Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No need. The Bernie and BLM anti First Amendment losers are too all fucking 'man-bun' pussies and coward negro thugs. Trump will place a few hundred cage fighters in the crowd.I could easily see the trump protesters becoming deadly violent.
There will not be anymore Trump 'outdoor' rallies.Really? Even the outdoor rallies?Fists. Everyone who enters one of Trump's rallies is scanned with a metal detector."Geterdone" with what? Fists? Guns?All Trump needs to do is bring in a few hundred 78 year old White men. They will 'geterdone'. Of course when the BLM negro thugs see the old White men the fucking thugs will run for the exits.I think it's possible we'll see more than just slap fights and thrown punches.
Not sure how security works at these things, especially outdoors, but would anyone be surprised if some of Trump's people brought weapons of some kind?
.
.
.
The anti-Trump forces are now obviously excited and emboldened by their victory in shutting down opposing speech in Chicago. This stuff is only going to intensify.
The Trump supporters are even angrier and will be attending his future rallies ready to take on those trying to shut down opposing speech. Who knows how, or with what.
Obviously this will get worse before it gets better. Any predictions?
Yes, I know it's all the other side's fault. I'm curious about what you think could happen.
.
That's why I'm curious. Let's say you have 2,500 people in a crowd, and they know what's been going on. Tough to imagine that at least a few wouldn't bring something with them.And what if they don't?
Look that is an awful lot of people (on either side) and there is no way in hell to control them all.
.
Well, my guess is that something pretty violent is most likely to happen at a Trump rally than at the rally of a more traditional politician, so unless people like him become the norm in elections, we may be dealing with a fairly unique thing here.The anti-Trump forces are now obviously excited and emboldened by their victory in shutting down opposing speech in Chicago. This stuff is only going to intensify.
The Trump supporters are even angrier and will be attending his future rallies ready to take on those trying to shut down opposing speech. Who knows how, or with what.
Obviously this will get worse before it gets better. Any predictions?
Yes, I know it's all the other side's fault. I'm curious about what you think could happen.
.
It is hard to see an upper limit.
The protesters believe that people they are trying to intimidate are effectively Pure Evil, who want to kill them and theirs, and oppress the survivors.
The Trump supporters are very tired of that shit.
THe organizers, I think just want to use intimidation at this point, and probably realize that actually mob violence would actually hurt their cause.
BUT when using angry mobs, precision control is not an option.
Random Chance will play a role here.
Also, consider this.
What makes you think this won't happen next election too?
Of course. But I don't think it's unfair to say the chances of elevated violence are higher at one of his rallies if protesters show up.That's why I'm curious. Let's say you have 2,500 people in a crowd, and they know what's been going on. Tough to imagine that at least a few wouldn't bring something with them.And what if they don't?
Look that is an awful lot of people (on either side) and there is no way in hell to control them all.
.
Ok, 2,500 people in a crowd and one has a history of mental illness and shows up with a completely different motivation. How in the hell are the other 2,499 going to know that?
I'm not going to paint Trump supporters as a bunch of violent hilljacks or with a propensity to violence. I'm sure they have some nutters. Just like on the groups protesting them.
The word has gone out to every Trump supporter: DO NOT! go to any Hillary or Bernie rally and cause any problems! You see that this is what is happening.The anti-Trump forces are now obviously excited and emboldened by their victory in shutting down opposing speech in Chicago. This stuff is only going to intensify.
The Trump supporters are even angrier and will be attending his future rallies ready to take on those trying to shut down opposing speech. Who knows how, or with what.
Obviously this will get worse before it gets better. Any predictions?
Yes, I know it's all the other side's fault. I'm curious about what you think could happen.
.
It is hard to see an upper limit.
The protesters believe that people they are trying to intimidate are effectively Pure Evil, who want to kill them and theirs, and oppress the survivors.
The Trump supporters are very tired of that shit.
THe organizers, I think just want to use intimidation at this point, and probably realize that actually mob violence would actually hurt their cause.
BUT when using angry mobs, precision control is not an option.
Random Chance will play a role here.
Also, consider this.
What makes you think this won't happen next election too?
Well, there is Trump, and then there are his supporters.The word has gone out to every Trump supporter: DO NOT! go to any Hillary or Bernie rally and cause any problems! You see that this is what is happening.The anti-Trump forces are now obviously excited and emboldened by their victory in shutting down opposing speech in Chicago. This stuff is only going to intensify.
The Trump supporters are even angrier and will be attending his future rallies ready to take on those trying to shut down opposing speech. Who knows how, or with what.
Obviously this will get worse before it gets better. Any predictions?
Yes, I know it's all the other side's fault. I'm curious about what you think could happen.
.
It is hard to see an upper limit.
The protesters believe that people they are trying to intimidate are effectively Pure Evil, who want to kill them and theirs, and oppress the survivors.
The Trump supporters are very tired of that shit.
THe organizers, I think just want to use intimidation at this point, and probably realize that actually mob violence would actually hurt their cause.
BUT when using angry mobs, precision control is not an option.
Random Chance will play a role here.
Also, consider this.
What makes you think this won't happen next election too?
Trump is a genius at marketing.
He is currently 'rope-a-doping' Sander's and BLM supporters. Letting the world watch as they attempt to deny Trump's right to free speech. It's working perfectly.
The LIB MSM/DEMS/BLM might as well hand Trump the keys to the White house on a solid GOLD platter.
There well might be violence outside a Trump rally and there will probably be some cases of fighting among some inside the official PRIVATE rally site. But Trump is hiring a few hundred cage fighters to be at every indoor, PRIVATE rally from now on.Well, my guess is that something pretty violent is most likely to happen at a Trump rally than at the rally of a more traditional politician, so unless people like him become the norm in elections, we may be dealing with a fairly unique thing here.The anti-Trump forces are now obviously excited and emboldened by their victory in shutting down opposing speech in Chicago. This stuff is only going to intensify.
The Trump supporters are even angrier and will be attending his future rallies ready to take on those trying to shut down opposing speech. Who knows how, or with what.
Obviously this will get worse before it gets better. Any predictions?
Yes, I know it's all the other side's fault. I'm curious about what you think could happen.
.
It is hard to see an upper limit.
The protesters believe that people they are trying to intimidate are effectively Pure Evil, who want to kill them and theirs, and oppress the survivors.
The Trump supporters are very tired of that shit.
THe organizers, I think just want to use intimidation at this point, and probably realize that actually mob violence would actually hurt their cause.
BUT when using angry mobs, precision control is not an option.
Random Chance will play a role here.
Also, consider this.
What makes you think this won't happen next election too?
I'll bet there are people who would protest who are wondering the same thing I'm wondering, and it's possible that they'll keep their eyes open.
.
The anti-Trump forces are now obviously excited and emboldened by their victory in shutting down opposing speech in Chicago. This stuff is only going to intensify.
The Trump supporters are even angrier and will be attending his future rallies ready to take on those trying to shut down opposing speech. Who knows how, or with what.
Obviously this will get worse before it gets better. Any predictions?
Yes, I know it's all the other side's fault. I'm curious about what you think could happen.
.
Of course. But I don't think it's unfair to say the chances of elevated violence are higher at one of his rallies if protesters show up.That's why I'm curious. Let's say you have 2,500 people in a crowd, and they know what's been going on. Tough to imagine that at least a few wouldn't bring something with them.And what if they don't?
Look that is an awful lot of people (on either side) and there is no way in hell to control them all.
.
Ok, 2,500 people in a crowd and one has a history of mental illness and shows up with a completely different motivation. How in the hell are the other 2,499 going to know that?
I'm not going to paint Trump supporters as a bunch of violent hilljacks or with a propensity to violence. I'm sure they have some nutters. Just like on the groups protesting them.
.
There well might be violence outside a Trump rally and there will probably be some cases of fighting among some inside the official PRIVATE rally site. But Trump is hiring a few hundred cage fighters to be at every indoor, PRIVATE rally from now on.Well, my guess is that something pretty violent is most likely to happen at a Trump rally than at the rally of a more traditional politician, so unless people like him become the norm in elections, we may be dealing with a fairly unique thing here.The anti-Trump forces are now obviously excited and emboldened by their victory in shutting down opposing speech in Chicago. This stuff is only going to intensify.
The Trump supporters are even angrier and will be attending his future rallies ready to take on those trying to shut down opposing speech. Who knows how, or with what.
Obviously this will get worse before it gets better. Any predictions?
Yes, I know it's all the other side's fault. I'm curious about what you think could happen.
.
It is hard to see an upper limit.
The protesters believe that people they are trying to intimidate are effectively Pure Evil, who want to kill them and theirs, and oppress the survivors.
The Trump supporters are very tired of that shit.
THe organizers, I think just want to use intimidation at this point, and probably realize that actually mob violence would actually hurt their cause.
BUT when using angry mobs, precision control is not an option.
Random Chance will play a role here.
Also, consider this.
What makes you think this won't happen next election too?
I'll bet there are people who would protest who are wondering the same thing I'm wondering, and it's possible that they'll keep their eyes open.
.
I know a former cage fighter. He couldn't care less if he gets punched first. But after that the adrenaline and training kick in and he feels no pain. Same goes with the Trump 'enhanced' security cage fighters.
Pro -tip: Each T-shirt is turned in after the rally and entirely new T-shirts are issued a few minutes before the doors open at the next rally. No one then gets the opportunity to video the T shirt and send the image to someone who could duplicate the T-shirt. Plus the T-shirts are handed out backstage.
Trump's security experts are ex MOSSAD.
Watch for the 'enhanced' security team. They will all be wearing T-shirts which will identify them to the SS and Trump's on stage private security team.
Sure, that's a big part of it. I think there is a fairly large element in his crowds that were either (a) perfectly fine with that guy sucker-punching that kid and/or (b) ready to do it themselves. I saw posts here in support of that punch.It's not like this doesn't have historical precedence, Mac...
Donald Trump and the Violence to Come
“You know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in a place like this? They’d be carried out on a stretcher.”In January, when protesters tried to disrupt a Trump rally in Vermont, Trump instructed security guards to “Get him out of here … Don't give him his coat, keep his coat. Confiscate his coat. You know, it’s about 10 degrees below zero outside.” As security dragged a protester from a Nevada rally in February, Trump declared: “You know what I hate? There’s a guy, totally disruptive, throwing punches, we’re not allowed to punch back anymore. I love the old days. You know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in a place like this? They’d be carried out on a stretcher.” Reporters found no evidence that the protester had, in fact, punched anyone.
In mentioning the “old days,” Trump was likely referring to the 1960s. Back then, another generation of young leftists disillusioned with the failure of liberal presidents to undo systemic justice tried to physically disrupt political events, most famously at the Democratic Convention in 1968. And back then, another presidential candidate, Alabama Governor George Wallace, also turned protesters into props for an audience hungry to see order restored—if necessary by force. In 1967, anti-Vietnam protesters laid down in front of President Lyndon Johnson’s car. In 1968, in speech after speech, Wallace roused crowds by saying, falsely, that the “protesters had threatened his [Johnson’s] personal safety,” but if “some of them lie down in front of my automobile, it will be the last one they’ll ever want to lie down in front of.”
“The confrontation with the hecklers became a highly stylized feature of every Wallace rally,” writes Lloyd Rohler in his book George Wallace: Conservative Populist. “Violence seemed always to be lurking in the background and it frequently burst forth.” At a Wallace rally on October 29 in Detroit, reported the Chicago Tribune, “wild, chair-swinging violence erupted” as “Wallace supporters and some of several thousand hecklers clashed, first with fists and then with folding chairs … Wallace supporters struck handcuffed hecklers as they were being led away by police, who did not interfere.”
Thanks for pointing out the violence was caused by LIBs at the DEM convention in 1968.It's not like this doesn't have historical precedence, Mac...
Donald Trump and the Violence to Come
“You know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in a place like this? They’d be carried out on a stretcher.”In January, when protesters tried to disrupt a Trump rally in Vermont, Trump instructed security guards to “Get him out of here … Don't give him his coat, keep his coat. Confiscate his coat. You know, it’s about 10 degrees below zero outside.” As security dragged a protester from a Nevada rally in February, Trump declared: “You know what I hate? There’s a guy, totally disruptive, throwing punches, we’re not allowed to punch back anymore. I love the old days. You know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in a place like this? They’d be carried out on a stretcher.” Reporters found no evidence that the protester had, in fact, punched anyone.
In mentioning the “old days,” Trump was likely referring to the 1960s. Back then, another generation of young leftists disillusioned with the failure of liberal presidents to undo systemic justice tried to physically disrupt political events, most famously at the Democratic Convention in 1968. And back then, another presidential candidate, Alabama Governor George Wallace, also turned protesters into props for an audience hungry to see order restored—if necessary by force. In 1967, anti-Vietnam protesters laid down in front of President Lyndon Johnson’s car. In 1968, in speech after speech, Wallace roused crowds by saying, falsely, that the “protesters had threatened his [Johnson’s] personal safety,” but if “some of them lie down in front of my automobile, it will be the last one they’ll ever want to lie down in front of.”
“The confrontation with the hecklers became a highly stylized feature of every Wallace rally,” writes Lloyd Rohler in his book George Wallace: Conservative Populist. “Violence seemed always to be lurking in the background and it frequently burst forth.” At a Wallace rally on October 29 in Detroit, reported the Chicago Tribune, “wild, chair-swinging violence erupted” as “Wallace supporters and some of several thousand hecklers clashed, first with fists and then with folding chairs … Wallace supporters struck handcuffed hecklers as they were being led away by police, who did not interfere.”
Here's my prediction.
Obama is behind all the uprisings of the blacks.
