How the Mueller report can still threaten Trump’s legitimacy

[PoliticalChic]

only
29% believe the Mueller report clears President Trump, according to a brand news NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll

40 percent say it does not clear him

Because he’s a vile corrupt bully criminal. Anyone with half a brain knows this.

For your reading displeasure:

“ The report further explains that a primary consideration for the Special Counsel's investigation was whether any Americans – including individuals associated with the Trump campaign – joined the Russian conspiracies to influence the election, which would be a federal crime. The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

As noted above, the Special Counsel did not find that any U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate conspired or knowingly coordinated with the IRA in its efforts, although the Special Counsel brought criminal charges against a number of Russian nationals and entities in connection with these activities.”
Read Attorney General William Barr’s Summary of the Mueller Report

 

[bendog]

Since we have not seen the Mueller report all this premature orgasms from the right might be unwise. And since WE are going to get the greatest redacted version of a report in history, questions will remain.

"All we can do right now is speculate about a report that only a few people have seen, at least until the redacted version comes out in April. But even based on what little we know — Attorney General William P. Barr’s summary, the indictments and court filings that came from Mueller’s team — it’s premature to write off its 400-page findings . Mueller’s office may have properly drafted a detailed and damning account of Trump’s obstruction of justice and simply cast it as a set of facts, a road map for the analysts who must decide what to do about it: members of Congress.

If Mueller believed it was inappropriate to pronounce on the president’s guilt — after all, the Justice Department has a long-standing policy against indicting a sitting president — he could still be following the example of Leon Jaworski, the Watergate independent counsel who decided against indicting President Richard Nixon, but instead submitted to Congress an extensive accounting of all the facts surrounding his efforts to shut down the investigation. Jaworski’s testimony skipped all the adjectives and adverbs. It simply told the story and allowed the branch of government tasked with oversight to do the rest."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...8b7525a8d5f_story.html?utm_term=.8f8d35eb0931

Only a complete moron would be hoping there is something to be found at this point. The only thing that is to be found now is a failed attempt at a coup and cause to string up a few democommie assholes for treason.

Oh there has to be evidence of contacts …. because there were contacts. But people thinking there'd be impeachment were fooling themselves.

 

[BlindBoo]

Since we have not seen the Mueller report all this premature orgasms from the right might be unwise. And since WE are going to get the greatest redacted version of a report in history, questions will remain.

"All we can do right now is speculate about a report that only a few people have seen, at least until the redacted version comes out in April. But even based on what little we know — Attorney General William P. Barr’s summary, the indictments and court filings that came from Mueller’s team — it’s premature to write off its 400-page findings . Mueller’s office may have properly drafted a detailed and damning account of Trump’s obstruction of justice and simply cast it as a set of facts, a road map for the analysts who must decide what to do about it: members of Congress.

If Mueller believed it was inappropriate to pronounce on the president’s guilt — after all, the Justice Department has a long-standing policy against indicting a sitting president — he could still be following the example of Leon Jaworski, the Watergate independent counsel who decided against indicting President Richard Nixon, but instead submitted to Congress an extensive accounting of all the facts surrounding his efforts to shut down the investigation. Jaworski’s testimony skipped all the adjectives and adverbs. It simply told the story and allowed the branch of government tasked with oversight to do the rest."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...8b7525a8d5f_story.html?utm_term=.8f8d35eb0931

Only a complete moron would be hoping there is something to be found at this point. The only thing that is to be found now is a failed attempt at a coup and cause to string up a few democommie assholes for treason.

Failed Coup? We've taken over half of Congress already. The next offensive will be complete in about 20 months or so and we'll try to conquer the other halve and the White House too. What's in the report will be known. Maybe we'll have to wait till 2021 to see it, but we will see it. I'm sure Ol'Trumpybear will find a nice home in Russia when that happens. Lets just hope he doesn't pull a "Benedict Arnold" on us in the meantime.