“I need a favor” was about Cloudstrike! Not Biden, not Burisma

[Crepitus]

Democrats keep saying I need a favor was towards Biden, to help trump in the election..

After the president of Ukraine congratulates the President Trump a rooting out corruption in the United States the conversation proceeded to javelin missile’s when Trump said I need a favor about cloud strike and do you know a cloud strike is?
It was about election interference in the two thousand and 16 presidential election the Democrats are begging Trump to fix.

lol this is like the twilight zone!!

The favor was about cloud strike! lol not Biden or Burisma in fact the Ukraine president brought up first. This is going to be so embarrassing for Democrats

Desperate excuse making.

Huh

Never mind Crepitus. He is an operative, and nothing but a propagandist. Impossible to have a reasonable debate with him and his fellow trolls.

More lies.

Not exactly a shocker though, I've seen your posts before.

 

[The Original Tree]

The favor was about cloud strike! lol not Biden or Burisma in fact the Ukraine president brought up first. This is going to be so embarrassing for Democrats

You were there? Because the people who WERE there all say differently. And they say the so-called "transcript" (ie edited summary) left out those names.
So who to believe? Hmmm lets see..we got several diplomats with sterling reputations having everything to lose and nothing to gain, and we got Trump and flunkies who have lied, called truth fake, subverted the Constitution from checks and balances.
Think I'll go with the diplomats who do their duty, fight our wars, face the scorn of sucking pissants like you and Jordan and Meadows and Nunez and Scalia with dignity and dedication to our laws that set our nation above all others.
So you and your flunky buddies can bring up Obama and Soros and Clinton and Voldemort and Snidely Whiplash and all the other villains Trump shadow boxes in his fear of exposure to his actions, but your faith in him is written on the wind at my house.

Vindman was considered anti American in his military team lol many reports about it

His own boss contradicted Vindman.
But here is the kicker.

Who gives a fuck what people's opinions are about The Transcript, when we have The Transcript to read for ourselves?

Here is the problem with The Bitter Left Clingers.

They Lie.

They invest their entire being and very soul in to lying. They spend enormous amounts of time, creating and spreading lies. Then they lie about the lies they create, 24-7 hoping that some gullible rube will start believing them.

They try to create a mob. They feign outrage at everything, especially The Truth. If people just quit listening to them, they'd have no power, but when 90% of the media is owned by just 6 Wealthy Elitist Liberal Organizations, their lies are broadcast every where.

It's like being in a Concentration Camp with Hitler's message of Hope and Chains being broadcast 24-7 over loud speakers. One my plug their ears with cotton balls, or rags, or their fingers to see "Truth" for themselves.

 

[Jitss617]

The language of the conversation actually exaggerates the president

yes, it does indeed exaggerate the president...

View attachment 288722

Exonerates

that is not what you posted. and now it is too late for you to go back and change it

The language of the phone call absolutely exonerate the president of the United States of America deal with it sit down cry stop your feet the phone call the language exonerates the president

 

[Crepitus]

Why do you not understand that there are proper channels to ask for assistance of any kind from other nations? We have this thing called a "State Department" that is built to deal with other nations and has a lot of lawyers who know what is proper and what is not. This bureaucracy protects the president from perhaps getting caught conducting diplomacy for his own gain.

The State Department works for POTUS. Not the other way around.

The bureaucracy only protects itself.

The bureaucracy in this and many cases, is the problem, not the solution.

Proper channels protect president from impeachment. Don't know how to make it any clearer.

So you think presidents should be impeached for telling another country to stop interfering in our elections? Lol we pray for your sanity ha

That's not what he's doing.

Quite the opposite in fact.

Huh?? That’s what the transcript says and all DAY THAT WAS THE Succession of the phone call

Your post makes no sense in context.

Try again.

 

[Jitss617]

The language of the conversation actually exaggerates the president

yes, it does indeed exaggerate the president...

View attachment 288722

Exonerates

that is not what you posted. and now it is too late for you to go back and change it

Jeff Sessions today said, (paraphrased) "The President was not very happy with me recusing myself, but in the end it worked out because he was totally exonerated from a false accusation of Russian Collusion."

So yah, he was Exonerated.

was he exaggerated or exonerated?

Nice photo shop what do you know my password?

 

[MeBelle]

was he exaggerated or exonerated?

both?


lmao

 

[Crepitus]

Democrats keep saying I need a favor was towards Biden, to help trump in the election..

After the president of Ukraine congratulates the President Trump a rooting out corruption in the United States the conversation proceeded to javelin missile’s when Trump said I need a favor about cloud strike and do you know a cloud strike is?
It was about election interference in the two thousand and 16 presidential election the Democrats are begging Trump to fix.

lol this is like the twilight zone!!

The favor was about cloud strike! lol not Biden or Burisma in fact the Ukraine president brought up first. This is going to be so embarrassing for Democrats

Desperate excuse making.

Huh

Never mind Crepitus. He is an operative, and nothing but a propagandist. Impossible to have a reasonable debate with him and his fellow trolls.

No, Crepitus is right. You are the one without reason.

He's either got right wing propaganda dripping straight into his brain or a contract with the Kremlin.

I'm betting on the contract.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The language of the conversation actually exaggerates the president

yes, it does indeed exaggerate the president...

View attachment 288722

Exonerates

that is not what you posted. and now it is too late for you to go back and change it

The language of the phone call absolutely exonerate the president of the United States of America deal with it sit down cry stop your feet the phone call the language exonerates the president

Perhaps, though the fact he used his personal lawyer vice the DOJ raises questions as to if he was asking for the country or for the candidate.

 

[CowboyTed]

Why do you not understand that there are proper channels to ask for assistance of any kind from other nations? We have this thing called a "State Department" that is built to deal with other nations and has a lot of lawyers who know what is proper and what is not. This bureaucracy protects the president from perhaps getting caught conducting diplomacy for his own gain.

The State Department works for POTUS. Not the other way around.

The bureaucracy only protects itself.

The bureaucracy in this and many cases, is the problem, not the solution.

Proper channels protect president from impeachment. Don't know how to make it any clearer.

So you think presidents should be impeached for telling another country to stop interfering in our elections? Lol we pray for your sanity ha

That's not what he's doing.

Quite the opposite in fact.

That’s how the conversation went

Please read the conversation again...

The main issue was the Biden's when it comes to investigating and they wanted to dictate the press release on the investigation.

There was little said about Crowdstrike and if there was it is a completely debunked hoax. He might as well been asking them to investigate did Napoleon fuck Queen Victoria. IT was meaningless...

The Trump Admin/GOP are swapping narratives all the time. Honest people don't swap stories they stick to the truth...

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Nice photo shop what are you know my password

Great grammar there buddy!

Did you make it past the 2nd grade?

 

[Jitss617]

was he exaggerated or exonerated?

both?


lmao

Exonerated golf and gator has some really cool Photoshop tricks the tries to make me look like I can’t spell But I ban lol haha

 

[MeBelle]

Trump was told there was no Crowdstrike. He suggested the Bidens were into something that should be looked into. There is no out here. The president violated the law. Now do we accept this as standard presidential behavior or not? Because if we accept this, the rules don't change when a democrat does it.

Geezus --- I'm getting tired of posting this link!

Read it.

Learn something!





Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

Don't need to. What Trump did has nothing to do with this agreement.

Well, OK - you just proved you didn't read it!

kool

If what Trump did was in compliance, those ambassadors testifying would have said so. OK? Know what an agreement covers before mindlessly posting it to defend Trump.

What testimony?

What if they don't understand the treaty either?

There's a lot of stupid running around in DC.

 

[Jitss617]

The language of the conversation actually exaggerates the president

yes, it does indeed exaggerate the president...

View attachment 288722

Exonerates

that is not what you posted. and now it is too late for you to go back and change it

The language of the phone call absolutely exonerate the president of the United States of America deal with it sit down cry stop your feet the phone call the language exonerates the president

Perhaps, though the fact he used his personal lawyer vice the DOJ raises questions as to if he was asking for the country or for the candidate.

Trump sets foreign policy and they can use anybody he wants

 

[Jitss617]

The State Department works for POTUS. Not the other way around.

The bureaucracy only protects itself.

The bureaucracy in this and many cases, is the problem, not the solution.

Proper channels protect president from impeachment. Don't know how to make it any clearer.

So you think presidents should be impeached for telling another country to stop interfering in our elections? Lol we pray for your sanity ha

That's not what he's doing.

Quite the opposite in fact.

That’s how the conversation went

Please read the conversation again...

The main issue was the Biden's when it comes to investigating and they wanted to dictate the press release on the investigation.

There was little said about Crowdstrike and if there was it is a completely debunked hoax. He might as well been asking them to investigate did Napoleon fuck Queen Victoria. IT was meaningless...

The Trump Admin/GOP are swapping narratives all the time. Honest people don't swap stories they stick to the truth...

You can’t make up a fake conversation, deal with the transcript

 

[Crepitus]

Yes and yes. Allergies are about killing me.

Do you know the definition of deregulation , promotion of first amendment and second amendment??

I know a lot of things. Do you have a specific question?

Lol because you can’t be a autocrat if you do all those things

LMAO!!

You don't know the definition!

Hilarious!

A ruler who has absolute power,, If you want power you don’t deregulate, Quite the opposite you take away free speech you take away peoples guns Trump is the opposite

Lol, ^ dude is clueless.

 

[Jitss617]

Nice photo shop what are you know my password

Great grammar there buddy!

Did you make it past the 2nd grade?

Huh?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Nice photo shop what are you know my password

Great grammar there buddy!

Did you make it past the 2nd grade?

Huh?

the smartest thing you have said all day.

 

[Paulie]

How do you people not understand that the president is in charge of the entire executive branch? He doesn’t answer to anyone they all answer to him ultimately. There is a worrying amount of people who don’t understand how the separation of powers actually works.

 

[IM2]

Trump was told there was no Crowdstrike. He suggested the Bidens were into something that should be looked into. There is no out here. The president violated the law. Now do we accept this as standard presidential behavior or not? Because if we accept this, the rules don't change when a democrat does it.

Who told Trump there was no Crowdstrike, and how is that relevant?

Trump was exonerated by the transcript, which is why the whiners have to resort to what a Secret Whistleblower says someone else feels about the conversation.

Trump broke no laws, otherwise you would have proof.

You've already being set up for a Democrat Nominee that's up to his wrinkled neck in Influence Peddling. Be careful about overdoing the fake outrage.

Former White House aide Tom Bossert on Trump's CrowdStrike claim: 'no validity'

Trump is not exonerated by jack squat. And you can quit repeating the lie of Trump breaking no laws. Trump has broken laws by stopping testimonies and release of subpoenaed documents. It's called obstruction of justice. Biden has done none of what you claim.

 

[Crepitus]

Proper channels protect president from impeachment. Don't know how to make it any clearer.

So you think presidents should be impeached for telling another country to stop interfering in our elections? Lol we pray for your sanity ha

That's not what he's doing.

Quite the opposite in fact.

That’s how the conversation went

Please read the conversation again...

The main issue was the Biden's when it comes to investigating and they wanted to dictate the press release on the investigation.

There was little said about Crowdstrike and if there was it is a completely debunked hoax. He might as well been asking them to investigate did Napoleon fuck Queen Victoria. IT was meaningless...

The Trump Admin/GOP are swapping narratives all the time. Honest people don't swap stories they stick to the truth...

You can’t make up a fake conversation, deal with the transcript

There is no transcript.