Gee, Dante...I thought the laptop and it's contents were fake? Now Biden wants his fake "personal information" to be protected? Seriously?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gee, Dante...I thought the laptop and it's contents were fake? Now Biden wants his fake "personal information" to be protected? Seriously?
Only James Woods and some RWinging Texans on this site can affirm that.
Go Hunter!
And you claim to be a cop?This reminds me of the 2016 election...
When Hillary's incriminating emails were leaked to the public ... she didn't spend any effort trying to convince people that the information in those emails was false or misleading.
What Hillary and her minions did scream about what that the incriminating information was leaked in the first place.
It's like a murderer claiming that it's not fair to convict him of the crime just because his fingerprints were all over the corpse.
After all, he never meant for those fingerprints to be found.
With incriminating you mean embarrassing, and with "found" you mean taken without consent. Let me put it in my own analogy.
It's like a public figure who's a closet gay. His laptop is being stolen and subsequently pictures attesting to that fact are leaked to the press. The thief defends himself by claiming that outing the person is a public service and therefore the theft is no longer criminal.
In practicality his laptop was taken by someone and subsequently leaked to the press and other people, up to and including naked pictures of Hunter Biden. The publishing of other peoples junk without consent is most definitely a crime. Nothing I so far saw leaked from that laptop amounts to proof of any criminal act.
Doesn't law enforcement need a subpoena, and a probable crime, with a court judge approval of the specific content on the laptop, that can be legally searched that is related to the probable crime committed, BEFORE they can search any person's personal papers, under our Constitution?I find it interesting that Hunter is calling on the criminal partisan weaponized DOJ and FBI, who have been protecting his and daddy's ass by hiding / refusing to investigate his laptop, to investigate those demanding the FBI & DOJ do their job.
He forfeited the laptop to the repair shop, plain and simple. But of course you're too stupid to comprehend that fact.WASHINGTON (AP) — A lawyer for President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, has asked the Justice Department to investigate close allies of former President Donald Trump and others who he says accessed and disseminated personal data from a laptop that was dropped off at a Delaware computer repair shop in 2019.
In a separate letter, Biden’s attorneys have also asked Fox News host Tucker Carlson to retract and apologize for what they say are false and defamatory claims made repeatedly about him on-air, including implying without evidence that he had unauthorized access to classified documents found at his father’s home.
More at the link below...
Hunter Biden Seeks Federal Probe Of Trump Allies Over Laptop
A lawyer for President Biden’s son asked the Justice Department to investigate close Trump allies, saying they accessed and disseminated personal data from his laptop.www.huffpost.com
Good to see Hunter fighting back. What do you think?
There’s plenty of material for you to go jerk it to, it’s almost like jerking it to the “big guy” who you really want to put it up your ass and step on you. You’d let that geriatric dementia patient get way more than 10% of you, he’d get it all…Is it true that Hunter is hung like a horse?
They got a grand jury subpoena before they confiscated it. If they find evidence of other crimes too, then it's fair game.Doesn't law enforcement need a subpoena, and a probable crime, with a court judge approval of the specific content on the laptop, that can be legally searched that is related to the probable crime committed, BEFORE they can search any person's personal papers, under our Constitution?
I doubt the FBI could legally scour his entire laptop looking for any previously unknown crimes.....?
The computer shop owner, could not identify Hunter as the person who dropped off the laptop....he claimed he was legally blind,and that's why he couldn't identify him .....which is ridiculous and suspicious.Where are you people coming up with the laptop was stolen? Hunter took it in for repair and never picked it up so it became the property of the repair shop owner to do with as he chose.
The left is just pissed because the laptop filled with videos and documents are real, unlike the fake Russian dossier pee pee tapes.
he may have forfeited the laptop, if his receipt states clearly that if he did not pick it up under a certain amount of time, BUT HE DID NOT FORFEIT his personal and private papers on it....the contents should have been wiped clean off the laptop, before the store owner went to sell it....or give it away to a political Campaign....or a rag paper....He forfeited the laptop to the repair shop, plain and simple. But of course you're too stupid to comprehend that fact.
That is not the law, though, and he gave it to the authorities, and they did NOTHING but cover it up and then lie.he may have forfeited the laptop, if his receipt states clearly that if he did not pick it up under a certain amount of time, BUT HE DID NOT FORFEIT his personal and private papers on it....the contents should have been wiped clean off the laptop, before the store owner went to sell it....or give it away to a political Campaign....or a rag paper....
And his sister, sister in law, and numerous underage hookers.Only James Woods and some RWinging Texans on this site can affirm that.
So you are sticking to the idiotic story this is Russian disinformation? Are you really that stupid?Also, why would Hunter even take those pictures of himself when drugged out, or having sex, let alone keep them all on his laptop? Were they taken by others for kompromat? To blackmail him? Or his father?
Sure, maybe he likes keeping pics of himself having sex, but the drugged out pics?
Every single thing about this lap top, stinks to high heaven!
I wish it would be investigated, including the Giuliani part....
what law gives a shop owner permission to take the customer's private papers and release them all to the public?That is not the law, though, and he gave it to the authorities, and they did NOTHING but cover it up and then lie.
It is his property and he can give copies of that data to whom he wants.
Where did I say that?So you are sticking to the idiotic story this is Russian disinformation? Are you really that stupid?
At that point it was the repair shop owner’s property, not Crackheads.With incriminating you mean embarrassing, and with "found" you mean taken without consent. Let me put it in my own analogy.
It's like a public figure who's a closet gay. His laptop is being stolen and subsequently pictures attesting to that fact are leaked to the press. The thief defends himself by claiming that outing the person is a public service and therefore the theft is no longer criminal.
In practicality his laptop was taken by someone and subsequently leaked to the press and other people, up to and including naked pictures of Hunter Biden. The publishing of other peoples junk without consent is most definitely a crime. Nothing I so far saw leaked from that laptop amounts to proof of any criminal act.