mention that you're a moron????

 

[DrLove]

That whole “responsibility” thing really pisses you selfish abortionists off doesn’t it?

So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:

It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.

Check

"....because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood ..."

If only.

Planned Parenthood prevents abortions. Big time. Why would Pro-Lifers not want them to continue?

Makes no sense does it? Stop funding PP to provide services for women only 3% of which are abortions which are paid for by private donations such as I send.
Then the clinics close, pregnancy rates skyrocket, more abortions are needed or the exact kind of people they don't want are born.
Then 15-20 years later they tell THEM not to have sex.
Lather, rinse, then repeat the same cycle as we take another spin on the Broken Merry Go Round.

Sad

 

[PoliticalChic]

So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:

It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.

Check

Don’t get ahead of yourself. The decision to engage in behavior that is known to result in pregnancy is also their responsibility. They are in full control. Short of rape; no one gets “sympathy” for becoming pregnant. It’s scienfically proven cause and effect. And the effects are well known.

So lets see you are anti abortion and yet you do not believe in helping infants if in need of food, healthcare, or a roof over their head, or even a clean environment (I am talking about Hud) conducive for them to become healthy and happy productive well educated adults?

I'd say your responsible is to keep your opinions to yourself then, you have no right to be anti abortion due to the fact you are not pro life.

Can't afford a kid. Easy solution. Don't have sex.

No - PROTECT YOURSELF.
Sadly, the states that promote abstinence only education have the highest rates of teen pregnancy.

Just ask Bristol Palin how abstinence works.

Abstinence has never worked. The number of six month term babies born to newlyweds has been constant since the beginning of marriage. Really big healthy six month babies. It happened in colonial America. It happened in my parents' generation and it still happens now. The trick is, do you take responsibility for what you have done? Do you find a way to bring this child into a world where it will be provided for and loved, raised with commitment, or do you terminate this seed of potential as the kinder and more responsible thing to do? Neither is an easy decision, and people don't ADVOCATE abortion--the advocate the right of CHOICE.

I wouldn't be opposed to changing the on-demand term limit to five months, unless the child or mother's life is a serious factor.

"Abstinence has never worked."


Have I mentioned that you're a moron?

 

[DrLove]

Don’t get ahead of yourself. The decision to engage in behavior that is known to result in pregnancy is also their responsibility. They are in full control. Short of rape; no one gets “sympathy” for becoming pregnant. It’s scienfically proven cause and effect. And the effects are well known.

So lets see you are anti abortion and yet you do not believe in helping infants if in need of food, healthcare, or a roof over their head, or even a clean environment (I am talking about Hud) conducive for them to become healthy and happy productive well educated adults?

I'd say your responsible is to keep your opinions to yourself then, you have no right to be anti abortion due to the fact you are not pro life.

Can't afford a kid. Easy solution. Don't have sex.

No - PROTECT YOURSELF.
Sadly, the states that promote abstinence only education have the highest rates of teen pregnancy.

Just ask Bristol Palin how abstinence works.

Abstinence has never worked. The number of six month term babies born to newlyweds has been constant since the beginning of marriage. Really big healthy six month babies. It happened in colonial America. It happened in my parents' generation and it still happens now. The trick is, do you take responsibility for what you have done? Do you find a way to bring this child into a world where it will be provided for and loved, raised with commitment, or do you terminate this seed of potential as the kinder and more responsible thing to do? Neither is an easy decision, and people don't ADVOCATE abortion--the advocate the right of CHOICE.

I wouldn't be opposed to changing the on-demand term limit to five months, unless the child or mother's life is a serious factor.

Abstinence does work if it's actually applied. don't have sex don't have babies. it really is that simple.

Nah - it's never worked for the average person and never will.
You are oversimplifying

 

[Vastator]

That whole “responsibility” thing really pisses you selfish abortionists off doesn’t it?

So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:

It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.

Check

"....because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood ..."

If only.

Planned Parenthood prevents abortions. Big time. Why would Pro-Lifers not want them to continue?

In a constellation of stupid posts....this may be the most stupid.


TOTAL ABORTIONS SINCE 1973:
59,115,995

Based on numbers reported by the Guttmacher Institute 1973-2014, with projections of 926,190 for 2015-16. GI estimates a possible 3 percent under reporting rate, which is factored into the overall total. [1/17]

Christian Life Resources



Did I mention that you're a moron????

Now THAT!!! Is a fucking holocaust!

 

[DrLove]

I haven't had sex since 1987 and I haven't gotten anyone pregnant.

You've not had sex in 40 years? - Well that ^ explains everything!

 

[DrLove]

So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:

It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.

Check

Don’t get ahead of yourself. The decision to engage in behavior that is known to result in pregnancy is also their responsibility. They are in full control. Short of rape; no one gets “sympathy” for becoming pregnant. It’s scienfically proven cause and effect. And the effects are well known.

So lets see you are anti abortion and yet you do not believe in helping infants if in need of food, healthcare, or a roof over their head, or even a clean environment (I am talking about Hud) conducive for them to become healthy and happy productive well educated adults?

I'd say your responsible is to keep your opinions to yourself then, you have no right to be anti abortion due to the fact you are not pro life.

Can't afford a kid. Easy solution. Don't have sex.

No - PROTECT YOURSELF.
Sadly, the states that promote abstinence only education have the highest rates of teen pregnancy.

Just ask Bristol Palin how abstinence works.

Abstinence has never worked. The number of six month term babies born to newlyweds has been constant since the beginning of marriage. Really big healthy six month babies. It happened in colonial America. It happened in my parents' generation and it still happens now. The trick is, do you take responsibility for what you have done? Do you find a way to bring this child into a world where it will be provided for and loved, raised with commitment, or do you terminate this seed of potential as the kinder and more responsible thing to do? Neither is an easy decision, and people don't ADVOCATE abortion--the advocate the right of CHOICE.

I wouldn't be opposed to changing the on-demand term limit to five months, unless the child or mother's life is a serious factor.

Hell, I'd be happy to limit it to four months unless Mom's life in danger.

 

[DrLove]

A woman would be held on a charge of manslaughter if a newly born baby was found in the garbage but lefties have rigged the system that a baby can be murdered if it is about four inches away from being born while it's head is held long enough in the birth canal by desperate technicians to successfully perform a partial birth abortion aka late term abortion. How many technicians say "what the hell" and execute the little bloody squirming infant if it is accidentally dropped on the table?

Thanks for painting a picture. I am opposed to PBA - Opposed to all abortions after 120 days.

And 60% of the Americans agree with me.

 

[irosie91]

A woman's choice, guys. No woman is going to be punished by the state.

Hopefully, by the end of Pres, Trump's 8 years in office.

Abortion will be illegal. ....

And lots of poor women will die in back alley's.

You must be thrilled. Your kind always are.

Sarah Palin Slashed Funding for Teen Moms

I'm willing to bet that even with illegality, many of today's doctors will help out.

Just an innocent D & C. That's what docs disguised it as before. For plenty of extra cash.

really-----I lived during that time---------D & C (dilation and curettage) involves a
scrapping of the uterine wall. The euphemism for very early abortion was
"for delayed menses"-----done in hospital clinics for either no or minimal remuneration TO THE HOSPITAL

 

[Slyhunter]

Don’t get ahead of yourself. The decision to engage in behavior that is known to result in pregnancy is also their responsibility. They are in full control. Short of rape; no one gets “sympathy” for becoming pregnant. It’s scienfically proven cause and effect. And the effects are well known.

So lets see you are anti abortion and yet you do not believe in helping infants if in need of food, healthcare, or a roof over their head, or even a clean environment (I am talking about Hud) conducive for them to become healthy and happy productive well educated adults?

I'd say your responsible is to keep your opinions to yourself then, you have no right to be anti abortion due to the fact you are not pro life.

Can't afford a kid. Easy solution. Don't have sex.

No - PROTECT YOURSELF.
Sadly, the states that promote abstinence only education have the highest rates of teen pregnancy.

Just ask Bristol Palin how abstinence works.

Abstinence has never worked. The number of six month term babies born to newlyweds has been constant since the beginning of marriage. Really big healthy six month babies. It happened in colonial America. It happened in my parents' generation and it still happens now. The trick is, do you take responsibility for what you have done? Do you find a way to bring this child into a world where it will be provided for and loved, raised with commitment, or do you terminate this seed of potential as the kinder and more responsible thing to do? Neither is an easy decision, and people don't ADVOCATE abortion--the advocate the right of CHOICE.

I wouldn't be opposed to changing the on-demand term limit to five months, unless the child or mother's life is a serious factor.

"Abstinence has never worked."


Have I mentioned that you're a moron?

Abstinence works 100% of the time.
How many people have babies that didn't have sex? Only one that I know of and that was Mary Magdalene.

 

[Slyhunter]

So lets see you are anti abortion and yet you do not believe in helping infants if in need of food, healthcare, or a roof over their head, or even a clean environment (I am talking about Hud) conducive for them to become healthy and happy productive well educated adults?

I'd say your responsible is to keep your opinions to yourself then, you have no right to be anti abortion due to the fact you are not pro life.

Can't afford a kid. Easy solution. Don't have sex.

No - PROTECT YOURSELF.
Sadly, the states that promote abstinence only education have the highest rates of teen pregnancy.

Just ask Bristol Palin how abstinence works.

Abstinence has never worked. The number of six month term babies born to newlyweds has been constant since the beginning of marriage. Really big healthy six month babies. It happened in colonial America. It happened in my parents' generation and it still happens now. The trick is, do you take responsibility for what you have done? Do you find a way to bring this child into a world where it will be provided for and loved, raised with commitment, or do you terminate this seed of potential as the kinder and more responsible thing to do? Neither is an easy decision, and people don't ADVOCATE abortion--the advocate the right of CHOICE.

I wouldn't be opposed to changing the on-demand term limit to five months, unless the child or mother's life is a serious factor.

Abstinence does work if it's actually applied. don't have sex don't have babies. it really is that simple.

Nah - it's never worked for the average person and never will.
You are oversimplifying

ok, how many people, who abstained from sex, have had a baby?

 

[PoliticalChic]

That whole “responsibility” thing really pisses you selfish abortionists off doesn’t it?

So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:

It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.

Check

"....because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood ..."

If only.

Planned Parenthood prevents abortions. Big time. Why would Pro-Lifers not want them to continue?

In a constellation of stupid posts....this may be the most stupid.


TOTAL ABORTIONS SINCE 1973:
59,115,995

Based on numbers reported by the Guttmacher Institute 1973-2014, with projections of 926,190 for 2015-16. GI estimates a possible 3 percent under reporting rate, which is factored into the overall total. [1/17]

Christian Life Resources



Did I mention that you're a moron????

Now THAT!!! Is a fucking holocaust!

And, as the data proves, 86.5 % of those killings are simply based on convenience....not rape, not incest, not the health of the mother.


Abortion, in effect, is the Left's claim to the 'right' to kill another human being.


The unborn human receiving sustenance from its mother, is, nonetheless, a separate and distinct human being.

There are a number of clear biological facts, and all sorts of legal precedents, that easily refute the claim that the embryo or fetus is simply part of the mother's body.

1. An individual's body parts all share the same genetic code. If the unborn child were actually a part of the mother's body, the unborn's cells would have the same genetic code as the cells of the mother. This is not the case. Every cell of the unborn's body is genetically distinct from every cell in the mother's body.
2. In many cases, the blood type of the unborn child is different than the blood type of the mother. Since one body cannot function with two different blood types, this is clearly not the mother's blood.
3. In half of all pregnancies, the unborn child is a male, meaning that even the sex of the child is different from the mother.
4. As Randy Alcorn states in his book Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, "A Chinese zygote implanted in a Swedish woman will always be Chinese, not Swedish, because his identity is based on his genetic code, not on that of the body in which he resides."1
5. It is possible for a fetus to die while the mother lives, and it is possible for the mother to die while the fetus lives. This could not be true if the mother and child were simply one person.
6. When the embryo implants in the lining of the uterus, it emits chemical substances which weaken the woman's immune system within the uterus so that this tiny "foreign" body is not rejected by the woman's body. Were this tiny embryo simply "part of the woman's body" there would be no need to locally disable the woman's immunities.
7. It is illegal to execute a pregnant woman on death row because the fetus living inside her is a distinct human being who cannot be executed for the crimes of the mother (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Article 6.5).
8. When Scott Peterson killed his pregnant wife, Laci, he was convicted on two counts of murder.
9. Sir Albert Liley (the "Father of Fetology") made this observation in a 1970 speech entitled, "The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?"

Physiologically, we must accept that the conceptus is, in a very large measure, in charge of the pregnancy.... Biologically, at no stage can we subscribe to the view that the fetus is a mere appendage of the mother.2

10. The late Christopher Hitchens, a prominent public intellectual, atheist, and abortion advocate wrote the following in his book, God is Not Great:
'As a materialist, I think it has been demonstrated that an embryo is a separate body and entity, and not merely (as some really did used to argue) a growth on or in the female body. There used to be feminists who would say that it was more like an appendix or even—this was seriously maintained—a tumor. That nonsense seems to have stopped… Embryology confirms morality. The words “unborn child,” even when used in a politicized manner, describe a material reality.3

Hitchens had other reasons for supporting legal abortion, but he recognized the absurdity of claiming that unborn children are simply part of the mother's body.

11. No matter how you spin it, women don't have four arms and four legs when they're pregnant. Those extra appendages belong to the tiny human being(s) living inside of them. At no point in pregnancy is the developing embryo or fetus simply a part of the mother's body.

Footnotes

1. Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments (Multnomah Publishers, 2000) p. 57.
2. Sir William Albert Liley,“The Termination of Pregnancy or the Extermination of the Fetus?” cited by Randy Alcorn, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments, 58.
3. Christopher Hitchens, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (Hachette Book Group. Kindle Edition, 2009), 378-379.

http://www.abort73.com/abortion/mothers_body/


Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?




The Leftist murderers will be unable to find any errors in the above.

 

[Brain357]

That whole “responsibility” thing really pisses you selfish abortionists off doesn’t it?

So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:

It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.

Check

"....because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood ..."

If only.

Planned Parenthood prevents abortions. Big time. Why would Pro-Lifers not want them to continue?

In a constellation of stupid posts....this may be the most stupid.


TOTAL ABORTIONS SINCE 1973:
59,115,995

Based on numbers reported by the Guttmacher Institute 1973-2014, with projections of 926,190 for 2015-16. GI estimates a possible 3 percent under reporting rate, which is factored into the overall total. [1/17]

Christian Life Resources



Did I mention that you're a moron????

Now THAT!!! Is a fucking holocaust!

Give the name of one of the victims.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So the message to the single Mom with an unplanned pregnancy because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood is:

It is your RESPONSIBILITY to have that baby - But not mine to feed it with government cheese even though you are working two jobs and daycare eats up half your income.

Check

"....because you cut funding to Planned Parenthood ..."

If only.

Planned Parenthood prevents abortions. Big time. Why would Pro-Lifers not want them to continue?

In a constellation of stupid posts....this may be the most stupid.


TOTAL ABORTIONS SINCE 1973:
59,115,995

Based on numbers reported by the Guttmacher Institute 1973-2014, with projections of 926,190 for 2015-16. GI estimates a possible 3 percent under reporting rate, which is factored into the overall total. [1/17]

Christian Life Resources



Did I mention that you're a moron????

Now THAT!!! Is a fucking holocaust!

Give the name of one of the victims.

Sooo.....you're looking for dates????