Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL the FBI already took me on and got kicked to the curbI do not know if I could beat up an 8 year old in a police uniform. Shit I might be on the ground LMFAOLetting this dork hold a gun is also not right7 shots to the back is never rightI know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted uponSo you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.All of the aboveYou said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trollingYou still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?no it's more like 95% of itNo I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.
2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.
You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Platitude arguments are never right
Why? Then you can't beat him up?
I'd bet on him heavily against you
Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
No. I am not a police officer. Not my job. Did you tackle anyone today?Yo did you shoot anyone in the back 7 times yet today?View attachment 385671LOL the FBI already took me on and got kicked to the curbI do not know if I could beat up an 8 year old in a police uniform. Shit I might be on the ground LMFAOLetting this dork hold a gun is also not right7 shots to the back is never rightI know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted uponSo you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.All of the aboveYou said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trollingYou still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?no it's more like 95% of itNo I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.
2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.
You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Platitude arguments are never right
Why? Then you can't beat him up?
I'd bet on him heavily against you
What a dumb ass comment! I am NOT surprised though because people like you do NOT have a connection to reality!Yo did you shoot anyone in the back 7 times yet today?View attachment 385671LOL the FBI already took me on and got kicked to the curbI do not know if I could beat up an 8 year old in a police uniform. Shit I might be on the ground LMFAOLetting this dork hold a gun is also not right7 shots to the back is never rightI know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted uponSo you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.All of the aboveYou said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trollingYou still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?no it's more like 95% of itNo I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.
2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.
You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Platitude arguments are never right
Why? Then you can't beat him up?
I'd bet on him heavily against you
nypost.com
My problem, being a police officer is a tough job, every job needs guide lines. You think hundreds of thousands of people are over reacting to imaginary over policing of black people ? That white people are so stupid that they would go out on the street to protest over some imaginary racial profiling.? that white people like my self have seen one to many Questionable Situations and think this at the very least deserves some very serious questions about police procedures. why jump to defend the police in every situation,? Are we looking for the police to decide how people of any color are treated ?
If you could translate this into English from retard, perhaps I might be able to understand you?What a dumb ass comment! I am NOT surprised though because people like you do NOT have a connection to reality!Yo did you shoot anyone in the back 7 times yet today?View attachment 385671LOL the FBI already took me on and got kicked to the curbI do not know if I could beat up an 8 year old in a police uniform. Shit I might be on the ground LMFAOLetting this dork hold a gun is also not right7 shots to the back is never rightI know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted uponSo you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.All of the aboveYou said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trollingYou still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?no it's more like 95% of itNo I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.
2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.
You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Platitude arguments are never right
Why? Then you can't beat him up?
I'd bet on him heavily against you
Blake evidently to multiple cops at the scene had a knife. .. why else would the cops yell this:
Remember the guy taking the video says he heard the cops yell ‘Drop the Knife’
So are you calling people that WERE actually there LIARS because YOU say so?Kenosha cops claim Jacob Blake was holding knife, contradicting AG
Jacob Blake — whose police shooting in Kenosha, Wis. touched off a renewed, nationwide wave of anti-cop sentiment — was armed with a knife and had engaged in a violent struggle with officers moment…
That’s not what I’m arguing. That’s a lie.I don’t support him resisting arrest nor have I ever said anything of the sort. This is you lying again. Prove me wrong and show the quote where I supported him resisting arrestIn what way have I protected Blake?No of course not. Do you have a learning deficiency? I never said anything close to what you pretend I’m saying. I don’t want the cops to get killed and the only thing I’m defending that guy of is from getting 7 bullets in the back. He should have been arrestedI’ve worked with cops for years and they have an extremely difficult job and I give them a tremendous amount of credit. They have a huge responsibility but that doesn’t mean I won’t call out people who abuse their powerNo but you also don’t want to give them credit for a difficult jobI don’t want any cops to be killed. Another ridiculous lie you’re tellingI know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted uponSo you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.All of the aboveYou said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trollingYou still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?no it's more like 95% of itNo I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.
2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.
You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
You can't spin your way out of that the sexual assaulter who violated his victim's restraining order that you're defending had the choice, not the cops you wanted to be killed for your leftist ideology
So it's OK then you want to get cops killed because you're protecting a guy who beats women then ignores the restraining order because you think it helps your political beliefs. Swell guy you are
And the sexual assaulter you're protecting should have obeyed the cops. It's on him.
You'd suddenly get that if it weren't for the orange many you hate so much
I've also said that he should have obeyed the police and he should have been arrested for not obeying. I don't know what Trump has to do with any of this, are you bringing him up because you don't have anything else to fling at this debate?
Blake was being arrested if he obeyed. There was a warrant out for his arrest and he violated the restraining order to stay away from his sexual assault victim.
You're protecting the sexual predator by supporting him resisting arrest and blaming the cops for his choices
You're word parsing. Of course you're supporting him resisting arrest. You're arguing that at the point he got into his car, the cops had to let him kill a cop and drive away
I shrugged 315 lbs yesterday, I was pissed as that was 90lbs off my usual weightNo. I am not a police officer. Not my job. Did you tackle anyone today?Yo did you shoot anyone in the back 7 times yet today?View attachment 385671LOL the FBI already took me on and got kicked to the curbI do not know if I could beat up an 8 year old in a police uniform. Shit I might be on the ground LMFAOLetting this dork hold a gun is also not right7 shots to the back is never rightI know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted uponSo you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.All of the aboveYou said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trollingYou still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?no it's more like 95% of itNo I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.
2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.
You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Platitude arguments are never right
Why? Then you can't beat him up?
I'd bet on him heavily against you
I see myself as more of what Mike Flynn wished he could have been if he were smarter.......................LOL the FBI already took me on and got kicked to the curbI do not know if I could beat up an 8 year old in a police uniform. Shit I might be on the ground LMFAOLetting this dork hold a gun is also not right7 shots to the back is never rightI know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted uponSo you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.All of the aboveYou said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trollingYou still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?no it's more like 95% of itNo I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.
2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.
You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Platitude arguments are never right
Why? Then you can't beat him up?
I'd bet on him heavily against you
So are you Bonnie or Clyde?
He’s a threat if he has a weapon and is acting aggressively. You don’t have a problem with cops shooting people before they see a weapon?I’m not protecting anybody. You should stop making stuff upHuh? What do women have to do with any of this? I seriously have doubts about your mental stability.She won’t show anything. She makes false claims all the time and never back them upSo tell meHey you're the guy who is comparing life to some TV show not me.You wrote "And who is Steve Garret?"You don't even know the difference between tackling and tripping.And you're just being an idiotTackling a person from behind is not the same as tripping him.You claimed they were at a bad angle to take him down did you not?No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
I was referring to the whole process of taking him down, stopping him from getting into the car, and having the wrestling match you wanted. You boiled that down to tripping him. If you want to address the whole point than do it, but I'm not bickering with you, old woman. Note I'm barely in this stupid conversation anymore
How fucking stupid are you anyway?
Now you're just bickering. Pass
Yes, you think you get 10 points for tripping him and then he's going to roll on his back and let you cuff him, like Steve Garrett did on TV last week.
Talk about a fucking idiot
And who is Steve Garret?
Like I said I don't watch the idiot box like you do
I think the name is "Steve McGarrett"..
Steve McGarrett is a fictional character who is the protagonist of CBS' Hawaii Five-O. McGarrett is a former United States Navy officer and the leader of a special state police task force, which is called Five-O.
McGarrett was famously portrayed by Jack Lord in the original show from 1968 to 1980,
and later by Alex O'Loughlin in the series' remake from 2010- 2018.
Wow you must watch a lot of TV
kaz: You watch a lot of TV
Blues: No YOU watch a lot of TV, kaz
Blues: healthmyths, wow, you watch a lot of TV
LOL, playground
If you know characters names in a bunch of TV shows then you do watch a lot of TV.
But I guess you even got that name of the character wrong so you not only watch a lot of TV you're too dim to remember the characters
Yes, you are a firm playground denizen. No you are!
I said two of the stars of popular police dramas and got one of the names wrong. Wow, that's a lot of TV! Yeah, dumb ass. You really are lame. No wonder you're just protecting a sexual assaulter against the police
if I don't know what police shows you are talking about or the characters or the actors who play those characters and you do then who watches more TV me or you?
And I have never said one single thing that could even be called a defense of Blake.
if you think I then please find the post and quote it. And when you can't find any post where I did come to the defense of Blake I wonder if you'll have the integrity to admit you just lied about what I have said in this thread.
LOL, now the leftist manly man used calling someone a "woman" as an insult. Of course you do. You're the knuckle dragging party who thinks women aren't smart enough to decide who to vote for on their own, so you pat them on the back if they are correct and destroy them like the bitches they are if they are wrong. Being called a woman by you is a badge of honor, Neanderthal
Slade: What do women have to do that I'm protecting a guy who assaulted a woman and violated her restraining order?
I'll go with the butt obvious
Certainly if the cops were able to stop him they should have. Maybe you're right and they were Charles Bronson and Van Diesel and they could have stopped him and didn't.
That doesn't change that he did get to his car, he did reach into it and if there was a gun and the cops did nothing there was going to be a dead cop. If you said you don't think based on your extensive experience doing police work they tried hard enough to stop him, fine. You're the guy with 40 years on the force. But at that point where he reached into his car, he was a deadly threat to him and your answer is let the cop die
I don’t think calling somebody a woman is an insult... what are you talking about?She does the same shit to me on a regular basis. What a dishonest jokeYou said I defended Blake.don't bother to reply to my posts until you admit you lied about what I posted here.Pay attention will you?You think I care enough about a TV show to worry if some actor plays a guy named Garret or whatever?Why don't you try it. the Internet when combined with common sense is very helpful.As you pointed out I would have had to have known that the character's name wasn't Steve Garret as the person I was responding to said it was.I do and I use the Internet as evidently YOU don't as the above wasn't from me but from Wikipedia which you might want to use to get facts...not subject guesses.You wrote "And who is Steve Garret?"You don't even know the difference between tackling and tripping.And you're just being an idiotTackling a person from behind is not the same as tripping him.You claimed they were at a bad angle to take him down did you not?No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
I was referring to the whole process of taking him down, stopping him from getting into the car, and having the wrestling match you wanted. You boiled that down to tripping him. If you want to address the whole point than do it, but I'm not bickering with you, old woman. Note I'm barely in this stupid conversation anymore
How fucking stupid are you anyway?
Now you're just bickering. Pass
Yes, you think you get 10 points for tripping him and then he's going to roll on his back and let you cuff him, like Steve Garrett did on TV last week.
Talk about a fucking idiot
And who is Steve Garret?
Like I said I don't watch the idiot box like you do
I think the name is "Steve McGarrett"..
Steve McGarrett is a fictional character who is the protagonist of CBS' Hawaii Five-O. McGarrett is a former United States Navy officer and the leader of a special state police task force, which is called Five-O.
McGarrett was famously portrayed by Jack Lord in the original show from 1968 to 1980,
and later by Alex O'Loughlin in the series' remake from 2010- 2018.
Wow you must watch a lot of TV
So really a Google search of Steve Garret would not have given me any info about some TV show I never heard of now would it?
I've been using the Internet since 1988 and before that was a frequent library visitor.
Facts are what help me make decisions along with common sense.
Attached is an example of how a little common sense combined with using the Internet shows how some really impactful decisions are made that affect us all. Remember... the operative word is "consumed" and because the lack of attention to small details LIKE the word "consumed" affect us all.
This was first used in 2018.View attachment 384755
At least get the characters name right, it was Steve McGarrett, originally played by Jack Lord and revived by Alex O'Loughlin in 2010.
.
Someone else called that character Steve Garret
And as i said I never heard of the stupid show so I care even less what the character's or the actors names
If you just said you don't/didn't watch the show, that would be believable. Saying you never heard of it isn't. The original show was a classic. It was before my time and I never watched it. I did watch some of the remake. But that you never heard of it unless you grew up in a different country or just in a Louisiana swamp off the grid is not believable.
Sit for a second and admit to yourself that sure, you heard of the show. You heard the term "Book him, Dano." Now think about how unbelievable it is to say no, never heard of it. It's not believable. Start by being honest
Like I said IDGAF what you believe
I don't know the names of lots of TV shows and have no desire to learn them
So now have you found a post where I was defending Jacob Blake yet?
And don't bother to reply to my posts until you admit you lied about what I posted here.
I have no time for dishonest pieces of shit
Hawaii Five O is not just a TV show, it's part of American culture. That's why it's so unbelievable.
"Book him Dano" again is a term used WAY beyond the TV show.
And the term "Five Oh" actually is a slang for "Police."
We aren't talking about a TV show. We are talking about American culture and you claim not to have heard of it even though you grew up in this country. Lots of people know those terms who never saw the show. No one grew up here without ever having heard of the show.
You're being fake shallow. If you claim to not know who Walker Texas Ranger is, maybe you're just a young guy, but it's possible. But you don't know American culture and you grew up here? No.
And yes, as I say every other time, you are blaming the cop for Blake's choice. You want the cop to die to save a guy who assaults women, ignored a restraining order and had a warrant out for him. That is clearly defending Blake
I have no time for dishonest pieces of shit
As soon as I take orders from you, then I'll do that.
When a guy has his hand in his car where he could clearly grab a gun and if he did the cop is dead speaks for itself. You're the liar.
When you make someone jump off a diving board but say you don't want them to go into the water, you're being completely disingenuous. You set up a situation where if guy has gun, cop is dead. You need to own the consequences of your choices, like Blake
And yet you cannot produce one single statement from any of my posts that corroborates your that
I did criticize the cops for mishandling the entire situation but you're too fucking stupid to realize that is not the same thing as defending Blake
You are a dishonest piece of shit.
And misogynist Slade thinks calling someone a woman is an insult, of course you do. Leftists and hypocrisy, arm in arm ... again ...
Wouldn't it be more fun to shoot the hand off the knife, or shoot the lunging fool in the faceHe’s a threat if he has a weapon and is acting aggressively. You don’t have a problem with cops shooting people before they see a weapon?I’m not protecting anybody. You should stop making stuff upHuh? What do women have to do with any of this? I seriously have doubts about your mental stability.She won’t show anything. She makes false claims all the time and never back them upSo tell meHey you're the guy who is comparing life to some TV show not me.You wrote "And who is Steve Garret?"You don't even know the difference between tackling and tripping.And you're just being an idiotTackling a person from behind is not the same as tripping him.You claimed they were at a bad angle to take him down did you not?No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
I was referring to the whole process of taking him down, stopping him from getting into the car, and having the wrestling match you wanted. You boiled that down to tripping him. If you want to address the whole point than do it, but I'm not bickering with you, old woman. Note I'm barely in this stupid conversation anymore
How fucking stupid are you anyway?
Now you're just bickering. Pass
Yes, you think you get 10 points for tripping him and then he's going to roll on his back and let you cuff him, like Steve Garrett did on TV last week.
Talk about a fucking idiot
And who is Steve Garret?
Like I said I don't watch the idiot box like you do
I think the name is "Steve McGarrett"..
Steve McGarrett is a fictional character who is the protagonist of CBS' Hawaii Five-O. McGarrett is a former United States Navy officer and the leader of a special state police task force, which is called Five-O.
McGarrett was famously portrayed by Jack Lord in the original show from 1968 to 1980,
and later by Alex O'Loughlin in the series' remake from 2010- 2018.
Wow you must watch a lot of TV
kaz: You watch a lot of TV
Blues: No YOU watch a lot of TV, kaz
Blues: healthmyths, wow, you watch a lot of TV
LOL, playground
If you know characters names in a bunch of TV shows then you do watch a lot of TV.
But I guess you even got that name of the character wrong so you not only watch a lot of TV you're too dim to remember the characters
Yes, you are a firm playground denizen. No you are!
I said two of the stars of popular police dramas and got one of the names wrong. Wow, that's a lot of TV! Yeah, dumb ass. You really are lame. No wonder you're just protecting a sexual assaulter against the police
if I don't know what police shows you are talking about or the characters or the actors who play those characters and you do then who watches more TV me or you?
And I have never said one single thing that could even be called a defense of Blake.
if you think I then please find the post and quote it. And when you can't find any post where I did come to the defense of Blake I wonder if you'll have the integrity to admit you just lied about what I have said in this thread.
LOL, now the leftist manly man used calling someone a "woman" as an insult. Of course you do. You're the knuckle dragging party who thinks women aren't smart enough to decide who to vote for on their own, so you pat them on the back if they are correct and destroy them like the bitches they are if they are wrong. Being called a woman by you is a badge of honor, Neanderthal
Slade: What do women have to do that I'm protecting a guy who assaulted a woman and violated her restraining order?
I'll go with the butt obvious
Certainly if the cops were able to stop him they should have. Maybe you're right and they were Charles Bronson and Van Diesel and they could have stopped him and didn't.
That doesn't change that he did get to his car, he did reach into it and if there was a gun and the cops did nothing there was going to be a dead cop. If you said you don't think based on your extensive experience doing police work they tried hard enough to stop him, fine. You're the guy with 40 years on the force. But at that point where he reached into his car, he was a deadly threat to him and your answer is let the cop die
He’s a threat if he has a weapon and is acting aggressively. You don’t have a problem with cops shooting people before they see a weapon?I’m not protecting anybody. You should stop making stuff upHuh? What do women have to do with any of this? I seriously have doubts about your mental stability.She won’t show anything. She makes false claims all the time and never back them upSo tell meHey you're the guy who is comparing life to some TV show not me.You wrote "And who is Steve Garret?"You don't even know the difference between tackling and tripping.And you're just being an idiotTackling a person from behind is not the same as tripping him.You claimed they were at a bad angle to take him down did you not?No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
I was referring to the whole process of taking him down, stopping him from getting into the car, and having the wrestling match you wanted. You boiled that down to tripping him. If you want to address the whole point than do it, but I'm not bickering with you, old woman. Note I'm barely in this stupid conversation anymore
How fucking stupid are you anyway?
Now you're just bickering. Pass
Yes, you think you get 10 points for tripping him and then he's going to roll on his back and let you cuff him, like Steve Garrett did on TV last week.
Talk about a fucking idiot
And who is Steve Garret?
Like I said I don't watch the idiot box like you do
I think the name is "Steve McGarrett"..
Steve McGarrett is a fictional character who is the protagonist of CBS' Hawaii Five-O. McGarrett is a former United States Navy officer and the leader of a special state police task force, which is called Five-O.
McGarrett was famously portrayed by Jack Lord in the original show from 1968 to 1980,
and later by Alex O'Loughlin in the series' remake from 2010- 2018.
Wow you must watch a lot of TV
kaz: You watch a lot of TV
Blues: No YOU watch a lot of TV, kaz
Blues: healthmyths, wow, you watch a lot of TV
LOL, playground
If you know characters names in a bunch of TV shows then you do watch a lot of TV.
But I guess you even got that name of the character wrong so you not only watch a lot of TV you're too dim to remember the characters
Yes, you are a firm playground denizen. No you are!
I said two of the stars of popular police dramas and got one of the names wrong. Wow, that's a lot of TV! Yeah, dumb ass. You really are lame. No wonder you're just protecting a sexual assaulter against the police
if I don't know what police shows you are talking about or the characters or the actors who play those characters and you do then who watches more TV me or you?
And I have never said one single thing that could even be called a defense of Blake.
if you think I then please find the post and quote it. And when you can't find any post where I did come to the defense of Blake I wonder if you'll have the integrity to admit you just lied about what I have said in this thread.
LOL, now the leftist manly man used calling someone a "woman" as an insult. Of course you do. You're the knuckle dragging party who thinks women aren't smart enough to decide who to vote for on their own, so you pat them on the back if they are correct and destroy them like the bitches they are if they are wrong. Being called a woman by you is a badge of honor, Neanderthal
Slade: What do women have to do that I'm protecting a guy who assaulted a woman and violated her restraining order?
I'll go with the butt obvious
Certainly if the cops were able to stop him they should have. Maybe you're right and they were Charles Bronson and Van Diesel and they could have stopped him and didn't.
That doesn't change that he did get to his car, he did reach into it and if there was a gun and the cops did nothing there was going to be a dead cop. If you said you don't think based on your extensive experience doing police work they tried hard enough to stop him, fine. You're the guy with 40 years on the force. But at that point where he reached into his car, he was a deadly threat to him and your answer is let the cop die
nypost.com
OK from 1st grade reader...If you could translate this into English from retard, perhaps I might be able to understand you?What a dumb ass comment! I am NOT surprised though because people like you do NOT have a connection to reality!Yo did you shoot anyone in the back 7 times yet today?View attachment 385671LOL the FBI already took me on and got kicked to the curbI do not know if I could beat up an 8 year old in a police uniform. Shit I might be on the ground LMFAOLetting this dork hold a gun is also not right7 shots to the back is never rightI know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted uponSo you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.All of the aboveYou said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trollingYou still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?no it's more like 95% of itNo I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.
2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.
You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Platitude arguments are never right
Why? Then you can't beat him up?
I'd bet on him heavily against you
Blake evidently to multiple cops at the scene had a knife. .. why else would the cops yell this:
Remember the guy taking the video says he heard the cops yell ‘Drop the Knife’
So are you calling people that WERE actually there LIARS because YOU say so?Kenosha cops claim Jacob Blake was holding knife, contradicting AG
Jacob Blake — whose police shooting in Kenosha, Wis. touched off a renewed, nationwide wave of anti-cop sentiment — was armed with a knife and had engaged in a violent struggle with officers moment…
"Blake evidently to multiple cops at the scene had a knife."
Sounds like BS to me but we shall seeHe’s a threat if he has a weapon and is acting aggressively. You don’t have a problem with cops shooting people before they see a weapon?I’m not protecting anybody. You should stop making stuff upHuh? What do women have to do with any of this? I seriously have doubts about your mental stability.She won’t show anything. She makes false claims all the time and never back them upSo tell meHey you're the guy who is comparing life to some TV show not me.You wrote "And who is Steve Garret?"You don't even know the difference between tackling and tripping.And you're just being an idiotTackling a person from behind is not the same as tripping him.You claimed they were at a bad angle to take him down did you not?No I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
I was referring to the whole process of taking him down, stopping him from getting into the car, and having the wrestling match you wanted. You boiled that down to tripping him. If you want to address the whole point than do it, but I'm not bickering with you, old woman. Note I'm barely in this stupid conversation anymore
How fucking stupid are you anyway?
Now you're just bickering. Pass
Yes, you think you get 10 points for tripping him and then he's going to roll on his back and let you cuff him, like Steve Garrett did on TV last week.
Talk about a fucking idiot
And who is Steve Garret?
Like I said I don't watch the idiot box like you do
I think the name is "Steve McGarrett"..
Steve McGarrett is a fictional character who is the protagonist of CBS' Hawaii Five-O. McGarrett is a former United States Navy officer and the leader of a special state police task force, which is called Five-O.
McGarrett was famously portrayed by Jack Lord in the original show from 1968 to 1980,
and later by Alex O'Loughlin in the series' remake from 2010- 2018.
Wow you must watch a lot of TV
kaz: You watch a lot of TV
Blues: No YOU watch a lot of TV, kaz
Blues: healthmyths, wow, you watch a lot of TV
LOL, playground
If you know characters names in a bunch of TV shows then you do watch a lot of TV.
But I guess you even got that name of the character wrong so you not only watch a lot of TV you're too dim to remember the characters
Yes, you are a firm playground denizen. No you are!
I said two of the stars of popular police dramas and got one of the names wrong. Wow, that's a lot of TV! Yeah, dumb ass. You really are lame. No wonder you're just protecting a sexual assaulter against the police
if I don't know what police shows you are talking about or the characters or the actors who play those characters and you do then who watches more TV me or you?
And I have never said one single thing that could even be called a defense of Blake.
if you think I then please find the post and quote it. And when you can't find any post where I did come to the defense of Blake I wonder if you'll have the integrity to admit you just lied about what I have said in this thread.
LOL, now the leftist manly man used calling someone a "woman" as an insult. Of course you do. You're the knuckle dragging party who thinks women aren't smart enough to decide who to vote for on their own, so you pat them on the back if they are correct and destroy them like the bitches they are if they are wrong. Being called a woman by you is a badge of honor, Neanderthal
Slade: What do women have to do that I'm protecting a guy who assaulted a woman and violated her restraining order?
I'll go with the butt obvious
Certainly if the cops were able to stop him they should have. Maybe you're right and they were Charles Bronson and Van Diesel and they could have stopped him and didn't.
That doesn't change that he did get to his car, he did reach into it and if there was a gun and the cops did nothing there was going to be a dead cop. If you said you don't think based on your extensive experience doing police work they tried hard enough to stop him, fine. You're the guy with 40 years on the force. But at that point where he reached into his car, he was a deadly threat to him and your answer is let the cop die
Kenosha cops claim Jacob Blake was holding knife, contradicting AG
Jacob Blake — whose police shooting in Kenosha, Wis. touched off a renewed, nationwide wave of anti-cop sentiment — was armed with a knife and had engaged in a violent struggle with officers moment…
.
Where can I see the cops yell drop the knife or Blake put the cops in a headlock? Cause the video I watched didn’t have either of those eventsOK from 1st grade reader...If you could translate this into English from retard, perhaps I might be able to understand you?What a dumb ass comment! I am NOT surprised though because people like you do NOT have a connection to reality!Yo did you shoot anyone in the back 7 times yet today?View attachment 385671LOL the FBI already took me on and got kicked to the curbI do not know if I could beat up an 8 year old in a police uniform. Shit I might be on the ground LMFAOLetting this dork hold a gun is also not right7 shots to the back is never rightI know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted uponSo you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.All of the aboveYou said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trollingYou still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?no it's more like 95% of itNo I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.
2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.
You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Platitude arguments are never right
Why? Then you can't beat him up?
I'd bet on him heavily against you
Blake evidently to multiple cops at the scene had a knife. .. why else would the cops yell this:
Remember the guy taking the video says he heard the cops yell ‘Drop the Knife’
So are you calling people that WERE actually there LIARS because YOU say so?Kenosha cops claim Jacob Blake was holding knife, contradicting AG
Jacob Blake — whose police shooting in Kenosha, Wis. touched off a renewed, nationwide wave of anti-cop sentiment — was armed with a knife and had engaged in a violent struggle with officers moment…
"Blake evidently to multiple cops at the scene had a knife."
See BLAKE.
See Blake running.
See cops running after Blake.
See cops yelling "drop the knife".
He never had a knife until he got back to the car so you are proved delusional. There is video to back me up as well doofusOK from 1st grade reader...If you could translate this into English from retard, perhaps I might be able to understand you?What a dumb ass comment! I am NOT surprised though because people like you do NOT have a connection to reality!Yo did you shoot anyone in the back 7 times yet today?View attachment 385671LOL the FBI already took me on and got kicked to the curbI do not know if I could beat up an 8 year old in a police uniform. Shit I might be on the ground LMFAOLetting this dork hold a gun is also not right7 shots to the back is never rightI know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted uponSo you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.All of the aboveYou said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trollingYou still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?no it's more like 95% of itNo I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.
2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.
You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Platitude arguments are never right
Why? Then you can't beat him up?
I'd bet on him heavily against you
Blake evidently to multiple cops at the scene had a knife. .. why else would the cops yell this:
Remember the guy taking the video says he heard the cops yell ‘Drop the Knife’
So are you calling people that WERE actually there LIARS because YOU say so?Kenosha cops claim Jacob Blake was holding knife, contradicting AG
Jacob Blake — whose police shooting in Kenosha, Wis. touched off a renewed, nationwide wave of anti-cop sentiment — was armed with a knife and had engaged in a violent struggle with officers moment…
"Blake evidently to multiple cops at the scene had a knife."
See BLAKE.
See Blake running.
See cops running after Blake.
See cops yelling "drop the knife".
He sees whatever he wants to seeWhere can I see the cops yell drop the knife or Blake out the cops in a headlock? Cause the video I watched didn’t have either of those eventsOK from 1st grade reader...If you could translate this into English from retard, perhaps I might be able to understand you?What a dumb ass comment! I am NOT surprised though because people like you do NOT have a connection to reality!Yo did you shoot anyone in the back 7 times yet today?View attachment 385671LOL the FBI already took me on and got kicked to the curbI do not know if I could beat up an 8 year old in a police uniform. Shit I might be on the ground LMFAOLetting this dork hold a gun is also not right7 shots to the back is never rightI know what happened was wrong. Whether the responsibility is on the cops for mishandling per their training or not is what needs to be determined and acted uponSo you don’t know. Fantastic. Then stop criticizing the police officers and critique the system.All of the aboveYou said “tackle” and then ran it back and then said they need more training. Which is it?I’ve answered it several times now. Stop trollingYou still have yet to state what you would do if you were one of the police officers. Don’t hate the player hate the game. Police officers aren’t trained to wrestle suspects. They are actually trained not to. Don’t allow facts in the way of your moral thinking...Haha. How do you know he cavalierly walked through two tasers?! Did you get that from the same source that told you he “raced around the car” and that the cops had a “bad angle” to take him down when they were directly behind him?No...it’s like 5% of it and not as easy as you think. Ever been in a fight? Real tough fight?no it's more like 95% of itNo I’m it word parsing I’m calling out the BS spin you all are trying to use to justify this shooting. THERES A VIDEO WE CAN ALL SEE WHAT HAPPENED!! Stop lying about what happened. You said he “raced to the car” that’s a straight up lie. He clearly walkedThat made me laugh out loud. Thank you.He walked briskly. If the officers were trained in H2H combat they would not have had to draw their weapons. Also, why send a woman officer there? Makes no sense.Raced to the car? Can you point out the section of the video where he “raced to the car.“ Let me know the time code where he did anything but walk and I’ll check it outYou think that the video captured the entire event?Plenty of time ? All within a 1/2 second, huh ?I don't know why the 2 cops didn't just take him to the ground and cuff him they certainly had plenty of time to
There are many posts within this thread that answer your question.
I keep asking people who say what you do that the cops could have taken the woman beater who ignored the court order to stay away from her down from behind while he raced to the car if they saw video that I didn't, but all of you have said no. Did you?
1. He didn’t walk briskly, he walked, watch the video
2. You really think cops with guns aren’t trained to apprehend and arrest subjects?! Are you serious?
3. Why not send a woman officer? Don’t be a dick
You're just word parsing and bickering now, you couldn't be more clear you have nothing
Right, there's a video. Yet you keep contradicting the video as if we didn't see it and we don't know you're lying. The cops were behind him.
Blake had a choice. The cops didn't. You can't hide from that
For the umpteenth time it's preferable to be behind someone if you want to put him on the ground. Only you think it's easier to put a guy on the ground from in front of him
For the umpteenth time, taking him down isn't the challenge. That's like 5% of it
Yeah I've been in fights. I grew up in the shit end of a city and am well acquainted with violence. I know that 2 guys can almost always take down one unarmed guy.
2 cops armed with various weapons and trained to physically subdue people should always be able to take down one unarmed guy.
You're obviously lying since you take two guys fighting a wanted felon who had walked through two taser shots so cavalierly. Anyone who had been in a real fight would have realized how risky and dangerous that is
Platitude arguments are never right
Why? Then you can't beat him up?
I'd bet on him heavily against you
Blake evidently to multiple cops at the scene had a knife. .. why else would the cops yell this:
Remember the guy taking the video says he heard the cops yell ‘Drop the Knife’
So are you calling people that WERE actually there LIARS because YOU say so?Kenosha cops claim Jacob Blake was holding knife, contradicting AG
Jacob Blake — whose police shooting in Kenosha, Wis. touched off a renewed, nationwide wave of anti-cop sentiment — was armed with a knife and had engaged in a violent struggle with officers moment…
"Blake evidently to multiple cops at the scene had a knife."
See BLAKE.
See Blake running.
See cops running after Blake.
See cops yelling "drop the knife".
