I Fear For Justice Thomas’ Life

[PoliticalChic]

9. Do not believe that Justice Thomas has picked a fight with two or three corporations that we call Big Tech alone!!

No, his fight is for Americanism, and against the Fascism that Franklin Roosevelt brought whole from Mussolini’s Italy, and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Fascism, corporatism, crony capitalism, is the alliance of government and business aimed at enriching individuals in both, to the detriment of Americans.

The propaganda of the New Deal (“malefactors of great wealth”) to the contrary, FDR simply endeavored to re-create the corporatism of the last war. The New Dealers invited one industry after another to write the codes under which they would be regulated. Even more aggressive, the National Recovery Administration forced industries to fix prices and in other ways to collude with one another: the NRA approved 557 basic and 189 supplementary codes, covering almost 95% of all industrial workers. (Goldberg)



The intention was for big business to get bigger, and the little guy to be squeezed out: for example, the owners of the big chain movie houses wrote the codes that almost ran the independents out of business (even though 13,571 of the 18,321 movie theatres were independently owned). This in the name of ‘efficiency’ and ‘progress.’




New Deal bureaucrats studied Mussolini’s corporatism closely.
From “Fortune” magazine: ‘The Corporate state is to Mussolini what the New Deal is to Roosevelt.’(July 1934)



Big Tech hid the Biden sell-out to Communist China, and got him elected.
No greater service could have been performed.
One wonders if getting Biden elected can be deducted on their taxes as a contribution in kind.

Clarence Thomas is a fool. His fight is for socialism. The right to take corporations because you don't like what they are doing. The New Deal was not fascism. It was a reponse to a major depression caused by Herbert Hoover and Republicans.

It was Trump who favored big business over other businesses. It was the Trump DOJ that provided the inpetus in ending the consent decree in the Paramount case. I didn't see you complaining about it.

"The New Deal was not fascism."


I love when you post, as I get to destroy the Left's lies.


1. Rex Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described."
Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48

2. " As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.....

.... Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.” Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator." Fascism - Econlib

I really should point out that today is Frances Perkin's birthday

Frances Perkins, original name Fannie Coralie Perkins, (born April 10, 1882, Boston, Mass., U.S.—died May 14, 1965, New York, N.Y.), U.S. secretary of labor during the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Besides being the first woman to be appointed to a cabinet post, she also served one of the longest terms of any Roosevelt appointee (1933–45).
Britannica



She complained about the Fascist nature of the New Deal, Mussolini being its source.


.... Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.” Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator."

Fascism - Econlib

As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal...

www.econlib.org

General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gve Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described." Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

 

[Synthaholic]

Let's not forget that only one party is responsible for censorship and opposition to free speech.

I just had one of my posts deleted. So which viewpoints are getting censured?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's not forget that only one party is responsible for censorship and opposition to free speech.

I just had one of my posts deleted. So which viewpoints are getting censured?

A post of yours deleted???


If you stopped posting altogether, you'd be the only one who knew it.


Or cared.

 

[PoliticalChic]

A day late and a dollar short.....the Republicans.


"House Republicans Outline Plan To Regulate Big Tech

A group of House Republicans released a plan to strip legal protections from big tech platforms, signaling a growing willingness among conservatives to regulate private businesses.

Republican staff on the House Energy and Commerce Committee distributed a memo as part of ranking member Cathy McMorris Rodgers's (R., Wash.) "Big Tech Accountability Platform." The memo suggests a variety of ways that lawmakers can remove liability protections granted to tech platforms under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

Currently, Section 230 protects tech companies from lawsuits pertaining to the content shared on their platforms. Some conservatives argue repealing these protections would make it possible to sue social media sites for censoring conservatives. But others doubt whether limiting these protections would change how tech platforms act, since companies have a First Amendment right to host whatever speech they choose.

The memo suggests limiting 230 protection to legally protected speech, creating an additional incentive for platforms to remove threatening or obscene content. Alternatively, the memo suggests only providing protection for companies that don’t "discriminate based on political affiliation or viewpoint." That suggestion will likely trigger debate over how to prove a company discriminates based on political affiliation."

House Republicans Outline Plan To Regulate Big Tech

A group of House Republicans released a plan to strip legal protections from big tech platforms, signaling a growing willingness among conservatives to regulate private businesses.

freebeacon.com

 

[busybee01]

The Left has been known to stop at nothing.


1.While the Supreme Court as a whole embarrassed itself in refusing to confront the theft of the election, the clear refusal by some swing states, Pennsylvania in particular, to observe the mandates of the US Constitution, the most courageous and conservative, the most brilliant of Justices, Clarence Thomas called out the injustice.
This week he did more, putting his life on the line in confronting the cash cows of the internet. Corrupt individuals will, I fear, not give up their $billions, their control of the dissemination of information without a fight. A bloody fight.



2. Justice Thomas is an originalist, a textualist, and a believer in our God-granted unalienable rights, the single most prominent one being free speech. Thomas called out the control by big tech, and the oligarchs allied with the Democrats/Progressives who have stolen our freedom.

“ On Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas announced that the Supreme Court soon will have to put an end to Big Tech tyranny. Amen. If the high court fails to act, it could mean the end of free speech in the 21st century and the shriveling of our constitutional rights to mere “paper rights” — still there on paper but functionally hollowed out.”
Justice Thomas shows how we can end Big Tech censorship for good



3. Just three unelected power mad Leftists….Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and Jack Dorsey deserves dishonorable mention, control Facebook and Google…..and have the power to disappear every opposing voice in the United States. Even the Commander in Chief.

Justice Thomas correctly claims that the Supreme Court must do what the spineless Republicans didn’t do….reign in this unaccountable tyranny.



4. The totalitarians and their Libertarian go-alongs claim that these are private companies, and government should never impost restrictions on any privately owned endeavors. But there are clear examples that fly in the face of that excise.

“The Skyway was operated and maintained by the City of Chicago until January 2005 when Skyway Concession Company, LLC assumed its operations under a 99-year operating lease. The lease agreement between Skyway and the City of Chicago was the first privatization of an existing toll road in the United States.”
The Skyway – Chicago Skyway

Anyone willing to pay the toll gets to use the skyway.
Who would make the argument that you cannot use that skyway based on your political views?




5. The Big Tech companies are information highways. The aim of these companies should be to increase the amount of information, communication, speech, available…..not just the state version of speech.

Justice Thomas, taking them on, is akin to Mel Gibson’s character in ‘Braveheart,’ shouting FREEDOM!!

Liberal's will stop at nothing to seize power through undemocratic means!

And that is why I fear for Justice Thomas' life.


Or.....they may do what the dictator FDR tried to do.....add justices to the court.

That is what Republicans did when they refused to even bring Merrick Garland's nomination to the floor of the Senate. Thery also refused to take up many of Obama's nominatiomns for the lower couts. Republicans abused their authority tp pack the courts. You had no problem with that.

"....Merrick Garland's nomination to the floor of the Senate."



He's nearly as dumb as you.....both of you belong in flower posts, watered daily.

You are the one who is dumb. Republicans abused their majority. The Democrats could have done the same thing to Thomas as they held the majority and given the accusations against Thomas. Yet they agreed to hold a floor vote. Something Republicans refused to do.

 

[busybee01]

8. The government has made the success of Big Tech possible. And that government is based on the consent of the governed, so saith our founding documents.


What are the things our government cannot take from our citizens?

Your right to speak, to your own private thoughts, your right to own property, to travel, to worship as you see fit, ….none cannot be removed sans a trial and proof that you have done something that injures others. These are inalienable. This is ‘the natural rights doctrine.’



A government exists for one reason: to protect and secure those rights. They cannot be sold for Big Tech’s political contributions, monetarily or by services in kind.
Or this is not America any longer…..it has been “fundamentally transformed.”

Justice Thomas has sounded the clarion call to all who believe in the natural rights doctrine, and thrown down the gauntlet to the totalitarians, the Militant Secularists, those who believe we only have those rights that the government allows us.
That would be Communists, Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Democrats.

Government had nothing to do with the success or failure of tech companies. Tech companies did that. No one has lost the right to speak. That is so ridiculous and shows how much of a kook you are. No tech company is preventing you from having private thoughts, own your own property, or worship as you see fit.

"No one has lost the right to speak."

I'd ask you to stop lying....but then you'd be mute.


The Fascists....er, Democrats and their allies hid the truth about Biden.....that he had been bought by our enemies.



“Facebook and Twitter took drastic measures to limit the reach of a disputed story about Hunter Biden



Facebook said on Wednesday morning that it’s reducing distribution of a New York Post story containing unconfirmed claims with questionable sourcing about Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden. Shortly after, Twitter said it’s blocking users from posting the story entirely. Both companies’ moves to limit the reach of a major news publisher are unusual and drastic…



While these companies have taken down or limited the reach of viral political misinformation networks in the past, doing so to a publication as prominent as the New York Post has immediately attracted attention and criticism. Although it is known for its conservative slant and track record of publishing questionable stories, the tabloid is a widely read, mainstream outlet.



Facebook spokesperson Andy Stone announced his company’s decision in a tweet on Tuesday:




·Oct 14, 2020



While I will intentionally not link to the New York Post, I want be clear that this story is eligible to be fact checked by Facebook's third-party fact checking partners. In the meantime, we are reducing its distribution on our platform.

Facebook and Twitter took drastic measures to limit the reach of a disputed story about Hunter Biden

Ronald Reagan would never be a member of the Trump Republican Party.

 

[busybee01]

9. Do not believe that Justice Thomas has picked a fight with two or three corporations that we call Big Tech alone!!

No, his fight is for Americanism, and against the Fascism that Franklin Roosevelt brought whole from Mussolini’s Italy, and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Fascism, corporatism, crony capitalism, is the alliance of government and business aimed at enriching individuals in both, to the detriment of Americans.

The propaganda of the New Deal (“malefactors of great wealth”) to the contrary, FDR simply endeavored to re-create the corporatism of the last war. The New Dealers invited one industry after another to write the codes under which they would be regulated. Even more aggressive, the National Recovery Administration forced industries to fix prices and in other ways to collude with one another: the NRA approved 557 basic and 189 supplementary codes, covering almost 95% of all industrial workers. (Goldberg)



The intention was for big business to get bigger, and the little guy to be squeezed out: for example, the owners of the big chain movie houses wrote the codes that almost ran the independents out of business (even though 13,571 of the 18,321 movie theatres were independently owned). This in the name of ‘efficiency’ and ‘progress.’




New Deal bureaucrats studied Mussolini’s corporatism closely.
From “Fortune” magazine: ‘The Corporate state is to Mussolini what the New Deal is to Roosevelt.’(July 1934)



Big Tech hid the Biden sell-out to Communist China, and got him elected.
No greater service could have been performed.
One wonders if getting Biden elected can be deducted on their taxes as a contribution in kind.

Clarence Thomas is a fool. His fight is for socialism. The right to take corporations because you don't like what they are doing. The New Deal was not fascism. It was a reponse to a major depression caused by Herbert Hoover and Republicans.

It was Trump who favored big business over other businesses. It was the Trump DOJ that provided the inpetus in ending the consent decree in the Paramount case. I didn't see you complaining about it.

"The New Deal was not fascism."


I love when you post, as I get to destroy the Left's lies.


1. Rex Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described."
Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48

2. " As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.....

.... Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.” Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator." Fascism - Econlib

There is nothing fascist about Roosevelt's new deal. There is nothing wrong with helping people. A massive number of people were suffering economically. The fact is that drastic measures were required to support the economy. Republicans have called programs to help people socialism so many times that no one is paying attention anymore. You are beating a dead horse.

The only person you are destroying is yourself. Voters are leaving the Republican Party in droves.

 

[PoliticalChic]

9. Do not believe that Justice Thomas has picked a fight with two or three corporations that we call Big Tech alone!!

No, his fight is for Americanism, and against the Fascism that Franklin Roosevelt brought whole from Mussolini’s Italy, and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Fascism, corporatism, crony capitalism, is the alliance of government and business aimed at enriching individuals in both, to the detriment of Americans.

The propaganda of the New Deal (“malefactors of great wealth”) to the contrary, FDR simply endeavored to re-create the corporatism of the last war. The New Dealers invited one industry after another to write the codes under which they would be regulated. Even more aggressive, the National Recovery Administration forced industries to fix prices and in other ways to collude with one another: the NRA approved 557 basic and 189 supplementary codes, covering almost 95% of all industrial workers. (Goldberg)



The intention was for big business to get bigger, and the little guy to be squeezed out: for example, the owners of the big chain movie houses wrote the codes that almost ran the independents out of business (even though 13,571 of the 18,321 movie theatres were independently owned). This in the name of ‘efficiency’ and ‘progress.’




New Deal bureaucrats studied Mussolini’s corporatism closely.
From “Fortune” magazine: ‘The Corporate state is to Mussolini what the New Deal is to Roosevelt.’(July 1934)



Big Tech hid the Biden sell-out to Communist China, and got him elected.
No greater service could have been performed.
One wonders if getting Biden elected can be deducted on their taxes as a contribution in kind.

Clarence Thomas is a fool. His fight is for socialism. The right to take corporations because you don't like what they are doing. The New Deal was not fascism. It was a reponse to a major depression caused by Herbert Hoover and Republicans.

It was Trump who favored big business over other businesses. It was the Trump DOJ that provided the inpetus in ending the consent decree in the Paramount case. I didn't see you complaining about it.

"The New Deal was not fascism."


I love when you post, as I get to destroy the Left's lies.


1. Rex Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described."
Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48

2. " As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.....

.... Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.” Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator." Fascism - Econlib

There ias nothing fascist about Roosevelt's new deal. There is nothing wrong with helping people. A massive number of people were suffering economically. The fact is that drastic measures were required to support the economy. Republicans have called programs to help people socialism so many times that no one is paying attention anymore. You are beating a dead horse.

The only person you are destroying is yourself. Voters are leaving the Republican Party in droves.

Oh, my.......an 'is not, isssssssssss noooooootttttttttttttt!!!!' post from a Liberal.....when the proof of otherwise is in the very post.


Gads, you're exactly what the Democrats want.....an imbecile.

 

[busybee01]

The Left has been known to stop at nothing.


1.While the Supreme Court as a whole embarrassed itself in refusing to confront the theft of the election, the clear refusal by some swing states, Pennsylvania in particular, to observe the mandates of the US Constitution, the most courageous and conservative, the most brilliant of Justices, Clarence Thomas called out the injustice.
This week he did more, putting his life on the line in confronting the cash cows of the internet. Corrupt individuals will, I fear, not give up their $billions, their control of the dissemination of information without a fight. A bloody fight.



2. Justice Thomas is an originalist, a textualist, and a believer in our God-granted unalienable rights, the single most prominent one being free speech. Thomas called out the control by big tech, and the oligarchs allied with the Democrats/Progressives who have stolen our freedom.

“ On Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas announced that the Supreme Court soon will have to put an end to Big Tech tyranny. Amen. If the high court fails to act, it could mean the end of free speech in the 21st century and the shriveling of our constitutional rights to mere “paper rights” — still there on paper but functionally hollowed out.”
Justice Thomas shows how we can end Big Tech censorship for good



3. Just three unelected power mad Leftists….Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and Jack Dorsey deserves dishonorable mention, control Facebook and Google…..and have the power to disappear every opposing voice in the United States. Even the Commander in Chief.

Justice Thomas correctly claims that the Supreme Court must do what the spineless Republicans didn’t do….reign in this unaccountable tyranny.



4. The totalitarians and their Libertarian go-alongs claim that these are private companies, and government should never impost restrictions on any privately owned endeavors. But there are clear examples that fly in the face of that excise.

“The Skyway was operated and maintained by the City of Chicago until January 2005 when Skyway Concession Company, LLC assumed its operations under a 99-year operating lease. The lease agreement between Skyway and the City of Chicago was the first privatization of an existing toll road in the United States.”
The Skyway – Chicago Skyway

Anyone willing to pay the toll gets to use the skyway.
Who would make the argument that you cannot use that skyway based on your political views?




5. The Big Tech companies are information highways. The aim of these companies should be to increase the amount of information, communication, speech, available…..not just the state version of speech.

Justice Thomas, taking them on, is akin to Mel Gibson’s character in ‘Braveheart,’ shouting FREEDOM!!

Nonsense, you should fear for our rights and protected liberties – all in jeopardy the consequence of the likes of Thomas.

And another Fascist joins the thead!


Here comes the custard pie in his ugly kisser:


2. Justice Thomas is an originalist, a textualist, and a believer in our God-granted unalienable rights, the single most prominent one being free speech. Thomas called out the control by big tech, and the oligarchs allied with the Democrats/Progressives who have stolen our freedom.



“ On Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas announced that the Supreme Court soon will have to put an end to Big Tech tyranny. Amen. If the high court fails to act, it could mean the end of free speech in the 21st century and the shriveling of our constitutional rights to mere “paper rights” — still there on paper but functionally hollowed out.”

Justice Thomas shows how we can end Big Tech censorship for good







3. Just three unelected power mad Leftists….Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and Jack Dorsey deserves dishonorable mention, control Facebook and Google…..and have the power to disappear every opposing voice in the United States. Even the Commander in Chief.



Justice Thomas correctly claims that the Supreme Court must do what the spineless Republicans didn’t do….reign in this unaccountable tyranny.

Thomas is launching a assault on free speech. He is a judge and not a legislator. It shows how corrupt he is.

They deserve honorable mention for enhancing communications in this country. They have a right to free speech and thewir companies do as well. No one disappears. The New York Post has a website. I can do a online search on many of your statements and a huge number of websites pop up saying the same thing. No one is taking their right to speak away. You are a socialist. You want to seize these companies because you don't like them. The anatomy of a lie starts at Trump then it is spread by fake News, Newsmin and OFF among many right wing fascist media. Then it filters down to right wing websites. Then ugly bitches like you spread it.

 

[busybee01]

9. Do not believe that Justice Thomas has picked a fight with two or three corporations that we call Big Tech alone!!

No, his fight is for Americanism, and against the Fascism that Franklin Roosevelt brought whole from Mussolini’s Italy, and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Fascism, corporatism, crony capitalism, is the alliance of government and business aimed at enriching individuals in both, to the detriment of Americans.

The propaganda of the New Deal (“malefactors of great wealth”) to the contrary, FDR simply endeavored to re-create the corporatism of the last war. The New Dealers invited one industry after another to write the codes under which they would be regulated. Even more aggressive, the National Recovery Administration forced industries to fix prices and in other ways to collude with one another: the NRA approved 557 basic and 189 supplementary codes, covering almost 95% of all industrial workers. (Goldberg)



The intention was for big business to get bigger, and the little guy to be squeezed out: for example, the owners of the big chain movie houses wrote the codes that almost ran the independents out of business (even though 13,571 of the 18,321 movie theatres were independently owned). This in the name of ‘efficiency’ and ‘progress.’




New Deal bureaucrats studied Mussolini’s corporatism closely.
From “Fortune” magazine: ‘The Corporate state is to Mussolini what the New Deal is to Roosevelt.’(July 1934)



Big Tech hid the Biden sell-out to Communist China, and got him elected.
No greater service could have been performed.
One wonders if getting Biden elected can be deducted on their taxes as a contribution in kind.

Clarence Thomas is a fool. His fight is for socialism. The right to take corporations because you don't like what they are doing. The New Deal was not fascism. It was a reponse to a major depression caused by Herbert Hoover and Republicans.

It was Trump who favored big business over other businesses. It was the Trump DOJ that provided the inpetus in ending the consent decree in the Paramount case. I didn't see you complaining about it.

"The New Deal was not fascism."


I love when you post, as I get to destroy the Left's lies.


1. Rex Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described."
Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48

2. " As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.....

.... Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.” Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator." Fascism - Econlib

There ias nothing fascist about Roosevelt's new deal. There is nothing wrong with helping people. A massive number of people were suffering economically. The fact is that drastic measures were required to support the economy. Republicans have called programs to help people socialism so many times that no one is paying attention anymore. You are beating a dead horse.

The only person you are destroying is yourself. Voters are leaving the Republican Party in droves.

Oh, my.......an 'is not, isssssssssss noooooootttttttttttttt!!!!' post from a Liberal.....when the proof of otherwise is in the very post.


Gads, you're exactly what the Democrats want.....an imbecile.

What is your definition of a liberal? Anyone who disagrees with you. You are so much of a fascist that a najority of the country is liberal to you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Left has been known to stop at nothing.


1.While the Supreme Court as a whole embarrassed itself in refusing to confront the theft of the election, the clear refusal by some swing states, Pennsylvania in particular, to observe the mandates of the US Constitution, the most courageous and conservative, the most brilliant of Justices, Clarence Thomas called out the injustice.
This week he did more, putting his life on the line in confronting the cash cows of the internet. Corrupt individuals will, I fear, not give up their $billions, their control of the dissemination of information without a fight. A bloody fight.



2. Justice Thomas is an originalist, a textualist, and a believer in our God-granted unalienable rights, the single most prominent one being free speech. Thomas called out the control by big tech, and the oligarchs allied with the Democrats/Progressives who have stolen our freedom.

“ On Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas announced that the Supreme Court soon will have to put an end to Big Tech tyranny. Amen. If the high court fails to act, it could mean the end of free speech in the 21st century and the shriveling of our constitutional rights to mere “paper rights” — still there on paper but functionally hollowed out.”
Justice Thomas shows how we can end Big Tech censorship for good



3. Just three unelected power mad Leftists….Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and Jack Dorsey deserves dishonorable mention, control Facebook and Google…..and have the power to disappear every opposing voice in the United States. Even the Commander in Chief.

Justice Thomas correctly claims that the Supreme Court must do what the spineless Republicans didn’t do….reign in this unaccountable tyranny.



4. The totalitarians and their Libertarian go-alongs claim that these are private companies, and government should never impost restrictions on any privately owned endeavors. But there are clear examples that fly in the face of that excise.

“The Skyway was operated and maintained by the City of Chicago until January 2005 when Skyway Concession Company, LLC assumed its operations under a 99-year operating lease. The lease agreement between Skyway and the City of Chicago was the first privatization of an existing toll road in the United States.”
The Skyway – Chicago Skyway

Anyone willing to pay the toll gets to use the skyway.
Who would make the argument that you cannot use that skyway based on your political views?




5. The Big Tech companies are information highways. The aim of these companies should be to increase the amount of information, communication, speech, available…..not just the state version of speech.

Justice Thomas, taking them on, is akin to Mel Gibson’s character in ‘Braveheart,’ shouting FREEDOM!!

Nonsense, you should fear for our rights and protected liberties – all in jeopardy the consequence of the likes of Thomas.

And another Fascist joins the thead!


Here comes the custard pie in his ugly kisser:


2. Justice Thomas is an originalist, a textualist, and a believer in our God-granted unalienable rights, the single most prominent one being free speech. Thomas called out the control by big tech, and the oligarchs allied with the Democrats/Progressives who have stolen our freedom.



“ On Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas announced that the Supreme Court soon will have to put an end to Big Tech tyranny. Amen. If the high court fails to act, it could mean the end of free speech in the 21st century and the shriveling of our constitutional rights to mere “paper rights” — still there on paper but functionally hollowed out.”

Justice Thomas shows how we can end Big Tech censorship for good







3. Just three unelected power mad Leftists….Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and Jack Dorsey deserves dishonorable mention, control Facebook and Google…..and have the power to disappear every opposing voice in the United States. Even the Commander in Chief.



Justice Thomas correctly claims that the Supreme Court must do what the spineless Republicans didn’t do….reign in this unaccountable tyranny.

Thomas is launching a assault on free speech. He is a judge and not a legislator. It shows how corrupt he is.

They deserve honorable mention for enhancing communications in this country. They have a right to free speech and thewir companies do as well. No one disappears. The New York Post has a website. I can do a online search on many of your statements and a huge number of websites pop up saying the same thing. No one is taking their right to speak away. You are a socialist. You want to seize these companies because you don't like them. The anatomy of a lie starts at Trump then it is spread by fake News, Newsmin and OFF among many right wing fascist media. Then it filters down to right wing websites. Then ugly bitches like you spread it.

"Thomas is launching a (sic) assault on free speech...."
"Thomas is launching AN assault on free speech..."

I see you're one of those milk-people.....2% intelligent.

I'm used to your absurd lies, but the grammar is like fingernails on a blackboard.

So you're a government school grad, huh?



The Beatles gave the requirement for being a Liberal in their song ‘Strawberry Fields:’ “Living is easy with eyes closed…Misunderstanding all you see.”

I see you live by that.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"...a najority..."

It's the letter with two humps, not one.


Time to be brutally honest: you are not equipped to compete at this level. You are doomed to remain little league for your entire life. Such are the vicissitudes one must face.

 

[busybee01]

The Left has been known to stop at nothing.


1.While the Supreme Court as a whole embarrassed itself in refusing to confront the theft of the election, the clear refusal by some swing states, Pennsylvania in particular, to observe the mandates of the US Constitution, the most courageous and conservative, the most brilliant of Justices, Clarence Thomas called out the injustice.
This week he did more, putting his life on the line in confronting the cash cows of the internet. Corrupt individuals will, I fear, not give up their $billions, their control of the dissemination of information without a fight. A bloody fight.



2. Justice Thomas is an originalist, a textualist, and a believer in our God-granted unalienable rights, the single most prominent one being free speech. Thomas called out the control by big tech, and the oligarchs allied with the Democrats/Progressives who have stolen our freedom.

“ On Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas announced that the Supreme Court soon will have to put an end to Big Tech tyranny. Amen. If the high court fails to act, it could mean the end of free speech in the 21st century and the shriveling of our constitutional rights to mere “paper rights” — still there on paper but functionally hollowed out.”
Justice Thomas shows how we can end Big Tech censorship for good



3. Just three unelected power mad Leftists….Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and Jack Dorsey deserves dishonorable mention, control Facebook and Google…..and have the power to disappear every opposing voice in the United States. Even the Commander in Chief.

Justice Thomas correctly claims that the Supreme Court must do what the spineless Republicans didn’t do….reign in this unaccountable tyranny.



4. The totalitarians and their Libertarian go-alongs claim that these are private companies, and government should never impost restrictions on any privately owned endeavors. But there are clear examples that fly in the face of that excise.

“The Skyway was operated and maintained by the City of Chicago until January 2005 when Skyway Concession Company, LLC assumed its operations under a 99-year operating lease. The lease agreement between Skyway and the City of Chicago was the first privatization of an existing toll road in the United States.”
The Skyway – Chicago Skyway

Anyone willing to pay the toll gets to use the skyway.
Who would make the argument that you cannot use that skyway based on your political views?




5. The Big Tech companies are information highways. The aim of these companies should be to increase the amount of information, communication, speech, available…..not just the state version of speech.

Justice Thomas, taking them on, is akin to Mel Gibson’s character in ‘Braveheart,’ shouting FREEDOM!!

The DemNazis were so sure Hillary Rotten Clinton had it rigged that they offed Scalia imo, because they wanted to flip the courts. Also why Obama Bin Spying left 400 plus bench seats unfilled.

It certainly was strange, and unexpected.


But the recent inaction by the Supreme Court per the stolen election seems to indicate that the Wehrmacht....er, Democrats had nothing to worry about.


Best hopes for Thomas, the bravest of the Justices.

There was no stolen election. That is what you wanted the Supreme Court to do.

Clarence Thomas is the craziest of the justices.

…evidence of carefully planned theft of the election.



1. I voted early, and the lines were enormous. On more than one day the lines went as much as five blocks, with lots of people bringing lawn chairs, and settling in for the duration.

Imagine two hypothetical voters..

Voter A is willing to wait on the long line, get up to the ballot and mark the presidential, and then go down the line, usually along party lines. As I did.

Voter B is an apparatchik of the Bolshevik Democrat apparatus, there for one reason: to do what he had been instructed to do to purloin the election for Biden. This individual need to fill in tons of ballots, and doesn’t plan to spend a great deal of time on each one. It’s quantity, not quality.



2. Person B is essentially a spy for the Democrats, which is fitting as their presidential candidate has been bought and paid for by a foreign government.



3. Here comes the circumstantial/mathematical evidence, specifically from the Georgia election: how do you explain 95,000 votes with only Biden marked…..the rest of the Democrat candidates for office ignored?
Only one way: the Democrat agent was sent in to win the election for Biden, and spent no time on any other aspirant.





4. “In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, “overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate.”

Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party’s Senate candidates are relatively close. …the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state’s Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.

In Georgia, there was an 818 vote difference between Trump and the GOP Senator, vs. a 95,000 difference between Biden and the Democratic candidate for Senator.” Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?

In Michigan, for example, there was a difference of just 7,131 votes between Trump and GOP candidate John James, yet the difference between Joe Biden and Democratic candidate Gary Peters was a staggering 69,093.

Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?
Via ZeroHedge In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candi…
www.theburningplatform.com

There were no extra votes cast. The number of votes cast were approximately the same as the number of voters. You are the one who is programmed.

You think you can slander people because they don't agree with you. You are spreading misinformation provided by Putin you Bolshevik.

What you describe is interesting but it is not proof of anything. The US Attorneys were instructed to look for voter fraud. The AG said there was no evidence of fraud that would have changed the election. There are no mathematics involved.

4. “In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, “overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate.”

Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party’s Senate candidates are relatively close. …the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state’s Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.

In Georgia, there was an 818 vote difference between Trump and the GOP Senator, vs. a 95,000 difference between Biden and the Democratic candidate for Senator.” Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?



The explanation is a mass fake vote production by your Wehrmacht......er, Democrats.

I do not like Clarence Thomas and usually disagree with him, as well as PoliticalChic, but they are right on this one.
Censorship not only is inherently illegal but extremely dangerous.
It can be used to prevent truth and force hysterical propaganda.
A democratic republic can not survive if arbitrary censorship is allowed.

The only legal times censorship can be allowed is if it is in clear violation of rights, such as libel, slander, yelling "fire" in a crowded theater when there is no fire, etc.
Even inciting violence with hate speech has to be tolerated to a degree.
Otherwise you don't have a democratic republic any more.

Only the government is prevented from censoring anything. Free speech rights do not apply to private entities.

It is only through the protections of Section 230 that Big Tech gets to impost its tyranny and censorship of opposing voice.

That's protection that government provides.


"Section 230's unconstitutional delegation of power to Big Tech


Twitter permanently banned President Trump’s account, wiping out his contact with 88 million followers, and banned thousands of conservative social media accounts. Google and Apple blocked Parler’s App from their stores, and Amazon Web Services (“AWS”) denied Parler access to its cloud network. Parler was shut down. A swath of conservatives lost the ability to speak on the internet, the nation’s new public square, the place where political ideas are exchanged and commerce flows.

Two questions must be answered:

1. Can private parties controlling the public square deprive citizens of their right to free speech? and
2. Can Congress empower private parties to regulate competitors?"

Section 230’s unconstitutional delegation of power to Big Tech

In the frenzied days after Democrats won control of Congress and the presidency, and rioters invaded the Capitol, Big Tech, relying on section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, for immuni…

thehill.com

Section 230 must be withdrawn.

Which they had every right to do. The terms of services that were agreed to were violated. Maybe Parler should have set up their own services and not relied on someone else. Twitter and Facebook were small and built their own network. No one has lost the right to speak on the internet. There are numerous far right wing websites and blogs on the internet.

1. Free speech rights have nothing to do with this. These are private companies. Free speech only applies to government entities.
2. Government only steps in when there are barriers to entry. You can't have multiple electric companies putting up poles or digging up streets.

Section 230 would still allow companies to take down posts and ban posters, As a matter of fact they would likely crack down harder and faster to avoid civil liability. It shows how ignorant you are.

 

[RealDave]

The Left has been known to stop at nothing.


1.While the Supreme Court as a whole embarrassed itself in refusing to confront the theft of the election, the clear refusal by some swing states, Pennsylvania in particular, to observe the mandates of the US Constitution, the most courageous and conservative, the most brilliant of Justices, Clarence Thomas called out the injustice.
This week he did more, putting his life on the line in confronting the cash cows of the internet. Corrupt individuals will, I fear, not give up their $billions, their control of the dissemination of information without a fight. A bloody fight.



2. Justice Thomas is an originalist, a textualist, and a believer in our God-granted unalienable rights, the single most prominent one being free speech. Thomas called out the control by big tech, and the oligarchs allied with the Democrats/Progressives who have stolen our freedom.

“ On Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas announced that the Supreme Court soon will have to put an end to Big Tech tyranny. Amen. If the high court fails to act, it could mean the end of free speech in the 21st century and the shriveling of our constitutional rights to mere “paper rights” — still there on paper but functionally hollowed out.”
Justice Thomas shows how we can end Big Tech censorship for good



3. Just three unelected power mad Leftists….Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and Jack Dorsey deserves dishonorable mention, control Facebook and Google…..and have the power to disappear every opposing voice in the United States. Even the Commander in Chief.

Justice Thomas correctly claims that the Supreme Court must do what the spineless Republicans didn’t do….reign in this unaccountable tyranny.



4. The totalitarians and their Libertarian go-alongs claim that these are private companies, and government should never impost restrictions on any privately owned endeavors. But there are clear examples that fly in the face of that excise.

“The Skyway was operated and maintained by the City of Chicago until January 2005 when Skyway Concession Company, LLC assumed its operations under a 99-year operating lease. The lease agreement between Skyway and the City of Chicago was the first privatization of an existing toll road in the United States.”
The Skyway – Chicago Skyway

Anyone willing to pay the toll gets to use the skyway.
Who would make the argument that you cannot use that skyway based on your political views?




5. The Big Tech companies are information highways. The aim of these companies should be to increase the amount of information, communication, speech, available…..not just the state version of speech.

Justice Thomas, taking them on, is akin to Mel Gibson’s character in ‘Braveheart,’ shouting FREEDOM!!

Because only Republicans are allowed to cheat like McConnell & Trtump.

McConnell would not consider Garland as per the Constitution.

Trump bribed Kennedy to retire probably by threatening to take down his son with him when his German bank loans are found to be fraudulent.

 

[busybee01]

not at all. I know polls are rigged and set up to provide a necessary response. I wasn't born yesterday like all of you. i was born the day before.

I remember this from the election.

Poll shows Trump losing, it was rigged to discourage Trump voters. Poll shows Trump winning, it was rigged to give Trump voters too much confidence and feel like they don’t even need to vote.

No matter what happens, it’s rigged. Perfect logic.

again, like I said, the polls are for shit. ANY of them. I don't agree with Polls that show in my favor. I'm consistent that no poll is good. None, nadda , K?

Consistency isn’t a virtue if it’s paranoia.

consistent is consistent. look it up, what's that definition say? here for your eyes.

acting or done in the same way over time, especially so as to be fair or accurate.

Thomas addressed and denied that solution.


10. Understand….Justice Thomas is not a Liberal….so his plan is not about using government to solve the problem.

Conservatives like Justice Thomas do not want to regulate or break up the Tech companies in order to increase government power. No, the argument is the inalienable rights argument, the invaluable importance of freedom of all sorts, particularly speech.



We've all heard 'These are private companies.....let the other side create their own.'

Thomas rejects the free-market competition as what will limit the tyranny of Big Tech. He states that the very size and power of Big Tech limits ‘substantial barriers to entry’ by would-be competitors:

“Nor did Thomas buy free-market absolutists’ argument about competition limiting Big Tech tyranny. He pointed to the “substantial barriers to entry” facing newcomers. The fate of Parler proves the justice’s point. When the Twitter alternative offered a censorship-free platform, Big Tech colluded to crush it.”
Justice Thomas shows how we can end Big Tech censorship for good



No….Thomas argues that it is the natural rights of citizens that demands an end to the tyranny.

Thomas keeps showing what a fool he is. Thomas sounds like a socialist. He is using government to nationalize Twitter ans Facebook. Twitter and Facebook were snall companies once too. There is no tyranny and no Big Tech. This goes along with your fantasy of a deep state.

There are not substantial barriers to entry. Twitter and Facebook did it. The reason Parler failed was they tried to take a shortcut. They relied on someone else for network services and they violated Amazon's terms of agreement.

Unlike you, Justice Thomas is an American and believes in the American ethos.


7. Even the drones who simply parrot the Bolsheviks in power, speak of caselaw. And from the start of this nation, that was based on natural God-given rights. ‘That means that the most important function of government is to maintain pre-existing rights, not to create them, nor to dispense them. They are known and self-evident prior to the founding of our nation, are inalienable, whether one chooses to use them or not. They are that men are created equal, and enjoy the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. They come from our Creator by virtue of our simply being human beings.’ George Will

The prime mission of Militant S
What are the things our government cannot take from our citizens?



Your right to speak, to your own private thoughts, your right to own property, to travel, to worship as you see fit, ….none cannot be removed sans a trial and proof that you have done something that injures others. These are inalienable. This is ‘the natural rights doctrine.’







A government exists for one reason: to protect and secure those rights. They cannot be sold for Big Tech’s political contributions, monetarily or by services in kind.

Or this is not America any longer…..it has been “fundamentally transformed.”



Justice Thomas has sounded the clarion call to all who believe in the natural rights doctrine, and thrown down the gauntlet to the totalitarians, the Militant Secularists, those who believe we only have those rights that the government allows us.

That would be Communists, Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Democrats.
ecularism is to reverse, to 'undo,' this foundational view of America.

Who gave you the right to make that determination. You have proven you are the fascist. Clarence Thomas is un-American. He has a bad case of TDS. He wants to launch a assault on free speech in this country.

You people don't have a clue as to what Gosd is. Trump is the first President to be rebuked by Jesus Christ who is the Son of God.

No one is taking anyone's right to speak away. No one's rights to anything are being taken away. The fqact is that one of God's commandments are that one should not lie. You have broken that commandment in every which way you ca.

You are a fascist, Nazi and socialist. You are the ones who believe in totalitarianism.

 

[busybee01]

The Left has been known to stop at nothing.

The left didn't cause a riot at the Capitol, Chinese Bot.

Of course they did......no one else had as much practice at it.



1.After witnessing a decade of Democrat authorized and inspired riots, how believable is it that the Right is responsible for the Capitol mayhem?





2. The Far Left relies on a dumbed down, history-challenged public….that’s the reason for government schooling. Remediation begins with terms like ‘agent provocateur,’ and ‘false flag operation.’ And nobody does it better than the Left.











3. “The Reichstag fire (German: Reichstagsbrand, listen (help·info)) was an arson attack on the Reichstag building, home of the German parliament in Berlin, on Monday 27 February 1933, precisely four weeks after Adolf Hitler was sworn in as Chancellor of Germany. The day after the fire, the Reichstag Fire Decree was passed. The Nazi Party used the fire as a pretext to claim that communists were plotting against the German government, which made the fire pivotal in the establishment of Nazi Germany.” Reichstag fire - Wikipedia







4. “Hitler, however, insisted that the Communist Party, which was a considerable force within the Reichstag, had set the fire, and pressed German President Paul von Hindenburg to approve of an emergency law suspending civil liberties. Communist leaders, including the Communist members of the Reichstag, were hunted down and arrested.



Without their presence in the Reichstag, the National Socialists and their coalition partners had a majority. That enabled the Nazis to pass a further law, the Enabling Act, on March 23, 1933, giving Hitler dictatorial powers and removing any obstacle to his absolute supremacy.” The Left Is Enjoying Its Reichstag Fire Moment







5. ‘Leftist Antifa Among Mob Storming US Capitol’



– Facial recognition experts and backers of American President Donald J. Trump said members of the hardline leftist Antifa movement infiltrated protestors who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday.



Several witnesses and reports monitored by Worthy News suggested radical leftist vandals broke into the building housing the U.S. Congress while most Trump supporters were loud but peaceful.” https://www.worthynews.com/55452-leftist-antifa-among-mob-storming-us-capitol







There is no disputing that the Democrats have had far more practice at riots than the Right.

Biden voters are well practiced.

===================================

6. Did you find stories in the media excoriating the dozens of anti-America riots by Biden voters?



Here they are in June, attacking the White House….practicing for the Capitol.






========================================================

7. “No one can point to any statement from President Trump calling upon his supporters to storm the Capitol, much less to stage a coup against the U.S. government, but it doesn’t matter anymore. The establishment media and the social media giants are insisting that he incited the attack on the Capitol and was trying to install himself as a dictator by means of a guy with a buffalo horn hat and some other dopes and wingnuts, and if you don’t believe it, you’re a racist, bigoted, MAGA-hat-wearing fascist who deserves to be silenced along with the president, and soon will be. But it’s clear who the real fascists are, and they are exploiting their Reichstag Fire moment to the fullest.” The Left Is Enjoying Its Reichstag Fire Moment







The NYTimes provided proof that it wasn't Trump supporters:



“About 20 minutes before Trump’s speech ends, some people in the Capitol crowd harass officers posted at the barricades and start to get physical. Others follow suit, until they violently overwhelm the police and breach the building’s outer perimeter.” How a Presidential Rally Turned Into a Capitol Rampage


Two facts that the past several years have established:

• Nothing the media claims turns out to be true.
• There could hardly be better instigators of violence, than those Biden voters who have been well practiced in ‘the art.’

With those facts in mind......who was responsible for the Capitol violence?

8. “Video Reveals Trump Supporters Tried to Stop the Violence
Violence by Antifa on the south side where Trump supporters were told to March to. Supporters stopped the breakage but he started again later. MSM keeps saying it’s Trump http://supporters.it’s not.






Video Reveals Trump Supporters Tried to Stop the Violence | Conservative Insider

conservativeinsider.org

=========================================================

9. 9. "The National Socialists used the Reichstag fire to destroy all political opposition in Germany and assert total control over the lives of every German citizen. They used it to give themselves official, pseudo-legal permission to break every moral law and ethical code ever known to mankind, and ultimately to murder tens of millions of people, including six million Jews (the particular target of their hatred), and lay waste to the entire European continent.



The American Left of today has followed the Nazis’ Reichstag Fire playbook to a T thus far. What is to prevent them from attempting to implement the whole thing? The one thing saving us from woke totalitarianism at this point may be the fact that the sinister authoritarians of the Democratic Party, the social media corporations, and the establishment media may already have overreached. America in 2020, even after fifty years of woke indoctrination in our schools, is not like Germany of 1933. We have a strong tradition of freedom, notably the freedom of speech. In attempting to impose their totalitarian woke straitjacket upon the American people, the Left is going to encounter considerably more opposition than the Nazis did in Germany, where the Weimar Republic was the nation’s first attempt at representative government and never enjoyed great support among the people."

The Left Is Enjoying Its Reichstag Fire Moment
The American Left of today has followed the Nazis’ Reichstag Fire playbook to a T so far. What can prevent them from doing the whole thing?

pjmedia.com

=====================================================

10. “Analysis concludes Antifa provoked shooting of Ashli Babbitt at Capitol
'The ones who were agitating the crowd were not Trump supporters'

An analysis of videos of the death of Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt at the U.S. Capitol indicates Antifa activists provoked the fatal gunshot from a police officer. Japanese investigator Misako Ganaha explained in a video interview with Epoch Times reporter Joshua Philipp on his “Crossroads” program that she analyzed two lengthy videos, affording two different angles of the incident near the House chamber…. just prior to the shooting, two men who had been agitating the crowd broke the glass on a set of doors.

… the same Marxist “agitate and divide” tactics employed by leftists in her home country…. part of the tactic, she said, is for someone in collaboration with the agitators to serve as a “witness” to mainstream media, which tells the story “without analyzing.” Media simply repeats what the witness says, explained Ganaha, “so the world does not know the truth.” Analysis concludes Antifa provoked shooting of Ashli Babbitt at Capitol

======================================================

11. “BLM instigator of Capitol riots, John Earle Sullivan, arrested

The Utah Black Lives Matter "activist" has been bragging about his involvement in instigating the Capitol riots. Now, he's been arrested.

The deadly riots at the Capitol last week that have sparked Big Tech cancelations and prompted another impeachment of President Trump were instigated in part by Black Lives Matter and Antifa “activists,” according to multiple media reports. One of the highest profile suspects, John Earle Sullivan from Utah, has been arrested.”

This story will be buried by mainstream media and suppressed by Big Tech. The arrest of John Earle Sullivan, a known Black Lives Matter leader and provocateur, belies the accepted narrative that Trump-supporters alone caused the riots.” BLM instigator of Capitol riots, John Earle Sullivan, arrested

=============================================================

12. “Democrats Cling Desperately to Trump Hatred
The Democrats are not going to be able to hide much longer behind their Trump hatred. But it’s really all they’ve got.

With nearly airtight totalitarian uniformity, the American media robotically repeat that there is no possible argument to be made that the 2020 presidential election produced an unjust result.

…Trump has been condemned for his remarks to hundreds of thousands of his supporters in Washington on January 6, and it is now a political commandment that he is responsible for the ensuing illegal forced entry and fatal violence at the United States Capitol.
He actually told his supporters that they should “peacefully and patriotically make your voices be heard” when they proceeded on to the Capitol;…


They have made Donald Trump the leader of all who object to government-restricted freedom of expression, corrupt election practices, and the transformation of America into a socialist commune. At the moment of Joe Biden’s ultimate triumph, he and his ramshackle coalition of contending (and in some cases disreputable) interests are exposed in their ghastly infirmity. The totalitarian woke media will not be able to disguise this macabre farce for long.” Democrats Cling Desperately to Trump Hatred - American Greatness
13. “James, brother of accused leftist provocateur John Sullivan, claims 226 Antifa members started Capitol riots
John Sullivan was arrested yesterday in connection with instigating the Capitol riots on January 6th. A video of him and CNN photojournalist Jade Sacker emerged this week that shows them giddy following the murder of Trump-supporter Ashli Babbitt. Now, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani is wondering why a text message from James Sullivan was not revealed during the President’s second impeachment hearings in Congress.

According to the text, James Sullivan makes a very bold claim: “I’m currently working with the FBI to expose and place total blame on John and the 226 members of antifa that instigated the Capitol ‘riot’ I was able to get my agent out of trouble along with three other uthan’s.”

…every day brings more evidence that Antifa and other left-wing “activists” incited the crowd to commit crimes. Videos of Antifa members secretly embedded with the Trump-supporters appear to reinforce these claims.

This all jibes with the credible conspiracy theory that Democrats or other interested parties planned this “false flag” attack in order to push for impeachment.” James, brother of accused leftist provocateur John Sullivan, claims 226 Antifa members started Capitol riots

======================================================

14. “Verified twitter user Amuse breaks everything down in further detail in a series of tweets.

"To make this clear. CNN was embedded with BLM/Antifa pretending to be Trump supporters taping them incite a riot. This is freaking huge. If CNN is allowed to maintain its press access anywhere in DC there needs to be a serious overhaul of our entire system," he tweeted.

Here's another one, who showed up with furs, and also got himself arrested. According to the New York Post:

Aaron Mostofsky was busted Tuesday at his brother’s house in Brooklyn by federal agents on multiple charges, including theft of government property for allegedly stealing a police riot shield and bulletproof vest, the source said.

Mostofsky, who is the son of Shlomo Mostofsky, a Supreme Court judge and a prominent figure in the Orthodox Jewish community, was photographed with both items.

Video circulating on Twitter following Mostofsky’s arrest shows FBI agents swarming the home and carting out what appeared to be the fur pelts and walking stick he had on him during the insurrection.

His politics? According to this report, registered Democrat.”



Rush to judgment on Trump? Multiple leftists arrested for Capitol riot

And Zero Hedge.

You are a big fat liar. It was the right who stormed the capitol. You are the one who is starting a Reichstag fire by conering up for right wing terrorists who storm3ed the capitol. Not one member of antifa has been indicted by the DOJ. Trump's own cabinet members know it was Trump followers who stormed the capitol. That is why there were massive resignationa with many of them citing Trump's role in the capitol riots. The facial recognition company confirmed it detected right wing fascists storming the capitol. The Washingtom Times retracted the story that made the claim.

"You are a big fat liar."


More proof that you should be named Pinocchio

If you were called Pinocchion your nose would reach around the world.

 

[busybee01]

The Left has been known to stop at nothing.


1.While the Supreme Court as a whole embarrassed itself in refusing to confront the theft of the election, the clear refusal by some swing states, Pennsylvania in particular, to observe the mandates of the US Constitution, the most courageous and conservative, the most brilliant of Justices, Clarence Thomas called out the injustice.
This week he did more, putting his life on the line in confronting the cash cows of the internet. Corrupt individuals will, I fear, not give up their $billions, their control of the dissemination of information without a fight. A bloody fight.



2. Justice Thomas is an originalist, a textualist, and a believer in our God-granted unalienable rights, the single most prominent one being free speech. Thomas called out the control by big tech, and the oligarchs allied with the Democrats/Progressives who have stolen our freedom.

“ On Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas announced that the Supreme Court soon will have to put an end to Big Tech tyranny. Amen. If the high court fails to act, it could mean the end of free speech in the 21st century and the shriveling of our constitutional rights to mere “paper rights” — still there on paper but functionally hollowed out.”
Justice Thomas shows how we can end Big Tech censorship for good



3. Just three unelected power mad Leftists….Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and Jack Dorsey deserves dishonorable mention, control Facebook and Google…..and have the power to disappear every opposing voice in the United States. Even the Commander in Chief.

Justice Thomas correctly claims that the Supreme Court must do what the spineless Republicans didn’t do….reign in this unaccountable tyranny.



4. The totalitarians and their Libertarian go-alongs claim that these are private companies, and government should never impost restrictions on any privately owned endeavors. But there are clear examples that fly in the face of that excise.

“The Skyway was operated and maintained by the City of Chicago until January 2005 when Skyway Concession Company, LLC assumed its operations under a 99-year operating lease. The lease agreement between Skyway and the City of Chicago was the first privatization of an existing toll road in the United States.”
The Skyway – Chicago Skyway

Anyone willing to pay the toll gets to use the skyway.
Who would make the argument that you cannot use that skyway based on your political views?




5. The Big Tech companies are information highways. The aim of these companies should be to increase the amount of information, communication, speech, available…..not just the state version of speech.

Justice Thomas, taking them on, is akin to Mel Gibson’s character in ‘Braveheart,’ shouting FREEDOM!!

The DemNazis were so sure Hillary Rotten Clinton had it rigged that they offed Scalia imo, because they wanted to flip the courts. Also why Obama Bin Spying left 400 plus bench seats unfilled.

It certainly was strange, and unexpected.


But the recent inaction by the Supreme Court per the stolen election seems to indicate that the Wehrmacht....er, Democrats had nothing to worry about.


Best hopes for Thomas, the bravest of the Justices.

There was no stolen election. That is what you wanted the Supreme Court to do.

Clarence Thomas is the craziest of the justices.

…evidence of carefully planned theft of the election.



1. I voted early, and the lines were enormous. On more than one day the lines went as much as five blocks, with lots of people bringing lawn chairs, and settling in for the duration.

Imagine two hypothetical voters..

Voter A is willing to wait on the long line, get up to the ballot and mark the presidential, and then go down the line, usually along party lines. As I did.

Voter B is an apparatchik of the Bolshevik Democrat apparatus, there for one reason: to do what he had been instructed to do to purloin the election for Biden. This individual need to fill in tons of ballots, and doesn’t plan to spend a great deal of time on each one. It’s quantity, not quality.



2. Person B is essentially a spy for the Democrats, which is fitting as their presidential candidate has been bought and paid for by a foreign government.



3. Here comes the circumstantial/mathematical evidence, specifically from the Georgia election: how do you explain 95,000 votes with only Biden marked…..the rest of the Democrat candidates for office ignored?
Only one way: the Democrat agent was sent in to win the election for Biden, and spent no time on any other aspirant.





4. “In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, “overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate.”

Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party’s Senate candidates are relatively close. …the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state’s Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.

In Georgia, there was an 818 vote difference between Trump and the GOP Senator, vs. a 95,000 difference between Biden and the Democratic candidate for Senator.” Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?

In Michigan, for example, there was a difference of just 7,131 votes between Trump and GOP candidate John James, yet the difference between Joe Biden and Democratic candidate Gary Peters was a staggering 69,093.

Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?
Via ZeroHedge In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candi…
www.theburningplatform.com

There were no extra votes cast. The number of votes cast were approximately the same as the number of voters. You are the one who is programmed.

You think you can slander people because they don't agree with you. You are spreading misinformation provided by Putin you Bolshevik.

What you describe is interesting but it is not proof of anything. The US Attorneys were instructed to look for voter fraud. The AG said there was no evidence of fraud that would have changed the election. There are no mathematics involved.

4. “In most elections, the majority of votes are cast “down the ticket” – meaning, a voter supports both party’s presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, “overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate.”

Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party’s Senate candidates are relatively close. …the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state’s Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.

In Georgia, there was an 818 vote difference between Trump and the GOP Senator, vs. a 95,000 difference between Biden and the Democratic candidate for Senator.” Why Does Biden Have So Many More Votes Than Democrat Senators In Swing States?



The explanation is a mass fake vote production by your Wehrmacht......er, Democrats.

In MOST ELECTIONS. This is not proof of anything. There was no mass fake voter production. YOU ARE A LOON.

 

[busybee01]

9. Do not believe that Justice Thomas has picked a fight with two or three corporations that we call Big Tech alone!!

No, his fight is for Americanism, and against the Fascism that Franklin Roosevelt brought whole from Mussolini’s Italy, and imposed it on America as the New Deal.



Fascism, corporatism, crony capitalism, is the alliance of government and business aimed at enriching individuals in both, to the detriment of Americans.

The propaganda of the New Deal (“malefactors of great wealth”) to the contrary, FDR simply endeavored to re-create the corporatism of the last war. The New Dealers invited one industry after another to write the codes under which they would be regulated. Even more aggressive, the National Recovery Administration forced industries to fix prices and in other ways to collude with one another: the NRA approved 557 basic and 189 supplementary codes, covering almost 95% of all industrial workers. (Goldberg)



The intention was for big business to get bigger, and the little guy to be squeezed out: for example, the owners of the big chain movie houses wrote the codes that almost ran the independents out of business (even though 13,571 of the 18,321 movie theatres were independently owned). This in the name of ‘efficiency’ and ‘progress.’




New Deal bureaucrats studied Mussolini’s corporatism closely.
From “Fortune” magazine: ‘The Corporate state is to Mussolini what the New Deal is to Roosevelt.’(July 1934)



Big Tech hid the Biden sell-out to Communist China, and got him elected.
No greater service could have been performed.
One wonders if getting Biden elected can be deducted on their taxes as a contribution in kind.

Clarence Thomas is a fool. His fight is for socialism. The right to take corporations because you don't like what they are doing. The New Deal was not fascism. It was a reponse to a major depression caused by Herbert Hoover and Republicans.

It was Trump who favored big business over other businesses. It was the Trump DOJ that provided the inpetus in ending the consent decree in the Paramount case. I didn't see you complaining about it.

"The New Deal was not fascism."


I love when you post, as I get to destroy the Left's lies.


1. Rex Tugwell was opposed to any private business not controlled by the government. General Hugh Johnson was working with Tugwell on a bill to create the NRA, and gave Francis Perkins the book by Rafaello Viglione, "The Corporate State," in which the neat Italian system of dictatorship for the benefit of the people was glowingly described."
Francis Perkins, "The Roosevelt I Knew." The NRA was copied from Mussolini's corporative system. p.47

a. Perkins questioned whether Johnson 'really understood the democratic process..." New Dealers had no problem with the fascist nature of their plans.

b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union." Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48

2. " As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. ... In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.....

.... Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.” Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator." Fascism - Econlib

There ias nothing fascist about Roosevelt's new deal. There is nothing wrong with helping people. A massive number of people were suffering economically. The fact is that drastic measures were required to support the economy. Republicans have called programs to help people socialism so many times that no one is paying attention anymore. You are beating a dead horse.

The only person you are destroying is yourself. Voters are leaving the Republican Party in droves.

Oh, my.......an 'is not, isssssssssss noooooootttttttttttttt!!!!' post from a Liberal.....when the proof of otherwise is in the very post.


Gads, you're exactly what the Democrats want.....an imbecile.

You are the embicile. You nelieve anything the Trump propaganda machine tells you.

 

[busybee01]

"...a najority..."

It's the letter with two humps, not one.


Time to be brutally honest: you are not equipped to compete at this level. You are doomed to remain little league for your entire life. Such are the vicissitudes one must face.

You are the one who needs to be honest. You are not equipped to do anything. You believe anything the Trump propaganda machine tells you. You claim others are socialist when you are the socialist. You belong in the pee-wee league because you cannot think for yourself. You cfan deny it but your posts prove otherwise.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Left has been known to stop at nothing.


1.While the Supreme Court as a whole embarrassed itself in refusing to confront the theft of the election, the clear refusal by some swing states, Pennsylvania in particular, to observe the mandates of the US Constitution, the most courageous and conservative, the most brilliant of Justices, Clarence Thomas called out the injustice.
This week he did more, putting his life on the line in confronting the cash cows of the internet. Corrupt individuals will, I fear, not give up their $billions, their control of the dissemination of information without a fight. A bloody fight.



2. Justice Thomas is an originalist, a textualist, and a believer in our God-granted unalienable rights, the single most prominent one being free speech. Thomas called out the control by big tech, and the oligarchs allied with the Democrats/Progressives who have stolen our freedom.

“ On Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas announced that the Supreme Court soon will have to put an end to Big Tech tyranny. Amen. If the high court fails to act, it could mean the end of free speech in the 21st century and the shriveling of our constitutional rights to mere “paper rights” — still there on paper but functionally hollowed out.”
Justice Thomas shows how we can end Big Tech censorship for good



3. Just three unelected power mad Leftists….Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and Jack Dorsey deserves dishonorable mention, control Facebook and Google…..and have the power to disappear every opposing voice in the United States. Even the Commander in Chief.

Justice Thomas correctly claims that the Supreme Court must do what the spineless Republicans didn’t do….reign in this unaccountable tyranny.



4. The totalitarians and their Libertarian go-alongs claim that these are private companies, and government should never impost restrictions on any privately owned endeavors. But there are clear examples that fly in the face of that excise.

“The Skyway was operated and maintained by the City of Chicago until January 2005 when Skyway Concession Company, LLC assumed its operations under a 99-year operating lease. The lease agreement between Skyway and the City of Chicago was the first privatization of an existing toll road in the United States.”
The Skyway – Chicago Skyway

Anyone willing to pay the toll gets to use the skyway.
Who would make the argument that you cannot use that skyway based on your political views?




5. The Big Tech companies are information highways. The aim of these companies should be to increase the amount of information, communication, speech, available…..not just the state version of speech.

Justice Thomas, taking them on, is akin to Mel Gibson’s character in ‘Braveheart,’ shouting FREEDOM!!

Because only Republicans are allowed to cheat like McConnell & Trtump.

McConnell would not consider Garland as per the Constitution.

Trump bribed Kennedy to retire probably by threatening to take down his son with him when his German bank loans are found to be fraudulent.

"McConnell would not consider Garland as per the Constitution."


I certainly can see why someone known as RealDumb would want Garland.





Twitter removed the dozen times he claimed not to know anything.

HAWLEY: Do you believe that illegal entry at America’s borders should remain a crime?

GARLAND: Well, I haven’t thought about that question. I just haven’t thought about that question. I think the president has made clear that we are a country with borders, with a concern about national security. I don’t know of a proposal to decriminalize but still make it unlawful to enter. I just don’t know the answer to that question. I haven’t thought about it.

HAWLEY: Will you continue to prosecute unlawful border crossings?

GARLAND: Well, again, this is a question of allocation of resources. We will … the Department will … prevent unlawful crossing. I don’t know … I have to admit, I just don’t know … what exactly the conditions are and how this is done. I think if … I don’t know what the current program even is with respect to this … so I assume that the answer would be yes but I don’t know what the issues surround it are.

Garland: 'I Don't Know' If DOJ Will Keep Prosecuting Illegal Immigration

Merrick Garland says he does not know if the DOJ will continue prosecuting illegal border crossings should the Senate confirm him.

www.breitbart.com

"Merrick Garland defends DOJ nominee Kristen Clarke, who called Blacks superior

Attorney General nominee Merrick Garland defended Kristen Clarke, the attorney tapped to lead the Justice Department’s civil rights division, during a heated exchange with Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, at his confirmation hearing on Monday.” Merrick Garland defends DOJ nominee Kristen Clarke, who called Blacks superior