I Call Upon All USMB Liberals To Answer This Question >>>

[charwin95]

Here is a couple of links to entertain or upgrade your self about tasers.

Tasers often don’t work, review of LAPD incidents finds

LOS ANGELES — As two Los Angeles police officers wrestled with a vandalism suspect, one grabbed her Taser and pressed the stun gun against the 38-year-old man’s body.

amp.lcsun-news.com

Tasers are less reliable than their maker has claimed. The results can be deadly

Tasers have become an essential tool for police, but how effective are they? An APM Reports investigation finds that officers in some big cities rated Tasers as unreliable up to 40 percent of the time, and in three large departments, newer models were less effective than older ones. In 258 cases...

www.apmreports.org

An APM Reports investigation finds that officers in some big cities rated Tasers as unreliable up to 40 percent of the time, and in three large departments, newer models were less effective than older ones. In 258 cases over three years, a Taser failed to subdue someone who was then shot and killed by police.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to

Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.

You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?

Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out

He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.

That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing

No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it

no it's more like 95% of it

No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is

Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?

You still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...

I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trolling

You said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?

All of the above

So you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.

I know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted upon

7 shots to the back is never right

Platitude arguments are never right

Letting this dork hold a gun is also not right

Don’t hate the player, hate the game.

I reserve the right to hate anyone who shoots another man 7 times in the back

So he was shot by “one man”?

Yup, the fag shot Blake 7 times in the back

Odd that you have no clue

This Is Rusten Sheskey, The Kenosha Officer Who Shot Jacob Blake 7 Times

You sure it was seven?

 

[healthmyths]

Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.

If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?

You left out several key points before asking your question. What do you do?
Answer. While he was walking away and his back against them they could have just easily trip him, tackle him and take him down before reaching the car door. They have plenty of time and opportunities. It’s that simple.......


Shooting someone with a taser it’s not that simple unless you are aiming to a wall that is flat and not moving. The leads has to be perfectly connected in order for the tasers to work 100%. They tasered him and it didn’t work. That does NOT mean that a person is high on drugs. At 40% sometimes it doesn’t work. Obviously there are plenty of IGNORANT people here.


This is not about liberal, conservatives, democrats or republicans ...... this is about police training, discipline, police brutalities. Shooting someone at the back is just plain coward and murder.

How would you have arrested him? Tackling him while he has a knife? Remember the guy taking the video says he heard the cops yell ‘Drop the Knife’
now being the perfectionist that you are... you are telling me you would then tackle the guy with the knife?
Here is a case similar to Blake... big distinction Glenn was white so there was NO big deal. In fact look up Google Lukus Glenn results.148..
Blake who is still alive and black... 60,300,000 results. Same kind of case but wow... who got 2.2 million gofundme??
Lukus Glenn’s mother called 911 when the 18-year-old came home intoxicated and agitated, damaging household property and threatening suicide. She advised the dispatcher Lukus was holding a knife to his neck and threatening to kill himself if the cops came. A staging area was established nearby, but the first two deputies bypassed it, responding directly to the scene. The first deputy positioned himself about 8–12 feet from Lukus with his weapon drawn and pointed at Lukus. While Lukus stood with the knife to his neck, the deputy screamed at him to drop the knife or he would kill him. The second deputy arrived a minute later. He started behaving the same way as the first deputy. An officer from a local agency arrived with a beanbag shotgun and the first deputy ordered him to “beanbag him.” Lukus was struck by multiple beanbag rounds and attempted to retreat toward the house. The deputies had already determined that if Lukus went toward the house—where the deputies had told the family to remain—they would shoot him. They fired 11 rounds at Lukus and he died on his grandmother’s porch.

Do Police Officers Have a Legal Obligation to Use De-Escalation Tactics?

Three seminal court cases shed light the question of whether law enforcement officers have a legal obligation to use de-escalation tactics.

www.lexipol.com

White man...nothing... BLACK MAN lives and gets $2.2 million NOW... no telling how much the lawsuit will get him!!

 

[charwin95]

Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.

If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?

You left out several key points before asking your question. What do you do?
Answer. While he was walking away and his back against them they could have just easily trip him, tackle him and take him down before reaching the car door. They have plenty of time and opportunities. It’s that simple.......


Shooting someone with a taser it’s not that simple unless you are aiming to a wall that is flat and not moving. The leads has to be perfectly connected in order for the tasers to work 100%. They tasered him and it didn’t work. That does NOT mean that a person is high on drugs. At 40% sometimes it doesn’t work. Obviously there are plenty of IGNORANT people here.


This is not about liberal, conservatives, democrats or republicans ...... this is about police training, discipline, police brutalities. Shooting someone at the back is just plain coward and murder.

How would you have arrested him? Tackling him while he has a knife? Remember the guy taking the video says he heard the cops yell ‘Drop the Knife’
now being the perfectionist that you are... you are telling me you would then tackle the guy with the knife?
Here is a case similar to Blake... big distinction Glenn was white so there was NO big deal. In fact look up Google Lukus Glenn results.148..
Blake who is still alive and black... 60,300,000 results. Same kind of case but wow... who got 2.2 million gofundme??
Lukus Glenn’s mother called 911 when the 18-year-old came home intoxicated and agitated, damaging household property and threatening suicide. She advised the dispatcher Lukus was holding a knife to his neck and threatening to kill himself if the cops came. A staging area was established nearby, but the first two deputies bypassed it, responding directly to the scene. The first deputy positioned himself about 8–12 feet from Lukus with his weapon drawn and pointed at Lukus. While Lukus stood with the knife to his neck, the deputy screamed at him to drop the knife or he would kill him. The second deputy arrived a minute later. He started behaving the same way as the first deputy. An officer from a local agency arrived with a beanbag shotgun and the first deputy ordered him to “beanbag him.” Lukus was struck by multiple beanbag rounds and attempted to retreat toward the house. The deputies had already determined that if Lukus went toward the house—where the deputies had told the family to remain—they would shoot him. They fired 11 rounds at Lukus and he died on his grandmother’s porch.

Do Police Officers Have a Legal Obligation to Use De-Escalation Tactics?

Three seminal court cases shed light the question of whether law enforcement officers have a legal obligation to use de-escalation tactics.

www.lexipol.com

White man...nothing... BLACK MAN lives and gets $2.2 million NOW... no telling how much the lawsuit will get him!!

You purposely ignored a lot of several key points.
1. if he was holding a knife in his hand. By all means shoot him right there on the spot. No question ask.

2. they never said he was holding a knife. Local LEO conducting the investigation did not mentioned he was holding a knife. Link below.

3. he just brawled or scuffled with 3 cops. Why didn’t they shoot him right there if he has a knife. And how in the hell he even have a knife at that point?

4. Blake said he has a knife but it didn’t say he was holding a knife in his hand. He has a knife in his car. That is why the witness said he heard drop the knife but he didn’t see the knife.

Family, investigators and police offer starkly different views of Jacob Blake in wake of police shooting

Jacob Blake captured the attention of civil rights advocates around the world last week as cellphone video circulated of the 29-year-old man being shot seven times.

abcnews.go.com

Several competing narratives have emerged in the wake of the shooting, including official accounts of the incident issued by Kenosha police and the Wisconsin Department of Justice, the agency charged with investigating the shooting.
The agency said Blake told authorities that he had a knife in his possession. Investigators later recovered a knife from the driver's side floorboard of Blake's vehicle. The Wisconsin DOJ has not said whether Blake was holding that knife during his interaction with police.

 

[charwin95]

Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.

If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?

You left out several key points before asking your question. What do you do?
Answer. While he was walking away and his back against them they could have just easily trip him, tackle him and take him down before reaching the car door. They have plenty of time and opportunities. It’s that simple.......


Shooting someone with a taser it’s not that simple unless you are aiming to a wall that is flat and not moving. The leads has to be perfectly connected in order for the tasers to work 100%. They tasered him and it didn’t work. That does NOT mean that a person is high on drugs. At 40% sometimes it doesn’t work. Obviously there are plenty of IGNORANT people here.


This is not about liberal, conservatives, democrats or republicans ...... this is about police training, discipline, police brutalities. Shooting someone at the back is just plain coward and murder.

How would you have arrested him? Tackling him while he has a knife? Remember the guy taking the video says he heard the cops yell ‘Drop the Knife’
now being the perfectionist that you are... you are telling me you would then tackle the guy with the knife?
Here is a case similar to Blake... big distinction Glenn was white so there was NO big deal. In fact look up Google Lukus Glenn results.148..
Blake who is still alive and black... 60,300,000 results. Same kind of case but wow... who got 2.2 million gofundme??
Lukus Glenn’s mother called 911 when the 18-year-old came home intoxicated and agitated, damaging household property and threatening suicide. She advised the dispatcher Lukus was holding a knife to his neck and threatening to kill himself if the cops came. A staging area was established nearby, but the first two deputies bypassed it, responding directly to the scene. The first deputy positioned himself about 8–12 feet from Lukus with his weapon drawn and pointed at Lukus. While Lukus stood with the knife to his neck, the deputy screamed at him to drop the knife or he would kill him. The second deputy arrived a minute later. He started behaving the same way as the first deputy. An officer from a local agency arrived with a beanbag shotgun and the first deputy ordered him to “beanbag him.” Lukus was struck by multiple beanbag rounds and attempted to retreat toward the house. The deputies had already determined that if Lukus went toward the house—where the deputies had told the family to remain—they would shoot him. They fired 11 rounds at Lukus and he died on his grandmother’s porch.

Do Police Officers Have a Legal Obligation to Use De-Escalation Tactics?

Three seminal court cases shed light the question of whether law enforcement officers have a legal obligation to use de-escalation tactics.

www.lexipol.com

White man...nothing... BLACK MAN lives and gets $2.2 million NOW... no telling how much the lawsuit will get him!!

As far as Blake and Lukus shootings. You are absolutely right they have lots of similarities. Sadly Lukus is suicidal need a lot of help. They called 911 for help ending up getting killed.
Both cases I blamed police training, discipline, stupidity and police brutalities. I already said enough about Blake so ill concentrate on Lukus.

Obviously Lukus has a mental problem 2 cops right there pointing a gun at him. He got shot by bean bag and it hurts so he ran toward the house. Then they SHOT him.......... What can can possibly go wrong if and when he ran towards the house? At worst he will kill himself. Cops can just easily say we did the best they could we cannot save him. But they choose the worst stupid solution to end the situation. Grandmother should sue these murderers in millions.


You are complaining that a black man get $2.2 millions in donations. White man got nothing. I don’t know what to tell you.

 

[protectionist]

I reserve the right to hate anyone who shoots another man 7 times in the back

You have the right to be a FOOL. No law against that.

 

[protectionist]

You left out several key points before asking your question. What do you do?
Answer. While he was walking away and his back against them they could have just easily trip him, tackle him and take him down before reaching the car door. They have plenty of time and opportunities. It’s that simple.......

Shooting someone with a taser it’s not that simple unless you are aiming to a wall that is flat and not moving. The leads has to be perfectly connected in order for the tasers to work 100%. They tasered him and it didn’t work. That does NOT mean that a person is high on drugs. At 40% sometimes it doesn’t work. Obviously there are plenty of IGNORANT people here.

This is not about liberal, conservatives, democrats or republicans ...... this is about police training, discipline, police brutalities. Shooting someone at the back is just plain coward and murder.

NONSENSE! You would be better off if you had read the thread before coming here late and showing off your ignorance. Read Post # 139 so as to not make the same mistake again.

 

[protectionist]

As far as Blake and Lukus shootings. You are absolutely right they have lots of similarities. Sadly Lukus is suicidal need a lot of help. They called 911 for help ending up getting killed.
Both cases I blamed police training, discipline, stupidity and police brutalities. I already said enough about Blake so ill concentrate on Lukus.

Obviously Lukus has a mental problem 2 cops right there pointing a gun at him. He got shot by bean bag and it hurts so he ran toward the house. Then they SHOT him.......... What can can possibly go wrong if and when he ran towards the house? At worst he will kill himself. Cops can just easily say we did the best they could we cannot save him. But they choose the worst stupid solution to end the situation. Grandmother should sue these murderers in millions.


You are complaining that a black man get $2.2 millions in donations. White man got nothing. I don’t know what to tell you.

Blake shooting was because of hands not visible. 100% police procedure. 100% justifiable homicide. Same as Shaver, Castille, and Crutcher shootings. Officers cleared in all 3. Granny won't get a dime. (unless system is rigged by Democrat courts).

 

[otto105]

Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.

If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?

Lol you and the cop are such pussies. I guess you feel tough with a gun - I don’t know. Either way, the guy didn’t have a gun so your point is stupid.

In 1960 a police Sargent in New York was killed by a homeless man wielding a knife. And the stabbing happened AFTER the cop and his partner unloaded their revolvers into him.

After his death, police depts across the country used his death as a teachable moment, and they understood that if an assailant is within 15 feet of you and attacks, you can get killed...even with a knife.

Mark

Bullshit.

 

[esalla]

I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to

Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.

You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?

Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out

He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.

That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing

No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it

no it's more like 95% of it

No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is

Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?

You still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...

I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trolling

You said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?

All of the above

So you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.

I know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted upon

7 shots to the back is never right

Platitude arguments are never right

Letting this dork hold a gun is also not right

Don’t hate the player, hate the game.

I reserve the right to hate anyone who shoots another man 7 times in the back

So he was shot by “one man”?

Yup, the fag shot Blake 7 times in the back

Odd that you have no clue

This Is Rusten Sheskey, The Kenosha Officer Who Shot Jacob Blake 7 Times

You sure it was seven?

I am sure that seven is the number quoted on the internet, just as I am sure that you are a clueless clown. Now the turd pretend cop might have missed 5 or 6 times however 7 shots were fired by one cop

 

[esalla]

I reserve the right to hate anyone who shoots another man 7 times in the back

You have the right to be a FOOL. No law against that.

I also have the right to own Apple and Google stock

Yawn

Who is the fool now dorky

 

[kaz]

I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to

Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.

You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?

Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out

He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.

That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing

No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it

no it's more like 95% of it

No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is

Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?

You still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...

I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trolling

You said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?

All of the above

So you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.

I know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted upon

You can't spin your way out of that the sexual assaulter who violated his victim's restraining order that you're defending had the choice, not the cops you wanted to be killed for your leftist ideology

I don’t want any cops to be killed. Another ridiculous lie you’re telling

No but you also don’t want to give them credit for a difficult job

I’ve worked with cops for years and they have an extremely difficult job and I give them a tremendous amount of credit. They have a huge responsibility but that doesn’t mean I won’t call out people who abuse their power

So it's OK then you want to get cops killed because you're protecting a guy who beats women then ignores the restraining order because you think it helps your political beliefs. Swell guy you are

No of course not. Do you have a learning deficiency? I never said anything close to what you pretend I’m saying. I don’t want the cops to get killed and the only thing I’m defending that guy of is from getting 7 bullets in the back. He should have been arrested

And the sexual assaulter you're protecting should have obeyed the cops. It's on him.

You'd suddenly get that if it weren't for the orange many you hate so much

In what way have I protected Blake?

I've also said that he should have obeyed the police and he should have been arrested for not obeying. I don't know what Trump has to do with any of this, are you bringing him up because you don't have anything else to fling at this debate?

Blake was being arrested if he obeyed. There was a warrant out for his arrest and he violated the restraining order to stay away from his sexual assault victim.

You're protecting the sexual predator by supporting him resisting arrest and blaming the cops for his choices

 

[kaz]

I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to

Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.

You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?

Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out

He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.

That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing

No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it

no it's more like 95% of it

No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is

Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?

You still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...

Bu-bu-but that's not what Slade saw on Walker Texas Ranger ...

What I see is you making claim after claim that you can’t back up when called out.... why can’t you just be honest when you debate. You don’t need to make shit up like you tend to do

Right, I didn't provide a link to you idiots who didn't provide a link to back up your claims 99 pound police women are as effective as men because of the personal testimony that someone knew a chick ...

And you call me not honest and making shit up, LOL.

Slade. PROVE ME WRONG!

You aren’t honest and you do make shit up. In this thread a few examples have been “raced to the car” “bad angle” “ Cavalierly walked through to tasers“

Raced to the car was true

I said bad angle and you denied being behind him is a bad angle. That's a matter of opinion

If you do any research, then they describe him as being unaffected by the tasers.

That's the Democrat way. If you don't like something, it's somehow dishonest and making shit up. Facts don't care about your feelings, no nuts

He didn’t race to the car he walked it’s on video. I’ve seen the reports that he was tazed twice. No other details. Was the connection made? How long before the video that we all saw? I certainly have not seen anybody but you say he Cavalierly walked through to tasers like you claimed. So I can only assume you are making that up

You're just bickering and word parsing. My description was accurate.

kaz: It was big
slade: No, it was large

kaz: It was wet
slade: no, it wasn't dry

kaz: The tree was tall
slade: no, it was high

You're failing ... badly ...

You’re wet and dry example was accurate the rest of your statement was your normal jibberish

another playground insult, no YOU are kaz. If it weren't for playground insults, Democrats would have nothing

Nothing playground about it. Just being accurate. You don’t post real and accurate things. Start being honest and these discussions will go much smoother

When you say no you are, that's totally playground, Guppy

Well good. Because I did say that

Yes, you were word parsing and bickering for sure

The only words that I parse are the ones you use to tell lies

kaz: It was big
slade: No, it was large

...

As I said....

Kaz: It was wet
Slade: No, it was dry

Is the correct example from your list. haha

That wasn't in my list, government school graduate

 

[kaz]

I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to

Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.

You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?

Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out

He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.

That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing

No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it

You claimed they were at a bad angle to take him down did you not?

I was referring to the whole process of taking him down, stopping him from getting into the car, and having the wrestling match you wanted. You boiled that down to tripping him. If you want to address the whole point than do it, but I'm not bickering with you, old woman. Note I'm barely in this stupid conversation anymore

Tackling a person from behind is not the same as tripping him.

How fucking stupid are you anyway?

Now you're just bickering. Pass

And you're just being an idiot

Yes, you think you get 10 points for tripping him and then he's going to roll on his back and let you cuff him, like Steve Garrett did on TV last week.

Talk about a fucking idiot

You don't even know the difference between tackling and tripping.


And who is Steve Garret?

Like I said I don't watch the idiot box like you do

You wrote "And who is Steve Garret?"

I think the name is "Steve McGarrett"..
Steve McGarrett is a fictional character who is the protagonist of CBS' Hawaii Five-O. McGarrett is a former United States Navy officer and the leader of a special state police task force, which is called Five-O.
McGarrett was famously portrayed by Jack Lord in the original show from 1968 to 1980,
and later by Alex O'Loughlin in the series' remake from 2010- 2018.

Wow you must watch a lot of TV

kaz: You watch a lot of TV

Blues: No YOU watch a lot of TV, kaz

Blues: healthmyths, wow, you watch a lot of TV

LOL, playground

Hey you're the guy who is comparing life to some TV show not me.

If you know characters names in a bunch of TV shows then you do watch a lot of TV.

But I guess you even got that name of the character wrong so you not only watch a lot of TV you're too dim to remember the characters

Yes, you are a firm playground denizen. No you are!

I said two of the stars of popular police dramas and got one of the names wrong. Wow, that's a lot of TV! Yeah, dumb ass. You really are lame. No wonder you're just protecting a sexual assaulter against the police

So tell me

if I don't know what police shows you are talking about or the characters or the actors who play those characters and you do then who watches more TV me or you?

And I have never said one single thing that could even be called a defense of Blake.

if you think I then please find the post and quote it. And when you can't find any post where I did come to the defense of Blake I wonder if you'll have the integrity to admit you just lied about what I have said in this thread.

She won’t show anything. She makes false claims all the time and never back them up

LOL, now the leftist manly man used calling someone a "woman" as an insult. Of course you do. You're the knuckle dragging party who thinks women aren't smart enough to decide who to vote for on their own, so you pat them on the back if they are correct and destroy them like the bitches they are if they are wrong. Being called a woman by you is a badge of honor, Neanderthal

Huh? What do women have to do with any of this? I seriously have doubts about your mental stability.

Slade: What do women have to do that I'm protecting a guy who assaulted a woman and violated her restraining order?

I'll go with the butt obvious

 

[kaz]

I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to

Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.

You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?

Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out

He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.

That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing

No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it

no it's more like 95% of it

No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is

Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?

You still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...

I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trolling

You said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?

All of the above

So you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.

I know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted upon

7 shots to the back is never right

Platitude arguments are never right

Letting this dork hold a gun is also not right

Why? Then you can't beat him up?

 

[kaz]

Or he could come back when they leave and drive drunk back into traffic.

Not if you tow it to the impound yard, which is what they did anyway

Eventually.

And again you defend the worst kind of people, someone who'd been convicted of home evasion, family battery, felony cruelty to children and other crimes. He was on probation and would have stayed in jail. Yet you blame the police.

Just like Blake who sexually assaulted a woman and then violated her restraining order. Funny how the left media never has her on TV.

Then you want only the police you claim are racists who want to murder blacks to have guns.

You're an idiot, in a moron all wrapped up in a dolt. It's about free government cheese

So they go "track him down later." So now what is is most likely course of action given they let him run away the first time in your scenario.

The next time they find him, he's sober, realizes how much trouble he's already in and doesn't make it worse.

Or he has to go and turn himself in, because, "Oh shit, they got my car!"

Or he decides he'd rather crash at his girlfriend's place than sit in jail

 

[kaz]

I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to

Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.

You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?

Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out

He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.

That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing

No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it

no it's more like 95% of it

No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is

Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?

You still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...

I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trolling

You said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?

All of the above

So you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.

I know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted upon

7 shots to the back is never right

Platitude arguments are never right

Letting this dork hold a gun is also not right

Don’t hate the player, hate the game.

I reserve the right to hate anyone who shoots another man 7 times in the back

I reserve the right to hate anyone who sexually assaults a woman and then violates her restraining order.

The one I hate had a choice, the one you hate you just wanted to die

 

[kaz]

I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to

Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.

You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?

Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out

He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.

That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing

No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it

no it's more like 95% of it

No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is

Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?

You still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...

I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trolling

You said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?

All of the above

So you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.

I know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted upon

7 shots to the back is never right

Platitude arguments are never right

Letting this dork hold a gun is also not right

Don’t hate the player, hate the game.

I reserve the right to hate anyone who shoots another man 7 times in the back

So he was shot by “one man”?

Yup, the fag shot Blake 7 times in the back

Odd that you have no clue

This Is Rusten Sheskey, The Kenosha Officer Who Shot Jacob Blake 7 Times

So now to the "liberal" (sic) homosexual is an insult?

 

[Blues Man]

I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to

Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.

You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?

Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out

He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.

That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing

No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it

You claimed they were at a bad angle to take him down did you not?

I was referring to the whole process of taking him down, stopping him from getting into the car, and having the wrestling match you wanted. You boiled that down to tripping him. If you want to address the whole point than do it, but I'm not bickering with you, old woman. Note I'm barely in this stupid conversation anymore

Tackling a person from behind is not the same as tripping him.

How fucking stupid are you anyway?

Now you're just bickering. Pass

And you're just being an idiot

Yes, you think you get 10 points for tripping him and then he's going to roll on his back and let you cuff him, like Steve Garrett did on TV last week.

Talk about a fucking idiot

You don't even know the difference between tackling and tripping.


And who is Steve Garret?

Like I said I don't watch the idiot box like you do

You wrote "And who is Steve Garret?"

I think the name is "Steve McGarrett"..
Steve McGarrett is a fictional character who is the protagonist of CBS' Hawaii Five-O. McGarrett is a former United States Navy officer and the leader of a special state police task force, which is called Five-O.
McGarrett was famously portrayed by Jack Lord in the original show from 1968 to 1980,
and later by Alex O'Loughlin in the series' remake from 2010- 2018.

Wow you must watch a lot of TV

I do and I use the Internet as evidently YOU don't as the above wasn't from me but from Wikipedia which you might want to use to get facts...not subject guesses.

As you pointed out I would have had to have known that the character's name wasn't Steve Garret as the person I was responding to said it was.

So really a Google search of Steve Garret would not have given me any info about some TV show I never heard of now would it?

Why don't you try it. the Internet when combined with common sense is very helpful.
I've been using the Internet since 1988 and before that was a frequent library visitor.
Facts are what help me make decisions along with common sense.
Attached is an example of how a little common sense combined with using the Internet shows how some really impactful decisions are made that affect us all. Remember... the operative word is "consumed" and because the lack of attention to small details LIKE the word "consumed" affect us all.
This was first used in 2018.View attachment 384755

You think I care enough about a TV show to worry if some actor plays a guy named Garret or whatever?

At least get the characters name right, it was Steve McGarrett, originally played by Jack Lord and revived by Alex O'Loughlin in 2010.

.

Pay attention will you?

Someone else called that character Steve Garret

And as i said I never heard of the stupid show so I care even less what the character's or the actors names

 

[kaz]

I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to

Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?

There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.

You think that the video captured the entire event?

I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?

Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it out

He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.

That made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick

You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing

No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walked

Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.

Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that

For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him

For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it

no it's more like 95% of it

No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?

Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.



2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.

You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is

Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?

You still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...

I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trolling

You said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?

All of the above

So you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.

I know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted upon

7 shots to the back is never right

Platitude arguments are never right

Letting this dork hold a gun is also not right

Don’t hate the player, hate the game.

I reserve the right to hate anyone who shoots another man 7 times in the back

So he was shot by “one man”?

Yup, the fag shot Blake 7 times in the back

Odd that you have no clue

This Is Rusten Sheskey, The Kenosha Officer Who Shot Jacob Blake 7 Times

You sure it was seven?

I am sure that seven is the number quoted on the internet, just as I am sure that you are a clueless clown. Now the turd pretend cop might have missed 5 or 6 times however 7 shots were fired by one cop

That's what investigations are for. I mean for us. Leftists don't care about investigations, you care which outcome serves your political interest