Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They're not but your interpretation is. Women born with XY chromosomes typically grow up as women. You want to argue that the abnormal should be seen as normal because you can't accept reality. Are you trans?How are brains scans an opinion?
Yes....seems like they are actually reaching out to pedophiles....that will be the breaking point....that's when you no longer struggle with the rationale of putting them down for the long sleep.Also because of their use as a tool in the ongoing effort to legitimize pedophilia.
I don’t think she deflected “beautifully”, I think she deflected because she was afraid of being labeled transphobic.Youre a little over the top and being silly.
The question was a set up and she deflected beautifully. They won't wedge that smart girl.
Go look up the 19th Amendment and tell us what you learned.Laws are written against discrimination based on sex which is why describing a woman is unnecessary since there is no direct definition by the law on discrimination, it is no discrimination period. I know the right wants to discriminate based on sex but unfortunately, the law doesn't signify sex as either a man or a woman.
That kind of cowardice does not belong on the SCOTUS bench.I don’t think she deflected “beautifully”, I think she deflected because she was afraid of being labeled transphobic.
This of course raises the question as to why anyone should fear stating what they think a man or a woman is.
To that I say that liberals are the ones who created this atmosphere of fear and paranoia and it is a fucking shame.
What's not brilliant are your arguments. Gender dysphoria is not a mental illness and is not classified by the medical community as a mental illness nor is gender dysphoria like crime. It's not something that needs to be combated. The existence of trans individuals is not an assault on you.Tremendously brilliant. So you're going to combat mental illness by simply calling it sanity. If you don't acknowledge it, it doesn't exist, right? I wonder if it'll work as well as "We'll lower the crime rate by simply redefining things as not-crimes."
I'm not pretending to be anything, it's you clowns pretending to hide behind science so you can give voice to your bigotry. My argument isn't that rare conditions invalidate biology it's that they expand our ideas of what biology is capable of and that we should recognize we as humans are not bound by strict biological absolutes in how we view one another. We can make room for recognizing people with XY chromosomes as women why not people who's brain patterns match those of a woman?Is that your idea of "science"? "Look, there's a rare birth defect! That invalidates the biology of the entire species, and we all just have to wander around pretending to be confused!"?
One study group and objective results from brain scans is more evidence then you've produced.By being one vague study, with a small subject group, that didn't really measure anything significant.
Not just "someone" you clown the professionals actually studying the science behind transgenderism.I know, I know. The instant someone tells you, "Look, you can say you were right!" that's all you need. Because you care about "science".
General consensus.EDIT: I forgot to ask. If there's no clear definition of what a woman is, how did the "scientists" in the brain scan study you love so much know whose scans to compare the transgenders' scans to?
Shall we do brain studies on everyone who has gender dysphoria so we know who is faking and who isn't, or do we just take their word and it doesn't really matter?What's not brilliant are your arguments. Gender dysphoria is not a mental illness and is not classified by the medical community as a mental illness nor is gender dysphoria like crime. It's not something that needs to be combated. The existence of trans individuals is not an assault on you.
I'm not pretending to be anything, it's you clowns pretending to hide behind science so you can give voice to your bigotry. My argument isn't that rare conditions invalidate biology it's that they expand our ideas of what biology is capable of and that we should recognize we as humans are not bound by strict biological absolutes in how we view one another. We can make room for recognizing people with XY chromosomes as women why not people who's brain patterns match those of a woman?
One study group and objective results from brain scans is more evidence then you've produced.
Not just "someone" you clown the professionals actually studying the science behind transgenderism.
General consensus.
I think we should take brain scans of the people who thinking they're faking.Shall we do brain studies on everyone who has gender dysphoria so we know who is faking and who isn't, or do we just take their word and it doesn't really matter?
Sure seems to be a sudden outbreak of transgenderism. Have you ever seen the movie "The Body Snatchers"?I think we should take brain scans of the people who thinking they're faking.
Do you often base your world view on things you saw in sci-fi movies?Sure seems to be a sudden outbreak of transgenderism. Have you ever seen the movie "The Body Snatchers"?
Are you admitting here that your mind is controlled by the Hollywood elites? 
Not MY mind. Yours. Many sci-fi movies are a satire of society and culture. Don't you know that?Do you often base your world view on things you saw in sci-fi movies?
My mind? I'm not the one referencing movies, I reference actual science, clown.Not MY mind. Yours. Many sci-fi movies are a satire of society and culture. Don't you know that?
Really? Okay, then scientifically define a woman.My mind? I'm not the one referencing movies, I reference actual science, clown.
I don't have to. That isn't my argument its yours.Really? Okay, then scientifically define a woman.
LOLShe said that she was unable to define the term "woman" because she is not a biologist. She is the current flavor of the week for liberal Democrats, so now the official stance of the liberal Democrats is that it is biologists who are the experts to be consulted on who is and is not a woman.
This is much better than what they said last week, which is that we have to listen to the science on that question. More correctly, what they do is to accuse anyone who disagrees with them of "not following the science." When they say "the science" about defining gender, they mean that gender studies professor who was interviewed on NPR the other day.
People such as Lia Thomas and Rachel Levine are not "women," by any biological definition, so it is good that it is biologists who are again recognized as the experts on that. I don't object if Lia and Rachel prefer to be called "transwomen," but I don't see what is wrong with the formerly widely accepted terms, "cross-dressers," and "ladyboys."
That would solve a lot of problems, since the NCAA Women's swimming competition is for "women," not "transwomen." If transwomen, and transmen are truly as ubiquitous as the left clams, they are deserving of their own categories in sports. I doubt that the swim meets for transwomen and transmen would draw much of a fanbase, but then neither does college swimming in general, as far as I know. Most of the audience are parents and friends, and I'm sure Lia's parents and friends would be just as proud, or even more proud, of Lia if he were the true champion of the transwomen swimmers category, and not the best cheater in the Women's category.
So everything is whatever you say it is. My, how convenient. Therefore, science is whatever you say it is. You claim that you reference actual science. Yet, you can't give us the actual science. You're full of shit and a fucking liar.I don't have to. That isn't my argument its yours.
No, I'm the majority, Shit Bird. There is science and then there is how we apply science. Biologists and scientists are concerned with DNA and chromosomes, genes and alleles, their work happens on a different plain of existence. Who gets to be considered a man or woman is a consideration that largely happens on the social plain of existence, not the cellular one. Science can inform us but biology and nature aren't perfect and sometimes people with XY chromosomes get to be considered women even though they are genetically men and may have testicles. Why? Because that is how they see themselves even though genetically the truth is more complicated. You also see this thinking exhibited on the Right (though usually as a lack of empathy) when they suggest liberal men aren't real men. There they are also acknowledging the social aspect of gender rather than the biological one just from the standpoint of a complete asshole.So everything is whatever you say it is. My, how convenient. Therefore, science is whatever you say it is. You're insane.
You're so full of shit. Buzz off, shit head.No, I'm the majority, Shit Bird. There is science and then there is how we apply science. Biologists and scientists are concerned with DNA and chromosomes, genes and alleles, their work happens on a different plain of existence. Who gets to be considered a man or woman is a consideration that largely happens on the social plain of existence, not the cellular one. Science can inform us but biology and nature aren't perfect and sometimes people with XY chromosomes get to be considered women even though they are genetically men and may have testicles. Why? Because that is how they see themselves even though genetically the truth is more complicated. You also see this thinking exhibited on the Right (though usually as a lack of empathy) when they suggest liberal men aren't real men. There they are also acknowledging the social aspect of gender rather than the biological one just from the standpoint of a complete asshole.
That's not a convincing argument to a population growing up on science instead of fairytales of a magical Sky Daddy.You're so full of shit. Buzz off, shit head.
