emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
Muslims murder thousands of americans in the name of Allah and the Koran, but there doesnt seem to be anyone wanting to ban the Koran or Mosques?
In this same way, there HAVE been groups rallying to ban Shariah Law and Mosques
(and people threatening to burn Qurans), including conservative candidates pushing campaigns and legislation as in Tennessee to ban Mosques.
So yes, to answer your question, yes there is that push going on.
The same way the Mosque in NY had every right to expand their center near the 9/11 ground zero site,
but the public rallied to stop this "out of respect" for the association with the attackers and Islam,
in this case people are asking to remove the Confederate flag "out of respect" for the association with
anti-Black racism linked to the KKK in the South. This is not a required interpretation of that symbol,
and neither is there a direct link between the Jihadist terrorists in 9/11 and the Muslim Mosque that
happens to be situated near the historic site of the attacks. It is out of courtesy, that people make those associations that we choose to respect that. But legally, religious freedom and free speech is protected,
and just like the Mohammad cartoon drawing contests, there is no law REQUIRING people to respect
people's personal religious interpretations. It is selective and depends on the people to respect
each other's personal limits on what symbols might mean, even if the law technically does not require that.
Please!!! How many companies have refused to sell Muslim religious symbols out of respect for the thousands of people murdered by Muslims. The guy down the street from me has a confederate flag on his pick up truck, yet he hasnt murdered anyone(or has he???)
I'm just saying that
the same way people have denounced and protested the Confederate Flag as an offensive racist symbol
Yes
there are people who have actively lobbied to ban Mosques and Shariah law.
There are groups that react that strongly,
while the rest of us don't take it that far.
There are people who sue to remove crosses or nativity scenes or Bibles from public places.
There are people who sue to declare the IRS or Federal Reserve unconstitutional and not required for them to follow.
I'm just saying yes there are people whose beliefs are so offended by one thing or another,
they do lobby to remove that thing, whatever it is, by legislation or lawsuit or protest.
(And yes there is a bias. it's okay for Atheists to sue to remove a cross that causes no harm, but simply on the grounds of "separation fo church and state" for excluding their beliefs and pushing one they don't believe in. But when it comes to laws like the ACA that pushes political beliefs, and offends, denies, excludes discriminates and even penalizes people of other creeds (who believe in free market and don't believe federal govt has the right to mandate insurance without a Constitutional amendment), that conflicting belief in public law isn't allowed to be removed. But the offended persons are expected to accept this as law required for everyone. Same with gay marriage being imposed against people's beliefs. That is expected to be tolerated and accepted. But when it comes to the Atheist suing to remove the cross, this argument to tolerate is not pushed, where the Atheist is NOT forced to tolerate religious diversity and let it be.
So there is a bias going on with liberal media and politics.)