Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
And, like I told you. IT DOESN'T MATTER!
It DOES MATTER. I'm sorry I'm taking the opinion of the Director of the FBI over some fucking guy on a forum on the internet.
No, it doesn't the Statute reads MAKES AVAILABLE TO UNAUTHORIZED PERSON. Notice how it doesn't say "unless they don't read it". It says MAKES AVAILABLE. Period. Were it Kelly Anne Conway and her husband you would be screaming for her head on a platter. You know it and I know it.
I've already said I think they were in the wrong, but if Comey, who knows this shit 1,000 times better than you, me, and anyone else on this forum, says there isn't enough there to convict them, then that's where I'm going to side. Please let me know how you are more qualified and knowledgeable about these laws than Comey. I'd be glad to hear it.
Comey is a political whore. His boss said she wouldn't do anything about it, and expressly told him so. He did as he was ordered. He tried to make it palatable to the American People, but it was pure unadulterated horseshit. If the shrilary wasn't the wife of bill clinton she would be sitting in the grey bar Hilton right now. She KNOWINGLY broke the law and she is laughing at you people who defend the indefensible.
Why the fuck do you carry that bitches water?
Who the fuck you think you are talking to? I'm not defending her or anyone else. I'm defending the law, and how it will be applied to ANYONE. Not only is Comey the Director of the FBI, he was also once the Deputy AG of the United States, the second highest lawyer in the country. He knows what the fuck he is talking about. I already told you how he circumvented giving her information once he found out what she did and that he felt she over-stepped her position. What the fuck more do you want out of him? His letter to Congress played a part in making Hillary lose the election, and he pretty much admitted to that today. Why the fuck would someone who wants to help Lynch and Hillary do something that would cost her the election instead of burying it until after the election???
It DOES MATTER. I'm sorry I'm taking the opinion of the Director of the FBI over some fucking guy on a forum on the internet.
No, it doesn't the Statute reads MAKES AVAILABLE TO UNAUTHORIZED PERSON. Notice how it doesn't say "unless they don't read it". It says MAKES AVAILABLE. Period. Were it Kelly Anne Conway and her husband you would be screaming for her head on a platter. You know it and I know it.
I've already said I think they were in the wrong, but if Comey, who knows this shit 1,000 times better than you, me, and anyone else on this forum, says there isn't enough there to convict them, then that's where I'm going to side. Please let me know how you are more qualified and knowledgeable about these laws than Comey. I'd be glad to hear it.
Comey is a political whore. His boss said she wouldn't do anything about it, and expressly told him so. He did as he was ordered. He tried to make it palatable to the American People, but it was pure unadulterated horseshit. If the shrilary wasn't the wife of bill clinton she would be sitting in the grey bar Hilton right now. She KNOWINGLY broke the law and she is laughing at you people who defend the indefensible.
Why the fuck do you carry that bitches water?
Who the fuck you think you are talking to? I'm not defending her or anyone else. I'm defending the law, and how it will be applied to ANYONE. Not only is Comey the Director of the FBI, he was also once the Deputy AG of the United States, the second highest lawyer in the country. He knows what the fuck he is talking about. I already told you how he circumvented giving her information once he found out what she did and that he felt she over-stepped her position. What the fuck more do you want out of him? His letter to Congress played a part in making Hillary lose the election, and he pretty much admitted to that today. Why the fuck would someone who wants to help Lynch and Hillary do something that would cost her the election instead of burying it until after the election???
I am talking to YOU. And yes you are defending her. The statutes are clear and unequivocal. You are appealing to authority as your reason for your position. That is a logic fail on an epic scale. He was TOLD to stand down so he did. That is a fact. It was looking like the shrilary was going to be a shoo in for POTUS so comey was protecting his ass because he would rather keep his position than do what is proper. That is an opinion, but it is supported by facts.
Yours are not.
He said trying to prove intent was difficult, particularly when the ag had stated she would keep the investigation from getting very far, in an email he got access to.Comey already said today they did an investigation and they decided not to press charges because they couldn't prove mens rea.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
And this......
18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent."
He said trying to prove intent was difficult, particularly when the ag had stated she would keep the investigation from getting very far, in an email he got access to.Comey already said today they did an investigation and they decided not to press charges because they couldn't prove mens rea.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
And this......
18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent."
He said trying to prove intent was difficult, particularly when the ag had stated she would keep the investigation from getting very far, in an email he got access to.Comey already said today they did an investigation and they decided not to press charges because they couldn't prove mens rea.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
And this......
18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent."
You are yet again ignoring that pesky comma. I thought you claimed to have a Bachelors degree. The shrilary AND huma signed a document that specified they KNEW they were violating this provision of the Statute. Flail away silly one, flail away.
,or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
He said trying to prove intent was difficult, particularly when the ag had stated she would keep the investigation from getting very far, in an email he got access to.Comey already said today they did an investigation and they decided not to press charges because they couldn't prove mens rea.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
And this......
18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent."
He said trying to prove intent was difficult, particularly when the ag had stated she would keep the investigation from getting very far, in an email he got access to.Comey already said today they did an investigation and they decided not to press charges because they couldn't prove mens rea.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
And this......
18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent."
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent"
That portion of 793(f) said neither.
He said trying to prove intent was difficult, particularly when the ag had stated she would keep the investigation from getting very far, in an email he got access to.Comey already said today they did an investigation and they decided not to press charges because they couldn't prove mens rea.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
And this......
18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent."
Hillary didn't know she had possession of material related to the national defense?
Didn't know that her server wasn't the proper place of custody?
Didn't know her bathroom was not an authorized location?
She didn't intend to put this material on her server?
Didn't intend to possess it where Huma could forward it to her husband?
Wasn't grossly negligent, at the least, when she allowed all these to occur?
She may have been too dumb to be Secretary of State.
He said trying to prove intent was difficult, particularly when the ag had stated she would keep the investigation from getting very far, in an email he got access to.Comey already said today they did an investigation and they decided not to press charges because they couldn't prove mens rea.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
And this......
18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent."
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent"
That portion of 793(f) said neither.
Yes it does... "(2) having knowledge"
He said trying to prove intent was difficult, particularly when the ag had stated she would keep the investigation from getting very far, in an email he got access to.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
And this......
18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent."
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent"
That portion of 793(f) said neither.
Yes it does... "(2) having knowledge"
Yet again, for the intellectually impaired, the shrilary and huma both signed a document that stated they understood the law and were going to follow it. That document blows your position right out of the water. Everything else that has been presented about comey and all the other monkey poo that you have been flinging is rendered moot by that document.
He said trying to prove intent was difficult, particularly when the ag had stated she would keep the investigation from getting very far, in an email he got access to.Comey already said today they did an investigation and they decided not to press charges because they couldn't prove mens rea.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
And this......
18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent."
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent"
That portion of 793(f) said neither.
Yes it does... "(2) having knowledge"
A real judge says there is enough evidence to prosecute:
Andrew Napolitano: Why the criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton is back to front and center
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
And this......
18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent."
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent"
That portion of 793(f) said neither.
Yes it does... "(2) having knowledge"
Yet again, for the intellectually impaired, the shrilary and huma both signed a document that stated they understood the law and were going to follow it. That document blows your position right out of the water. Everything else that has been presented about comey and all the other monkey poo that you have been flinging is rendered moot by that document.
Once again, Comey knows more than you do. He has, does, and always will. He's held positions under both Republicans and Democrats. End of story. I'm done arguing with you, as I've said before I don't trust your decision making and you made this argument personal before I did as a way of troll baiting me. When you get a law degree and reach the level of achievement within the criminal justice system as Comey has, let me know.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
(f)
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
And this......
18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a)
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent."
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent"
That portion of 793(f) said neither.
Yes it does... "(2) having knowledge"
Yet again, for the intellectually impaired, the shrilary and huma both signed a document that stated they understood the law and were going to follow it. That document blows your position right out of the water. Everything else that has been presented about comey and all the other monkey poo that you have been flinging is rendered moot by that document.
Once again, Comey knows more than you do. He has, does, and always will. He's held positions under both Republicans and Democrats. End of story. I'm done arguing with you, as I've said before I don't trust your decision making and you made this argument personal before I did as a way of troll baiting me. When you get a law degree and reach the level of achievement within the criminal justice system as Comey has, let me know.
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent."
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent"
That portion of 793(f) said neither.
Yes it does... "(2) having knowledge"
Yet again, for the intellectually impaired, the shrilary and huma both signed a document that stated they understood the law and were going to follow it. That document blows your position right out of the water. Everything else that has been presented about comey and all the other monkey poo that you have been flinging is rendered moot by that document.
Once again, Comey knows more than you do. He has, does, and always will. He's held positions under both Republicans and Democrats. End of story. I'm done arguing with you, as I've said before I don't trust your decision making and you made this argument personal before I did as a way of troll baiting me. When you get a law degree and reach the level of achievement within the criminal justice system as Comey has, let me know.
"Appeal to Authority
argumentum ad verecundiam
(also known as: argument from authority, appeal to false authority, appeal to unqualified authority, argument from false authority, ipse dixit)
Definition: Using an authority as evidence in your argument when the authority is not really an authority on the facts relevant to the argument. As the audience, allowing an irrelevant authority to add credibility to the claim being made.
Appeal to Authority
Both things you just quoted says, "Knowingly" and "with the intent"
That portion of 793(f) said neither.
Yes it does... "(2) having knowledge"
Yet again, for the intellectually impaired, the shrilary and huma both signed a document that stated they understood the law and were going to follow it. That document blows your position right out of the water. Everything else that has been presented about comey and all the other monkey poo that you have been flinging is rendered moot by that document.
Once again, Comey knows more than you do. He has, does, and always will. He's held positions under both Republicans and Democrats. End of story. I'm done arguing with you, as I've said before I don't trust your decision making and you made this argument personal before I did as a way of troll baiting me. When you get a law degree and reach the level of achievement within the criminal justice system as Comey has, let me know.
"Appeal to Authority
argumentum ad verecundiam
(also known as: argument from authority, appeal to false authority, appeal to unqualified authority, argument from false authority, ipse dixit)
Definition: Using an authority as evidence in your argument when the authority is not really an authority on the facts relevant to the argument. As the audience, allowing an irrelevant authority to add credibility to the claim being made.
Appeal to Authority
It's not just appeal to authority when he is the one in position to make the decision and you are not. And you have ZERO qualifications to counteract his position with.
Yes it does... "(2) having knowledge"
Yet again, for the intellectually impaired, the shrilary and huma both signed a document that stated they understood the law and were going to follow it. That document blows your position right out of the water. Everything else that has been presented about comey and all the other monkey poo that you have been flinging is rendered moot by that document.
Once again, Comey knows more than you do. He has, does, and always will. He's held positions under both Republicans and Democrats. End of story. I'm done arguing with you, as I've said before I don't trust your decision making and you made this argument personal before I did as a way of troll baiting me. When you get a law degree and reach the level of achievement within the criminal justice system as Comey has, let me know.
"Appeal to Authority
argumentum ad verecundiam
(also known as: argument from authority, appeal to false authority, appeal to unqualified authority, argument from false authority, ipse dixit)
Definition: Using an authority as evidence in your argument when the authority is not really an authority on the facts relevant to the argument. As the audience, allowing an irrelevant authority to add credibility to the claim being made.
Appeal to Authority
It's not just appeal to authority when he is the one in position to make the decision and you are not. And you have ZERO qualifications to counteract his position with.
It IS an appeal to authority when his boss tells him to stand down. But you have to be intellectually honest to admit that fact. And you are clearly not.
Comey already said today they did an investigation and they decided not to press charges because they couldn't prove mens rea.
