Jackson
Gold Member
- Dec 31, 2010
- 27,502
- 7,917
I read it and that is what the article said. So, I am sorry and thank you for finding the link.Official: Amb. Stevens Refused Additional Security | Military.comI have read and listened to everything I found and NEVER did I hear that he turned down protection. I listened to the hearings as well. The Democrats would have brought that up.And at one point he turned down help, twice. Maybe that was another lie IDK. I don't feel like ANY OF US know what really happened. Sometimes, I feel like Benghazi was just a victim of US corruption but I don't know that.."I don't think Benghazi was a big deal. I mean, it sucks but it happens." !!!! Stevens asked for more protection over and over again!!!! Then they took away protection he already had!!!! And you say it wasn't a big deal and that it sucks?!!! I don't use the word "moron," But I just have to here.I don't think Benghazi was a big deal. I mean, it sucks but it happens.. I think the continuous efforts on this is partisan hackery. But it has shed some light on a few things. And one of them is she lied about that shit. Only a partisan hack would deny it.. Seriously..All the lies I heard were from right wingers.
Moron, maybe you attitude would be different if you were one of the three trying to save him. Maybe if your husband or wife was killed over this.!!!!! 9/11!!!!!
Question now, we know he asked for more protection and then the State (I assume...said that conditions were worsening and they wouldn't send more. Other countries brought their people in Libya back to their home countries. Why didn't Hillary bring Stevens and his men back?
Ham said the protection was denied but refused comment on it later. Why?
Thanks again,