Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what is preterism?I fully agree. And it wouldn't even be a topic of conversation here if surada wasn't around. She is the one who constantly brings it up, every day, on every religion thread (and even on other threads for that matter)even though most of the Christians here realize full preterism is a heresy, and a completely idiotic one at that. Too dumb to even argue about.
Jesus said "It is finished" when He died on the Cross. No, that didn't mean that nothing else was left to be done.. He said that He would build HIS Church and that Church began to be built when He was still on Earth, Peter being given the primacy in said Church as the first pope. Yeh, I know, dismiss that like u always do. But your "church" does not go back to the Beginning. Smith was born in.. what? the 1800s? And of course we are to believe that there was NO Christian Church on earth for 1800 years before he came along? Please.I quit reading after your first sentence. That sentence is a complete lie. The Gospel teaches that Jesus Christ's atonement bridges the gap between what we do with our moral agency and what is expected with keeping the commandments of our Father in Heaven as Jesus Christ said to do. Why do so-called Christians complain about keeping Father's commandments? Maybe you should stop calling The fulness of the Gospel "Mormonism." We have named the Church after the the Lord himself. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. "Saints meaning members who have been baptized and confirmed members with the gift of the Holy Ghost. Jesus said "DO" all things in His name. You so-called Christians can't even name your churches in his name. Should I then call you Satanism religions?
You have obviously never read the Book of Mormon or would not say such ignorant stuff about what is taught in it. The Book is another testament of Jesus Christ. That's all it teaches from beginning to end is about the great atonement of Jesus Christ. Does your Bible teach you to lie about what others teach?
All with 72 virgins?Don't know. There's many allegories for heaven. .. like my father's house has many mansions. In Islam there are 30 descriptions of heaven.
All with 72 virgins?
an antiChrist is anyone who rejects Christ and His ways and His Church.That's what they were teaching in the first century... False teachers and all that.
1 John 2:18 - Bible Gateway
www.biblegateway.com
LOLAll with 72 virgins?
what is preterism?
Fake news?Nope.
an antiChrist is anyone who rejects Christ and His ways and His Church.
Whether someone is knowingly rejecting His Church or not is something known only to the Father. But once someone is aware they are persecuting the real Church Christ founded... well.. nuff said..
No, it did not say that. You lie again. Stop lying. You are rewriting history.The revelation letter to the 7 churches says it will happen soon within that generation. Did the Mormons rewrite revelation?
You also have trouble understanding what the Kingdom of God is and what The Church of Jesus Christ represents. The Church of Jesus Christ is an earthly representation of the Heavenly Kingdom of God. When the people committed the falling away or apostasy as Paul stated, the authority of the Church also disappeared as well. The RCC was and still is just an empty shell with no authority of the Priesthood. Oh, it has a Priesthood. But, it's really Priestcrafts because it has no authority including the Pope. And, the Lord was not going to restore the Priesthood authority in a dead shell of a church.Jesus said "It is finished" when He died on the Cross. No, that didn't mean that nothing else was left to be done.. He said that He would build HIS Church and that Church began to be built when He was still on Earth, Peter being given the primacy in said Church as the first pope. Yeh, I know, dismiss that like u always do. But your "church" does not go back to the Beginning. Smith was born in.. what? the 1800s? And of course we are to believe that there was NO Christian Church on earth for 1800 years before he came along? Please.
It is a man made religion like all of them are that are not the Original.
the Original Church was called Catholic as early as 107 AD and probably sooner (it's just that ancient writings have not always been preserved, and yet 107 is very early)
No, it does not. It just refers to the future in the last days before the Savior's coming. Those who understand and are prepared will be saved from much of the calamity. Apparently, not you.
I know full well what you don't believe.
There have been many who serve the Spirit of the Antichrist. The Son of Perdition has yet to be revealed. I have some thoughts but no way to prove anything.
I am however starting to believe that you see yourself (like many others do) as god, that is you are your own highest authority.
My original point stands, you don't believe your Bible.
He's talking about the New Jerusalem. Not the Old Jerusalem. And, eventually, there will be a temple there as there will be thousands all over the world to do the work for the dead. You can look in the OT like Zechariah chapter 9 and Ezekiel chapters 38-48. And, of course, we have latter day Prophets who have cleared up much confusion about this. The Church of Jesus Christ will assist in the building of the Temple in Old Jerusalem.
No, he is not. Funny how you first say it's not a real city, only spiritual. Now, he's writing about a real city?
You do realize that the Anti-Christ was the roman emperor Nero and that John the Revelator was writing to the actual church at that time? Right? Caesar Nero, when spelled out in Hebrew using Hebrew numerology is 666. John wasn't talking about some unknown future date. That wouldn't make sense since he was writing the very specific churches who would expect those things he was writing about to soon occur, which John says in Revelation 1:1 "...which must soon take place". John sets the time frame right there. So why be somewhat specific if the church is still waiting over 2000 years later? It doesn't make sense.
John wrote in Hebraic code, that would be understood by first century Jews, and confusing for others.... like many Christians today who try and make Revelation fit some future date and future characters.
Unfortunately, dispensationalism is the root cause for this poor hermeneutic espoused today and popularized in the 19th century by Darby. Why in the world would we think that God would cloud proper interpretation for almost 2000 years. It doesn't make sense.
Jesus says it will be soon before that generation dies.
That's silly. Read the revelation letter to the 7 churches.
