Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama had it going for awhile, then as he always seems to do, he steps on his dick.
It'll be worse if he gets another 4 years. He won't give a darned what anyone thinks about his policies then.
These rules were in Obamacare.
How many other surprises are in that monstrosity.
Obama had it going for awhile, then as he always seems to do, he steps on his dick.
It'll be worse if he gets another 4 years. He won't give a darned what anyone thinks about his policies then.
These rules were in Obamacare.
How many other surprises are in that monstrosity.
Almost ANYTHING is a surprise for dumbazz ignoramus dittoheads like you and all the others. Hopeless citizens who believe anything the lying cheating megarich BS Pub Propaganda machine says. How does it feel to be a mindless tool of the greedy megarich/corporations? You go RDean! LOL
Massachusetts, under Romney, did the same thing as the ACA would. So does Georgia (and 28 other states). More Pubcrappe for the dupes, with Catholic priests doing what they're told to- don't want to be excommunicated, while 98% of CATHOLIC women use birth control.They already have a year waiver, and Dems have said enforcement would be weak. That'll be nothing compared to the protests of the women involved LOL!
the USMB cons just want to whine because they know Obama will win reelectionBesides, logic has never been their strong suit
another 'me too' post by the little poster that can't. Nothing to add, just 'me too!'
The beauty of this is, in the end the Obama administration will come up with a perfect compromise settlement, the Catholics will be happy,
Obama will put another nail in the coffin of the rightwing myth that he's too extreme and never willing to reach out and work with the opposition,
and the only ones who will wrongly think they won anything will be the wingnuts who would never vote for Obama in the first place.
Did anyone answer my question as to whether it would be protected by the 1st amendment if Muslims somewhere in the US decided that their own Sharia law could trump US law,
on the grounds of religious freedom?
Sorry if I missed it.
I heard some Hispanic Republican guy today claiming that Hispanics were against this be cause they thought Obama was trying to prevent them from having as many babies as they wanted to.
Yes, I did. I swear.
The beauty of this is, in the end the Obama administration will come up with a perfect compromise settlement, the Catholics will be happy,
Obama will put another nail in the coffin of the rightwing myth that he's too extreme and never willing to reach out and work with the opposition,
and the only ones who will wrongly think they won anything will be the wingnuts who would never vote for Obama in the first place.
Only problem being is that reach out is a grope, and that compromise settlement is Public Ejaculation, illegal, the last time I checked. You are right on him being a Perve though. Good Catch.
I heard some Hispanic Republican guy today claiming that Hispanics were against this be cause they thought Obama was trying to prevent them from having as many babies as they wanted to.
Yes, I did. I swear.
Great, and more evidence that lefties are racist eugenecists.
You guys are on a roll.
No, we answered it by pointing out that you were obfuscating, and using logical fallacy.
Sharia law that makes it legal to abuse and stone women is not the same as a law that forces the church to provide contraceptives. Nobody is HARMED if the church doesn't pay for contraceptives.
People are HARMED by sharia law.
See the difference? Yes? No?
No, we answered it by pointing out that you were obfuscating, and using logical fallacy.
Sharia law that makes it legal to abuse and stone women is not the same as a law that forces the church to provide contraceptives. Nobody is HARMED if the church doesn't pay for contraceptives.
People are HARMED by sharia law.
See the difference? Yes? No?
The beauty of this is, in the end the Obama administration will come up with a perfect compromise settlement, the Catholics will be happy,
Obama will put another nail in the coffin of the rightwing myth that he's too extreme and never willing to reach out and work with the opposition,
and the only ones who will wrongly think they won anything will be the wingnuts who would never vote for Obama in the first place.
Only problem being is that reach out is a grope, and that compromise settlement is Public Ejaculation, illegal, the last time I checked. You are right on him being a Perve though. Good Catch.
You therefore demonstrate that you fall into the wingnut category I included above.
Life must be really, really hard for you.
Massachusetts, under Romney, did the same thing as the ACA would. So does Georgia (and 28 other states). More Pubcrappe for the dupes, with Catholic priests doing what they're told to- don't want to be excommunicated, while 98% of CATHOLIC women use birth control.They already have a year waiver, and Dems have said enforcement would be weak. That'll be nothing compared to the protests of the women involved LOL!
the USMB cons just want to whine because they know Obama will win reelection
No, we answered it by pointing out that you were obfuscating, and using logical fallacy.
Sharia law that makes it legal to abuse and stone women is not the same as a law that forces the church to provide contraceptives. Nobody is HARMED if the church doesn't pay for contraceptives.
People are HARMED by sharia law.
See the difference? Yes? No?
No. Who are you to say what part of a religion's beliefs are unacceptable?
Obama turned his back on the US on his first trip to Europe where he criticized America on a nonstop basis.My vision on this is Obama stamping his feet and throwing tantrum...
Sheesh yet another large segment of the population turning their backs on the golden child..
The church definitely knows how to wage wars.
Yes, it does and let's hope so.
Though it has been awhile..hopefully they still have their manual.
