Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not at all. I was making the same arguments against liberals when Bush was President.OK I work for the government I control the process collecting and releasing the data do you take my word?
Well, if that's true then you're lying about your location which makes me question your truthfulness. And since you've displayed zero understanding of statistics, economics, or the numbers, it seems very unlikely (especially since collection and releasing are two seperate agencies).
And since I do know the people who process and release the data (though I've never been one) and meet with them several times a year, I know for a fact you're not telling the truth.
See, actual data points relevant to the particular topic that lead to the conclusion of untrustworthiness. This does not mean you lie about everything all the time nor does it mean you don't know your actual job very well.
So you wouldn't take my word on the numbers but you will take the word of the government who is run by a person that is running for re-election? Just how partisan are you?
Not at all. I was making the same arguments against liberals when Bush was President.Well, if that's true then you're lying about your location which makes me question your truthfulness. And since you've displayed zero understanding of statistics, economics, or the numbers, it seems very unlikely (especially since collection and releasing are two seperate agencies).
And since I do know the people who process and release the data (though I've never been one) and meet with them several times a year, I know for a fact you're not telling the truth.
See, actual data points relevant to the particular topic that lead to the conclusion of untrustworthiness. This does not mean you lie about everything all the time nor does it mean you don't know your actual job very well.
So you wouldn't take my word on the numbers but you will take the word of the government who is run by a person that is running for re-election? Just how partisan are you?
And I don't take your word because I have EVIDENCE (that nast word) that you are not truthful about this. I do not have any evidence that BLS is not being truthful and I have evidence that they are.
See, it's a matter of EVIDENCE, not word.
You have no evidence to show that obama's labor department and census department do not manipulate the data they receive. There is not oversight out side of the government control. NONE. Gallops numbers are higher than obama's government manipulated numbers.And I don't take your word because I have EVIDENCE (that nast word) that you are not truthful about this.
bigreb: YOU posted GALLUP that validated the GOVERNMENT's data.
YOU, indeeded, MURDERED your own OP.
FAIL.
Go back and read the range of error in the two survey samples.
Yeah, bigreb, once again (but did we have any doubt), you blew up your own OP.
They are not when you compare the apples to apples, which dishonest CON$ never do, like the monthly Gallup UNADJUSTED rate to the SAME month's BLS UNADJUSTED rate!!!Why is gallops numbers higher than obama's numbers?
Read the range of samples, please, not the extremes.
Will someone explain to him why that is important?
Which is highers obama's reported 8.2They are not when you compare the apples to apples, which dishonest CON$ never do, like the monthly Gallup UNADJUSTED rate to the same month's BLS UNADJUSTED rate!!!Why is gallops numbers higher than obama's numbers?
Gallup unadjusted Jan 2012 rate 8.6%
U.S. Unemployment Up, to 8.6% in January
BLS unadjusted Jan 2012 rate 8.8%
Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization
Don't you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself??????
The BLS 8.8% rate is higher than the Gallup 8.6% rate for the SAME month. What month is Gallup's 9.1 rate???? I'll bet dollars to doughnuts it's not the same month as the BLS 8.2%, and it probably isn't even a monthly rate at that. As I said CON$ are always too DISHONEST to compare apples to apples!!!Which is highers obama's reported 8.2They are not when you compare the apples to apples, which dishonest CON$ never do, like the monthly Gallup UNADJUSTED rate to the same month's BLS UNADJUSTED rate!!!Why is gallops numbers higher than obama's numbers?
Gallup unadjusted Jan 2012 rate 8.6%
U.S. Unemployment Up, to 8.6% in January
BLS unadjusted Jan 2012 rate 8.8%
Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization
Don't you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself??????
or Gallops 9.1?
And you have no evidence showing they do. They're methodology, the oversight and scrutiny they receive from the media and academia, the sheer size of the conspiracy that would be necessary, that past investigations show no wrong-doing, all lead to the conclusion that thru're not.Not at all. I was making the same arguments against liberals when Bush was President.So you wouldn't take my word on the numbers but you will take the word of the government who is run by a person that is running for re-election? Just how partisan are you?
And I don't take your word because I have EVIDENCE (that nast word) that you are not truthful about this. I do not have any evidence that BLS is not being truthful and I have evidence that they are.
See, it's a matter of EVIDENCE, not word.
You were arguing with liberals?...... RIGHT SURE YEP GOT IT
You have no evidence to show that obama's labor department and census department do not manipulate the data they receive.And I don't take your word because I have EVIDENCE (that nast word) that you are not truthful about this.
State governments cooperate with BLS for state and local data so they could complain. Academics can get access to the raw data as well. BLS has been around over 100 years and no one has ever shown manipulation.There is not oversight out side of the government control. NONE. Gallops numbers are higher than obama's government manipulated numbers.
And you have no evidence showing they do. They're methodology, the oversight and scrutiny they receive from the media and academia, the sheer size of the conspiracy that would be necessary, that past investigations show no wrong-doing, all lead to the conclusion that thru're not.Not at all. I was making the same arguments against liberals when Bush was President.
And I don't take your word because I have EVIDENCE (that nast word) that you are not truthful about this. I do not have any evidence that BLS is not being truthful and I have evidence that they are.
See, it's a matter of EVIDENCE, not word.
You were arguing with liberals?...... RIGHT SURE YEP GOT IT
You have no evidence to show that obama's labor department and census department do not manipulate the data they receive.
State governments cooperate with BLS for state and local data so they could complain. Academics can get access to the raw data as well. BLS has been around over 100 years and no one has ever shown manipulation.There is not oversight out side of the government control. NONE. Gallops numbers are higher than obama's government manipulated numbers.
GALLUP's number was higher for January, though not by much when you compare the right numbers. Sometimes Galllup shows a higher number. What's your argument then?
And you have no evidence showing they do.
GALLUP's number was higher for January, though not by much when you compare the right numbers. Sometimes Galllup shows a higher number. What's your argument then?
The BLS 8.8% rate is higher than the Gallup 8.6% rate for the SAME month. What month is Gallup's 9.1 rate???? I'll bet dollars to doughnuts it's not the same month as the BLS 8.2%, and it probably isn't even a monthly rate at that. As I said CON$ are always too DISHONEST to compare apples to apples!!!Which is highers obama's reported 8.2They are not when you compare the apples to apples, which dishonest CON$ never do, like the monthly Gallup UNADJUSTED rate to the same month's BLS UNADJUSTED rate!!!
Gallup unadjusted Jan 2012 rate 8.6%
U.S. Unemployment Up, to 8.6% in January
BLS unadjusted Jan 2012 rate 8.8%
Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization
Don't you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself??????
or Gallops 9.1?
So you haven't looked at the source provided?What month is Gallup's 9.1 rate???? I'll bet dollars to doughnuts it's not the same month as the BLS 8.2%, and it probably isn't even a monthly rate at that.
The BLS 8.8% rate is higher than the Gallup 8.6% rate for the SAME month. What month is Gallup's 9.1 rate???? I'll bet dollars to doughnuts it's not the same month as the BLS 8.2%, and it probably isn't even a monthly rate at that. As I said CON$ are always too DISHONEST to compare apples to apples!!!Which is highers obama's reported 8.2
or Gallops 9.1?
The latest number released from obama's labor department was 8.2
So you haven't looked at the source provided?What month is Gallup's 9.1 rate???? I'll bet dollars to doughnuts it's not the same month as the BLS 8.2%, and it probably isn't even a monthly rate at that.
Why don't you look at the source.
Correction it was revised to 8.3
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
Sure you've argue with liberals, dude stop it. I can smell your liberal trollness through the computer screen.The BLS 8.8% rate is higher than the Gallup 8.6% rate for the SAME month. What month is Gallup's 9.1 rate???? I'll bet dollars to doughnuts it's not the same month as the BLS 8.2%, and it probably isn't even a monthly rate at that. As I said CON$ are always too DISHONEST to compare apples to apples!!!
The latest number released from obama's labor department was 8.2
So you haven't looked at the source provided?What month is Gallup's 9.1 rate???? I'll bet dollars to doughnuts it's not the same month as the BLS 8.2%, and it probably isn't even a monthly rate at that.
Why don't you look at the source.
Correction it was revised to 8.3
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
Look at that link and find the Not seasonally adjusted rate. That's the one to compare to Gallup.
OK, as usual you won't admit you are comparing apples to oranges. Gallup's 9.1 rate is a daily, not monthly, rate for February 2012 unadjusted and the BLS 8.3 rate is the monthly adjusted rate for Jan 2012. What a surprise you are not comparing the UNADJUSTED BLS JAN 2012 rate to the UNADJUSTED Jan 2012 Gallup rate to make your false claim that Gallup's rate is higher than the BLS rate.The BLS 8.8% rate is higher than the Gallup 8.6% rate for the SAME month. What month is Gallup's 9.1 rate???? I'll bet dollars to doughnuts it's not the same month as the BLS 8.2%, and it probably isn't even a monthly rate at that. As I said CON$ are always too DISHONEST to compare apples to apples!!!Which is highers obama's reported 8.2
or Gallops 9.1?
The latest number released from obama's labor department was 8.2
So you haven't looked at the source provided?What month is Gallup's 9.1 rate???? I'll bet dollars to doughnuts it's not the same month as the BLS 8.2%, and it probably isn't even a monthly rate at that.
Why don't you look at the source.
Correction it was revised to 8.3
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
Because that's the official rate, seasonally adjusted to account for normal seasonal fluctuations...similar to accounting for the tide.Sure you've argue with liberals, dude stop it. I can smell your liberal trollness through the computer screen.The latest number released from obama's labor department was 8.2
So you haven't looked at the source provided?
Why don't you look at the source.
Correction it was revised to 8.3
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
Look at that link and find the Not seasonally adjusted rate. That's the one to compare to Gallup.
Why did the media report unemployment at 8.3?
OK, as usual you won't admit you are comparing apples to oranges. Gallup's 9.1 rate is a daily, not monthly, rate for February 2012 unadjusted and the BLS 8.3 rate is the monthly adjusted rate for Jan 2012. What a surprise you are not comparing the UNADJUSTED BLS JAN 2012 rate to the UNADJUSTED Jan 2012 Gallup rate to make your false claim that Gallup's rate is higher than the BLS rate.The BLS 8.8% rate is higher than the Gallup 8.6% rate for the SAME month. What month is Gallup's 9.1 rate???? I'll bet dollars to doughnuts it's not the same month as the BLS 8.2%, and it probably isn't even a monthly rate at that. As I said CON$ are always too DISHONEST to compare apples to apples!!!
The latest number released from obama's labor department was 8.2
So you haven't looked at the source provided?What month is Gallup's 9.1 rate???? I'll bet dollars to doughnuts it's not the same month as the BLS 8.2%, and it probably isn't even a monthly rate at that.
Why don't you look at the source.
Correction it was revised to 8.3
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
Don't you ever get tired of being dishonest?????
Gallup unadjusted Jan 2012 rate 8.6%
U.S. Unemployment Up, to 8.6% in January
BLS unadjusted Jan 2012 rate 8.8%
Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization
