Hunter and the big guy document is published

I am on topic little bubble boy.
I am responding to the OP title

"Hunter and the big guy document is published"​

by simply stating that this story AIN'T shit compared to all the FELONIES facing 45.
You remain way off topic.

Look, you scumbag simpleton. We all see you engaging in deliberate deflection. If you can’t stay on topic, don’t post in a thread. If you insist on posting on a different topic, start a thread on your own.

You know what you’re doing is prohibited by the rules.
 
Well does the check have the big guy named on it. or does the check just has Hunter's name on it.

If Hunter name is on it then it was paid to Hunter Biden. Hunter had a drug problem and he needed money so if he lies to his partners to get more money from the deal then yeah he will say anything if your gullible enough to believe it. Hunter is a drug addict. Do you believe anything one drug addict tells you.

That is not collaboration as you need proof that money paid to Hunter was then given to Joe. All you have is hearsay which is inadmissible in court.

Unless they produce a check written to Joe Biden , there is no case. Sorry "Big Guy" on the check is not cashable. Don't you see the problem with always referring to the big guy.

If I wrote a check to BackAgain then good luck cashing it.

Still where is this check and who cashed it. Until you guys find that answer, you have lost.
You’re a retard.
 
Ever hear of “investigation?” For example, the investigators obtain the date of a payment of 5 million dollars to Hunter (or to the big guy). They check the corresponding LLC bank accounts for around that date. That’s called “corroboration.” Obtain enough of that and you end up with a case.
There is tape of Biden shaking down Poroshenko to fire Shokin and Poroshenko claims Shokin has done nothing wrong, yet tells Biden he fired him anyway.

Post #49
 
You remain way off topic.

Look, you scumbag simpleton. We all see you engaging in deliberate deflection. If you can’t stay on topic, don’t post in a thread. If you insist on posting on a different topic, start a thread on your own.

You know what you’re doing is prohibited by the rules.
How are those indictments coming along on Hunter and Joe?
 
You remain way off topic.

Look, you scumbag simpleton. We all see you engaging in deliberate deflection. If you can’t stay on topic, don’t post in a thread. If you insist on posting on a different topic, start a thread on your own.

You know what you’re doing is prohibited by the rules.
How are those indictments coming along on Hunter and Joe?
 
There is tape of Biden shaking down Poroshenko to fire Shokin and Poroshenko claims Shokin has done nothing wrong, yet tells Biden he fired him anyway.

Post #49
You’d have to be a moron to think Shokin is the good guy here.
 
Are you going to include who the guy on the Grassy Knoll was?

A conspiracy theory site for people who love conspiracy theories.
 
Is the investigation completed?

A pair of whistleblowers that House Republicans intend to testify against President Joe Biden and his family have serious credibility issues and have already “undermined this Republican narrative in their depositions,” Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) stated in a memo to colleagues, reportedThe New Republic on Wednesday.

The two people, an IRS agent named Gary Shapley and a person identified only as "Mr. X," have alleged that the Justice Department interfered in the tax investigation against Hunter Biden. But according to the memo, their own writings contradict this idea.

Both witnesses acknowledged it is very common for agents, supervisors, and prosecutors to disagree about investigative steps and charging decisions,' Raskin said in the memo, which was sent late Tuesday and obtained by The New Republic."

Shapley previously testified that such disagreements happened with '90-plus percent' of his work. Meanwhile, Mr. X said that even his direct supervisors disagreed with his conclusion about the strength of the case against Hunter Biden."

All of this suggests that what these two people claimed was a conspiracy from the top to quash investigations into the president's son, was actually just day-to-day ordinary debate about how to go about the investigation or whether there was enough evidence.

This comes after Delaware District Attorney David Weiss, a Trump appointee who ultimately brokered a plea deal with Hunter Biden over tax and firearm offenses, contradicted Shapley's account and said there was no pressure against him to move forward with the investigation or charges.
 
You’d have to be a moron to think Shokin is the good guy here.
Where did I claim that? No matter, it's quite apparent they have been lying about the reason Shokin was fired.
Uke was awash in corruption during Obama. Bipartisan kick back factory.
 
Is the investigation completed?
Other than questionable "whistelblower" stories there hasn't been much of an investigation.
But on another note the last POTUS remains indicted on 71 felony counts backed by MOUNTAINS of solid evidence.
And we haven't even seen the new charges for Jan. 6th OR the Georgia indictments yet.
 
Starts at 5:30



Starts at 33:10

At 36:57 Bongino mentions Poroshenko being a FBI established source. You know, like was mentioned in the 1023.

38:33 Biden worrying about Trump nebbing in Ukraine.


Wow. I had not seen this post earlier, much less played the Bongino videos. I’m a fan of Bongino ever since I heard him — several years back — subbing for Mark Levin on the Levin radio program.

If anything, Bongino has grown even more powerful.

Excellent post. Thanks for sharing it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top