geauxtohell
Choose your weapon.
Yes, that is why I didn't indicate that I was sure of the length of 'public service' required and have since looked it up and ya'll are right that it does require 10 years of public service.
So, a kid enters a fancy smancy expensive college at age 18, earns a degree at age 22, perhaps goes on to lawschool or whatever, he or she will still be in his/her 20's when entering that public sector job and in his/her 30's when s/he completes the mandatory term of service in order to get the loan forgiven. And then the tax payer pays the mega thousands likely to still be owed on the loans and the person is free to move into a cushy private sector job unencumbered by his/her college debt. Maybe even into the despised 1%.
Of course those who did it the hard way and are already working in the public and private sector don't get any kind of break but do get the privilege of paying for somebody else to get an education that provides the sky as a limit.
It's the same deal for people who took advantage of little or no down payments and super low interest rates on ARMS to buy a house at top dollar and now find that they owe a whole lot more than what they can sell the house for. The government now wants to lower the interest rates and refinance those houses with the loans covered by Fannie and Freddie. That means the rest of us who worked and saved up a standard down paymet and bought our houses on fixed rates so that we KNEW what our costs would be and who have been paying our mortgages every month will be on the hook as taxpayers to all those who did it the less responsible way and are still likely to default and/or just walk away from a house they can't sell. They don't have anything invested in the house to protect, and their credit is shot already, so why not let the government, i.e. the other taxpayers, pick up the tab?
If government would get out of education AND healthcare, it is a safe bet that we would see costs coming dramatically down in both.
If government would get out of the business of encouraging irresponsible loans and banking practices, it is an even safer bet that the whole thing would bottom out and then straighten out and be put back on sound financial footing that won't happen as long as the government keeps dickering with it.
Now you are just making tangential arguments. Fannie and freddie is a separate issue and the cost of college, while related, is also a whole other issue.
The government has deemed the need for public servants to be sufficiently high enough that they are willing to boot the cost of creating a public servant in exchange for 10 years of service.
I am sure Obama did that simply because he loves big government and secretly wants to expand it.
Oh wait......
The program started in 2007.
FinAid | Loans | Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Gee, who was the asshole who signed off on that one?
But seriously, it makes sense. It's analogous to ROTC and lawyers who enter the public sector do so at a considerable loss of potential earnings. I know this to be true as my wife left a higher paying firm job to work for the government as an attorney (the loan forgiveness deal was not really a consideration.
At any rate, for the savy invester and shopper, which is what a borrower is, there are always opportunities to leverage your position. You can't blame people for taking advantage of something they see as beneficial.
What it is not, is a massive give away. 10 years of your life earning less then you could and working for the government is no small task. Hell, I got my loans "forgiven" after 4 years of government service. No one ever bitches about that, though.