Nazism is morality itself. Not even the New York Times is clued up enough, and is helping to mislead the prisoners.
'The sharp left turn in the Democratic party and the rise of progressive presidential candidates are unnerving moderate Democrats who increasingly fear that the party could fritter away its chances of beating President Trump in 2020 by careening over a liberal cliff. Two months into the presidential campaign, the leading Democratic contenders have largely broken with consensus-driven politics and embraced leftist ideas on health care, taxes, the environment and Middle East policy that would fundamentally alter the economy, elements of foreign policy and ultimately remake American life.....These progressive Democrats risk playing into Trump's hands -- he has repeatedly branded them as "socialists" -- yet they argue that their ambitious agenda can inspire a voter revolt in 2020 that elects a left-wing president.'
"Those ideas that we talked about here in Iowa four years ago that seemed so radical at the time, remember that? Mr Sanders, returning to Iowa last week for the first time as a 2020 candidate, crowed on Thursday. "Shock of all shocks, those very same ideas are now supported not only by Democratic candidates all across the board, from school board on up." '
(New York Times Sunday 10 Mar 2019, Centrists Squirm as 2020 Democrats Swerve Left)
As Deleuze has said, "One must be more centrist than centrist," Deleuze's idea of the Left is not political, but is a concept of "movement" (Bosteels, Badiou and Politics). Thus, we know that Sanders, at least, is clued up about the dynamism of a "movement" while also manipulating the symbology of the Impossible Trident such that socialism becomes a stick-and-carrot bait to perception.
'The sharp left turn in the Democratic party and the rise of progressive presidential candidates are unnerving moderate Democrats who increasingly fear that the party could fritter away its chances of beating President Trump in 2020 by careening over a liberal cliff. Two months into the presidential campaign, the leading Democratic contenders have largely broken with consensus-driven politics and embraced leftist ideas on health care, taxes, the environment and Middle East policy that would fundamentally alter the economy, elements of foreign policy and ultimately remake American life.....These progressive Democrats risk playing into Trump's hands -- he has repeatedly branded them as "socialists" -- yet they argue that their ambitious agenda can inspire a voter revolt in 2020 that elects a left-wing president.'
"Those ideas that we talked about here in Iowa four years ago that seemed so radical at the time, remember that? Mr Sanders, returning to Iowa last week for the first time as a 2020 candidate, crowed on Thursday. "Shock of all shocks, those very same ideas are now supported not only by Democratic candidates all across the board, from school board on up." '
(New York Times Sunday 10 Mar 2019, Centrists Squirm as 2020 Democrats Swerve Left)
As Deleuze has said, "One must be more centrist than centrist," Deleuze's idea of the Left is not political, but is a concept of "movement" (Bosteels, Badiou and Politics). Thus, we know that Sanders, at least, is clued up about the dynamism of a "movement" while also manipulating the symbology of the Impossible Trident such that socialism becomes a stick-and-carrot bait to perception.
