Hunter Biden

[Slade3200]

Well you don't listen to me. What is the purpose of Hunter Biden or The Whistle Bower testifying? Consider the WBer to call 911 with a claim a crime was being committed.

Wasn't Donald Trump counseled to never testify under oath, because he would put himself into jeopardy.

Both are irrelevant to the issue, did Donald Trump attempt to bribe the President of Ukraine is the seminal issue.

and since the facts say he didnt try to bribe anyone lets get back to the biden and DNC corruption/collusion with ukraine,,,

We have no interest in further discussion of debunked conspiracy theories about the DNC, and Guiliani's lies about the Bidens. The Russians hacked the DNC, the Ukraine had nothing to do with it. There was no corruption involved in Joe Biden's firing of the previous prosecutors. These are FACTS which you Russian posters keep pretending aren't true.

The crime here is Trump's attempt to extort false evidence against the DNC and the Bidens in return for military aid. There is no evidence of Trump being out to investigate corruption in the Ukraine. He had previously extorted Zelensky's predecessor into dropping the corruption investigation of Paul Manafort. He didn't ask about current corruption in the Ukraine - only stuff that happened years before Zelensky's election. The only corruption Trump was interested in having investigated was corruption involving his political enemies in the USA.

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election. Trump had spent 2 years being investigated to determine whether he asked the Russian government for help in the last election. One would think Trump would have learned that such requests are illegal by now, but Trump has always been a slow learner who thinks the rules don't apply to him.

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election.

Why would exposing Biden's corruption help Trump in the election?

There is no evidence of corruption with Joe. Asking Ukraine to publicly announce an investigation into Biden is the help. Trump can then start the lock him up crooked Joe charade which is his go to when running against political opponents. It’s painfully obvious

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

What Joe admitted to was not wrong doing. Y’all are trying to spin it that way but nobody serious or in law enforcement agrees with you. This is a Trump narrative designed to demonize him which is how Trump campaigns

 

[Paul Motter]

Here is an affidavit that says Shokin was fired because he would not investigate Hunter Biden - not because the IMF wanted him fired, (Joe's lie): Shokin Statement

The phone call transcript shows Trump asked for help in a CRIMINAL investigation - not a POLITICAL one. He asked about the prosecutor firing from 2016 and what happened with Joe Biden and Burisma. The mentioned treaty gives Trump every right and authority to ask for this investigation: Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

And just for fun: Here is a transcript of Hunter Biden's police report from early 2017: Hunter Biden Docs Final Redacted | National Security | Politics

 

[progressive hunter]

and since the facts say he didnt try to bribe anyone lets get back to the biden and DNC corruption/collusion with ukraine,,,

We have no interest in further discussion of debunked conspiracy theories about the DNC, and Guiliani's lies about the Bidens. The Russians hacked the DNC, the Ukraine had nothing to do with it. There was no corruption involved in Joe Biden's firing of the previous prosecutors. These are FACTS which you Russian posters keep pretending aren't true.

The crime here is Trump's attempt to extort false evidence against the DNC and the Bidens in return for military aid. There is no evidence of Trump being out to investigate corruption in the Ukraine. He had previously extorted Zelensky's predecessor into dropping the corruption investigation of Paul Manafort. He didn't ask about current corruption in the Ukraine - only stuff that happened years before Zelensky's election. The only corruption Trump was interested in having investigated was corruption involving his political enemies in the USA.

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election. Trump had spent 2 years being investigated to determine whether he asked the Russian government for help in the last election. One would think Trump would have learned that such requests are illegal by now, but Trump has always been a slow learner who thinks the rules don't apply to him.

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election.

Why would exposing Biden's corruption help Trump in the election?

There is no evidence of corruption with Joe. Asking Ukraine to publicly announce an investigation into Biden is the help. Trump can then start the lock him up crooked Joe charade which is his go to when running against political opponents. It’s painfully obvious

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

Are you joking? “Crooked Hillary” “Lock her up!” Ring any bells?

Stating a fact and a desire is perfectly legal and a sane thing to do,,,its not like he lied about that,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

and since the facts say he didnt try to bribe anyone lets get back to the biden and DNC corruption/collusion with ukraine,,,

We have no interest in further discussion of debunked conspiracy theories about the DNC, and Guiliani's lies about the Bidens. The Russians hacked the DNC, the Ukraine had nothing to do with it. There was no corruption involved in Joe Biden's firing of the previous prosecutors. These are FACTS which you Russian posters keep pretending aren't true.

The crime here is Trump's attempt to extort false evidence against the DNC and the Bidens in return for military aid. There is no evidence of Trump being out to investigate corruption in the Ukraine. He had previously extorted Zelensky's predecessor into dropping the corruption investigation of Paul Manafort. He didn't ask about current corruption in the Ukraine - only stuff that happened years before Zelensky's election. The only corruption Trump was interested in having investigated was corruption involving his political enemies in the USA.

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election. Trump had spent 2 years being investigated to determine whether he asked the Russian government for help in the last election. One would think Trump would have learned that such requests are illegal by now, but Trump has always been a slow learner who thinks the rules don't apply to him.

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election.

Why would exposing Biden's corruption help Trump in the election?

There is no evidence of corruption with Joe. Asking Ukraine to publicly announce an investigation into Biden is the help. Trump can then start the lock him up crooked Joe charade which is his go to when running against political opponents. It’s painfully obvious

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

What Joe admitted to was not wrong doing. Y’all are trying to spin it that way but nobody serious or in law enforcement agrees with you. This is a Trump narrative designed to demonize him which is how Trump campaigns

if it was legal for joe to do then it is legal for trump to do it,,,

one difference is trump did it for national security and joe did it to protect his son,,,

 

[Slade3200]

We have no interest in further discussion of debunked conspiracy theories about the DNC, and Guiliani's lies about the Bidens. The Russians hacked the DNC, the Ukraine had nothing to do with it. There was no corruption involved in Joe Biden's firing of the previous prosecutors. These are FACTS which you Russian posters keep pretending aren't true.

The crime here is Trump's attempt to extort false evidence against the DNC and the Bidens in return for military aid. There is no evidence of Trump being out to investigate corruption in the Ukraine. He had previously extorted Zelensky's predecessor into dropping the corruption investigation of Paul Manafort. He didn't ask about current corruption in the Ukraine - only stuff that happened years before Zelensky's election. The only corruption Trump was interested in having investigated was corruption involving his political enemies in the USA.

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election. Trump had spent 2 years being investigated to determine whether he asked the Russian government for help in the last election. One would think Trump would have learned that such requests are illegal by now, but Trump has always been a slow learner who thinks the rules don't apply to him.

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election.

Why would exposing Biden's corruption help Trump in the election?

There is no evidence of corruption with Joe. Asking Ukraine to publicly announce an investigation into Biden is the help. Trump can then start the lock him up crooked Joe charade which is his go to when running against political opponents. It’s painfully obvious

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

Are you joking? “Crooked Hillary” “Lock her up!” Ring any bells?

Stating a fact and a desire is perfectly legal and a sane thing to do,,,its not like he lied about that,,,

its a branding tactic and a hyperbolic exploitation of his opponents... it worked with Hillary and it was what he was trying to set up with Joe. Can’t you just be honest and admit that?

 

[Slade3200]

We have no interest in further discussion of debunked conspiracy theories about the DNC, and Guiliani's lies about the Bidens. The Russians hacked the DNC, the Ukraine had nothing to do with it. There was no corruption involved in Joe Biden's firing of the previous prosecutors. These are FACTS which you Russian posters keep pretending aren't true.

The crime here is Trump's attempt to extort false evidence against the DNC and the Bidens in return for military aid. There is no evidence of Trump being out to investigate corruption in the Ukraine. He had previously extorted Zelensky's predecessor into dropping the corruption investigation of Paul Manafort. He didn't ask about current corruption in the Ukraine - only stuff that happened years before Zelensky's election. The only corruption Trump was interested in having investigated was corruption involving his political enemies in the USA.

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election. Trump had spent 2 years being investigated to determine whether he asked the Russian government for help in the last election. One would think Trump would have learned that such requests are illegal by now, but Trump has always been a slow learner who thinks the rules don't apply to him.

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election.

Why would exposing Biden's corruption help Trump in the election?

There is no evidence of corruption with Joe. Asking Ukraine to publicly announce an investigation into Biden is the help. Trump can then start the lock him up crooked Joe charade which is his go to when running against political opponents. It’s painfully obvious

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

What Joe admitted to was not wrong doing. Y’all are trying to spin it that way but nobody serious or in law enforcement agrees with you. This is a Trump narrative designed to demonize him which is how Trump campaigns

if it was legal for joe to do then it is legal for trump to do it,,,

one difference is trump did it for national security and joe did it to protect his son,,,

Sure... but Trump has to prove he was doing state business and not personal/political dealings. Biden had a documented mandate from the president and members of Congress. Trump sent his personal attorney to try and work that deal outside of our diplomatic and legal system. You do understand the difference, right?

 

[progressive hunter]

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election.

Why would exposing Biden's corruption help Trump in the election?

There is no evidence of corruption with Joe. Asking Ukraine to publicly announce an investigation into Biden is the help. Trump can then start the lock him up crooked Joe charade which is his go to when running against political opponents. It’s painfully obvious

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

Are you joking? “Crooked Hillary” “Lock her up!” Ring any bells?

Stating a fact and a desire is perfectly legal and a sane thing to do,,,its not like he lied about that,,,

its a branding tactic and a hyperbolic exploitation of his opponents... it worked with Hillary and it was what he was trying to set up with Joe. Can’t you just be honest and admit that?

well it was and is true about both of them so wheres the problem???

 

[progressive hunter]

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election.

Why would exposing Biden's corruption help Trump in the election?

There is no evidence of corruption with Joe. Asking Ukraine to publicly announce an investigation into Biden is the help. Trump can then start the lock him up crooked Joe charade which is his go to when running against political opponents. It’s painfully obvious

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

What Joe admitted to was not wrong doing. Y’all are trying to spin it that way but nobody serious or in law enforcement agrees with you. This is a Trump narrative designed to demonize him which is how Trump campaigns

if it was legal for joe to do then it is legal for trump to do it,,,

one difference is trump did it for national security and joe did it to protect his son,,,

Sure... but Trump has to prove he was doing state business and not personal/political dealings. Biden had a documented mandate from the president and members of Congress. Trump sent his personal attorney to try and work that deal outside of our diplomatic and legal system. You do understand the difference, right?

he did that by including the DOJ in the investigation,,,CASE CLOSED,,,

and if you knew all the facts you would know that rudy was also working with the DOJ the whole time,,,CASE CLOSED AGAIN,,,

 

[Slade3200]

There is no evidence of corruption with Joe. Asking Ukraine to publicly announce an investigation into Biden is the help. Trump can then start the lock him up crooked Joe charade which is his go to when running against political opponents. It’s painfully obvious

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

Are you joking? “Crooked Hillary” “Lock her up!” Ring any bells?

Stating a fact and a desire is perfectly legal and a sane thing to do,,,its not like he lied about that,,,

its a branding tactic and a hyperbolic exploitation of his opponents... it worked with Hillary and it was what he was trying to set up with Joe. Can’t you just be honest and admit that?

well it was and is true about both of them so wheres the problem???

Trump did it in secret and Biden did it as a mandate from his government. Documented and expressed for weeks prior. The two situations aren’t even close. If you don’t understand that then you are way dumber than I thought

 

[Slade3200]

There is no evidence of corruption with Joe. Asking Ukraine to publicly announce an investigation into Biden is the help. Trump can then start the lock him up crooked Joe charade which is his go to when running against political opponents. It’s painfully obvious

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

What Joe admitted to was not wrong doing. Y’all are trying to spin it that way but nobody serious or in law enforcement agrees with you. This is a Trump narrative designed to demonize him which is how Trump campaigns

if it was legal for joe to do then it is legal for trump to do it,,,

one difference is trump did it for national security and joe did it to protect his son,,,

Sure... but Trump has to prove he was doing state business and not personal/political dealings. Biden had a documented mandate from the president and members of Congress. Trump sent his personal attorney to try and work that deal outside of our diplomatic and legal system. You do understand the difference, right?

he did that by including the DOJ in the investigation,,,CASE CLOSED,,,

and if you knew all the facts you would know that rudy was also working with the DOJ the whole time,,,CASE CLOSED AGAIN,,,

There is no evidence of corruption with Joe. Asking Ukraine to publicly announce an investigation into Biden is the help. Trump can then start the lock him up crooked Joe charade which is his go to when running against political opponents. It’s painfully obvious

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

What Joe admitted to was not wrong doing. Y’all are trying to spin it that way but nobody serious or in law enforcement agrees with you. This is a Trump narrative designed to demonize him which is how Trump campaigns

if it was legal for joe to do then it is legal for trump to do it,,,

one difference is trump did it for national security and joe did it to protect his son,,,

Sure... but Trump has to prove he was doing state business and not personal/political dealings. Biden had a documented mandate from the president and members of Congress. Trump sent his personal attorney to try and work that deal outside of our diplomatic and legal system. You do understand the difference, right?

he did that by including the DOJ in the investigation,,,CASE CLOSED,,,

and if you knew all the facts you would know that rudy was also working with the DOJ the whole time,,,CASE CLOSED AGAIN,,,

So is there a DOJ investigation into Biden? Do you have any documentation on that?

 

[progressive hunter]

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

Are you joking? “Crooked Hillary” “Lock her up!” Ring any bells?

Stating a fact and a desire is perfectly legal and a sane thing to do,,,its not like he lied about that,,,

its a branding tactic and a hyperbolic exploitation of his opponents... it worked with Hillary and it was what he was trying to set up with Joe. Can’t you just be honest and admit that?

well it was and is true about both of them so wheres the problem???

Trump did it in secret and Biden did it as a mandate from his government. Documented and expressed for weeks prior. The two situations aren’t even close. If you don’t understand that then you are way dumber than I thought

trump did it in a room with other people where his words were transcribed for the record,,,
that doesnt sound secret to me,,,not to mention that he had been looking into it for several months before the phone call,,,

 

[Faun]

Don’t you all think that Trump or somebody from the DOJ should formally present their reasons for accusing the Biden’s of criminal activity before the Biden’s get dragged through The mud with public and political depositions?

Wouldn’t that be the proper way to go about it?

so far its been mostly an ethics thing, but thanks to joe bragging about extortion he committed thats where the illegal issue begins

How so? I’m not seeing the criminal extortion. Can you explain? Also where does Hunter come into it?

hunter comes into it because he worked for the company that his father stopped a criminal investigation into,,,at least thats what the documents say happened,,,

I say let an investigation happen and hope for the best,,,

Bullshit.

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

 

[progressive hunter]

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

What Joe admitted to was not wrong doing. Y’all are trying to spin it that way but nobody serious or in law enforcement agrees with you. This is a Trump narrative designed to demonize him which is how Trump campaigns

if it was legal for joe to do then it is legal for trump to do it,,,

one difference is trump did it for national security and joe did it to protect his son,,,

Sure... but Trump has to prove he was doing state business and not personal/political dealings. Biden had a documented mandate from the president and members of Congress. Trump sent his personal attorney to try and work that deal outside of our diplomatic and legal system. You do understand the difference, right?

he did that by including the DOJ in the investigation,,,CASE CLOSED,,,

and if you knew all the facts you would know that rudy was also working with the DOJ the whole time,,,CASE CLOSED AGAIN,,,

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

What Joe admitted to was not wrong doing. Y’all are trying to spin it that way but nobody serious or in law enforcement agrees with you. This is a Trump narrative designed to demonize him which is how Trump campaigns

if it was legal for joe to do then it is legal for trump to do it,,,

one difference is trump did it for national security and joe did it to protect his son,,,

Sure... but Trump has to prove he was doing state business and not personal/political dealings. Biden had a documented mandate from the president and members of Congress. Trump sent his personal attorney to try and work that deal outside of our diplomatic and legal system. You do understand the difference, right?

he did that by including the DOJ in the investigation,,,CASE CLOSED,,,

and if you knew all the facts you would know that rudy was also working with the DOJ the whole time,,,CASE CLOSED AGAIN,,,

So is there a DOJ investigation into Biden? Do you have any documentation on that?

well trump told the ukraine president to contact the DOJ,,, so theres your proof,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Don’t you all think that Trump or somebody from the DOJ should formally present their reasons for accusing the Biden’s of criminal activity before the Biden’s get dragged through The mud with public and political depositions?

Wouldn’t that be the proper way to go about it?

so far its been mostly an ethics thing, but thanks to joe bragging about extortion he committed thats where the illegal issue begins

How so? I’m not seeing the criminal extortion. Can you explain? Also where does Hunter come into it?

hunter comes into it because he worked for the company that his father stopped a criminal investigation into,,,at least thats what the documents say happened,,,

I say let an investigation happen and hope for the best,,,

Bullshit.

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

it had been dormant up until a month before when shokin tried to reopen it and biden had him fired for it,,,

its all in the links provided,,,

 

[Faun]

Here is an affidavit that says Shokin was fired because he would not investigate Hunter Biden - not because the IMF wanted him fired, (Joe's lie): Shokin Statement

The phone call transcript shows Trump asked for help in a CRIMINAL investigation - not a POLITICAL one. He asked about the prosecutor firing from 2016 and what happened with Joe Biden and Burisma. The mentioned treaty gives Trump every right and authority to ask for this investigation: Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

And just for fun: Here is a transcript of Hunter Biden's police report from early 2017: Hunter Biden Docs Final Redacted | National Security | Politics

Why isn't that signed??

 

[Faun]

We have no interest in further discussion of debunked conspiracy theories about the DNC, and Guiliani's lies about the Bidens. The Russians hacked the DNC, the Ukraine had nothing to do with it. There was no corruption involved in Joe Biden's firing of the previous prosecutors. These are FACTS which you Russian posters keep pretending aren't true.

The crime here is Trump's attempt to extort false evidence against the DNC and the Bidens in return for military aid. There is no evidence of Trump being out to investigate corruption in the Ukraine. He had previously extorted Zelensky's predecessor into dropping the corruption investigation of Paul Manafort. He didn't ask about current corruption in the Ukraine - only stuff that happened years before Zelensky's election. The only corruption Trump was interested in having investigated was corruption involving his political enemies in the USA.

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election. Trump had spent 2 years being investigated to determine whether he asked the Russian government for help in the last election. One would think Trump would have learned that such requests are illegal by now, but Trump has always been a slow learner who thinks the rules don't apply to him.

It is illegal to ask a foreign government for help in an American Presidential election.

Why would exposing Biden's corruption help Trump in the election?

There is no evidence of corruption with Joe. Asking Ukraine to publicly announce an investigation into Biden is the help. Trump can then start the lock him up crooked Joe charade which is his go to when running against political opponents. It’s painfully obvious

HIS GO TOO???

WTF???
this is only the 2nd election in his life so how do you see a pattern of something he didnt do in the first one,,,

THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE WRONG DOING AND ALSO JOE ADMITTED TO DOING IT,,,

What Joe admitted to was not wrong doing. Y’all are trying to spin it that way but nobody serious or in law enforcement agrees with you. This is a Trump narrative designed to demonize him which is how Trump campaigns

if it was legal for joe to do then it is legal for trump to do it,,,

one difference is trump did it for national security and joe did it to protect his son,,,

 

[Faun]

Don’t you all think that Trump or somebody from the DOJ should formally present their reasons for accusing the Biden’s of criminal activity before the Biden’s get dragged through The mud with public and political depositions?

Wouldn’t that be the proper way to go about it?

so far its been mostly an ethics thing, but thanks to joe bragging about extortion he committed thats where the illegal issue begins

How so? I’m not seeing the criminal extortion. Can you explain? Also where does Hunter come into it?

hunter comes into it because he worked for the company that his father stopped a criminal investigation into,,,at least thats what the documents say happened,,,

I say let an investigation happen and hope for the best,,,

Bullshit.

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

it had been dormant up until a month before when shokin tried to reopen it and biden had him fired for it,,,

its all in the links provided,,,

Bullshit. And you provided no such links. You posted links to videos with links to Glenn Beck's website. You've posted zero links to any documents to back a word you've posted.

 

[progressive hunter]

so far its been mostly an ethics thing, but thanks to joe bragging about extortion he committed thats where the illegal issue begins

How so? I’m not seeing the criminal extortion. Can you explain? Also where does Hunter come into it?

hunter comes into it because he worked for the company that his father stopped a criminal investigation into,,,at least thats what the documents say happened,,,

I say let an investigation happen and hope for the best,,,

Bullshit.

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim

But what has received less attention is that at the time Biden made his ultimatum, the probe into the company -- Burisma Holdings, owned by Mykola Zlochevsky -- had been long dormant, according to the former official, Vitaliy Kasko.

it had been dormant up until a month before when shokin tried to reopen it and biden had him fired for it,,,

its all in the links provided,,,

Bullshit. And you provided no such links. You posted links to videos with links to Glenn Beck's website. You've posted zero links to any documents to back a word you've posted.

yes I did,,,youre just to lazy to click on them,,,

 

[Faun]

Are you joking? “Crooked Hillary” “Lock her up!” Ring any bells?

Stating a fact and a desire is perfectly legal and a sane thing to do,,,its not like he lied about that,,,

its a branding tactic and a hyperbolic exploitation of his opponents... it worked with Hillary and it was what he was trying to set up with Joe. Can’t you just be honest and admit that?

well it was and is true about both of them so wheres the problem???

Trump did it in secret and Biden did it as a mandate from his government. Documented and expressed for weeks prior. The two situations aren’t even close. If you don’t understand that then you are way dumber than I thought

trump did it in a room with other people where his words were transcribed for the record,,,
that doesnt sound secret to me,,,not to mention that he had been looking into it for several months before the phone call,,,

More bullshit. In reality, Trump had the notes from his call locked up where few could access them. So yes, that's secret. Then he only released it months later after a whistleblower blew up his presidency.

 

[progressive hunter]

Stating a fact and a desire is perfectly legal and a sane thing to do,,,its not like he lied about that,,,

its a branding tactic and a hyperbolic exploitation of his opponents... it worked with Hillary and it was what he was trying to set up with Joe. Can’t you just be honest and admit that?

well it was and is true about both of them so wheres the problem???

Trump did it in secret and Biden did it as a mandate from his government. Documented and expressed for weeks prior. The two situations aren’t even close. If you don’t understand that then you are way dumber than I thought

trump did it in a room with other people where his words were transcribed for the record,,,
that doesnt sound secret to me,,,not to mention that he had been looking into it for several months before the phone call,,,

More bullshit. In reality, Trump had the notes from his call locked up where few could access them. So yes, that's secret. Then he only released it months later after a whistleblower blew up his presidency.

since when do presidents release day to day calls from the whitehouse???