How the Mueller report can still threaten Trump’s legitimacy

[bodecea]

You fail to remember, Nixon was guilty of the crime of breaking into the DNC, first.
Trump is not guilty of any crime, thus he can’t be charged with obstructing a non existent crime.

No...Nixon was NOT guilty of the crime of breaking into the DNC.....

 

[bodecea]

IM2 and Russian collusion have much in common.

They are both frauds. ....

Did I miss the release of the Mueller report?

Still not released....what are the CRCs hiding from us?

 

[depotoo]

You are correct. I should have stated he covered it up, or attempted to.

You fail to remember, Nixon was guilty of the crime of breaking into the DNC, first.
Trump is not guilty of any crime, thus he can’t be charged with obstructing a non existent crime.

No...Nixon was NOT guilty of the crime of breaking into the DNC.....

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Democrats create their own reality by starting with "if, then". They move on to "we speculate ". Whatever they come up with is their reality.

 

[jc456]

son, son, son, are there any open indictments to act on in Mueller's report? no, are there are any sealed indictments? no. Son, that's all you need to know. That, in all it's glory means, there ain't nothing in the 600 pages. Not one gd damn thing. We don't need to see anything else.

 

[blackhawk]

The Mueller report said there was no collusion the DOJ said no on obstruction of justice and Mueller has said no more indictments are coming there might be things in the report that are embarrassing for Trump but it’s extremely unlikely anything criminal is in it.

 

[Maxdeath]

Since we have not seen the Mueller report all this premature orgasms from the right might be unwise. And since WE are going to get the greatest redacted version of a report in history, questions will remain.

"All we can do right now is speculate about a report that only a few people have seen, at least until the redacted version comes out in April. But even based on what little we know — Attorney General William P. Barr’s summary, the indictments and court filings that came from Mueller’s team — it’s premature to write off its 400-page findings . Mueller’s office may have properly drafted a detailed and damning account of Trump’s obstruction of justice and simply cast it as a set of facts, a road map for the analysts who must decide what to do about it: members of Congress.

If Mueller believed it was inappropriate to pronounce on the president’s guilt — after all, the Justice Department has a long-standing policy against indicting a sitting president — he could still be following the example of Leon Jaworski, the Watergate independent counsel who decided against indicting President Richard Nixon, but instead submitted to Congress an extensive accounting of all the facts surrounding his efforts to shut down the investigation. Jaworski’s testimony skipped all the adjectives and adverbs. It simply told the story and allowed the branch of government tasked with oversight to do the rest."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...8b7525a8d5f_story.html?utm_term=.8f8d35eb0931

First off let me congratulate you on the first post I have ever seen you do that is not racist.

That being said let us look at your idea. Nixon authorized the watergate break in. So he was a criminal. He tried to cover that up which was obstruction. If you have no criminal act you can not have obstruction when you fire someone that you are allowed by law to fire.

Barr and Rosenstine both are responsible for the summary that was released. They will both be part of the team red acting the final report. So of course they are both covering for Trump.

Mueller and the 19 lawyers all but Mueller being registered democrats are going to remain silent on the findings because they are covering for Trump.

The democrats have already stated that they will be continuing to investigate and will be calling Mueller, Barr and anyone else that had anything to do with the report. So of course they will be covering for Trump.

Yeah right. Great thought process there. Barr and Rosenstine would absolutely put themselves in legal jeopardy in the hopes that everyone will cover for them.

I've posted no racism ever. Just because you don't like me pointing out continuing white racism doesn't make what I say racist. And we are not going to shut up about it because you whites don't want to hear. Oh if life was just that fucking easy for us. We ask you to stop being racists and it stops. Instead we have to live with it.

So grow the fuck up, bow your neck, batten the hatches, put on your big boy pants, whatever. Because there has never been a motherfucking solution to anything by people who just shut up and took it. And whites have had almost 250 years to stop your bullshit and haven't.

This article was written by a law professor at Duke. And since we have not seen the Mueller report, you cannot accurately state there was no crime. You can obstruct justice if you are obstructing the investigation of whether or not a crime was committed.

So sorry do you like bigot better?
Just perhaps if you tried to not find the bad in everyone and everything. If you tried not to color every little nuance of life with your hate. But no you are just sure that without you posting hate all the time things will get better and that can not be allowed to happen. Because without hate you have nothing.

Still anyone can allow their opinion to be clouded by feelings. Considering right off the bat I would say that he is a Trump hater he probably is letting his emotions cloud his judgement.

 

[BluesLegend]

Since we have not seen the Mueller report all this premature orgasms from the right might be unwise. And since WE are going to get the greatest redacted version of a report in history, questions will remain.

The AG has issued a summary, no crimes, no collusion, no obstruction. Tissue?

 

[airplanemechanic]

Barr took two days to clear the president but needs weeks to turn the report over to congress probably in a highly redacted form. Fish do not smell this fishy.

We've said 1000 fucking times you fucking moron the report contains classified information and CANNOT BE RELEASED IN ITS ENTIRETY.

 

[ColonelAngus]

It wouldn’t surprise me if Mueller’s team leaked to the Dimms that although there is nothing criminal they found on Trump, there is some politically damaging information in the report.

Dimms have a real hard on for the report to be published in its entirety.

 

[Claudette]

Another steaming pile of horse shit thread.

There was no collusion between Trump and the Russians. No obstruction as there was no collusion.

You lefty loons are bat shit crazy.

 

[dudmuck]

Barr took two days to clear the president but needs weeks to turn the report over to congress probably in a highly redacted form. Fish do not smell this fishy.

We've said 1000 fucking times you fucking moron the report contains classified information and CANNOT BE RELEASED IN ITS ENTIRETY.

It can be released to congress entirely, because congress is permitted access to classified information. Its the public release which required redaction of those classified bits.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Barr took two days to clear the president but needs weeks to turn the report over to congress probably in a highly redacted form. Fish do not smell this fishy.

We've said 1000 fucking times you fucking moron the report contains classified information and CANNOT BE RELEASED IN ITS ENTIRETY.

It can be released to congress entirely, because congress is permitted access to classified information. Its the public release which required redaction of those classified bits.

That decision is up to Barr and Barr alone. Don't you think if his summary had been wrong Mueller would have said something?

 

[IM2]

Since we have not seen the Mueller report all this premature orgasms from the right might be unwise. And since WE are going to get the greatest redacted version of a report in history, questions will remain.

"All we can do right now is speculate about a report that only a few people have seen, at least until the redacted version comes out in April. But even based on what little we know — Attorney General William P. Barr’s summary, the indictments and court filings that came from Mueller’s team — it’s premature to write off its 400-page findings . Mueller’s office may have properly drafted a detailed and damning account of Trump’s obstruction of justice and simply cast it as a set of facts, a road map for the analysts who must decide what to do about it: members of Congress.

If Mueller believed it was inappropriate to pronounce on the president’s guilt — after all, the Justice Department has a long-standing policy against indicting a sitting president — he could still be following the example of Leon Jaworski, the Watergate independent counsel who decided against indicting President Richard Nixon, but instead submitted to Congress an extensive accounting of all the facts surrounding his efforts to shut down the investigation. Jaworski’s testimony skipped all the adjectives and adverbs. It simply told the story and allowed the branch of government tasked with oversight to do the rest."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...8b7525a8d5f_story.html?utm_term=.8f8d35eb0931

First off let me congratulate you on the first post I have ever seen you do that is not racist.

That being said let us look at your idea. Nixon authorized the watergate break in. So he was a criminal. He tried to cover that up which was obstruction. If you have no criminal act you can not have obstruction when you fire someone that you are allowed by law to fire.

Barr and Rosenstine both are responsible for the summary that was released. They will both be part of the team red acting the final report. So of course they are both covering for Trump.

Mueller and the 19 lawyers all but Mueller being registered democrats are going to remain silent on the findings because they are covering for Trump.

The democrats have already stated that they will be continuing to investigate and will be calling Mueller, Barr and anyone else that had anything to do with the report. So of course they will be covering for Trump.

Yeah right. Great thought process there. Barr and Rosenstine would absolutely put themselves in legal jeopardy in the hopes that everyone will cover for them.

I've posted no racism ever. Just because you don't like me pointing out continuing white racism doesn't make what I say racist. And we are not going to shut up about it because you whites don't want to hear. Oh if life was just that fucking easy for us. We ask you to stop being racists and it stops. Instead we have to live with it.

So grow the fuck up, bow your neck, batten the hatches, put on your big boy pants, whatever. Because there has never been a motherfucking solution to anything by people who just shut up and took it. And whites have had almost 250 years to stop your bullshit and haven't.

This article was written by a law professor at Duke. And since we have not seen the Mueller report, you cannot accurately state there was no crime. You can obstruct justice if you are obstructing the investigation of whether or not a crime was committed.

So sorry do you like bigot better?

Just perhaps if you tried to not find the bad in everyone and everything. If you tried not to color every little nuance of life with your hate. But no you are just sure that without you posting hate all the time things will get better and that can not be allowed to happen. Because without hate you have nothing.

Still anyone can allow their opinion to be clouded by feelings. Considering right off the bat I would say that he is a Trump hater he probably is letting his emotions cloud his judgement.

Your retarded claims of bigotry and hate have no substance when compared to the facts I have presented. Posting the facts as borne out by documented evidence is not posting hate or seeing the bad in everyone. Your consistent ignoring of what white racist say, repeating the same belief then telling me how I should say nothing is proof of your hate.

We have not seen the Mueller report. That is a fact. Wm Barr wrote an unwanted letter to congress dissing the investigation. That is a fact. Barr was not unbiased and should have recused himself. That is a fact. So until congress gets all the information, not what Barr decides to give with redactions, this situation smells like bullshit.

And the law professor is not the one letting his emotions cloud his judgement. You are.

 

[IM2]

Barr took two days to clear the president but needs weeks to turn the report over to congress probably in a highly redacted form. Fish do not smell this fishy.

We've said 1000 fucking times you fucking moron the report contains classified information and CANNOT BE RELEASED IN ITS ENTIRETY.

It can be released to congress entirely, because congress is permitted access to classified information. Its the public release which required redaction of those classified bits.

That decision is up to Barr and Barr alone. Don't you think if his summary had been wrong Mueller would have said something?

Barr was Muellers boss.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Since we have not seen the Mueller report all this premature orgasms from the right might be unwise. And since WE are going to get the greatest redacted version of a report in history, questions will remain.

"All we can do right now is speculate about a report that only a few people have seen, at least until the redacted version comes out in April. But even based on what little we know — Attorney General William P. Barr’s summary, the indictments and court filings that came from Mueller’s team — it’s premature to write off its 400-page findings . Mueller’s office may have properly drafted a detailed and damning account of Trump’s obstruction of justice and simply cast it as a set of facts, a road map for the analysts who must decide what to do about it: members of Congress.

If Mueller believed it was inappropriate to pronounce on the president’s guilt — after all, the Justice Department has a long-standing policy against indicting a sitting president — he could still be following the example of Leon Jaworski, the Watergate independent counsel who decided against indicting President Richard Nixon, but instead submitted to Congress an extensive accounting of all the facts surrounding his efforts to shut down the investigation. Jaworski’s testimony skipped all the adjectives and adverbs. It simply told the story and allowed the branch of government tasked with oversight to do the rest."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...8b7525a8d5f_story.html?utm_term=.8f8d35eb0931

First off let me congratulate you on the first post I have ever seen you do that is not racist.

That being said let us look at your idea. Nixon authorized the watergate break in. So he was a criminal. He tried to cover that up which was obstruction. If you have no criminal act you can not have obstruction when you fire someone that you are allowed by law to fire.

Barr and Rosenstine both are responsible for the summary that was released. They will both be part of the team red acting the final report. So of course they are both covering for Trump.

Mueller and the 19 lawyers all but Mueller being registered democrats are going to remain silent on the findings because they are covering for Trump.

The democrats have already stated that they will be continuing to investigate and will be calling Mueller, Barr and anyone else that had anything to do with the report. So of course they will be covering for Trump.

Yeah right. Great thought process there. Barr and Rosenstine would absolutely put themselves in legal jeopardy in the hopes that everyone will cover for them.

I've posted no racism ever. Just because you don't like me pointing out continuing white racism doesn't make what I say racist. And we are not going to shut up about it because you whites don't want to hear. Oh if life was just that fucking easy for us. We ask you to stop being racists and it stops. Instead we have to live with it.

So grow the fuck up, bow your neck, batten the hatches, put on your big boy pants, whatever. Because there has never been a motherfucking solution to anything by people who just shut up and took it. And whites have had almost 250 years to stop your bullshit and haven't.

This article was written by a law professor at Duke. And since we have not seen the Mueller report, you cannot accurately state there was no crime. You can obstruct justice if you are obstructing the investigation of whether or not a crime was committed.

So sorry do you like bigot better?

Just perhaps if you tried to not find the bad in everyone and everything. If you tried not to color every little nuance of life with your hate. But no you are just sure that without you posting hate all the time things will get better and that can not be allowed to happen. Because without hate you have nothing.

Still anyone can allow their opinion to be clouded by feelings. Considering right off the bat I would say that he is a Trump hater he probably is letting his emotions cloud his judgement.

Your retarded claims of bigotry and hate have no substance when compared to the facts I have presented. Posting the facts as borne out by documented evidence is not posting hate or seeing the bad in everyone. Your consistent ignoring of what white racist say, repeating the same belief then telling me how I should say nothing is proof of your hate.

We have not seen the Mueller report. That is a fact. Wm Barr wrote an unwanted letter to congress dissing the investigation. That is a fact. Barr was not unbiased and should have recused himself. That is a fact. So until congress gets all the information, not what Barr decides to give with redactions, this situation smells like bullshit.

And the law professor is not the one letting his emotions cloud his judgement. You are.

Any proof at all Barr's summary was not correct? From like....the guy who wrote it, Mueller?

 

[IM2]

Since we have not seen the Mueller report all this premature orgasms from the right might be unwise. And since WE are going to get the greatest redacted version of a report in history, questions will remain.

The AG has issued a summary, no crimes, no collusion, no obstruction. Tissue?

So?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Barr took two days to clear the president but needs weeks to turn the report over to congress probably in a highly redacted form. Fish do not smell this fishy.

We've said 1000 fucking times you fucking moron the report contains classified information and CANNOT BE RELEASED IN ITS ENTIRETY.

It can be released to congress entirely, because congress is permitted access to classified information. Its the public release which required redaction of those classified bits.

Not when Schiff releases it to CNN or Feinstein sends it to China

 

[IM2]

Since we have not seen the Mueller report all this premature orgasms from the right might be unwise. And since WE are going to get the greatest redacted version of a report in history, questions will remain.

"All we can do right now is speculate about a report that only a few people have seen, at least until the redacted version comes out in April. But even based on what little we know — Attorney General William P. Barr’s summary, the indictments and court filings that came from Mueller’s team — it’s premature to write off its 400-page findings . Mueller’s office may have properly drafted a detailed and damning account of Trump’s obstruction of justice and simply cast it as a set of facts, a road map for the analysts who must decide what to do about it: members of Congress.

If Mueller believed it was inappropriate to pronounce on the president’s guilt — after all, the Justice Department has a long-standing policy against indicting a sitting president — he could still be following the example of Leon Jaworski, the Watergate independent counsel who decided against indicting President Richard Nixon, but instead submitted to Congress an extensive accounting of all the facts surrounding his efforts to shut down the investigation. Jaworski’s testimony skipped all the adjectives and adverbs. It simply told the story and allowed the branch of government tasked with oversight to do the rest."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...8b7525a8d5f_story.html?utm_term=.8f8d35eb0931

First off let me congratulate you on the first post I have ever seen you do that is not racist.

That being said let us look at your idea. Nixon authorized the watergate break in. So he was a criminal. He tried to cover that up which was obstruction. If you have no criminal act you can not have obstruction when you fire someone that you are allowed by law to fire.

Barr and Rosenstine both are responsible for the summary that was released. They will both be part of the team red acting the final report. So of course they are both covering for Trump.

Mueller and the 19 lawyers all but Mueller being registered democrats are going to remain silent on the findings because they are covering for Trump.

The democrats have already stated that they will be continuing to investigate and will be calling Mueller, Barr and anyone else that had anything to do with the report. So of course they will be covering for Trump.

Yeah right. Great thought process there. Barr and Rosenstine would absolutely put themselves in legal jeopardy in the hopes that everyone will cover for them.

I've posted no racism ever. Just because you don't like me pointing out continuing white racism doesn't make what I say racist. And we are not going to shut up about it because you whites don't want to hear. Oh if life was just that fucking easy for us. We ask you to stop being racists and it stops. Instead we have to live with it.

So grow the fuck up, bow your neck, batten the hatches, put on your big boy pants, whatever. Because there has never been a motherfucking solution to anything by people who just shut up and took it. And whites have had almost 250 years to stop your bullshit and haven't.

This article was written by a law professor at Duke. And since we have not seen the Mueller report, you cannot accurately state there was no crime. You can obstruct justice if you are obstructing the investigation of whether or not a crime was committed.

So sorry do you like bigot better?

Just perhaps if you tried to not find the bad in everyone and everything. If you tried not to color every little nuance of life with your hate. But no you are just sure that without you posting hate all the time things will get better and that can not be allowed to happen. Because without hate you have nothing.

Still anyone can allow their opinion to be clouded by feelings. Considering right off the bat I would say that he is a Trump hater he probably is letting his emotions cloud his judgement.

Your retarded claims of bigotry and hate have no substance when compared to the facts I have presented. Posting the facts as borne out by documented evidence is not posting hate or seeing the bad in everyone. Your consistent ignoring of what white racist say, repeating the same belief then telling me how I should say nothing is proof of your hate.

We have not seen the Mueller report. That is a fact. Wm Barr wrote an unwanted letter to congress dissing the investigation. That is a fact. Barr was not unbiased and should have recused himself. That is a fact. So until congress gets all the information, not what Barr decides to give with redactions, this situation smells like bullshit.

And the law professor is not the one letting his emotions cloud his judgement. You are.

Any proof at all Barr's summary was not correct? From like....the guy who wrote it, Mueller?

Maybe when Barr releases the full report to congress. Because we have no proof Barrs summary is correct.

 

[airplanemechanic]

First off let me congratulate you on the first post I have ever seen you do that is not racist.

That being said let us look at your idea. Nixon authorized the watergate break in. So he was a criminal. He tried to cover that up which was obstruction. If you have no criminal act you can not have obstruction when you fire someone that you are allowed by law to fire.

Barr and Rosenstine both are responsible for the summary that was released. They will both be part of the team red acting the final report. So of course they are both covering for Trump.

Mueller and the 19 lawyers all but Mueller being registered democrats are going to remain silent on the findings because they are covering for Trump.

The democrats have already stated that they will be continuing to investigate and will be calling Mueller, Barr and anyone else that had anything to do with the report. So of course they will be covering for Trump.

Yeah right. Great thought process there. Barr and Rosenstine would absolutely put themselves in legal jeopardy in the hopes that everyone will cover for them.

I've posted no racism ever. Just because you don't like me pointing out continuing white racism doesn't make what I say racist. And we are not going to shut up about it because you whites don't want to hear. Oh if life was just that fucking easy for us. We ask you to stop being racists and it stops. Instead we have to live with it.

So grow the fuck up, bow your neck, batten the hatches, put on your big boy pants, whatever. Because there has never been a motherfucking solution to anything by people who just shut up and took it. And whites have had almost 250 years to stop your bullshit and haven't.

This article was written by a law professor at Duke. And since we have not seen the Mueller report, you cannot accurately state there was no crime. You can obstruct justice if you are obstructing the investigation of whether or not a crime was committed.

So sorry do you like bigot better?

Just perhaps if you tried to not find the bad in everyone and everything. If you tried not to color every little nuance of life with your hate. But no you are just sure that without you posting hate all the time things will get better and that can not be allowed to happen. Because without hate you have nothing.

Still anyone can allow their opinion to be clouded by feelings. Considering right off the bat I would say that he is a Trump hater he probably is letting his emotions cloud his judgement.

Your retarded claims of bigotry and hate have no substance when compared to the facts I have presented. Posting the facts as borne out by documented evidence is not posting hate or seeing the bad in everyone. Your consistent ignoring of what white racist say, repeating the same belief then telling me how I should say nothing is proof of your hate.

We have not seen the Mueller report. That is a fact. Wm Barr wrote an unwanted letter to congress dissing the investigation. That is a fact. Barr was not unbiased and should have recused himself. That is a fact. So until congress gets all the information, not what Barr decides to give with redactions, this situation smells like bullshit.

And the law professor is not the one letting his emotions cloud his judgement. You are.

Any proof at all Barr's summary was not correct? From like....the guy who wrote it, Mueller?

Maybe when Barr releases the full report to congress. Because we have no proof Barrs summary is correct.

Do you have any proof that its not?