Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Read the report, fool. It proves that Hillary and obozo lied to the American people and the families of the dead.
Why do you want a proven liar and corrupt bitch in the WH?
It doesn't, but that is completely off topic from this thread. I swear, Benghazi is you wingnuts' proverbial mother. Whenever you can't prove your point you run behind and under Benghazi's dress for safety.
Stay on topic.
The topic is who is leading in the "polls". If you believe the polls, the recent Benghazi report has brought them into a virtual tie. My point, which is on topic, is that as more comes out proving Hillary's lying and corruption, the more the polls will swing to Trump.
Face it, Hillary Clinton is a terrible candidate, and a terrible human being. She is only in contention because of morons like you who will vote D while the D candidate is shitting in your soup.
They are tied now, where? Provide a link. Are you going to be wrong about this too?
you are the polling expert. Look up the latest Q poll.
Clearly you're an idiot. Arguing against polls and now what do you do? Focus on only one. Quinn had Clinton only up by 4 in May, it's now 2. Could be something, could be noise, nothing to do with Benghazi considering when the poll was conducted but maybe it's not just math you need help with.
I see Hillary taking both Georgia and Arizona for 374 EV
Texas????
You see what you want.
My gut tells me Arizona is in play, Georgia and Texas are not.
I see Hillary taking both Georgia and Arizona for 374 EV
Texas????
You see what you want.
My gut tells me Arizona is in play, Georgia and Texas are not.
I don't think that Arizona is in play at all. I think Texas is more likely to be "in play" but still has 0% chance of going blue come November. Arizonians are far more likely to latch on to Trump's anti immigration rhetoric. Whereas Texans are inclined to be repulsed by it because 90% of the population there (including their conservatives) either 1) is of relatively recent Mexican ancestry, or 2) makes money off of cheap immigrant labor.
It doesn't, but that is completely off topic from this thread. I swear, Benghazi is you wingnuts' proverbial mother. Whenever you can't prove your point you run behind and under Benghazi's dress for safety.
Stay on topic.
The topic is who is leading in the "polls". If you believe the polls, the recent Benghazi report has brought them into a virtual tie. My point, which is on topic, is that as more comes out proving Hillary's lying and corruption, the more the polls will swing to Trump.
Face it, Hillary Clinton is a terrible candidate, and a terrible human being. She is only in contention because of morons like you who will vote D while the D candidate is shitting in your soup.
They are tied now, where? Provide a link. Are you going to be wrong about this too?
you are the polling expert. Look up the latest Q poll.
Clearly you're an idiot. Arguing against polls and now what do you do? Focus on only one. Quinn had Clinton only up by 4 in May, it's now 2. Could be something, could be noise, nothing to do with Benghazi considering when the poll was conducted but maybe it's not just math you need help with.
I didn't say that the poll was accurate, only that it had them in a tie (within margin of error).
I am really tired of trying to make you understand something that most Jr high kids understand.
you clearly are not mentally capable of participating in an intellectual debate, so bye for now.
Go Hillary!!!!!
No. But as awful as she is, Trump would be worse.
I see Hillary taking both Georgia and Arizona for 374 EV
Texas????
You see what you want.
My gut tells me Arizona is in play, Georgia and Texas are not.
I don't think that Arizona is in play at all. I think Texas is more likely to be "in play" but still has 0% chance of going blue come November. Arizonians are far more likely to latch on to Trump's anti immigration rhetoric. Whereas Texans are inclined to be repulsed by it because 90% of the population there (including their conservatives) either 1) is of relatively recent Mexican ancestry, or 2) makes money off of cheap immigrant labor.
New Electoral College Projection Has Hillary Clinton Demolishing Donald Trump
An updated Electoral College projection from Larry Sabato’s Crystal Ball predicts that Hillary Clinton will demolish Donald Trump in the general election this fall.
The website, which is run by University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, has the presumptive Democratic nominee beating Trump by a 347-191 electoral vote margin.
I see Hillary taking both Georgia and Arizona for 374 EV
Texas????
How are things in fantasy land today? Your "leans" states are something out of looney tunes.
New Electoral College Projection Has Hillary Clinton Demolishing Donald Trump
An updated Electoral College projection from Larry Sabato’s Crystal Ball predicts that Hillary Clinton will demolish Donald Trump in the general election this fall.
The website, which is run by University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, has the presumptive Democratic nominee beating Trump by a 347-191 electoral vote margin.
I see Hillary taking both Georgia and Arizona for 374 EV
Texas????
How are things in fantasy land today? Your "leans" states are something out of looney tunes.
Georgia and Arizona are far from fantasies
They used to be counted as solid red and now they are up for grabs
You think Hillary will not be campaigning in those states? Trump should have been able to mark them in the red collumn
That's your ugly ass hero there Jake. Get that 'H' sug out you have. Come in dude, come out and show us your stripes lolOne more week of this bad ratings and I would not be surprised that the GOP convention will be opened.
Clinton Opens 12-Point Lead; Two-Thirds Say Trump's Biased
Get that 'H' sug out you have. Come in dude, come out and show us your stripes lol
-Geaux
Stubby assuage fingers on IPhoneGet that 'H' sug out you have. Come in dude, come out and show us your stripes lol
-Geaux
What the fuck?
Pollsters are in the business of making money. They do that by producing accurate polls.There are more registered Democrats than registered Republicans, the polls are not unfairly skewed, they are accurately representing the populous.
bullshit, 40% of americans self identify as conservative, 20% as liberal.
Make your case then here is the poll data:
http://www.langerresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/1178a12016Election.pdf
Show us how they got it wrong.
statistics 101. the so-called polls are designed to influence public opinion, not the report on it. If you doubt that, check into who is paying the pollsters.
wrong, they make money producing polls that please the people paying them, are you really so naïve that you think the pollsters don't have a political agenda?
wrong, they make money producing polls that please the people paying them, are you really so naïve that you think the pollsters don't have a political agenda?
Are you so paranoid and brainwashed as to believe polls would continue to have value if they were intentionally partisan?
Funny thing about the set of self defined conservatives, they don't trust the MSM for its so called liberal biases, don't trust polling because they too are biased, and don't trust higher education because the profs have a liberal bias; these points lead to the conclusion that those self defined conservatives, the New Right, define themselves in terms of what they oppose.
How do we identify this set of posters, by the idiot-grams they post, the use of pejoratives ("libtard" for example) in their posts, and their inability to write cogent, concise and credible responses on major issues. A dead giveaway is their propensity to echo the comments of history revisionists and their lies of commission, omission; half-truths, rumors, innuendos all posted without anymore evidence than the crawl on a Fox News telecast.
wrong, they make money producing polls that please the people paying them, are you really so naïve that you think the pollsters don't have a political agenda?
Are you so paranoid and brainwashed as to believe polls would continue to have value if they were intentionally partisan?
Funny thing about the set of self defined conservatives, they don't trust the MSM for its so called liberal biases, don't trust polling because they too are biased, and don't trust higher education because the profs have a liberal bias; these points lead to the conclusion that those self defined conservatives, the New Right, define themselves in terms of what they oppose.
How do we identify this set of posters, by the idiot-grams they post, the use of pejoratives ("libtard" for example) in their posts, and their inability to write cogent, concise and credible responses on major issues. A dead giveaway is their propensity to echo the comments of history revisionists and their lies of commission, omission; half-truths, rumors, innuendos all posted without anymore evidence than the crawl on a Fox News telecast.
Kinda like everything you just said....
Some things are self evident
Some things are self evident
Oh. You mean, things you say are self evident. It's everyone else who needs to provide evidence, because the pigs have special needs that only milk and apples can fill.
Some things are self evident
Oh. You mean, things you say are self evident. It's everyone else who needs to provide evidence, because the pigs have special needs that only milk and apples can fill.
Bullshit, I've made an allegation and have offered evidence, empirical evidence which you may or may not find probative. You've not considered the truth of my comments, and that maybe willful ignorance, cognitive dissonance or laziness - honestly I don''t care. The proof is out there; I learned long ago one can't take a whore to culture and make he or she think.
Some things are self evident
Oh. You mean, things you say are self evident. It's everyone else who needs to provide evidence, because the pigs have special needs that only milk and apples can fill.
Bullshit, I've made an allegation and have offered evidence, empirical evidence which you may or may not find probative. You've not considered the truth of my comments, and that maybe willful ignorance, cognitive dissonance or laziness - honestly I don''t care. The proof is out there; I learned long ago one can't take a whore to culture and make he or she think.
Check this out. One of the safest cities in America, with a population of over 200,000 is Gilbert, AZ. Why will this make liberal heads explode? Well, you see, in Arizona, you can buy a gun online, or from a friend, without a background check. Also, you do not need a permit to carry a concealed firearm. All those guns floating around. The streets should be running with blood. But they aren't. Would any of you libtards care to explain this?
