Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A new survey shows what really interests 'pro-lifers': controlling women | Jill Filipovic
According to self-identified “pro-life” advocates, the fundamental divide between those who want to outlaw abortion and those who want to keep it legal comes down to one question: when does life begin? Anti-abortion advocacy pushes the view that life begins at conception; the name of their movement carefully centers the conceit that opposition to abortion rights is simply about wanting to save human lives.
A new poll shows that’s a lie. The “pro-life” movement is fundamentally about misogyny.
A Supermajority/PerryUndem survey released this week divides respondents by their position on abortion, and then tracks their answers to 10 questions on gender equality more generally. On every question, anti-abortion voters were significantly more hostile to gender equity than pro-choice voters.
I have always thought that it is more about punishing "sluts" and this confirms it. The article is pretty much nailed on but it refers to these extremists as "Christian".
Do me a favour.
Women have rights, and it is better to not bring unwanted babies into this world.
what about the babys rights???
The FETUS have no rights while being inside the woman's body, it is the Mother who has the right to decide to provide for it or terminate it. Since it is IN her body, it is a part of her, thus can decide to remove it, which should be early in the Pregnancy.
Once it comes out of the mother, it becomes separate individual with all rights reserved as a living INDIVIDUAL being, who should be loved, supported and defended.
sorry sweetie but its a separate body/life inside here,,,
you tell yourself anything you want to justify the murder of a child
Women have rights, and it is better to not bring unwanted babies into this world.
what about the babys rights???
The FETUS have no rights while being inside the woman's body, it is the Mother who has the right to decide to provide for it or terminate it. Since it is IN her body, it is a part of her, thus can decide to remove it, which should be early in the Pregnancy.
Once it comes out of the mother, it becomes separate individual with all rights reserved as a living INDIVIDUAL being, who should be loved, supported and defended.
sorry sweetie but its a separate body/life inside here,,,
you tell yourself anything you want to justify the murder of a child
If it's separate as you say then make it really separate.
Separate it from the woman. Remove it from her body. Let it do all the same things any other living human being does. Let it breath, eat and behave just like a separate life.
While it's ATTACHED to the woman's body it's part of her body and she has the right to do what she wants with her own body.
"Advanced" societies do not murder their own children.Yup, that would be seen as an extreme position in advanced societies.
You make several shaky assumptions there.They reflect the general findings of the survey.A new survey shows what really interests 'pro-lifers': controlling women | Jill Filipovic
According to self-identified “pro-life” advocates, the fundamental divide between those who want to outlaw abortion and those who want to keep it legal comes down to one question: when does life begin? Anti-abortion advocacy pushes the view that life begins at conception; the name of their movement carefully centers the conceit that opposition to abortion rights is simply about wanting to save human lives.
A new poll shows that’s a lie. The “pro-life” movement is fundamentally about misogyny.
A Supermajority/PerryUndem survey released this week divides respondents by their position on abortion, and then tracks their answers to 10 questions on gender equality more generally. On every question, anti-abortion voters were significantly more hostile to gender equity than pro-choice voters.
I have always thought that it is more about punishing "sluts" and this confirms it. The article is pretty much nailed on but it refers to these extremists as "Christian".
Do me a favour.
This article does not nail anything it misses by a mile.
Take a close look at the questions raised on the survey they are actually ideological questions and reflect feminist beliefs as opposed to general beliefs in equality.
For example it claims it is misogynistic to believe or claim that women are too sensitive. It is not misogynistic at all.
It asks if lack of women in positions of power affects women's equality. It does not.
Clearly the survey cited in the article is made to generate pre conceived conclusions based on extremist ideology
Therefore your op is a failure
The extreme anti-choice people keep running away from the topic of using modern technology to lessen the amount of unwanted pregnancies. They are against this, but will not come to the discussion table to explain their views. One less unwanted pregnancy is one less abortion. What is going on here? What are these people hiding?
The extreme anti-choice people keep running away from the topic of using modern technology to lessen the amount of unwanted pregnancies. They are against this, but will not come to the discussion table to explain their views. One less unwanted pregnancy is one less abortion. What is going on here? What are these people hiding?
Odd this. I asked you earlier what you meant by "modern technology" and you never answered.
A new survey shows what really interests 'pro-lifers': controlling women | Jill Filipovic
According to self-identified “pro-life” advocates, the fundamental divide between those who want to outlaw abortion and those who want to keep it legal comes down to one question: when does life begin? Anti-abortion advocacy pushes the view that life begins at conception; the name of their movement carefully centers the conceit that opposition to abortion rights is simply about wanting to save human lives.
A new poll shows that’s a lie. The “pro-life” movement is fundamentally about misogyny.
A Supermajority/PerryUndem survey released this week divides respondents by their position on abortion, and then tracks their answers to 10 questions on gender equality more generally. On every question, anti-abortion voters were significantly more hostile to gender equity than pro-choice voters.
I have always thought that it is more about punishing "sluts" and this confirms it. The article is pretty much nailed on but it refers to these extremists as "Christian".
Do me a favour.
A new survey shows what really interests 'pro-lifers': controlling women | Jill Filipovic
According to self-identified “pro-life” advocates, the fundamental divide between those who want to outlaw abortion and those who want to keep it legal comes down to one question: when does life begin? Anti-abortion advocacy pushes the view that life begins at conception; the name of their movement carefully centers the conceit that opposition to abortion rights is simply about wanting to save human lives.
A new poll shows that’s a lie. The “pro-life” movement is fundamentally about misogyny.
A Supermajority/PerryUndem survey released this week divides respondents by their position on abortion, and then tracks their answers to 10 questions on gender equality more generally. On every question, anti-abortion voters were significantly more hostile to gender equity than pro-choice voters.
I have always thought that it is more about punishing "sluts" and this confirms it. The article is pretty much nailed on but it refers to these extremists as "Christian".
Do me a favour.
You serve Satan well, Tommy.
The extreme anti-choice people keep running away from the topic of using modern technology to lessen the amount of unwanted pregnancies. They are against this, but will not come to the discussion table to explain their views. One less unwanted pregnancy is one less abortion. What is going on here? What are these people hiding?
Odd this. I asked you earlier what you meant by "modern technology" and you never answered.
I went to bed without signing off. The answer is modern birth-control methods. Pill, IUD, shots, etc. All of which people should be aware of and have access to.
A new survey shows what really interests 'pro-lifers': controlling women | Jill Filipovic
According to self-identified “pro-life” advocates, the fundamental divide between those who want to outlaw abortion and those who want to keep it legal comes down to one question: when does life begin? Anti-abortion advocacy pushes the view that life begins at conception; the name of their movement carefully centers the conceit that opposition to abortion rights is simply about wanting to save human lives.
A new poll shows that’s a lie. The “pro-life” movement is fundamentally about misogyny.
A Supermajority/PerryUndem survey released this week divides respondents by their position on abortion, and then tracks their answers to 10 questions on gender equality more generally. On every question, anti-abortion voters were significantly more hostile to gender equity than pro-choice voters.
I have always thought that it is more about punishing "sluts" and this confirms it. The article is pretty much nailed on but it refers to these extremists as "Christian".
Do me a favour.
You serve Satan well, Tommy.
What is this "Satan" shit? You sound like a monkey-cult member with a bible and a military assault weapon who is so proud of his male appendage.
I stated several facts there.You make several shaky assumptions there.They reflect the general findings of the survey.A new survey shows what really interests 'pro-lifers': controlling women | Jill Filipovic
According to self-identified “pro-life” advocates, the fundamental divide between those who want to outlaw abortion and those who want to keep it legal comes down to one question: when does life begin? Anti-abortion advocacy pushes the view that life begins at conception; the name of their movement carefully centers the conceit that opposition to abortion rights is simply about wanting to save human lives.
A new poll shows that’s a lie. The “pro-life” movement is fundamentally about misogyny.
A Supermajority/PerryUndem survey released this week divides respondents by their position on abortion, and then tracks their answers to 10 questions on gender equality more generally. On every question, anti-abortion voters were significantly more hostile to gender equity than pro-choice voters.
I have always thought that it is more about punishing "sluts" and this confirms it. The article is pretty much nailed on but it refers to these extremists as "Christian".
Do me a favour.
This article does not nail anything it misses by a mile.
Take a close look at the questions raised on the survey they are actually ideological questions and reflect feminist beliefs as opposed to general beliefs in equality.
For example it claims it is misogynistic to believe or claim that women are too sensitive. It is not misogynistic at all.
It asks if lack of women in positions of power affects women's equality. It does not.
Clearly the survey cited in the article is made to generate pre conceived conclusions based on extremist ideology
Therefore your op is a failure
A new survey shows what really interests 'pro-lifers': controlling women | Jill Filipovic
According to self-identified “pro-life” advocates, the fundamental divide between those who want to outlaw abortion and those who want to keep it legal comes down to one question: when does life begin? Anti-abortion advocacy pushes the view that life begins at conception; the name of their movement carefully centers the conceit that opposition to abortion rights is simply about wanting to save human lives.
A new poll shows that’s a lie. The “pro-life” movement is fundamentally about misogyny.
A Supermajority/PerryUndem survey released this week divides respondents by their position on abortion, and then tracks their answers to 10 questions on gender equality more generally. On every question, anti-abortion voters were significantly more hostile to gender equity than pro-choice voters.
I have always thought that it is more about punishing "sluts" and this confirms it. The article is pretty much nailed on but it refers to these extremists as "Christian".
Do me a favour.
You serve Satan well, Tommy.
What is this "Satan" shit? You sound like a monkey-cult member with a bible and a military assault weapon who is so proud of his male appendage.
The world belongs to Satan and so do you. He owns you and you serve him.
A new survey shows what really interests 'pro-lifers': controlling women | Jill Filipovic
According to self-identified “pro-life” advocates, the fundamental divide between those who want to outlaw abortion and those who want to keep it legal comes down to one question: when does life begin? Anti-abortion advocacy pushes the view that life begins at conception; the name of their movement carefully centers the conceit that opposition to abortion rights is simply about wanting to save human lives.
A new poll shows that’s a lie. The “pro-life” movement is fundamentally about misogyny.
A Supermajority/PerryUndem survey released this week divides respondents by their position on abortion, and then tracks their answers to 10 questions on gender equality more generally. On every question, anti-abortion voters were significantly more hostile to gender equity than pro-choice voters.
I have always thought that it is more about punishing "sluts" and this confirms it. The article is pretty much nailed on but it refers to these extremists as "Christian".
Do me a favour.
You serve Satan well, Tommy.
What is this "Satan" shit? You sound like a monkey-cult member with a bible and a military assault weapon who is so proud of his male appendage.
The world belongs to Satan and so do you. He owns you and you serve him.
So you believe in this mythological creature; some god of evil? Please contact a mental-health practitioner in your area.
The extreme anti-choice people keep running away from the topic of using modern technology to lessen the amount of unwanted pregnancies. They are against this, but will not come to the discussion table to explain their views. One less unwanted pregnancy is one less abortion. What is going on here? What are these people hiding?
Odd this. I asked you earlier what you meant by "modern technology" and you never answered.
A new survey shows what really interests 'pro-lifers': controlling women | Jill Filipovic
According to self-identified “pro-life” advocates, the fundamental divide between those who want to outlaw abortion and those who want to keep it legal comes down to one question: when does life begin? Anti-abortion advocacy pushes the view that life begins at conception; the name of their movement carefully centers the conceit that opposition to abortion rights is simply about wanting to save human lives.
A new poll shows that’s a lie. The “pro-life” movement is fundamentally about misogyny.
A Supermajority/PerryUndem survey released this week divides respondents by their position on abortion, and then tracks their answers to 10 questions on gender equality more generally. On every question, anti-abortion voters were significantly more hostile to gender equity than pro-choice voters.
I have always thought that it is more about punishing "sluts" and this confirms it. The article is pretty much nailed on but it refers to these extremists as "Christian".
Do me a favour.
You serve Satan well, Tommy.
What is this "Satan" shit? You sound like a monkey-cult member with a bible and a military assault weapon who is so proud of his male appendage.
The world belongs to Satan and so do you. He owns you and you serve him.
So you believe in this mythological creature; some god of evil? Please contact a mental-health practitioner in your area.
You probably believe that the universe caused itself to come into existence.
God is real and so is Satan and you serve the latter.
I dont see that. The questions are relevant whether you like them or not.I stated several facts there.You make several shaky assumptions there.They reflect the general findings of the survey.A new survey shows what really interests 'pro-lifers': controlling women | Jill Filipovic
According to self-identified “pro-life” advocates, the fundamental divide between those who want to outlaw abortion and those who want to keep it legal comes down to one question: when does life begin? Anti-abortion advocacy pushes the view that life begins at conception; the name of their movement carefully centers the conceit that opposition to abortion rights is simply about wanting to save human lives.
A new poll shows that’s a lie. The “pro-life” movement is fundamentally about misogyny.
A Supermajority/PerryUndem survey released this week divides respondents by their position on abortion, and then tracks their answers to 10 questions on gender equality more generally. On every question, anti-abortion voters were significantly more hostile to gender equity than pro-choice voters.
I have always thought that it is more about punishing "sluts" and this confirms it. The article is pretty much nailed on but it refers to these extremists as "Christian".
Do me a favour.
This article does not nail anything it misses by a mile.
Take a close look at the questions raised on the survey they are actually ideological questions and reflect feminist beliefs as opposed to general beliefs in equality.
For example it claims it is misogynistic to believe or claim that women are too sensitive. It is not misogynistic at all.
It asks if lack of women in positions of power affects women's equality. It does not.
Clearly the survey cited in the article is made to generate pre conceived conclusions based on extremist ideology
Therefore your op is a failure
The findings of the survey was based on biased and false assumptions is the point
The extreme anti-choice people keep running away from the topic of using modern technology to lessen the amount of unwanted pregnancies. They are against this, but will not come to the discussion table to explain their views. One less unwanted pregnancy is one less abortion. What is going on here? What are these people hiding?
Odd this. I asked you earlier what you meant by "modern technology" and you never answered.
I went to bed without signing off. The answer is modern birth-control methods. Pill, IUD, shots, etc. All of which people should be aware of and have access to.
I know no one against that. The Catholic Church's position is still against it but no one pays attention to that. Catholic's readily avail themselves of it.
Now providing for it in health care is another matter.
Sorry wrong they are not and that is absolute fact.I dont see that. The questions are relevant whether you like them or not.I stated several facts there.You make several shaky assumptions there.They reflect the general findings of the survey.A new survey shows what really interests 'pro-lifers': controlling women | Jill Filipovic
According to self-identified “pro-life” advocates, the fundamental divide between those who want to outlaw abortion and those who want to keep it legal comes down to one question: when does life begin? Anti-abortion advocacy pushes the view that life begins at conception; the name of their movement carefully centers the conceit that opposition to abortion rights is simply about wanting to save human lives.
A new poll shows that’s a lie. The “pro-life” movement is fundamentally about misogyny.
A Supermajority/PerryUndem survey released this week divides respondents by their position on abortion, and then tracks their answers to 10 questions on gender equality more generally. On every question, anti-abortion voters were significantly more hostile to gender equity than pro-choice voters.
I have always thought that it is more about punishing "sluts" and this confirms it. The article is pretty much nailed on but it refers to these extremists as "Christian".
Do me a favour.
This article does not nail anything it misses by a mile.
Take a close look at the questions raised on the survey they are actually ideological questions and reflect feminist beliefs as opposed to general beliefs in equality.
For example it claims it is misogynistic to believe or claim that women are too sensitive. It is not misogynistic at all.
It asks if lack of women in positions of power affects women's equality. It does not.
Clearly the survey cited in the article is made to generate pre conceived conclusions based on extremist ideology
Therefore your op is a failure
The findings of the survey was based on biased and false assumptions is the point
